Equities
No significant change was made except that the weight of France was increased to 7% from 1.7%, largely driven by improvement in relative liquidity conditions. It's mainly financed by a reduction in the U.S. weight which remains the largest overweight in the model.
Are the arguments for overweighting European equities still valid? If so, overweighting relative to what?
The recent rebound is not a harbinger of a prolonged recovery in risk assets. The many potential negatives will keep volatility high and trigger further occasional selloffs.
For the month of February, the model underperformed both global and U.S. equities. For March, the model has modestly pared back its equity risk exposure, shifting the allocation into bonds. While Europe remains the largest equity overweight, EM and Canada also received some allocation. The U.S. and New Zealand were slightly downgraded. In the fixed-income space, the model is sticking with Italy and Spain.
The risk to ROE remains to the downside, which suggests that valuation multiples have peaked for the cycle. Beyond a potentially violent near-term counter-trend bounce, valuation multiples will remain under pressure.
The risk to ROE remains to the downside, which suggests that valuation multiples have peaked for the cycle. Beyond a potentially violent near-term counter-trend bounce, valuation multiples will remain under pressure.