War/Conflict
In Section I, we audit the market’s “soft landing” narrative in response to a meaningful challenge to our cautious stance from recent financial market developments. We acknowledge that US economic growth was stronger in the first half of the year than many investors expected, but we are unmoved by the recent uptick in “soft landing” hopes. A “soft landing” outcome very likely necessitates interest rate cuts before recessionary dynamics emerge, and it is far from clear that rate cuts or (especially) an easy monetary policy stance are likely to materialize over the coming year. As such, we continue to believe that conservative portfolio positioning is appropriate. In Section II, we discuss some simple approaches that we use when valuing the major asset classes that we cover. We conclude that global ex-US equities and ex-US developed market currencies are the main assets that can be considered “cheap” today.
Falling inflation enables central banks to pause rate hikes, which is good news. But time goes on. Restrictive monetary policy, Chinese debt-deflation, energy supply shocks, US and global policy uncertainty, and extreme geopolitical risks will undermine hopes of a soft landing and beautiful disinflation.
Positive economic surprises have delayed the onset of recession in the United States. But tighter monetary and fiscal policy, slowing global growth, and a looming rebound in policy uncertainty and geopolitical risk suggest that investors should buy insurance while it is cheap.
The Russian mutiny reveals the underlying trend of domestic instability. Russian instability is negative for global stability. The endgame of the war in Ukraine is exacerbating the problem, likely pushing up the equity risk premium.
Talks of a détente are premature and there is no domestic political basis in China or the US to support a true détente. Investors should not underappreciate global risk, on the basis of a détente, and should avoid Greater China equities in the next 18 months.
We are strategically bullish on the outlook of the energy sector. Domestic and external political constraints asserted themselves, restraining the most negative impulse against this sector by the Biden administration. Go long energy versus cyclicals (ex-tech).
