Equities

Highlights Covid-19 has wreaked havoc in the markets, but the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure, and Airline industries have been most affected. These industries constitute what we call the “travel complex” as they share common drivers of profitability: First, they have been significantly affected by restrictions imposed on individuals and businesses in response to Covid-19 and, second, they rely on discretionary spending. Recovery of the group was proceeding swimmingly until the Delta variant derailed it in late summer, with reports pouring in about dining rooms closing, airline bookings flagging, and hotel occupancy dipping. What is next? The Delta variant is cresting. Our base case is that herd immunity is not far off. Of course, the travel complex is vulnerable to any new virus scare, and this is a risk investors need to keep in mind. Rising rates will be a mild tailwind for the group, as it tends to outperform in that regime. But this is not a key driver of its performance. Consumer confidence and financial wellbeing are at the core of this group’s profitability. So far, Americans still have money to spare and generally prefer to spend it on services. It is disconcerting that the Consumer Confidence Indicator has turned, but we are not too alarmed just yet: Jobs are still plentiful, and Americans are going back to work. August retail sales surprised on the upside. In Part 1 of the report this week, we take a deep dive into the Hotel, Resort, and Cruise Lines industry. We find the industry attractive for the following reasons: Hotel occupancy has increased, and the amount of money consumers are prepared to spend in hotel stays has surged. Sales are expected to increase by 75%, albeit from low levels, over the next 12 months. Hotels have also discovered many new sources of revenue. Earnings growth is impossible to estimate since last year the industry was losing money; however, margins have just turned positive. Companies also have significant pricing power to pass on expenses to their guests, and have the ability to mend their margins, eventually going back to the historical 20%. Lastly, the industry is cheap relative to its own history on a forward PE basis. According to our Technical Indicator, it is also oversold. The Hotels, Resorts, and Cruise Lines industry has a significant potential to return to its former “glory”, and we believe that it is a sound tactical and cyclical investment. We recommend overweighing this industry. NB: Please stay tuned for Part 2 of the report, on Restaurants and Airlines, next week. Feature Part 1: Hotels, Resorts And Cruise Lines In this two-part publication, we will provide an in-depth overview of Hotels, Restaurants, and Airlines. These industries constitute what we call the “travel complex” as they share many common drivers of profitability: First, they are the industries most exposed to Covid-related fears as well as corresponding government health directives, and, second, they rely on the discretionary spending of both consumers and businesses. In this publication, we will examine the macroeconomic backdrop for the entire travel complex, and then zoom into the Hotels, Resorts, and Cruise Lines industry (“Hotels”). Next week, we will provide an in-depth overview of Restaurants and Airlines. Sneak preview: We are bullish on Hotels and are overweight this industry in our portfolio. Hotels, Restaurant And Leisure, Along With Airlines, Were The Poster Child For Post-Covid Recovery… Covid-19 has wreaked havoc in the markets, but the travel complex was most affected. Airlines, hotels, and restaurants have suffered tremendous losses, and all have required government bailouts either directly, or indirectly through the Paycheck Protection Program (PPP). The travel complex rebounded mightily as the vaccine became widely available in February, and Americans suffering from cabin fever boarded planes, traveled, and ate out (Chart 1). Chart 1Hotels And Airlines Are Still Trading Below Their Pre-Covid Levels Table 1Travel Complex Is Lagging S&P 500 …Everything Changed This Summer All these positive developments began to reverse over the summer as Delta made its appearance in the US, and even the vaccinated succumbed to fears of infection. Airlines were one of the worst performers in the index. Hotels and restaurants were doing better, but their performance did not shoot the lights out either (Table 1). Restaurants: According to a National Restaurant Association survey of 1,000 adults, in recent weeks nearly one in five Americans say they are no longer going out to restaurants, 9% have canceled existing plans to eat out, and 37% of adults said they ordered delivery or takeout instead of dining in a restaurant. Chains like McDonald’s and Chick-fil-A are slowing their dining room reopenings. As data from restaurant analytics firm Black Box Intelligence demonstrate, sales that had grown steadily earlier this summer have fallen.1 Airlines: Several major airlines have warned in regulatory filings that their third quarter may not look as rosy as hoped. United Airlines has noted a deceleration in customer bookings, while Southwest Airlines reported a continued softness in bookings—even in leisure—and elevated trip cancelations. Similarly, American Airlines has said that, after a strong July, it saw a softness in near-term bookings in August and an increase in near-term cancelations. All three have suggested that the Delta variant is having a dampening effect on business.2 Hotels: Marriott International said that revenue per available room in August of 2021 was down 27% from the 2019 level – a drop from the 23% decline seen in July. However, the CEO of the company sounded sanguine: “The trends seem to be stabilizing as we get into the early days of September”. Most of the decline came from lockdowns in China. The most recent data shows revenue per available room was down 44 percent off 2019 levels — not ideal but an improvement from the 57 percent decline seen a week prior.3 With bad news abundant, the natural question is whether these industries are still a good tactical and cyclical investment. Delta Variant Clearly, a resurgence in infections has had an adverse effect on the travel complex. However, there are early signs that the Covid-19 Delta variant is cresting (Chart 2). Around 75% of the U.S. population has had at least one vaccine shot. Globally, 31.5 million doses/day are being administered. At this rate, it will take just eight months to vaccinate 75% of the global population. Herd immunity is not far off. Our base case is that Covid-19 and its multiple variants are unlikely to disappear, but consumers and businesses are learning how to live with it. We believe that the surge of Delta infections will subside over the fall, and the entire travel complex will continue to recuperate from the Covid-inflicted damage. Of course, the resurgence of Covid-19 cases and newer variants could undermine a recovery. This is a risk investors need to monitor. Chart 2The Covid-19 Delta Variant Is Cresting Macroeconomic Backdrop Rising Rates Are A Tailwind For The Travel Complex Direction and rate of change in yields dictate which US equity sectors and industries will do well. There are many crosscurrents in both economic data and Fed speak currently that obscure the answer to this question. Analysis of the performance of travel industries by rates regime suggests that all of them tend to do better when rates are rising, as higher rates indicate stronger economic growth (Chart 3). Airlines are most sensitive to an economic slowdown and will underperform most if rates stay “lower for longer”. Consumers Still Have Money To Spend On Services But Less Than Before Chart 3Travel Outperforms When Rates Are Rising Travel is a quintessential representation of discretionary spending on services. Consumers travel and eat out when they are confident about the future and have a healthy income and excess savings. Chart 4Disposable Income And Savings Are Returning To Trend The helicopter money drop has increased consumer income and padded their savings. However, income gains were not permanent and, recently, disposable income has returned to trend (Chart 4, Panel 1). Further, much of the excess savings has been spent (Chart 4, Panel 2). In another unpleasant twist, over the past few months, wage gains (4.8%) have lagged price increases (5.2%), reducing the purchasing power of American consumers. In response to these developments, the consumer mood has soured: The Consumer Confidence Indicator has slumped to a six-month low of 114 from 125 a month earlier. The next 12-month inflation expectations have surged to 6.5%. While it is disconcerting that consumer confidence has turned, we are not too alarmed just yet: Jobs are still plentiful, and Americans are likely to go back to work as the majority of children are now attending schools in person. In short, Americans are not destitute, but the pattern of spending is normalizing and returning to the pre-pandemic trend. The August retail sales print at 0.7% surprised on the upside and proves that US consumers have not tightened their belts. It is also a positive for the travel complex that demand for services exceeds demand for goods: Consumer expenditure on goods is above trend and has recently turned, while spending on services is below pre-pandemic levels, and the rebound is running its course (Chart 5). Inflation Is Not A Concern For The Travel Complex CPI readings for the travel complex this summer looked outright scary: In July, airfares were up 19% YoY and the price of hotel stays was up 24% YoY. These numbers have come down to 6.7% and 19.6% in August. Indeed, these readings make us wonder whether travel is still affordable to consumers. The answer is a resounding “yes” – reported surges in prices are a function of a base effect and, compared to the same time two years ago, the two-year CAGR of prices looks reasonable for all the industries (Chart 6). Chart 6Price Increases For The Travel Complex Are Moderate Chart 5Real Spending On Services Is At Pre-Pandemic Levels: Room For Further Rebound Analysis By Industry: Hotels, Resorts, And Cruise Lines Hotels is a $55B industry4 which is forecast to produce 31.4% growth in 2021 (Table 2). Its market cap is $239Bn and it constitutes 0.6% of the S&P 500 index. The US Hotel industry suffered about $125 billion5 in aggregate lost revenues due to the pandemic in 2020. Hotel operators were in total cash-conservation mode – slashing capex budgets by 75%, suspending dividends, and raising capital. Some 670,000 workers lost their jobs or were furloughed – only half of these workers have returned so far (Chart 7). Table 2Hotels (GICS 4) Constituents After a tough year, Hotels have now mostly reopened. Demand is expected to surge by 31.4% YoY in 2021, and per room revenue has reached $94, higher than the pre-Covid-19 level. Many hotels have returned to profitability. However, hotel occupancy in the US is yet to return to the pre-pandemic level: It currently stands at around 50% compared to 70% plus pre-Covid (Chart 8). Chart 7Industry Was Decimated By Covid And Is Recovering Slowly Chart 8Occupancy Rates Are Returning Back To Normal Sources Of Revenue Hotels started to recover during the first half of 2021 and revenues are expected to continue to surge to well above the pre-pandemic level in 2022. Analysts expect hotel sales to rebound by 75% over the next 12 months (Chart 9). There are multiple sources of revenue, and a reduction in business travel and international tourism is likely to be replaced by other creative options. Leisure Travel: Significant pent-up demand has been driving a recovery in hotel stays, but it is mostly in leisure travel. According to AHLA, 56% of consumers say they expect to travel for leisure, roughly the same amount as in an average year. Consumer spending on hotels has rebounded and is close to the pre-pandemic normal (Chart 10). Chart 9Blockbuster Sales Growth Is Expected (Off Low Base) Chart 10Consumers Eagerly Spend On Hotels Business travel is still lagging. According to AHLA, business travel was down by 85% compared to 2019 through April 2021, and since then has only begun ticking up slightly. However, going forward, this trend may turn as companies start positioning their in-person visits as a competitive advantage. Bleisure travel: A new post-Covid trend has developed: Workers combine business travel with leisure, prolonging hotel stays. Another creative idea is “working from a hotel” packages to appeal to remote workers tired of being cooped up at home. International tourism: Covid-related restrictions in the rest of the world, and especially cessation of travel from China, is still denting hotel revenue. With global vaccination rates improving by the day, this segment won’t take long to rebound. Profitability While there is forecast to be a pronounced rebound in hotel sales growth over the next 12 months, it is less obvious whether and when the industry will return to its former levels of profitability (Chart 11). After all, not only was the travel complex damaged by the pandemic, but now hotel operators also incur additional Covid-related cleaning expenses. Currently, analysts expect the next 12 months EPS to rebound to about a quarter of January 2020 trailing EPS ($10 vs $34). While this looks measly, from an investment standpoint it presents an opportunity as eventually, albeit slowly, earnings will return to trend. Historical earnings growth is not calculable as the industry was losing money until very recently. Chart 11Earnings Are Expected To Grow Again Margins And Pricing Power Margins crossed the zero threshold in Q2-2021, but are still almost 20 percentage points below the long-term average (Chart 12). While hotel costs have increased with the pandemic, this industry has significant pricing power to pass on its costs to consumers (Chart 13). Chart 12The Hotel Industry Has Returned To Profitability Chart 13Hotels Have Significant Pricing Power And Can Pass Extra Costs To Guests Valuations And Technicals The Hotels industry is trading at 30x forward PE and on a 5-year normalized basis, it is trading with a discount to the S&P 500, which is unusual (Chart 14). In terms of our Technical Indicator, the industry is somewhat oversold, and now looks more attractive than it did earlier this year (Chart 15). Chart 14Hotels Are Trading With A Discount To S&P 500 Which Is Unusual Chart 15Hotels Are Slightly Oversold Cruise Lines Cruise Lines were the worst-hit and the slowest to recover among the sub-industries, but they are expected to make a comeback in 2022 with a significant surge in revenue growth. Most of the drivers for these companies are similar to Hotels and Resorts – but recovery is delayed due to restrictions that kept cruise ships anchored much longer than initially expected. Investment Implications We stay with our overweight in Hotels, Resorts, and Cruise Lines. We will summarize the reasons: The Delta variant is cresting. Our base case is that herd immunity is not far off. Of course, the industry is also vulnerable to any new virus scare, and this is a risk that investors need to keep in mind. Rising rates will be a mild tailwind for the industry, as it tends to outperform in that regime. But this is not a key driver of its performance. Consumer confidence and financial wellbeing are at the core of Hotel profitability. So far, Americans still have money to spare and prefer to spend it on services. It is disconcerting that the Consumer Confidence Indicator has turned, but we are not too alarmed just yet: Jobs are still plentiful, and Americans are going back to work. Hotel occupancy has increased, and the amount of money consumers are prepared to spend on hotel stays has surged. Sales are expected to increase by 75%, albeit from lower levels, over the next 12 months. Hotels have also discovered many new sources of revenue. Historical earnings growth is not available as until recently the industry was losing money; however, margins have just turned positive. Companies also have the significant pricing power to pass on expenses to their guests and have the ability to mend their margins, eventually going back to the historical 20%. Lastly, the industry is cheap relative to its own history on a forward PE basis. According to our Technical indicator, it is also oversold. The Hotels, Resorts, and Cruise Lines industry has significant potential to return to its former “glory”, and we believe that it is a sound tactical and cyclical investment. We recommend overweighing this industry. Bottom Line The Hotels, Resorts, and Cruise Lines industry has been severely damaged by the pandemic, and the road to recovery may be long. It is also vulnerable to any new virus scare. However, with Delta cresting, financially healthy US consumers choosing to spend their money on services and experiences, sell-side forecasts pointing to surging sales, and companies possessing substantial pricing power mean that we are bullish on the industry.   Irene Tunkel Chief Strategist, US Equity Strategy irene.tunkel@bcaresearch.com     Footnotes 1     Restaurants Close Dining Rooms Again as Delta-Driven Infections Spread, WSJ, September 13, 2021.   2     Travel Investors Need More Drive, WSJ, September 12, 2021. 3    Hotel Industry News: Marriott CEO Sees Hotels Bouncing Back Quickly After Delta Variant Slump, Skift, September 9, 2021. 4    IBISWorld, August 23, 2021. 5    Oxford Economics. Recommended Allocation

Highlights Economy – The inflation question is unresolved, and it will remain that way for the rest of the year: August’s CPI report had something for everyone and ensured the debate will continue. Doves could celebrate the month-over-month decline while hawks could argue that upward inflation pressures are no longer a transitory phenomenon. Markets – Elevated valuations make equities vulnerable, but a little turmoil in China is not likely to trigger a de-rating wave: The demise of large Chinese property developer Evergrande may cause some upheaval in China but it is not likely to ruffle the S&P 500, corporate bonds or other US spread product. Strategy – Policymakers continue to hold the key. As long as the Fed is still easing, and households direct some of their excess savings to consumption, risk assets should outperform: We still think Goldilocks is far more likely that a too-cold or a too-hot outcome. Feature We continue to view the prospects for financial markets and the economy through a Goldilocks-and-the-two-tails lens, with the idea that equities and credit will thrive against a backdrop of supercharged growth and ongoing policy support (Figure 1). The Fed’s unusually pro-cyclical stance will prolong the macro sweet spot for risk assets and ensure positive excess returns provided growth doesn’t flop (the too-cold left tail), or the inflation genie doesn’t get out of the bottle (the too-hot right tail). Though both flanks pose a risk to our base-case Goldilocks scenario, we deem overheating to be the bigger concern. Unless a vaccine-resistant variant reestablishes COVID-19 as a mortal threat to the broad population, we think it is unlikely that growth will tumble below trend this year or next. Figure 1Goldilocks And The Two Tails One does not need to be a sworn devotee of rugged individualism to harbor some misgivings about the magnitude and scope of the direct transfers to American households or the broader fiscal effort to combat the economic effects of the pandemic. Egged on by support amounting to 25% of a year’s output, it remains entirely possible that aggregate demand might overwhelm productive capacity. The emergence of rolling bottlenecks in the spaces that were most crimped by COVID has focused attention on the threat of overheating, but the more lasting risk emanates from spaces that cannot be dismissed as unduly influenced by the pandemic. We have been closely monitoring the path of consumer prices and will continue to do so, but the ultimate outcome remains unclear. Though a Goldilocks macro backdrop remains our base-case expectation, it is far from assured. In this week’s report, we consider three potential disruptions: too much inflation, a change in the Fed’s policy course and a credit shock from China. We do not think that any of the potential disruptions is likely to change the picture in a material way and we therefore reiterate our view that investors with a twelve-month timeframe ought to maintain at least an equal weight exposure to equities and credit in a multi-asset portfolio. Fitting The August CPI Tile Into The Inflation Mosaic The pace of consumer price increases cooled in August, according to the headline and core CPIs. Both measures came in below market expectations, and the leading month-over-month series (Chart 1, dashed line) decelerated more than their year-over-year counterparts (Chart 1, solid line). Although the data were encouraging on their face, the ongoing inflation debate is nowhere near resolved. COVID continues to play havoc with the spaces it impacted most heavily, defying simple interpretations of aggregate CPI data. Base effects have warped year-over-year data once the peak pandemic months of last spring and summer entered the equation. As category-by-category analyses of the April CPI release showed, the lion’s share of the aggregate core CPI increase was powered by new and used cars and a handful of badly disrupted services like air travel, car rental, lodging and in-person entertainment. Chart 1Inflation Seems To Have Peaked Chart 2A Stunning Reversal On Used-Car Lots The semiconductor-driven production squeeze pushed up new car prices and took used car prices along for the ride as consumers turned to them as a ready substitute. Used car prices then rose even more as rental car companies frantically reversed 2020’s culling of their fleets to meet revived 2021 demand (Chart 2). By July, however, several of those categories had come off the boil and began to make more modest contributions to month-over-month core CPI growth. In August, they turned into headwinds, limiting core CPI’s sequential gain to just 0.1%. While the core index grew at its slowest rate since February, the segments that weren’t as heavily affected by the pandemic – the gray portion of the stacked bars in Chart 3 – experienced their largest price increases of the year. Those core categories less sensitive to transitory pandemic factors have eased a bit on a year-over-year basis (Chart 4, bottom panel) but the leading month-on-month measure suggests they will turn higher going forward. Chart 3Passing The Baton Shelter costs account for 41% of the core CPI basket and though spiking hotel rates (Chart 5, second panel) have made an outsized contribution to their bounce off the bottom (Chart 5, top panel), the much weightier owners’ equivalent rent and primary residence cost measures have begun to hook up (Chart 5, third panel). Series that impact the supply and demand balance for residences, like the prime-age employment-to-population ratio (Chart 5, fourth panel) and the National Multifamily Housing Council’s measures of apartment market activity (Chart 5, fifth panel), suggest that the key rent series will continue moving higher. Chart 4Transitory Factors Are Abating ... Chart 5... But Rents Are Rising The bottom line is that the August CPI report, like much of the economic data in this particularly uncertain time, offered evidence to support opposing interpretations. We will simply have to wait and see how the data evolve over the rest of the year to gain a good read on its future trajectory. We expect that inflation will continue to come down from its summer peak while remaining comfortably above the Fed’s effective 2.3-2.5% core CPI target. Such a move will underscore that its inflation criteria have been met and focus investor attention squarely on the labor market’s progress toward regaining full employment. Much Ado About Nothing The bond market has cottoned on to the fact that the labor market, not consumer price inflation, is the swing factor for monetary policy settings, and the 10-year Treasury note has essentially ignored the core CPI breakout (Chart 6). Equities have evinced little concern, reflecting the causal relationship we noted last week. High inflation by itself is not kryptonite for stocks; the restrictive monetary policy measures the Fed eventually imposes in response to high inflation are. Inflation’s market importance thus turns on the tipping point at which it heralds restrictive monetary policy. Chart 6Treasuries Are On Board With The Transitory View A Fed that believes elevated inflation readings are transitory is a Fed that will wait to restrain the economy to contain them. A Fed that is determined to let the economy run hot so as to nurture broad-based strength in the labor market is a Fed with a less sensitive inflation reaction function than has prevailed since Paul Volcker’s tenure. The same goes for a Fed that has made no secret of its desire to reset inflation expectations higher. Putting it all together, the Fed appears determined to wait until it sees the whites of inflation’s eyes before it takes action that will undermine economic growth. Our view that the Fed’s inflation reaction function has become less sensitive is independent of the identity of the chair. The revised statement on longer-run goals and monetary policy strategy was issued by the entire FOMC, and investors should not be distracted by the quadrennial reappointment parlor game, which has settled on a contest between chair Powell and board member Brainard. Although Brainard has won progressives’ admiration for her advocacy of tighter bank supervision, policy would not be materially different under her stewardship than it would be under Jay Powell’s. Monetary policy will be accommodative for a long time regardless of who is chairing the FOMC on February 1st and the Biden administration’s nomination decision will not have lasting market implications. Could A Messy Evergrande Unwind Trip Up The US Bull? The financial press last week was filled with stories about the dire condition of Evergrande Property Group (Chart 7), one of China’s largest property developers. As noted in several of last week’s reports, Evergrande is the world’s most indebted developer and its leverage burden is not news to dollar bond investors, who have increasingly required outsized yields to lend to the company.1 All three major credit rating agencies have downgraded it to the equivalent of CC, reflecting their view that default is imminent. Though a technical default may be certain, per reports that Evergrande will fail to make scheduled interest and principal payments due this week, the ultimate ripple effects are unknown. As our Emerging Markets Strategy team has noted, a broad range of outcomes are possible. At the most benign end of the continuum, the event could mark a crescendo of concerns that have been weighing on sentiment and activity, and trigger policy stimulus that produces economic and market inflections. At the other end, Evergrande could intensify the existing credit crunch, sparking a wave of self-reinforcing defaults and bankruptcies, culminating in a systemic event on the order of Lehman Brothers’ bankruptcy. Absent government intervention, the defaults will be messy. Most of the company’s assets are in the form of unfinished properties that will require additional capital and know-how before they can be monetized. Even its portfolios of completed properties may not be easy to sell in a residential market that was already slowing (Chart 8). The pall its troubles have cast over the property market will make things worse by prodding other liquidity-constrained developers to slash prices to move their own inventories. Chart 7Boom And Bust Chart 8Not Exactly A Seller's Market Our China strategists believe that the government wants to make an example out of Evergrande to impose some discipline on investors and developers. Despite repeated warnings, it has remained on the wrong side of the three red lines policy makers recently established to rein in property market excesses. Some onshore investors may be bailed out, but party officials will have no qualms about leaving offshore investors holding the bag. As China goes, so too do small neighboring economies reliant on its appetite for imports. Resource economies like Brazil, Chile and Australia that export iron ore, copper and other base metals to feed the China construction and infrastructure juggernaut could slow. Suppliers of machinery and specialized manufactured components like Japan and Europe could also feel a bit of a chill. While the US is not immune to disruptions in the rest of the world, it is a comparatively closed economy that is generally less susceptible to external troubles and has minimal financial links with the Middle Kingdom. A review of the 2020 10-Ks for the SIFI banks and Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley confirmed that the American banking system has minimal direct exposures to China and Hong Kong. Only Citigroup, which operates a meaningful commercial banking franchise in Hong Kong, has direct cross-border exposures that amount to as much as 1% of assets (Table 1). Table 1SIFI Exposures To China And Hong Kong The bottom line is that we do not view Evergrande as China’s Lehman. Policymakers may want to make an example of it but not to the point that they will stand by in the face of a broad contagion. Even if it did produce a credit event that rippled across Asian EM markets and tempered investors’ enthusiasm for risk assets more generally, US markets would benefit in a relative sense befitting the dollar’s status as a defensive currency, Treasuries’ status as the predominant risk-free asset and the S&P 500’s low-beta nature. The fall of an overextended Chinese property developer is unlikely to push the US out of Goldilocks and into too-cold territory. Investment Implications Inflation will trigger a policy change once it stays high enough for long enough to trigger the Fed’s recalibrated reaction function. Markets will sniff out a policy change ahead of time and could even catalyze a policy change if the bond vigilantes awaken from their long hibernation. When we reiterate our constructive view on markets and the economy over a three-to-twelve-month timeframe, we are reiterating our assessment that markets will not begin to prepare for the policy change within the next twelve months and that growth will appear as if it will remain on an above-trend trajectory for some time beyond. We are confident that the next twelve months will remain “safe” from a policy and a growth perspective. We have much less conviction about the next six to twelve months following next September and are acutely aware that the outlook for the second half of 2022 and the first half of 2023 will exert a meaningful influence next summer. We will adjust our views based on the incoming data, but we do think the first three to six months of our cyclical timeframe will be conducive to risk asset outperformance and therefore reiterate our recommendation to overweight equities and credit while sharply underweighting Treasuries.   Doug Peta, CFA Chief US Investment Strategist dougp@bcaresearch.com Footnotes 1 Per Evergrande’s annual reports, its average annual interest rate on outstanding debt on 12/31/20 was 9.49%, up from 8.99% on 12/31/19, 8.13% on 12/31/18 and 8.09% on 12/31/17.

Dear Client, I will be holding a webcast next Friday, September 24th at 10:00 AM EDT (3:00 PM BST, 4:00 PM CEST, 11:00 PM HKT) with BCA Research’s Chief Emerging Markets Strategist Arthur Budaghyan where we will debate the outlook for EM stocks. As this week’s report conveys, I am bullish, while Arthur is in the bearish camp. Please join us for what is sure to be a fiery debate. Also, instead of our regular report next week, we will be sending you a Special Report written by Matt Gertken, BCA Research’s Chief Geopolitical Strategist, discussing the stability of the American political system. I hope you will find it insightful. We will be back the following week with the GIS Quarterly Strategy Outlook, where we will explore the major trends that are set to drive financial markets in the rest of 2021 and beyond. As always, I will hold a webcast discussing the outlook the week after, on Thursday, October 7th. Best regards, Peter Berezin Chief Global Strategist Highlights After lagging the global indices, EM stocks are set to outperform during the remainder of this year and into 2022. Go long the EM FTSE index versus the global benchmark (ETF proxy: VWO versus VT). Five factors will support EM assets over the coming months: 1) The vaccination campaign in emerging markets is in full swing; 2) Domestic EM inflation will crest; 3) China will stimulate its economy; 4) The US dollar will weaken; and 5) EM valuations have discounted a lot of bad news. Contrary to popular perception, the Chinese government has not launched an indiscriminate attack on tech companies. If anything, heightened geopolitical tensions have made it more important than ever for China to buttress its tech sector. Investors wanting to gain exposure to Chinese tech while still limiting risk should consider writing cash-covered puts. For example, a strategy of selling puts on Alibaba could generate a 9% annualized yield while giving investors access to the stock at a forward PE ratio of only 12.5. Go long an equally-weighted basket consisting of the Russian ruble and Brazilian real against the US dollar. Both currencies enjoy favorable interest rate differentials and will benefit from continued strength in commodity markets. Debating The EM Outlook BCA Research has some of the brightest, most creative strategists in the world. While we often agree on many issues, we sometimes disagree. The near-term outlook for emerging markets is a case in point. My colleague, Chief EM Strategist Arthur Budaghyan, is bearish on emerging markets over a 3-to-6 month horizon. In contrast, I am bullish. In this note, I explain why. I see five reasons why EM assets will do very well during the remainder of the year and into 2022: 1) The vaccination campaign in emerging markets is in full swing; 2) Domestic EM inflation will crest; 3) China will stimulate its economy; 4) The US dollar will weaken; and 5) EM valuations have discounted a lot of bad news. Let’s examine all five reasons in turn. Vaccine Access In Emerging Markets Is Improving The proportion of EM populations which have been vaccinated is rising rapidly (Chart 1). India is now vaccinating 10 million people per day, a number that would have seemed unimaginable just a few months ago. Chart 1EM Vaccination Rates Have Been Ramping Up Rapidly Globally, about 10 billion doses of vaccine will be produced this year (Chart 2). This does not include potential new mRNA vaccines that China is developing. China-based Walvax Biotechnology is conducting late-stage trials in Nepal, with mass production of the vaccine expected to start in October. Sinopharm is also working on its own mRNA vaccine. Meanwhile, the number of new Covid cases in most EM economies has peaked, permitting a relaxation of lockdown measures (Chart 3). Goldman’s Effective Lockdown Index for China has eased significantly since mid-August, although this week’s outbreak in Fujian province could partially reverse that trend. Chart 2At Least 10 Billion Doses Of Vaccine Will Be Produced This Year Chart 3EM Lockdown Measures Have Eased As The Number Of New Cases Has Peaked It is true, as Arthur has pointed out, that vaccine hesitancy is a problem in some emerging markets. However, this may not be as significant an issue as previously believed. The huge spike in cases in highly vaccinated countries such as Israel and the UK shows that herd immunity is a pipe dream. Given this reality, as long as everyone who wants a vaccine is able to receive it, the political pressure to maintain lockdowns will dissipate. Pandemic-Induced Spike In Inflation Is Fading As in most developed economies, many emerging markets have experienced a post-pandemic rise in inflation (Chart 4). Whereas DM central banks generally looked through the inflation spike, many EMs did not have that luxury. Chart 4Inflation Across The EM Universe   Worried about an unmooring of inflation expectations and currency depreciation, central banks in such countries as Brazil, Mexico, Chile, Colombia, Peru, Russia, and Turkey have all raised rates this year. Higher rates have weighed on EM growth and financial markets. The good news is that inflationary pressures are starting to abate. This week’s US CPI report for August showed an absolute decline in prices in pandemic-related categories such as airfares, hotels, admissions, and vehicles (Chart 5). Things are even improving on the semiconductor front. Chart 6 shows that memory chip prices are in a clear downtrend. Chart 5Pandemic-Driven Inflation Is Cresting Chart 6Chip Prices Are Off Their Highs Chart 7Agricultural Prices Have Stabilized, Which Will Help Cool EM Inflation Critically for emerging markets, agricultural prices have stabilized (Chart 7). Historically, food inflation has been a major driver of EM inflation. Chinese Stimulus On The Way Growth in China was quite weak in the first half of the year, averaging only 3.5% on a sequential annualized basis (Chart 8). The Bloomberg consensus estimate is for Q3 growth to hit 4.3%, reflecting the negative impact of lockdown measures and the lagged effect from policy tightening. Growth in the fourth quarter is expected to rebound to only 5.7%. This seems too low to us. Barring a major spike in Covid cases, Chinese industry will be saddled with fewer social distancing restrictions in the fourth quarter. Policy is also turning more stimulative. The PBOC cut bank reserve requirements in July. In the past, cuts in reserve requirements have been a reliable predictor of faster credit growth (Chart 9). Chart 8Chinese Growth Should Accelerate After A Disappointing First Half Of 2021 Chart 9Chinese Stimulus Is On The Way   With credit growth back to its 2018 lows, there is little need for further actions to reduce lending. On the contrary, the PBOC’s meeting with financial institutions on August 23rd revealed a desire to increase credit availability. Partly reflecting this development, new bank loans rose to RMB 1.22 trillion in August, up from RMB 1.08 trillion in the prior month. Chart 10EM Stocks Have Done Well When Global Industrial Stocks Have Outperformed On the fiscal side, the Ministry of Finance stated on August 27th its intention to ramp up fiscal spending by increasing local government bond issuance. As of the end of August, local governments had used up only 50% of their annual debt issuance quota, compared to 77% at the same time last year and 93% in 2019. To reinforce the need for more stimulus, the authorities announced an additional RMB 300 billion in credit support for SMEs during the latest State Council meeting held on September 1st. Local Chinese government spending has typically flowed into infrastructure. Increased infrastructure spending should buttress metals prices while providing a tailwind for global industrial stocks. I agree with Arthur’s assessment that industrials will be a winning equity sector over the coming years. EM stocks have usually beaten the global benchmark during periods when global industrial stocks were outperforming (Chart 10).   A Weaker US Dollar Will Benefit Emerging Markets EM stocks tend to perform best when the US dollar is on the back foot (Chart 11). We expect the greenback to weaken over the next 12 months. As a countercyclical currency, the dollar is likely to struggle in an environment of above-trend global growth (Chart 12). Chart 11EM Stocks Tend To Outperform The Global Benchmark When The Dollar Is Weakening Chart 12The Dollar Is A Countercyclical Currency Interest rate differentials have moved sharply against the dollar (Chart 13). The US trade deficit has surged over the past 16 months. The way the US has been financing its trade deficit – relying heavily on fickle equity inflows – also leaves the dollar in a vulnerable position (Chart 14). Chart 13Interest Rate Differentials Have Moved Against The Dollar Chart 14Volatile Equity Inflows Have Been Financing The US Trade Deficit, Putting The Dollar In A Vulnerable Position Go Long BRL And RUB Against a backdrop of broad-based dollar weakness, EM currencies will strengthen. Currently, the 12-month interest rate differential between Brazil and the US stands at 8.7%, up from a low of 2.1% last year. Russian rates have also risen rapidly relative to US rates (Chart 15). The Russian ruble will benefit from the cyclical recovery in oil prices. Bob Ryan and BCA’s commodity team project that the price of Brent will rise 5% to $80/bbl in 2023, whereas market expectations are for a 12% decline (Chart 16). Likewise, Brazil will gain from both higher oil prices and rising Chinese demand for metals. Chart 15Interest Rate Differentials Favor The RUB And BRL Versus The USD Chart 16Oil Prices Have More Upside Accordingly, we are initiating a new trade going long an equally-weighted basket consisting of BRL/USD and RUB/USD. Are EMs A Value Trap? Emerging market stocks currently trade at a Shiller PE ratio of 14.7, compared to 36.8 for the US, 22.2 for Europe, and 24.1 for Japan. The EM discount to the global index is as large now as it was during the late 1990s. Other valuation measures tell a similar story (Chart 17). Chart 17AEM Equities Are Trading At A Large Discount (I) Chart 17BEM Equities Are Trading At A Large Discount (II) A low PE ratio for EM stocks could be justified based on weak expected earnings growth. However, it is far from clear that such an expectation is warranted. While EM earnings growth has lagged the US since 2011, this follows a decade when EM earnings grew much faster than in the US (Chart 18). Chart 18AEM Earnings Have Moved Sideways Since 2011 After Blazing Higher Over The Preceding Decade (I) Chart 18BEM Earnings Have Moved Sideways Since 2011 After Blazing Higher Over The Preceding Decade (II) Chart 19EM Stocks Underperformed Their US Peers By More Than What Is Suggested By Earnings On that note, it is worth mentioning that US earnings have risen by only 6 percentage points more than EM earnings since mid 2019 (20% versus 14%), even as EM stocks have underperformed their US peers by 29% over this period (52% versus 23%) (Chart 19). China’s Regulatory Crackdown The regulatory crackdown on Chinese tech companies has weighed on the sector. Chinese tech stocks have underperformed their global tech peers by 48% since February (Chart 20). Chart 20Chinese Tech Stocks Have Been Underperforming Their Global Tech Peers Chinese tech is 44% of the China investable index and 15% of the MSCI EM index. Thus, the outlook for Chinese stocks is relevant not just for China-focused investors, but for EM investors more broadly (especially those who invest in index products). The current crackdown bears some resemblance to the one in 2018, which saw Tencent lose $20 billion in market capitalization in a single day. Like other Chinese tech names, Tencent shares quickly recovered from that incident. Contrary to popular perception, the Chinese government has not launched an indiscriminate attack on tech companies. If anything, heightened geopolitical tensions have made it more important than ever for China to buttress its tech sector. Rather, what the government has done is restrain companies that it either perceives as working against the national interest (i.e., addictive video game makers and expensive after-school tutoring companies) or that have too much sway over the public. Private tech companies in sectors such as semiconductors or clean energy continue to receive government support. A plausible outcome is that China’s leading consumer-oriented internet companies will go out of their way to pledge allegiance to the Communist Party just as US companies have pledged allegiance to woke ideology. If that were to happen, the Chinese government may allow them to operate normally, cognizant of the fact that it is easier to monitor a few large internet companies than many small ones. While such an outcome is far from assured, current valuations offer enough cushion to prospective investors. As we go to press, Alibaba is trading at 16.4-times earnings, Baidu is trading at 17.9-times earnings, and Tencent is trading at 26.7-times current year earnings. In comparison, the NASDAQ 100 trades at nearly 30-times earnings. Investment Conclusions Sentiment towards EM stocks is very bearish (Chart 21). Investor angst towards China is especially elevated, with the media replete with stories about the tech crackdown and problems at Evergrande, the country’s largest property developer. Chart 21Sentiment Towards EM Stocks Is Highly Bearish All these downside risks to EM assets are well known. What are less well known are the upside risks stemming from higher vaccination rates, an easing of domestic inflationary pressures, Chinese stimulus, a weaker US dollar, and favorable valuations. With that in mind, we are upgrading our rating on EM equities and currencies to strong overweight in the view matrix at the back of this report. We are also reinstating a long EM/Global equity trade (ETF proxy: VWO versus VT). The risk-reward of buying Chinese internet stocks is reasonably appealing. Investors who want to mitigate risk should consider writing cash-covered puts. For example, a BABA put with a strike price of $130 expiring on December 16th 2022 trades for about $16. If the price of BABA does not fall below $130, you will pocket the premium, realizing an annualized yield of 9%. If the price does fall to $130, you get the stock at an attractive PE ratio of 12.5 based on current forward earnings estimates.   Peter Berezin Chief Global Strategist pberezin@bcaresearch.com Global Investment Strategy View Matrix Special Trade Recommendations Current MacroQuant Model Scores

Weekly Performance Update For the week ending Thu Sep 16, 2021 The Market Monitor displays the trailing 1-quarter performance of strategies based around the BCA Score. For each region, we construct an equal-weighted, monthly rebalanced portfolio consisting of the top 3 stocks per sector and compare it with the regional benchmark. For each portfolio, we show the weekly performance of individual holdings in the Top Contributors/Detractors table. In addition, the Top Prospects table shows the holdings that currently have the highest BCA Score within the portfolio. For more details, click the region headers below to be redirected to the full historical backtest for the strategy. BCA US Portfolio Total Weekly Return BCA US Portfolio S&P500 TRI -0.24% -0.40% Top Contributors   AN:US EOG:US GOLF:US KOF:US SAFM:US Weekly Return 34 bps 30 bps 8 bps 5 bps 2 bps Top Detractors   CQP:US MRNA:US UGI:US PFE:US DUK:US Weekly Return -14 bps -11 bps -11 bps -10 bps -9 bps Top Prospects   BRK.A:US SC:US MPLX:US ESGR:US PFE:US BCA Score 96.34% 95.76% 95.14% 94.82% 94.64% BCA Canada Portfolio Total Weekly Return BCA Canada Portfolio S&P/TSX TRI 0.02% -0.43% Top Contributors   TOU:CA PXT:CA AND:CA ECN:CA IMO:CA Weekly Return 45 bps 21 bps 20 bps 15 bps 13 bps Top Detractors   CFP:CA CRON:CA LNR:CA TOY:CA L:CA Weekly Return -24 bps -13 bps -12 bps -12 bps -12 bps Top Prospects   LNF:CA ELF:CA WIR.UN:CA CFP:CA RUS:CA BCA Score 97.84% 96.35% 96.27% 95.53% 94.44% BCA UK Portfolio Total Weekly Return BCA UK Portfolio FTSE 100 TRI -1.75% 0.05% Top Contributors   ROSN:GB EMIS:GB IMB:GB SVT:GB KLR:GB Weekly Return 18 bps 15 bps 5 bps 4 bps 4 bps Top Detractors   MXCT:GB FXPO:GB CNE:GB TRMR:GB AAL:GB Weekly Return -48 bps -37 bps -27 bps -22 bps -21 bps Top Prospects   SVST:GB GLTR:GB BPCR:GB FDM:GB VVO:GB BCA Score 99.58% 98.43% 98.11% 97.85% 97.70% BCA Eurozone Portfolio Total Weekly Return BCA EMU Portfolio MSCI EMU TRI -0.84% -0.39% Top Contributors   HLAG:DE OMV:AT RDSA:NL MELE:BE IRE:IT Weekly Return 32 bps 18 bps 11 bps 10 bps 2 bps Top Detractors   TTALO:FI BSL:DE CDI:FR TL5:ES FSKRS:FI Weekly Return -33 bps -20 bps -18 bps -13 bps -13 bps Top Prospects   FSKRS:FI STR:AT LOG:ES BFF:IT EDNR:IT BCA Score 99.53% 99.47% 98.58% 96.15% 96.08% BCA Japan Portfolio Total Weekly Return BCA Japan Portfolio TOPIX TRI 0.33% 1.23% Top Contributors   5021:JP 4966:JP 5020:JP 8334:JP 3132:JP Weekly Return 16 bps 15 bps 11 bps 11 bps 11 bps Top Detractors   7244:JP 3290:JP 4326:JP 8117:JP 9543:JP Weekly Return -26 bps -13 bps -11 bps -9 bps -8 bps Top Prospects   6960:JP 9882:JP 9436:JP 4544:JP 2208:JP BCA Score 99.93% 99.33% 99.11% 98.49% 98.22% BCA Hong Kong Portfolio Total Weekly Return BCA Hong Kong Portfolio Hang Seng TRI -3.36% -4.01% Top Contributors   857:HK 1735:HK 2686:HK 6118:HK 506:HK Weekly Return 42 bps 21 bps 14 bps 8 bps 5 bps Top Detractors   710:HK 836:HK 991:HK 1277:HK 323:HK Weekly Return -80 bps -37 bps -34 bps -32 bps -23 bps Top Prospects   1277:HK 98:HK 316:HK 6868:HK 323:HK BCA Score 100.00% 99.50% 98.59% 98.35% 98.31% BCA Australia Portfolio Total Weekly Return BCA Australia Portfolio S&P/ASX All Ord. TRI 1.24% 1.36% Top Contributors   YAL:AU BFG:AU MMS:AU SXY:AU SGF:AU Weekly Return 32 bps 27 bps 25 bps 16 bps 15 bps Top Detractors   BXB:AU SDG:AU AGL:AU SGLLV:AU CDA:AU Weekly Return -27 bps -17 bps -11 bps -10 bps -7 bps Top Prospects   SDG:AU GRR:AU PIC:AU PL8:AU RIC:AU BCA Score 99.91% 99.55% 99.38% 98.89% 98.59%

Please note that next Friday September 24 at 10am EDT, we will host a webcast featuring a debate between my colleague Peter Berezin and me. The topic of debate is whether investors should overweight EM in a global portfolio. Please join us by registering via this link.   Highlights Chinese internet companies’ ROE will drop, warranting lower equity valuations. However, their ROE and equity multiples will not fall to the levels of listed state-owned enterprises (SOEs). Evergrande’s partial default on its liabilities will likely reinforce credit tightening that has been underway in China over the past 12 months. EM ex-TMT stocks also remain vulnerable. Continue underweighting EM in global equity and credit portfolios. Feature This is the September issue of Charts That Matter. We begin by addressing the issues concerning Chinese internet companies that have been subject to intense debate among investors. We then present key charts on overall EM and various asset classes along with brief commentary. Are Chinese Internet Stocks Investable? There is an ongoing debate in the investment community as to whether Chinese equities in general and Chinese TMT stocks in particular will remain investable. Our short answer is: they will remain investable but mind their valuations. In our opinion, “investable” means that they will from time to time offer medium- and long-term investment opportunities. Our hunch is that they may do so in the future. Nevertheless, we do not think that Chinese TMT stocks presently offer a good buying opportunity. In fact, their share prices have material downside from current levels. In our recent report and webcast, we identified the primary risks to Chinese platform companies: Higher uncertainty about their business model = a higher equity risk premium. Government regulating their profitability like those of mono- and oligopolies = low multiples. These companies performing their social duties in the form of redistributing profits from shareholders to Chinese peoples. Beijing’s involvement in their management and in the prioritization of national and geopolitical objectives over shareholder interests. Risks of delisting from US stock exchanges. Although these companies will remain investable, investors should bear these risks in mind and give careful consideration to what multiples they pay for such stocks. Going forward, Chinese platform companies’ return on equity will be considerably lower than they have been or what their current multiplies imply. A lower return on equity warrants a lower equity multiple. Chart 1Chinese Growth Stocks Are Not Cheap On the whole, the current valuations of Chinese internet stocks are still high. Chart 1 shows trailing and 12-month forward P/E ratios for Chinese MSCI Growth Investable Index at 34 and 31, respectively. A downshifting return on equity and high uncertainty around these businesses herald lower equity valuations to come. Besides, in the case of several companies, there are also political underpinnings of this regulatory crackdown. In the case of Alibaba, a mainland government official has recently noted that Alibaba’s chairman, Jack Ma, has been acquiring media companies across the country, and now owns nearly 30 provincial-level media companies, as well as the South China Morning Post in Hong Kong. Beijing will not tolerate the control of or influence over domestic media from anyone outside the inner leadership circle. In this context, it is probable that Alibaba’s businesses will remain subject to severe regulatory pressures. How much lower should these companies’ multiples drop to become attractive? Meaningfully lower, but not to the level of multiples of listed state-owned enterprises (SOEs). Here are two reasons why these platform companies will not trade at multiples of SOEs in China: First, many existing SOEs operate in cyclical industries – commodities, industrials, autos, and banks – that structurally have low equity multiples. By contrast, platform companies operate in non-cyclical sectors that structurally have lower business cycle volatility and, therefore, should trade at higher equity multiples than cyclical industries. Second, many SOEs often had losses because they operated in non-oligopolistic industries. Faced with intense competition they had to cut prices to support volumes and employment. By contrast, platform companies’ profitability will be suppressed and capped by new government policies, but they will remain profitable because they operate in oligopolistic industries. In short, platform companies’ ROEs will be higher than those of traditional/”old-economy” SOEs. All in all, our bias is that platform companies’ valuation multiples will contract further but will not be as low as Chinese, Russian, or Brazilian SOEs have been. Bottom Line: Investors should be mindful of further de-rating in Chinese TMT/platform company stocks. These stocks are not yet out of woods. On Property Market Clampdown And Evergrande's Default Evergrande will likely default on some of its liabilities but there will be a bailout or roll-over of its other debt.  Is the partial default by Evergrande, a very large Chinese property developer, a sign of a bottom in Chinese offshore equity and bond markets or will it produce a full-blown credit crisis in China? This is a valid question because both outcomes are possible: a partial bankruptcy can be a culmination of all existing negatives and can trigger policy stimulus that will produce an economic recovery and a major rally (an example of this is the LTCM crisis in the US in 1998); or  a partial bankruptcy can lead to a credit crunch escalation becoming a systemic event. An example of this is Lehman Brothers’ bankruptcy in 2008. We will assign the highest probability to a third scenario: the well-telegraphed Evergrande default might not create a systemic crisis or crash. However, it will likely reinforce chronic credit tightening that has been underway in China over the past 12 months. This is negative for China and EM risk assets. Predicting the trajectory and speed of market adjustments – a crisis (wholesale selloff) versus a regular bear market interrupted by short-term rebounds – is impossible. That said, investors should stay put for now. On another note, during our webcast last week, a client asked whether restrictions on property developers’ leverage will hinder their ability and willingness to build. In turn, limited property supply will likely push up property prices, which is contrary to Beijing’s goals of curbing property price inflation. So, why are authorities pursuing this clampdown on property developers? Chart 2Property Starts And Prices Are Positively Correlated This is a very good question, and we have the following observations. In our view, authorities are clamping down on property developers’ leverage because historically there was a strong positive correlation between property starts and house prices (Chart 2). The basis for this positive correlation is that when property developers start more projects, they raise expectations via aggressive marketing of higher prices in future. As a result, people become more inclined to buy houses. In fact, more supply has not precluded property prices from surging and vice versa, as shown in Chart 2. Provided housing valuations (the house price-to-income ratios) are exceptionally high in China and high-income households have been buying multiple apartments, we can argue that (speculative) expectations for higher prices in the future have often been an important driver of demand. So, authorities are probably hoping to break this speculative cycle where higher prices breed higher prices. Aggressive marketing on the part of property developers – creating an atmosphere of euphoria around new property launches – has been an essential driver for surging house price expectations. Hence, authorities’ reasoning is that curbing property developers’ relentless debt financed expansion activity is essential for both (1) to restrain excessive house prices inflation (a social stability goal) and (2) to reduce risks of a future credit crisis (a financial stability goal). Finally, with many households/investors who own multiple properties (that are vacant rather than rented out), authorities hope that diminished expectations for future house price appreciation will bring some of these vacant properties to the market. If this occurs, the supply of residential properties for sale and rent will not drop dramatically despite lower starts by property developers. It is also critical to assess the implications of the ongoing carnage in Chinese offshore corporate bonds, where the epicenter of the selloff is property companies. The fact that property developers are experiencing a credit crunch and will be forced to deleverage has implications for China’s business cycle and other EM economies. Chart 3 illustrates that the periods of rising emerging Asian USD corporate bond yields (shown inverted on the chart) coincide with lower emerging Asian ex-TMT share prices. The link is as follows: the ongoing credit stress and deleveraging by mainland property developers means less construction and diminished demand for raw materials and industrial goods as well as possibly household white goods. There are thus negative implications not only for emerging Asian non-TMT stocks but also for overall EM. Bottom Line: Property construction in China will continue contracting (Chart 4). This will weigh on raw materials and industrial goods demand in China and beyond it. Chart 3Rising Emerging Asian Corporate Bond Yields Point To Lower Asian ex-TMT Stocks Chart 4Chinese Housing: Sales And Starts Are Contracting   Arthur Budaghyan Chief Emerging Markets Strategist arthurb@bcaresearch.com     Have EM Stocks Bottomed? Investor sentiment on EM equities has plunged close to its previous lows. However, this is a necessary but not sufficient condition to issue a buy recommendation. Critically, EM narrow money growth points to EPS deceleration in the next nine months. Yet, analysts’ net EPS revisions remain elevated and have not yet dropped to negative levels. Our bias is that EM net EPS revisions will be downgraded in the coming months. From a technical perspective, the EM equity index has failed to break above its 200-day moving average. This is a negative technical signal.  Chart 5 Chart 6 Chart 7 Chart 8 EM Underperformance Is Broad-Based Not only have EM TMT stocks massively underperformed their global peers, but also EM ex-TMT stocks have been underperforming their global counterparts. Besides, the EM equal-weighted stock index has failed to break above its previous highs. Failure to break above a resistance line is often a bad omen. Finally, EM ex-TMT share prices correlate with the average of AUD, NZD and CAD, and the latter remains in a corrective phase.  Chart 9 Chart 10 Chart 11 Red Flags For EM Periods of rising EM USD corporate bond yields coincide with lower EM share prices. EM corporate USD bond yields are rising (shown inverted below) and we expect more upside. Either US Treasury bond yields will rise and EM corporate spreads will stay broadly constant, or EM credit spreads will widen and US Treasury yields will stay range-bound. Either of these scenarios will produce higher EM corporate bond yields and, thereby, herald lower EM equity prices. Further, a breakdown in platinum prices is also raising a red flag for EM risk assets.  Chart 12 Chart 13 Have Chinese And Asian Stocks Hit An Air Pocket? Relative performance of emerging Asian equities versus the global stock index has broken below its previous lows. Technically, this entails a protracted period of underperformance. Neither emerging Asian ex-TMT nor Chinese investable ex-TMT share prices have been able to break above their major resistance lines. Failure to break above a resistance line is often a bad omen. Meantime, Chinese onshore stocks and corporate bonds have not sold off enough so that authorities panic and stimulate aggressively.  Chart 14 Chart 15 Chart 16 Chart 17 The US Dollar As A Litmus Test EM risk assets negatively correlate with the US dollar. The broad trade-weighted US dollar is holding above its 200-day moving average. Plus, investor sentiment on the greenback remains negative. Finally, the US dollar moves inversely with relative performance of global cyclical sectors versus global defensives (the dollar is shown inverted on chart below). The ongoing slowdown in China is bullish for the US dollar because the US economy is the least vulnerable to China’s economy. Overall, we expect the US dollar to continue firming in the coming months. Chart 18 Chart 19 Chart 20 Global Mining Stocks, Commodity Currencies And Commodity Prices The share prices of BHP and Rio Tinto have fallen dramatically in absolute terms. This reflects the plunge in iron ore prices and might also be a harbinger of a broader selloff in industrial metals. Further, the average of AUD, NZD and CAD also signals a correction in the broad commodities price index.  Chart 21 Chart 22 Chart 23 Is This Decoupling Sustainable? Industrial metals prices were historically correlated with the Chinese business cycle but have decoupled since early this year. Several commodity prices – like coal, steel and aluminum – have shot up due to production shutdowns as a part of the Chinese government’s decarbonization policies. However, it will be extraordinary if commodity prices continue advancing amid a protracted slowdown in China’s old economy.   Chart 24 Chart 25 Chinese Commodity Imports Have Contracted Reflecting a demand slowdown and the government’s willingness to dampen commodity price inflation, China has been shrinking its imports of several commodities. It has also released some of its strategic reserves for oil and certain industrial metals. High commodity prices are hurting profit margins of manufacturing and industrial companies leading them to lower output. Beijing is determined to curb and bring down key commodity prices to lessen the negative impact on overall growth and employment.  Chart 26 Chart 27 Chinese Stimulus: How Fast And How Large? In recent months, China has been injecting more liquidity into the banking system. Rising commercial banks’ excess reserves at the PBOC point to a bottom in the credit impulse in Q4 of this year. However, the credit impulse leads the business cycle by about nine months. This implies that the economy will not revive before Q2 next year at best. In fact, the aggregate building floor area started and the installation of electricity transmission lines are already contracting and will continue shrinking till Q2 next year.   Chart 28 Chart 29 Chart 30 Chart 31 An Inflation Dichotomy Between China And The US In China, consumer price inflation remains largely contained. However, in the US core consumer price inflation measures are still rising and are above 2%. An optimal exchange rate adjustment to redistribute inflation pressures from the US into China will require a stronger US dollar and a weaker RMB.  Chart 32 Chart 33 Inflation And Monetary Tightening In EM ex-China Core measures of inflation have been rising in many Eastern European and Latin American economies. Their central banks will hike interest rates further. This will hurt their domestic demand at a time when the recovery in these economies has been underwhelming. Monetary and fiscal tightening will offset benefits from reopening as their vaccination rates ameliorate.  Chart 34 Chart 35 Chart 36 Chart 37 What Drives EM Credit Markets? We downgraded our allocation to EM credit, currencies and equities from neutral to underweight on March 25, 2021. This strategy remains intact. The outlook for the key drivers of EM credit – EM/China business cycles and EM exchange rates – remains downbeat. In fact, EM credit markets – both investment grade and high-yield – have been underperforming their US counterparts and this trend will persist.  Chart 38 Chart 39 Chart 40 Chart 41 Our Relative Equity Value Strategies We have been recommending investors go long Chinese A shares / short Chinese investable stocks since March 4, 2021 and this strategy has been extremely profitable. The same is true for the short Chinese property developers / long overall index and short Chinese investable value stocks versus global value stocks strategies. Finally, our recommendation to be long global industrials / short global materials has so far been flat but we expect it to play out for the reasons elaborated in the linked report.  Chart 42 Chart 43 Chart 44 Chart 45 Retail Equity Mania In Korea And Taiwan The retail mania continues in the Korean and Taiwanese stock markets. Retail investors are the main buyers while foreign investors and domestic institutional investors have been scaling back their exposure. Surging margin loans and equity trading volumes in Korea confirm ongoing equity euphoria. We continue overweighting Korean stocks and are neutral on Taiwanese stocks within an EM equity portfolio. The difference in our strategy is due to the potential geopolitical risks that Taiwan is facing. Chart 46 Chart 47 Chart 48 Chart 49 The Semi Cycle And Risks To The Absolute Performance Of Korean And Taiwanese Stocks DRAM and NAND prices have rolled over. This is a near-term risk to the absolute performance of Korean tech stocks. However, if global industrial stocks outperform, as we expect, Korean share prices will outperform the EM equity benchmark because the KOSPI is a good proxy play on global industrials within the EM universe. Although global semiconductor shortages remain widespread, the 6-month outlook for Taiwanese technology companies has rolled over too.  Chart 50 Chart 51 Chart 52 Chart 53 Footnotes Equities Recommendations Currencies, Credit And Fixed-Income Recommendations

Following this week’s CPI release, we update our Corporate Pricing Power Indicator (CPPI). As a reminder, we calculate industry group pricing power from the relevant CPI, PPI, PCE and commodity prices growth rates for each of the 60 industry groups we track. Table 1 on the next page highlights short-term pricing power trends and each industry's spread to overall inflation. 83% of the industries we cover are lifting selling prices, at a faster clip than overall inflation. Commodity-sensitive industries dominate the top of Table 1 with steel and energy industries leading the way with 75% to 10% price increase as they have enjoyed a slingshot post-COVID-19 recovery. One notable exception is the forest products industry with a tape reading of -47% due to the ongoing bear market in lumber futures. We expect the rest of the commodity complex to give up leadership as headwinds from a slowdown in China filter through the global markets. Pricing power of auto manufacturers is also on the rise – empty dealership lots and reduced supply result in a significant upward pressure on prices. There is already evidence that price increases and shortages in supply are starting to discourage consumers from making purchases. Meanwhile, most other consumer goods and services categories populate the middle of the Pricing Power table, suggesting that there is a limit to companies’ ability to raise consumer prices without damaging the demand. We also note that it is reassuring that prices of semiconductors have come down, as it may be an early indication that supply chain is starting to unclog and shortages, such as the one in semiconductors, are starting to resolve. Finally, yesterday was Lehman Bankruptcy Day – 13 years have passed. Time flies. Bottom Line: Outside of commodities and building materials, price increases are moderating. Table 1