Sorry, you need to enable JavaScript to visit this website.
Skip to main content
Skip to main content

Euro Area

A collection of 10 important charts to monitor closely through the summer months.

The 35-year bond bull market is coming to an end and the downward sloping trend channel for yields is changing to flat. Asset allocators should trim duration and fixed income exposure.

This week, we are sending a <i>Special Report</i> written by BCA's Chief Global Strategist Peter Berezin, discussing the end of the 35-year global bond bull market. In addition, we are also sending you a joint <i>U.S. Bond Strategy/Global Fixed Income Strategy Weekly Report</i> which discusses the end of the secular bond bull market and the implications for global bond strategy.

Special Report

This week, we are sending a <i>Special Report </i>written by BCA's Chief Global Strategist Peter Berezin, discussing the end of the 35-year global bond bull market.

Special Report

Using long-term real rates, Uncovered Interest Rate Parity still works for exchange rate determination. Currencies are also affected by the global risk appetite and commodity prices. Intermediate-term fundamentals for EUR/USD are pointing up, but the timing is not optimal to buy it yet. However, the long-term outlook for the euro remains poor. Currently, USD/JPY has room to rally in the short term. Long-term factors will also continue to weigh on the yen.

In successful investment analysis "less is more, and usually much more effective."

Special Report

Our newly-developed European bottom-up Corporate Health Monitor is signaling that European corporate balance sheets, in aggregate, are steadily improving.

U.S. companies have historically traded at a premium to their European counterparts because of better underlying 'financials'. To address this issue, we developed the "Fundamental Approach" to determine the relative value of European equities in comparison to the U.S. Our analysis involved regressing the difference in the valuation metrics between the two markets on differences in financial variables, including RoE, operating margins, trailing EPS, forward EPS, sales-per-share, interest coverage, two measures of leverage and cash flow growth. While not as successful as the mechanical approach, the regressions confirmed the conclusion of the mechanical approach. The historical "batting average" of the fundamental valuation indicators are also good. Taken as a whole, our analysis suggests that Eurozone stocks are on the cheap side of fair value versus the U.S. at the moment, but not by enough to justify overweighing the Eurozone based on value alone. One also needs the expectation that European earnings growth will be better than in the U.S. over the next 1-2 years. Indeed, we are more bullish on Eurozone EPS growth than for the U.S. due to ongoing margin pressure in the latter market. For additional details please see Monday's Special Report.
European stocks have lagged the U.S. by a wide margin in the post-Lehman era. The relative EMU/U.S. total return index is close to its lowest level since the late 1970s in local currency terms. It is tempting to take a contrary position, especially since European stocks appear cheap relative to the U.S. on the surface. Nonetheless, European stocks have traditionally traded at a discount, in part because of persistently lower profitability. A Special Report - first published in the Bank Credit Analyst last month - takes a top-down approach to determine whether Eurozone stocks are cheap versus the U.S. after adjusting for persistent differences in underlying profit fundamentals. The report focused on the non-financial sector, and re-weighted the Eurozone equity index using U.S. weights in order to avoid the problem that differing sector weights could bias measures of relative value for the overall market. The report employed both a mechanical approach and a fundamental approach. Seven valuation measures were used, Price/Sales, Price/Forward Earnings, Price/Cash Flow, Price/Book, EV/EBITDA, Price/Trailing Earnings and Shiller P/E. The mechanical approach adjusted the valuation measures by subtracting the 5-year moving average from both markets. We then divided the Valuation Gap (VG) between the U.S. and Eurozone markets by the 5-year moving standard deviation of the VG. In this way, we adjusted for the persistent, but time-varying, gap between the two markets. The result is an indicator that moves roughly between +/- 2 standard deviations. Valuation is not a timing tool, but our analysis of the historical "batting average" shows that all of these valuation metrics except the trailing P/E provide value added as an investment tool. Historically, there was a high probability of a significant excess return to positioning in a contrary fashion between the two markets when relative valuation reached 1 and, especially, 2 standard deviations away from the mean. Currently, all of the mechanical valuation indicators suggest that Eurozone stocks are on the cheap side of fair value relative to the U.S., except for the trailing P/E. However, only two are more than 1 standard deviation away from the mean. We then approached valuation from a fundamental perspective (see next Insight).
Special Report

Eurozone equities have delivered one of the worst stretches of underperformance in more than 25 years. Are European equities a 'buy' versus the U.S., or are they "cheap for a reason"?