Money Trends / Liquidity
If China's credit growth decelerates below 9.4% by the end of 2016 from the current rate of 11.7%, the negative credit impulse will overwhelm any plausible fiscal spending impulse. This is quite a plausible scenario given the lingering credit excesses in China. This warrants a caution on China-related plays in financial markets.
It is the perfect time to add protection, given the 13% rally in stocks over the past six weeks and the current steepness of the VIX term-structure.
If the EM rally is sustained, the Fed will once again become resolute in its commitment to hiking interest rates. This in turn will spur another relapse in EM risk assets. Chinese policymakers are attempting to juggle contradictory objectives without a clear and realistic plan of action to resolve existing problems.
A Chinese reflationary cycle is unfolding. Capital spending is showing signs of regained vigor, driven by both housing and infrastructure. Chinese PPI deflation will ease further. This will help reduce balance sheet stress of materials producers and boost overall industrial profits. Remain positive on Chinese investable stocks.
Expectations of a deepening EM/China growth slump and RMB depreciation have been the key to the selloff in global risk assets. There is no basis for these expectations to improve. Therefore, there are few fundamental reasons for EM and global risk assets to rally much further. Stay put. In Brazil, the impeachment rally is unsustainable and will reverse sooner than later. Stay short Brazilian risk assets.
Credit growth acceleration in China is a bearish development in the long run. Potential non-performing loans at Chinese banks could wipe out 40-55% of their equity capital. "Muddling through" for China, from its own internal standpoint, is possible. However, Chinese stocks and China-related equities worldwide will remain in a bear market. From the perspective of the rest of the world, China is now in recession.
An improvement in the euro area credit impulse is encouraging, but we explain why it is not enough to sustainably boost risk-assets.