Developed Countries

Highlights Chart 1Bond Yields Have Upside In A Blue Sweep Today’s US election has important implications for the near-term path of bond yields. In particular, a “blue sweep” outcome where the Democrats win control of the House, Senate and White House will probably cause yields to jump (Chart 1), as such an outcome virtually guarantees a large fiscal relief package early next year. Fiscal negotiations will be more contentious if the Republicans maintain control of the Senate, and yields could decline this evening if that occurs. However, no matter the election outcome, our 6-12 month below-benchmark portfolio duration recommendation will not change tomorrow. The economic recovery appears to be on track and some further fiscal stimulus is likely next year no matter who prevails tonight. The stimulus will just be smaller if a divided government necessitates compromise. In any case, bond investors should keep portfolio duration below-benchmark and stay overweight TIPS versus nominal Treasuries. They should also maintain positions in nominal and real yield curve steepeners and inflation curve flatteners. Feature Investment Grade: Overweight Chart 2Investment Grade Market Overview Investment grade corporate bonds outperformed the duration-equivalent Treasury index by 99 basis points in October, bringing year-to-date excess returns up to -300 bps. Corporate bonds are certainly not as cheap as they were back in March, but we still see acceptable value in the sector. The corporate index’s 12-month breakeven spread is at its 20th percentile since 1995 and the equivalent Baa spread is at its 28th percentile (Chart 2). Both levels appear somewhat expensive at first blush. However, considering the strong tailwinds from the Fed’s extraordinarily accommodative interest rate policy and emergency lending facilities, we see a lot of room for further tightening. Corporate bond issuance increased in September, though it remains well below the extreme levels seen in the spring (panel 4). The fact that the Financing Gap – the difference between capital expenditures and retained earnings – turned negative in the second quarter suggests that firms have enough cash to cover their investment needs (bottom panel). This will keep issuance low in the coming months. At the sector level, we continue to recommend overweight allocations to subordinate bank bonds,1  Healthcare and Energy bonds.2  We also advise underweight allocations to Technology3 and Pharmaceutical bonds.4 Table 3ACorporate Sector Relative Valuation And Recommended Allocation* Table 3BCorporate Sector Risk Vs. Reward* High-Yield: Neutral Chart 3High-Yield Market Overview High-Yield outperformed the duration-equivalent Treasury index by 86 basis points in October, bringing year-to-date excess returns up to -373 bps. Ba-rated bonds outperformed lower-rated credits in October, and they remain the best performing corporate credit tier since the March 23 peak in spreads (See Appendix A). In terms of value, if we assume a 25% recovery rate on defaulted debt and a minimum required spread of 150 bps in excess of default losses, then the High-Yield index is priced for a default rate of 4.8% during the next 12 months (Chart 3). Such a large drop in the default rate cannot be ruled out completely, but it would necessitate a rapid pace of economic recovery. We are not yet confident enough in the recovery to position for such a fast drop-off in defaults, especially with Job Cut Announcements still well above pre-COVID levels (bottom panel). We therefore continue to recommend an overweight allocation to the Ba-rated credit tier – where access to the Fed’s emergency lending facilities is broadly available – and an underweight allocation to bonds rated B and below. At the sector level, we advise overweight allocations to high-yield Technology5 and Energy bonds.6 We are underweight the Healthcare and Pharmaceutical sectors.7   MBS: Underweight Chart 4MBS Market Overview Mortgage-Backed Securities outperformed the duration-equivalent Treasury index by 12 basis points in October, bringing year-to-date excess returns up to -39 bps. The conventional 30-year MBS index option-adjusted spread (OAS) tightened 11 bps on the month to land at 72 bps. This is now slightly below the 76 basis point spread offered by Aa-rated corporate bonds but well above the 62 bps offered by Agency CMBS and the 29 bps offered by Aaa-rated consumer ABS. Despite the relatively attractive OAS, we remain concerned that the elevated primary mortgage spread is a warning that refinancing risk is greater than what is currently being priced in the market (Chart 4). Yes, the mortgage spread has tightened during the past few months, but it remains 35 bps above its average 2019 level. This suggests that the mortgage rate could fall another 35 bps due to spread compression alone, even if Treasury yields are unchanged. Such a move would lead to a significant increase in prepayment losses. The recent spike in the mortgage delinquency rate does not pose a near-term risk to spreads as it is being driven by households that have been granted forbearance from the federal government (panel 4). The risk for MBS holders only comes into play if many households are unable to resume their regular mortgage payments when the forbearance period expires early next year. But even in that case, further government intervention to either support household incomes or extend the forbearance period would mitigate the risk. Government-Related: Underweight Chart 5Government-Related Market Overview The Government-Related index outperformed the duration-equivalent Treasury index by 30 basis points in October, bringing year-to-date excess returns up to -284 bps. Sovereign debt outperformed duration-equivalent Treasuries by 151 bps on the month, bringing year-to-date excess returns up to -420 bps. Foreign Agencies outperformed the Treasury benchmark by 18 bps in October, bringing year-to-date excess returns up to -690 bps. Local Authority debt underperformed Treasuries by 21 bps in October, dragging year-to-date excess returns down to -362 bps. Domestic Agency bonds outperformed by 7 bps, bringing year-to-date excess returns up to -33 bps. Supranationals outperformed by 5 bps, bringing year-to-date excess returns up to -7 bps. US dollar weakness is usually a boon for Emerging Market (EM) Sovereign and Foreign Agency returns. However, this year’s dollar weakness has been relative to other Developed Market currencies. In recent months, the dollar has actually strengthened versus EM currencies (Chart 5). Value also remains poor for EM Sovereigns, which continue to offer a lower spread than Baa-rated corporate debt (panel 4). We looked at EM Sovereign valuation on a country-by-country basis in a recent report.8 We concluded that Mexican and Russian bonds offer the most compelling risk/reward trade-offs relative to the US corporate sector. Of those two countries, Mexican debt offers the best opportunity as US politics remain a concern for the Russian currency. Municipal Bonds: Overweight Chart 6Municipal Market Overview Municipal bonds outperformed the duration-equivalent Treasury index by 41 basis points in October, bringing year-to-date excess returns up to -464 bps (before adjusting for the tax advantage). Municipal bond spreads versus Treasuries tightened in October, but value remains exceptional with most maturities trading at a positive before-tax spread. As we showed in a recent report, municipal bonds are also attractively priced relative to corporate bonds across the entire investment grade credit spectrum.9 On a duration-matched basis, the Bloomberg Barclays General Obligation and Revenue Bond indexes trade at before-tax premiums relative to corporate bonds of the same credit rating, an extremely rare occurrence (Chart 6). Extraordinary valuation is the main reason for our recommendation to overweight municipal bonds. The severe ongoing state & local government credit crunch is a concern, but it is a risk we are willing to take. If the Democrats win the House, Senate and White House this evening – a fairly likely scenario – federal aid for state & local governments will be delivered in January. This would alleviate a lot of concern. But even in the absence of federal assistance, the combination of austerity measures (bottom panel) and all-time high State Rainy Day Fund balances should help stave off a wave of municipal downgrades. Treasury Curve: Buy 5-Year Bullet Versus 2/10 Barbell Chart 7Treasury Yield Curve Overview The Treasury curve bear-steepened in October, largely due to rising expectations of a “blue sweep” election outcome. The 2/10 and 5/30 Treasury slopes steepened 18 bps and 9 bps, respectively, to reach 74 bps and 127 bps. Our expectation is that continued economic recovery will cause investors to price-in eventual monetary tightening at the long-end of the Treasury curve. With the Fed maintaining a firm grip on the front end, this will lead to Treasury curve bear steepening. More bear steepening is likely if the Democrats win the House, Senate and White House tonight, as this would mean that a large amount of fiscal stimulus is coming early next year. But we will stick with our curve steepening recommendation regardless of the election outcome. No matter who wins the election, some further fiscal stimulus is likely on a 6-12 month horizon. We recommend positioning for a steeper curve by owning the 5-year Treasury note and shorting a duration-matched barbell consisting of the 2-year and 10-year notes. This position is designed to profit from 2/10 curve steepening. Valuation is a concern with our recommended steepener, as the 5-year yield is below the yield on the duration-matched 2/10 barbell (Chart 7). However, the 5-year looked much more expensive during the last zero-lower-bound period between 2010 and 2013 (bottom 2 panels). We anticipate a return to similar valuation levels. TIPS: Overweight Chart 8TIPS Market Overview TIPS outperformed the duration-equivalent nominal Treasury index by 38 basis points in October, bringing year-to-date excess returns up to -93 bps. The 10-year and 5-year/5-year forward TIPS breakeven inflation rates rose 7 bps and 5 bps on the month. They currently sit at 1.71% and 1.82%, respectively. Core CPI rose 0.19% in September and the year-over-year rate held steady at 1.73%. The 12-month trimmed mean CPI ticked down from 2.48% to 2.37%, so the gap between core and trimmed mean continued to narrow (Chart 8). We anticipate further narrowing in the months ahead, and therefore expect core CPI to come in relatively hot. For this reason, we recommend maintaining an overweight allocation to TIPS versus nominal Treasuries for the time being, even though the 10-year TIPS breakeven rate is no longer cheap according to our Adaptive Expectations Model (panel 2).10 Inflation pressures may moderate once core and trimmed mean inflation measures converge, and this could give us an opportunity to tactically reduce TIPS exposure sometime next year. We also recommend holding real yield curve steepeners and inflation curve flatteners. With the Fed now officially targeting an overshoot of its 2% inflation goal, we would expect the cost of 2-year inflation protection to rise above the cost of 10-year inflation protection (panel 4). With the Fed also exerting more control over short-dated nominal yields than over long-term ones, we expect that short-maturity real yields will come under downward pressure relative to the long end (bottom panel). ABS: Overweight Chart 9ABS Market Overview Asset-Backed Securities outperformed the duration-equivalent Treasury index by 9 basis points in October, bringing year-to-date excess returns up to +72 bps. Aaa-rated ABS outperformed the Treasury benchmark by 6 bps on the month, bringing year-to-date excess returns up to +59 bps. Non-Aaa ABS outperformed by 29 bps, bringing year-to-date excess returns up to +157 bps. Aaa ABS are a high conviction overweight, given that spreads remain elevated compared to historical levels and that the sector benefits from Fed support through the Term Asset-Backed Loan Facility (TALF). However, spreads are even more attractive in non-Aaa ABS (Chart 9) and we recommend owning those securities as well. This is despite the fact that only Aaa-rated bonds are eligible for TALF. We explained our rationale for owning non-Aaa consumer ABS in a June report.11  We noted that stimulus received from the CARES act caused disposable income to increase significantly since February. Then, faced with fewer spending opportunities, households used much of that windfall to pay down consumer debt (panel 4). Granted, further income support from fiscal policymakers is needed now that the CARES act’s enhanced unemployment benefits have expired. But given the substantial boost to savings that has already occurred, we are confident that more stimulus will arrive in time to prevent a wave of consumer bankruptcies. Non-Agency CMBS: Neutral Chart 10CMBS Market Overview Non-Agency Commercial Mortgage-Backed Securities outperformed the duration-equivalent Treasury index by 9 basis points in October, bringing year-to-date excess returns up to -250 bps. Aaa Non-Agency CMBS underperformed Treasuries by 10 bps on the month, dragging year-to-date excess returns down to -73 bps. Non-Aaa Non-Agency CMBS outperformed by 72 bps, bringing year-to-date excess returns up to -738 bps (Chart 10). We continue to recommend an overweight allocation to Aaa Non-Agency CMBS and an underweight allocation to non-Aaa CMBS. Our reasoning is simple. Aaa CMBS are eligible for TALF, meaning that spreads can still tighten even as the hardship in commercial real estate (CRE) continues. Without Fed support, non-Aaa CMBS will struggle to deal with tightening CRE lending standards and falling demand (panels 3 & 4). Agency CMBS: Overweight Agency CMBS outperformed the duration-equivalent Treasury index by 29 basis points in October, bringing year-to-date excess returns up to +17 bps. The average index spread tightened 6 bps on the month. It currently sits at 62 bps, well above typical historical levels (bottom panel). At its last meeting, the Fed decided to slow its pace of Agency CMBS purchases. It will no longer seek to increase its Agency CMBS holdings, but will instead purchase only what is “needed to sustain smooth market functioning”. This is nonetheless a Fed back-stop of the market, and it does not change our overweight recommendation. Appendix A: Buy What The Fed Is Buying The Fed rolled out a number of aggressive lending facilities on March 23. These facilities focused on different specific sectors of the US bond market. The fact that the Fed has decided to support some parts of the market and not others has caused some traditional bond market correlations to break down. It has also led us to adopt of a strategy of “Buy What The Fed Is Buying”. That is, we favor those sectors that offer attractive spreads and that benefit from Fed support. The below Table tracks the performance of different bond sectors since the March 23 announcement. We will use this to monitor bond market correlations and evaluate our strategy’s success. TablePerformance Since March 23 Announcement Of Emergency Fed Facilities Appendix B: Butterfly Strategy Valuations The following tables present the current read-outs from our butterfly spread models. We use these models to identify opportunities to take duration-neutral positions across the Treasury curve. The following two Special Reports explain the models in more detail: US Bond Strategy Special Report, “Bullets, Barbells And Butterflies”, dated July 25, 2017, available at usbs.bcaresearch.com US Bond Strategy Special Report, “More Bullets, Barbells And Butterflies”, dated May 15, 2018, available at usbs.bcaresearch.com Table 4 shows the raw residuals from each model. A positive value indicates that the bullet is cheap relative to the duration-matched barbell. A negative value indicates that the barbell is cheap relative to the bullet. Table 4Butterfly Strategy Valuation: Raw Residuals In Basis Points (As Of October 30TH, 2020) Table 5 scales the raw residuals in Table 4 by their historical means and standard deviations. This facilitates comparison between the different butterfly spreads. Table 5Butterfly Strategy Valuation: Standardized Residuals (As Of October 30TH, 2020) Table 6 flips the models on their heads. It shows the change in the slope between the two barbell maturities that must be realized during the next six months to make returns between the bullet and barbell equal. For example, a reading of 63 bps in the 5 over 2/10 cell means that we would only expect the 5-year to outperform the 2/10 if the 2/10 slope steepens by more than 63 bps during the next six months. Otherwise, we would expect the 2/10 barbell to outperform the 5-year bullet. Table 6Discounted Slope Change During Next 6 Months (BPs) Appendix C: Excess Return Bond Map The Excess Return Bond Map is used to assess the relative risk/reward trade-off between different sectors of the US bond market. It is a purely computational exercise and does not impose any macroeconomic view. The Map’s vertical axis shows 12-month expected excess returns. These are proxied by each sector’s option-adjusted spread. Sectors plotting further toward the top of the Map have higher expected returns and vice-versa. Our novel risk measure called the “Risk Of Losing 100 bps” is shown on the Map’s horizontal axis. To calculate it, we first compute the spread widening required on a 12-month horizon for each sector to lose 100 bps or more relative to a duration-matched position in Treasury securities. Then, we divide that amount of spread widening by each sector’s historical spread volatility. The end result is the number of standard deviations of 12-month spread widening required for each sector to lose 100 bps or more versus a position in Treasuries. Lower risk sectors plot further to the right of the Map, and higher risk sectors plot further to the left. Chart 11Excess Return Bond Map (As Of October 30TH, 2020)   Ryan Swift US Bond Strategist rswift@bcaresearch.com Footnotes 1 Please see US Bond Strategy Weekly Report, “The Case Against The Money Supply”, dated June 30, 2020, available at usbs.bcaresearch.com 2 Please see US Bond Strategy Special Report, “The Outlook For Energy Bonds Part 1: A Model Of Energy Bond Excess Returns”, dated July 14, 2020 and US Bond Strategy Special Report, “The Outlook For Energy Bonds Part 2: Buy The Dip In High-Yield Energy”, dated July 21, 2020, available at usbs.bcaresearch.com 3 Please see US Bond Strategy Weekly Report, “Take A Look At High-Yield Technology Bonds”, dated June 23, 2020, available at usbs.bcaresearch.com 4 Please see US Bond Strategy Weekly Report, “Assessing Healthcare & Pharma Bonds In A Pandemic”, dated June 9, 2020, available at usbs.bcaresearch.com 5 Please see US Bond Strategy Weekly Report, “Take A Look At High-Yield Technology Bonds”, dated June 23, 2020, available at usbs.bcaresearch.com 6 Please see US Bond Strategy Special Report, “The Outlook For Energy Bonds Part 1: A Model Of Energy Bond Excess Returns”, dated July 14, 2020 and US Bond Strategy Special Report, “The Outlook For Energy Bonds Part 2: Buy The Dip In High-Yield Energy”, dated July 21, 2020, available at usbs.bcaresearch.com 7 Please see US Bond Strategy Weekly Report, “Assessing Healthcare & Pharma Bonds In A Pandemic”, dated June 9, 2020, available at usbs.bcaresearch.com 8 Please see US Bond Strategy Weekly Report, “Trading Bonds In A Dollar Bear Market”, dated September 22, 2020, available at usbs.bcaresearch.com 9 Please see US Bond Strategy Weekly Report, “Political Risk Will Dominate In A Pivotal Month For The Bond Market”, dated October 13, 2020, available at usbs.bcaresearch.com 10 For more details on our model please see US Bond Strategy Weekly Report, “How Are Inflation Expectations Adapting?”, dated February 11, 2020, available at usbs.bcaresearch.com 11 Please see US Bond Strategy Weekly Report, “No Holding Back”, dated June 16, 2020, available at usbs.bcaresearch.com Fixed Income Sector Performance Recommended Portfolio Specification Corporate Sector Relative Valuation And Recommended Allocation

In mid-September, we highlighted the CBOE equity put/call (EPC) ratio that warned investors were complacent. Our goal was to attempt to quantify when the correction would end, and we noted that since the early-2018 “Volmageddon” episode, SPX drawdowns corresponded to higher EPC ratio readings (EPC shown inverted, see chart). As a reminder in the past 10 iterations, the EPC ratio has averaged 0.93 with a 0.86 median, and ranged from 0.74 to 1.28. The price action last Friday finally pushed the EPC ratio to 0.77 signaling that the correction is long in the tooth and some of the speculative fervor was wrung out of the market. Bottom Line: As the election-related uncertainty lifts, we expect the cyclical bull market to resume. Stay tuned.  

Highlights COVID-19 In Europe: The latest surge in COVID-19 cases in Europe has unnerved investors who now see renewed national lockdowns increasing the risk of a double-dip European recession and continued deflationary pressures. ECB: The signals from last week’s ECB policy meeting could not be more clear – the central bank will deliver new stimulus measures in December in response to the second wave of coronavirus sweeping through the euro area. This will be a combination of policies focused on expanding and extending the existing bond-buying vehicles and TLTROs, rather than cutting policy rates deeper into negative territory. European Bond Strategy: Stay overweight core European government debt, particularly versus US Treasuries. Remain overweight Italian and Spanish government bonds, as well, which remain supported by both ECB asset purchases and perceptions of increases European fiscal integration. Stay cautious on euro area corporate debt, however, as the renewed recession risk comes at a time when yields and spreads offer poor protection from future credit downgrades and defaults. Feature Chart of the WeekA Bad Time For A Second Wave Today’s long anticipated US election will be the focus for investors in the coming days (and, potentially, weeks) as all votes are counted. We have discussed our views on the potential bond market impact of the election - bearish for US Treasuries with both Joe Biden and Donald Trump promising big fiscal stimulus in 2021 – in our previous two reports. We will provide an update of those views as soon as we get clarity on the election result. This week, we discuss a new concern for jittery markets - the explosion of new COVID-19 cases in Europe that has already led to governments imposing aggressive lockdown measures. The timing of the new viral surge could not be worse for the euro area economy, which had recovered smartly from the massive lockdown-related demand shock this past spring. Real GDP for the entire euro area exploded higher at a 12.7% rate in Q3/2020, a big rebound from the 11.8% drop in Q2. Yet the second wave of coronavirus is starting to weigh on the more domestically focused service sectors most vulnerable to lockdowns and declining consumer confidence (Chart of the Week). From the perspective of European fixed income strategy, the imposition of lockdowns will only force the ECB to turn more dovish at a time when Europe is already in deflation, as was strongly signaled at last week’s ECB policy meeting. This will support the performance of euro area government bond markets, both in absolute terms and especially versus US Treasuries where yields are drifting higher and should continue to do so after the US election. Another Deflationary Shock To Europe From The Virus The surge in COVID-19 cases has hit the euro area hard and fast. France has seen the most stunning increase, with a population-adjusted daily increase of 596 new cases per million, a nearly six-fold increase in just two months (Chart 2). Importantly, this second wave has so far been nowhere near as lethal as the first wave. The “case fatality ratio” – confirmed deaths as a percentage of confirmed cases – is down in the low single digits for the largest euro area countries (bottom panel). The imposition of lockdowns will only force the ECB to turn more dovish at a time when Europe is already in deflation, as was strongly signaled at last week’s ECB policy meeting. Even with this second wave being less deadly, governments are taking no chances. France and Germany announced national lockdowns last week for at least the month of November, and Italy and Spain have put new restrictions on activity as well. The new lockdowns are already denting consumer confidence across the euro area and this trend will continue as people choose to spend less time outside of their homes to avoid infection. If the case numbers do not begin to stabilize and the lockdown measures extend into December or beyond, governments will likely be forced to consider new fiscal stimulus measures. According to the latest IMF Fiscal Monitor, the largest euro area economies are projected to have a negative “fiscal thrust” – the change in the cyclically-adjusted primary budget balance as a share of potential GDP – in 2021 of at least -3% of GDP (Chart 3). Chart 22nd Wave Of European Coronavirus Is Far Less Lethal Chart 3A Big European Fiscal Drag Coming Next Year In the case of Italy, the fiscal thrust is expected to be a whopping -6.6% of GDP. The main cause is reduced government spending as the massive temporary stimulus measures to fight the 2020 COVID-19 recessions roll off. Chart 4The ECB Has A Deflation Problem A fresh set of lockdowns will result in a need for more government support measures for unemployed workers, especially those in service-related industries like hospitality and tourism most exposed to lost business as consumers stay home. This poses a serious problem in countries like Spain and Italy that saw a rise in unemployment during the first lockdown but have seen no reversal since (Chart 4). More elevated unemployment rates suggest a lack of inflationary pressure, a point confirmed by recent inflation data. Overall headline HICP inflation fell to -0.3% in September, while core inflation is now a mere +0.4%. Headline HICP inflation rates are now below 0% in the largest euro area economies (Germany, France, Italy and Spain), while core HICP inflation in Italy fell to -0.3% in September. The collapse in oil prices earlier in 2020 has been the main cause of the negative headline inflation prints in the euro area, but is not the only source of weak inflation. According to a decomposition of inflation presented in the Bank of Italy’s October 2020 Economic Bulletin, a falling contribution from services inflation was responsible for about one-third of the entire decline in euro area headline HICP inflation since January (Chart 5). This comes from the part of the euro area economy most exposed to COVID-19 restrictions, highlighting the deflationary risk of the second wave. Chart 5Euro Area Deflation Is Mostly, But Not Only, Driven By Oil Simply put, the second wave of COVID-19 could not have come at a worse time. The euro area economy is still dealing with excess capacity and deflation, made worse by previous appreciation of the euro, with a looming fiscal tightening next year. Policymakers need to spring into action to help provide support for the euro area economy during this time, starting with the ECB. The second wave of COVID-19 could not have come at a worse time. The euro area economy is still dealing with excess capacity and deflation, made worse by previous appreciation of the euro, with a looming fiscal tightening next year. Bottom Line: The latest surge in COVID-19 cases in Europe has unnerved investors who now see renewed national lockdowns increasing the risk of a double-dip European recession and continued deflationary pressures. The ECB Will Deliver New Stimulus In December At last week’s policy meeting, ECB President Christine Lagarde announced that the Governing Council would reassess its monetary policy stance at the December meeting, when a new set of economic projections would be presented that factored in the negative impact of the second COVID-19 wave. Lagarde was very candid about the expected outcome of that next meeting, when she stated that the ECB would “recalibrate its instruments” based on the new economic forecasts. Chart 6European Banks Are Tigthening Lending Standards In our view, the ECB’s next policy options can only realistically focus on three options: Cutting policy rates deeper into negative territory Increasing the size, or altering the composition of its bond-buying programs Altering the terms of its current Targeted Long-Term Refinancing Operations (TLTROs) We view a rate cut as a low probability outcome. Not only are policy rates at or below 0%, but it is not clear that a cut would even help boost the demand or supply of new loans. According to the ECB’s latest Bank Lending Survey, euro area banks tightened credit conditions in Q3/2020 (Chart 6). Worsening perceptions of risk and a deteriorating economic outlook were cited as the main reasons for tightening lending standards. The tightening was most severe in Spain, but Italy also saw a big swing away from the easing standards seen in the Q2/2020 survey. Within the details of the Q3/2020 survey, the demand for loans from companies was expected to improve in Q4/2020. The demand for housing and consumer credit increased due to favorable borrowing conditions and a softening in negative contribution from consumer sentiment. Not only are policy rates at or below 0%, but it is not clear that a cut would even help boost the demand or supply of new loans. The ECB’s bond buying programs – the Asset Purchase Program (APP) and the Pandemic Emergency Purchase Program (PEPP) – were deemed to have a positive impact on bank liquidity and financing but a negative impact on profitability. Chart 7Low Interest Rates Are Crushing European Bank Stocks Therein lies the problem of the ECB’s negative interest rate policy and large-scale bond buying – it has lowered borrowing costs for euro area governments, consumers and businesses, but has crushed the profits of Europe’s banks. That can be seen when looking at the ongoing miserable performance of euro area bank stocks, which continue to plumb new lows. The relative performance of euro area banks versus the broad equity market benchmark index tracks the slope of government bond yield curves quite closely in the major euro area economies (Chart 7), highlighting the link between the level of euro area interest rates and bank profits. In Chart 8A, we show the Tier 1 capital ratio, as well as the non-performing loan (NPL) ratio for the five largest banks in Germany, France, Italy, Spain and the Netherlands. The message from the chart is clear – European banks remain well capitalized, with double-digit Tier 1 capital ratios well in excess of regulatory minimums, and have a relatively low share of assets that are non-performing. This is especially true in Italy, where the NPL ratio has collapsed from a high of 20% to 7% over the past five years. In Chart 8B, we present the return on equity and return on asset ratios for the same banks presented in the previous chart. Most large euro area banks suffer from a very low return on assets, not materially above 0%, reflecting the non-existent interest rates banks earn on their government bond holdings as well as the low rates on their loan books. Chart 8AEuropean Banks: The Good News Chart 8BEuropean Banks: The Bad News So given the fragile state of euro area bank health, and with banks already tightening lending standards in anticipation of slower economic activity because of second wave lockdowns, we can rule out a policy interest rate cut as an option to ease policy in December. This leaves only two other easing options, both associated with an expansion of the ECB’s balance sheet – more asset purchases of sovereign bonds and encouraging bank lending through cheap funding via TLTROs (Chart 9). The impact of either policy in offsetting slowing growth is debatable. Government bond yields are already miniscule, if not outright negative, across the euro area and do not represent a hindrance to increased government spending. The ECB can tweak some of the terms of the existing TLTRO programs, like maturity or the price of funding, but that may not encourage new lending if both borrowers and lenders fear a double-dip recession because of the second wave. The pressure is on the ECB to do something to stem the decline in euro area inflation. Nonetheless, the pressure is on the ECB to do something to stem the decline in euro area inflation. While real interest rates are still negative, they are increasingly becoming less so as inflation expectations continue to drift lower. The 5-year/5-year forward EUR CPI swap rate is now down to 1.1%, and was last trading near the ECB’s inflation target of just under 2% in 2013-14 (Chart 10). Unsurprisingly, the rising real rate backdrop has helped boost the value of the euro, especially versus the US dollar, which has suffered under the weight of falling real US interest rates this year. Chart 9The ECB Can Only Expand Its Balance Sheet In the end, greater fiscal stimulus will be the only option available to get Europe through the second wave. All the ECB can do is provide a backdrop of loose monetary policy that supports easy financial conditions, so that any stimulus will have the maximum effect on growth. Chart 10Deflation Is Pushing Up Real Rates In Europe Bottom Line: The signals from last week’s ECB policy meeting could not be more clear – the central bank will deliver new stimulus measures in December in response to the second wave of coronavirus sweeping through the euro area. This will be a combination of policies focused on expanding and extending the existing bond-buying vehicles and TLTROs, rather than cutting policy rates deeper into negative territory. Stay Overweight European Government Bonds, But Stay Cautious On Euro Area Credit With the ECB set to deliver some form of easing in December, core European bond yields are likely to remain stable over at least the next six months. The ECB has shown no reservations about expanding its balance sheet via bond purchases when needed. A surge of buying similar in size to that of the first COVID-19 wave is not out of the question if Europe faces a double-dip second wave recession (Chart 11). Chart 11Stay Overweight Core European Government Bonds Chart 12Italian BTPs Are Preferable To Euro Area Corporate Credit In an environment where we see US Treasury yields having more upside on the back of post-election fiscal stimulus, this makes the likes of German bunds and French OATs good “defensive” lower-beta plays to replace high-beta US Treasury exposure in global USD-hedged bond portfolios. We also like core Europe as a pure spread trade versus Treasuries, as we see scope for the UST-Bund spread to widen further – a tactical trade we initiated last week (see our Tactical Overlay table on page 15). We continue to recommend overweighting Italian government bonds as the preferred way to add scarce yield to a European bond portfolio with an asset that will directly benefit from more ECB buying.  We continue to recommend overweighting Italian government bonds as the preferred way to add scarce yield to a European bond portfolio with an asset that will directly benefit from more ECB buying (Chart 12). The ECB has already been purchasing a greater share of Italy in the PEPP, allowing significant deviations from the Capital Key weights that limit purchases in the older APP. ECB President Lagarde noted last week that those deviations will continue over the life of the PEPP, which should help support further declines in Italian bond yields over at least the next six months. We are maintaining a relatively cautious stance on European credit, however, even with the ECB likely to make a move in December. The renewed recession risk from the second wave comes at a time when low yields and spreads for euro area corporate bonds offer poor protection from future credit downgrades and defaults. We continue to prefer owning US corporate credit, both investment grade and high-yield, versus US equivalents in USD-hedged bond portfolios.   Robert Robis, CFA Chief Fixed Income Strategist rrobis@bcaresearch.com   Recommendations The GFIS Recommended Portfolio Vs. The Custom Benchmark Index Duration Regional Allocation Spread Product Tactical Trades Yields & Returns Global Bond Yields Historical Returns

Your feedback is important to us. Please take our client survey today Highlights Portfolio Strategy An easy Fed, the drubbing in the US dollar, the opening up of the global economy, poor pharma operating metrics and the specter of a “Blue Wave” more than offset the likelihood of a COVID-19 vaccine and oversold technicals, and compel us to cut pharma exposure below benchmark. This downgrade of the heavyweight pharma index also pushes the S&P health care sector down to a neutral position. Recent Changes Downgrade the S&P pharmaceuticals index to underweight, today. Trim the S&P health care sector down to a benchmark allocation, today. Table 1 Feature On the eve of the election, the SPX oscillated violently last week as it became evident that there will be no agreement on a bipartisan fiscal package. Thus, the odds are rising of a mega fiscal package next year irrespective of the election outcome. The longer politicians wait the larger the stimulus bill will end up being. Realistically now a fresh fiscal impulse is pushed out to late-January at the earliest, casting a dark cloud over the current quarter’s economic and profit growth prospects.   In mid-October we highlighted that positioning remained stretched in both VIX and S&P 500 e-mini futures, which warned that investors were prematurely betting on subsiding volatility. Similarly, we cautioned that VIX options activity corroborated the stretched positioning message as investors were piling into VIX puts and neglecting to buy any election protection in the form of VIX calls. The final blow came early last week when the equity vol curve inverted with the VIX spiking north of 40 and implying that the SPX would move by +/- 12% in the next 30 days. Given so much fear priced in the VIX, last Thursday we decided to close our election protection in the form of VIX December 16, 2020 expiry futures that we held since our July 27 Special Report we penned with our sister Geopolitical Strategy on the rising odds of a contested US election. Our view remains that the SPX could glide lower into the November election before rallying into year-end courtesy of receding election and fiscal policy uncertainties. Nevertheless, at the risk of getting overly bearish a few offsetting observations are in order. While there is a chance that the VIX will continue to roar as it did early in the year and push the equity vol curve deeper in backwardation, our sense is that the correction that commenced in early September is close to running its course. Historically, Chart 1 shows that the VIX curve inversion is typically short-lived and more often than not serves as a launchpad for the SPX. Chart 1Correction Enters Third Month With regard to market internals, a flurry of M&A activity has propelled the Philly SOX index to all-time highs in absolute terms and to nineteen-year highs versus the SPX. IPO activity has also resumed and the Renaissance IPO exchange trade fund is on a tear breaking out recently to uncharted territory. Moreover, the SPX advance/decline line is also probing all-time highs and signaling increased participation beyond the top 5 tech titans (Chart 2). While the Fed has been a bystander of late – trying to exert some pressure on Congress to pass a fresh stimulus package – and the fiscal circus continues unabated in Washington D.C., both the money supply release and the American Association on Individual Investors confirm that a lot of dry powder remains on the sidelines. The implication is that as election uncertainty recedes then this idle cash courtesy of the sloshing liquidity will make its way through the markets. In other words decreasing cash balances push the SPX higher and vice versa (Chart 3). Chart 2Market Internals: A Few Rays Of Light Chart 3Lots Of Dry Powder Meanwhile, following up from last week’s debt discussion we delve deeper into the non-financial corporate sector’s debt profile. The pandemic has pushed non-financial business debt to an extreme almost on a par with nominal GDP (top panel, Chart 4). The big difference this cycle is that, according to Moody’s, subordinated debt that has defaulted sports a recovery rate in the teens, a far cry from previous recessionary troughs (second panel, Chart 4). The overall junk bond recovery rate is near 25 cents on the dollar plumbing historical lows (a recent Bloomberg article highlighted that COVID-19 has ushered in this “new era of US bankruptcies” with ultra-low recovery rates).1 The risk remains that the default rate will continue to rise (bottom panel, Chart 4): the longer the fiscal stimulus package takes to arrive the higher the bankruptcies will be.   Importantly, the deep cyclicals (tech, industrials, materials and energy) net debt-to-EBITDA ratio has crossed above 1.5x during the recession on the back of cash flow ails. In fact cyclicals have been paying down net debt in absolute terms during the pandemic (bottom panel, Chart 5). Chart 4Beware Low Recovery Rates Chart 5Debt Saddled Defensives In marked contrast, the defensives (health care, consumer staples, utilities and telecom services) net debt-to-EBITDA ratio is hovering near 3x, as these debt saddled sectors have not been able to pay down net debt. Not only is net debt roughly $2tn, but it also comprises 50% of the broad market’s net debt at a time when the market cap weight is close to 30% (Chart 5). Taken together, the relative debt profile clearly favors cyclicals at the expense of defensives and we continue to recommend a cyclicals versus defensives portfolio bent. One neglected part of the Baker, Bloom and Davis policy uncertainty has been the trade-related uncertainty. The pandemic has put the trade dispute in the back burner. Moreover, the odds remain high of a Biden win; at the margin, a Democratic President will be less hawkish on trade and will try to deescalate global trade tensions. This backdrop is a de facto positive for cyclicals/defensives, especially given our view of a reopening of the global economy in 2021 (Chart 6). This week we continue to augment the cyclical/defensive bent of our portfolio by taking a defensive sector down a notch. Chart 6Cyclicals Benefit From Dwindling Trade Uncertainty Comatose Big Pharma shares broke down recently and we are compelled to downgrade exposure to underweight on the eve of the US election. While a short term reflex bounce may be in the cards, we would sell that strength as relative share prices are teetering and are on the verge of giving up 25 years of relative returns (top panel, Chart 7). Stiff macro headwinds, tough operating metrics and hawkish political rhetoric more than offset positive COVID-19 vaccine-related news.  On the macro front, the Fed’s ZIRP bodes ill for defensive pharma equities. The Fed was uncharacteristically quick this recession to drop rates to the lower zero bound to reflate the economy. As a result, safe haven equities, Big Pharma included, typically trail the broad market as the economy gets out of the ER and into the recovery room (middle & bottom panels, Chart 7).  Importantly, relative pharmaceutical profits are highly counter cyclical: they rise with the onset of recession and collapse as the economy stands back on its own two feet. Currently, as the COVID-19 hit to the world economy has transitioned to a V-shaped recovery, the reopening of the economy into the New Year will continue to knock the wind out of relative pharma profitability (global manufacturing PMI shown inverted, middle panel, Chart 8). Chart 7A Tough Pill To Swallow Chart 8Sell The Pharma Counter-Cyclicality Similarly, an appreciating greenback has historically been synonymous with pharma outperformance and vice versa (third panel, Chart 8). Keep in mind, Big Pharma make the lion’s share of their profits domestically further cementing the positive correlation with the US dollar. This local profit sourcing represents one of the main reasons why politicians on both sides of the aisle are after domestic pharma profits (more on this below). Worrisomely and likely tied to the domestic nature of the industry’s profit extraction, the debasing of the US dollar fails to provide any export relief. In fact, exports have been historically positively correlated with the greenback (bottom panel, Chart 8). Pharma prices are on the cusp of contracting. Importantly, President Trump’s late-July executive order “to allow importation of certain prescription drugs from Canada”2  among other provisions is a direct blow to the profit prospects of Big Pharma (second panel, Chart 9). Other operating factors also weigh on pharma earnings. Industry shipments have risen to a level that has marked prior peak growth rates. Any letdown on the demand side coupled with the recent inventory build, will lead to pricing power losses. Tack on accelerating productivity losses despite recovering pharma industrial production and factors are falling into place for a relative profit driven underperformance phase (Chart 9). With regard to the election outcome, a Biden win accompanied by a Senate flip to the Democrats would be the worst possible outcome for the pharmaceutical industry, as we posited in our recent Special Report penned with our sister Geopolitical Strategy services on sector implication of a “Blue Trifecta”, and reiterate today (Chart 10). Chart 9Pricing Power Blues Nevertheless, we are cognizant that definitive news of a COVID-19 vaccine will likely lift Big Pharma, but only temporarily, as cyclical forces will more than offset the positive vaccine news. Finally, with regard to valuations and technicals, pharma is not offering compelling value but rather is a value trap and we would use any reflex rebound to lighten up exposure to this defensive industry (Chart 11). Chart 10Heightened “Blue Sweep” Risk Chart 11Value Trap Netting it all out, an easy Fed, the drubbing in the US dollar, the opening up of the global economy, poor pharma operating metrics and the specter of a “Blue Wave” more than offset the benefits of a COVID-19 vaccine and oversold technicals. Bottom Line: Downgrade the S&P pharmaceuticals index to underweight today. The ticker symbols for the stocks in this index are: BLBG – S5PHARX, JNJ, PFE, MRK, LLY, BMY, ZTS, CTLT, MYL, PRGO. A Few Words On Health Care The Big Phama downgrade to underweight also pushes the S&P health care sector to a benchmark allocation from a previously modest overweight stance. This leaves the S&P medical equipment index as the sole overweight in this defensive sector that enjoys cyclical and structural tailwinds (especially in emerging markets that are instituting the health care safety nets the developed markets already enjoy) more than offsetting the safe haven characteristics that typically overshadow health care outfits (second panel, Chart 12). Moreover, we are putting the S&P health care sector on downgrade alert as we reckon most of the positive profit drivers are already reflected in cycle high relative profit growth figures and are at major risk of deflating if our thesis of a global reopening of the economy takes shape in the New Year. Our relative macro driven EPS growth models corroborate that earnings are at heightened risk of major disappointment next year (Chart 13). Chart 12Stick With Health Equipment Chart 13Put The S&P Health Care Sector On Downgrade Alert Bottom Line: Trim the S&P health care sector to neutral today and also put it on downgrade watch.   Anastasios Avgeriou US Equity Strategist anastasios@bcaresearch.com   Footnotes 1     https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2020-10-26/bond-defaults-deliver-99-losses-in-new-era-of-u-s-bankruptcies 2     https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/executive-order-increasing-drug-importation-lower-prices-american-patients/   Current Recommendations Current Trades Strategic (10-Year) Trade Recommendations Size And Style Views October 26, 2020 Favor small over large caps July 27, 2020 Overweight cyclicals over defensives June 11, 2018 Long the BCA Millennial basket  The ticker symbols are: (AAPL, AMZN, UBER, HD, LEN, MSFT, NFLX, SPOT, TSLA, V). January 22, 2018 Favor value over growth

Highlights Outsized daily moves were the rule for the S&P 500 last week as surging COVID-19 infections and tightening election polls highlighted the uncertain road ahead: Stocks sold off and the VIX spiked as the US set new daily infection records, European countries imposed a new round of strict lockdowns and narrowing polls pointed to increasing odds of a messy election outcome. We continue to believe more fiscal stimulus is needed, but households are doing just fine in the aggregate, … : Apartment rent collections and consumer credit performance have yet to betray any signs of post-CARES Act weakness, and the personal income report showed that aggregate household financial positions improved for a sixth straight month in September. … and studies focusing on households at the lower end of the income and wealth distributions do not reveal signs of distress: Payday loan transaction volumes have collapsed despite the recession and an analysis of Chase Bank customer activity showed that the unemployed received enough aid to double their savings and increase consumption while the CARES Act taps were open. Feature We will be holding a webcast next Monday, November 9th at 10:00 a.m. Eastern time in lieu of publishing a Strategy Report. Please join us with your questions to make it a fully interactive event. We will resume our regular publication schedule on the 16th. Markets sold off worldwide last week as surging COVID-19 infections in Europe and the US raised the specter of a new round of lockdowns. As French President Macron put it while announcing France’s new limits, “[The] virus is circulating … at a speed that even the most pessimistic forecast didn’t foresee. The measures we’ve taken have turned out to be insufficient to counter a wave that’s affecting all Europe.” Until December 1st, barring a dramatic reversal in new infections, bars, restaurants and non-essential retailers will close, and domestic travel and public gatherings will be banned, though schools will remain open. Germany implemented similar measures, albeit with gentler limits on retailers. Though the seven-day average of US cases made a new high last week as the third wave accelerated (Chart 1), we do not expect lockdowns on a par with spring’s draconian measures. We also were not fazed as pre-election stimulus hopes were snuffed out for good. We think last week’s slide simply reflected the considerable uncertainty surrounding the pandemic and the size, composition and timing of the next round of fiscal stimulus intended to combat it. We have been more cautious over the tactical 0-to-3-month timeframe than the cyclical 3-to-12-month timeframe because we expected that stocks would eventually stumble while the outcome of the policymakers-versus-the-virus contest appeared to be in doubt. Chart 1Daily New COVID-19 Infections: United States We continue to believe that policymakers have the capacity to stave off the virus’ economic impacts for all of 2021, if need be, and that they will eventually rediscover the will to use it. The path from here to there could be contentious and drawn-out, however, depending on the election results. A blue wave that puts the Democrats in control of the White House and the Senate would be the most stimulus-friendly outcome, but it became less likely last week as the universe of polls tracked by our geopolitical strategists showed the president rallying in several key battleground states. They argue that the president’s re-election chances are better than the pundits realize and that the joint probability of a Biden White House and a Republican Senate is rising. We could easily see stimulus negotiations becoming protracted and bitter under that scenario, with no agreement being reached until after the economy sustains some heavy blows. Households Are Still Holding On, In The Aggregate … According to several key data series we’ve been monitoring to track households’ financial health, the big blows have not yet begun to land. Through the week ended October 27th, apartment rent collections were a good bit better than they were in August and September, and were within one-and-a-half percentage points of their year-ago level, where they have remained since May (Table 1). Investors and economy watchers are rightly concerned about households’ ability to meet their financial obligations three full months after the weekly $600 unemployment insurance (UI) benefit supplement expired, but the National Multifamily Housing Council’s rent tracker shows that they are continuing to keep up with their single largest expense. Although their stocks sold off last week on rent declines of as much as 20% at properties in coastal cities, the six apartment REITs in the S&P 500 all reported third quarter rent collections well above the landlords in the NMHC’s sample (Table 2). The end of the weekly $600 supplemental unemployment benefit checks does not appear to have been a watershed event, ... Table 1Apartment Tenants Are Still Paying Their Rent Table 2S&P 500 Residential REIT Rent Collections Consumer credit performance held up through September, updated TransUnion data showed, confirming the signal from the SIFI banks’ third quarter earnings reports. September delinquencies in auto loans and unsecured personal loans ticked up from their August level, but all categories, ex-autos, are well below their September 2019 delinquency rates and auto delinquencies are only five basis points above their year-ago level (Table 3). While it is possible that September marked the beginning of some erosion, consumer credit has performed far better than expected given double-digit unemployment across April, May and June; leading 30-day delinquency series are not sending worrisome signals (Chart 2); average credit card balances keep coming down and the share of borrowers in forbearance programs is falling across all four loan categories. ... as the broad mass of American households are still paying their rent and servicing their debt. Table 3TransUnion Consumer Loan Delinquency Data Chart 2A Slight Pickup Is Coming … And In The Lower Reaches Of The Distribution Widely available data series reflect aggregate consumer health, but are not granular enough to provide insight into the condition of household finances across the entire wealth and income distribution. Such insight could be useful: the most vulnerable households have the highest marginal propensity to consume, and a real-time read on how they’re faring would shed some light on pending changes in economic activity at the margin. Several internal discussions about the robustness of the recovery have come down to how much longer households in the lower quintiles might be able to hold on. Their plight will figure heavily into how soon the next round of fiscal aid is needed and how large it will have to be. Veritec Solutions creates databases that allow states to monitor payday lenders to ensure that loans comply with laws and regulations. It recently released data showing that weekly payday loan transactions across seven states have cratered relative to year-ago transactions, bottoming around -65% in the second week of May before recovering to -46% through the second week of October.1 In the two years preceding the onset of the pandemic, payday transaction volumes had been trending downward at an annual rate of about 5%, consistent with what one might expect nine and ten years into an expansion, as accelerating wage gains allowed lower-income households to share some of the spoils. If those households were suffering, as one would expect in a recession that has disproportionately wiped out lower-skilled services jobs, an inferior-good industry like payday lending should be thriving. Given that payday loan transaction activity has not picked up meaningfully since the federal UI benefit supplement ran out at the end of July (transactions were down just under 50% year-over-year in the week ended August 1st), lower-income households do not yet appear to be under any particular duress. A separate study analyzing checking account and credit card data from Chase Bank customers focused on the impact of CARES Act measures on unemployed households. The median unemployed checking account balance roughly doubled between the end of March and the end of July, as inflows exceeded outflows in all four of the intervening months, consistent with the aggregate personal income data. Unemployed Chase customers used up nearly two-thirds of their pandemic savings in the month of August, however, raising some questions over how far their CARES Act support can stretch. That support boosted consumption while the transfers were flowing, with unemployed households' spending outpacing spending by households that kept their jobs, reversing the typical pattern. Spending by the unemployed tumbled in August once the $600 federal supplement expired and further declines are likely in store as savings dwindle and the stopgap weekly $400 joint federal/state supplement disappears, but the ranks of the unemployed are shrinking and fewer households will need help going forward. What Comes In And What Goes Out September Personal Income bounced a little bit after declining in August, modestly topping estimates and exceeding February’s pre-pandemic level for a sixth consecutive month. In the aggregate, households socked away close to another $100 billion over and above the baseline savings they might have amassed in the absence of the pandemic. (To calculate the baseline, we assume 4% annual nominal disposable income growth since February and a constant 8.3% savings rate (Table 4).) Looking ahead, the bottom line is that, with $1.2 trillion of excess savings, households are in a position to serve as a bridge to the next round of fiscal aid if they so choose. Table 4Excess Savings Keep Piling Up Chart 3Huge Fiscal Transfers And Sharply Reduced Spending Have Put Households On A Sounder Footing With COVID-19 infections surging even before the clocks were turned back and the bulk of the country had yet to contend with wintry temperatures, a consumption surge is unlikely. Holiday travel, to highlight one seasonal component of spending, will likely be very weak. When the personal income data came out Friday morning, however, we could not help but think that households’ need for the next round of stimulus may not be quite so pressing (Chart 3). Fiscal support from Washington is desperately needed at the state and local government level, however, and the longer it is withheld, the greater the likelihood that public employee layoffs will erode many households’ savings cushion. While the flow of fiscal aid has slowed and will continue to slow once funding for the $400 weekly UI supplement patch is exhausted, CARES Act assistance also had a stock effect that has not yet played out. Households built a war chest of savings that may be able to tide them over for longer than the consensus of observers assume. Investors have benefited from betting on policymakers so far this year, and we will continue to do so. We expect that the next round of stimulus, whenever it arrives, will turn out to be bigger than it needs to be. That may not be ideal for markets and the economy in the long run, but we expect it will be very good for the former over the next year or two. Investment Implications The available data paint an encouraging portrait of aggregate household financial conditions through the end of September. Solid October apartment rent collections support the view that nothing changed too much last month, and the personal income release showed that households continued to add to their formidable war chest of pandemic savings through September. Aggregate data can mask isolated soft patches, and it is possible that unemployed households are nearing the end of their rope three months after receiving the last of their supplemental benefit checks. From that perspective, it was encouraging to learn that pawn shop owners and other small-dollar lenders have been as lonely as the Maytag repairman. They represent lower-income households’ last resort for making ends meet and the 50% year-over-year falloff in their business suggests that the beneficial effects of the CARES Act’s support for the highest marginal-propensity-to-consume households have not run out. It's been a lousy recession for pawn brokers, debt collectors and repo men so far, and it won't get any better if Washington delivers a new round of aid soon after Election Day or Inauguration Day, as we expect. With COVID-19 gathering fresh momentum in the US and Europe, the policymakers-versus-the-virus framework that has guided our thinking since the spring remains as relevant as ever. The Fed has done nearly all it can, leaving the fight from here to fiscal policymakers. While the January makeup of Congress and the White House is highly uncertain, most Senate/White House combinations point to a sizable fiscal package soon after the election or the inauguration. We therefore remain sanguine about the prospects for risk assets over our cyclical twelve-month timeframe, even if there are some near-term bumps before the election dust settles and an effective vaccine can be developed. We reiterate our tactical (equal weight equities, underweight fixed income and overweight cash) and cyclical recommendations (overweight equities, underweight fixed income and equal weight cash), along with our below-benchmark duration recommendation within bond portfolios.   Doug Peta, CFA Chief US Investment Strategist dougp@bcaresearch.com Footnotes 1 The study with the data, "Update: COVID-19 Impact Study on Small-Dollar Lending," is available at https://www.veritecs.com/update-covid-19-impact-study-on-small-dollar-lending/. Accessed October 27, 2020.

Your feedback is important to us. Please take our client survey today. Highlights The long-term outlook for the dollar is bearish, but fresh shorts could be offside over the next one to three months. An uptick in US political uncertainty adds to our bullish dollar view over the next month. Stay short USD/JPY as a core holding for now. Beyond the near term, the Scandinavian currencies are best positioned for outperformance over the next 12 months. Silver is selling off relative to gold. Being long silver is a long-term bet that will pay handsome returns, but stand aside for now. Feature November is seasonally a good month for the dollar, and this year could well prove no exception (Chart I-1). Just a few days ago, the market consensus was that the dollar would decline irrespective of who sits in the Oval Office next year. A few days later and the market woke up to the realization that such a “heads I win, tails I win” bet rarely pans out smoothly. We have been very sympathetic to a dollar-bearish view over the long term, but as we highlighted last week, a few indicators have not passed our smell test, setting up the potential for a knee-jerk dollar rally. To add to this thesis, the rise in the greenback this week (and bloodbath in financial markets) has eerie historical echoes with the recent past. Remarkably, since the 2009 global financial crisis and the ensuing 2011 dollar bull market, the greenback has tended to stage its most powerful rallies into year-end. Chart I-2 shows that even after adjusting for the dollar uptrend over the last decade, November to January have proven to be very good months for dollar-long positions. This was particularly notable in 2009, 2011, 2014 and 2017 (Chart I-3). Chart I-1The Dollar Loves November Chart I-2The Dollar Since GFC Chart I-3The Dollar Is Oversold We are no technical experts, but could this time be different, especially given so many uncertainties clouding the investment outlook? And if so, what are other catalysts for a dollar bounce, other than those penned in report last week? What Could Be Different? Chart I-4The Dollar Rally Occurs In Two Phases Crises are rarely solved with one silver bullet. Historians can try to justify this over the last several centuries, but for the dollar call, it is instructive to simply re-examine the significant events we have lived through since the Great Financial Crisis. Enter 2008. The dollar rally occurred in two phases. The first phase prompted the US authorities to act by dropping interest rates, which dampened the rally and stimulated reflation. When the crisis proved bigger than the authorities expected, indiscriminate liquidation by financial market participants eventually prompted more action (Chart I-4). To be specific, the US first introduced swap lines with a select few central banks in December 2007 in response to the dollar crisis following the collapse of the housing market. These swap lines allowed foreign central banks to draw on dollar liquidity directly from the Federal Reserve and use this to provide credit to domestic concerns. However, from March to October 2008, the dollar soared by about 25%, since the swap lines did not include emerging markets. This prompted the Fed to expand its swap lines to include more developed-market participants and some emerging market countries. When the crisis proved bigger than the authorities expected, indiscriminate liquidation by financial market participants eventually prompted more action.  If we consider the situation today, we can all agree that the nature of the crisis is quite different from 2008, but the severity is as important, if not greater. However, similar to 2008, the Fed only has swap lines with 14 central banks. Moreover, the six-month original window is expiring. Granted, cross-currency basis swaps do not suggest any imminent danger (Chart I-5). Nevertheless, emerging market countries like South Africa, Turkey, India, Indonesia, and Russia do not have direct access to dollar liquidity from the Fed and are at risk to torpedo the dollar decline. Chart I-5No Funding Stresses For Now In short, many emerging market central banks do not have swap agreements with the US. These are countries with huge dollar liabilities that could continue to see their currencies fall, pushing up the aggregate dollar index. Developed market commodity currencies tend to be highly correlated with emerging market currencies, so this dynamic is very important for the US dollar call (Chart I-6). Meanwhile, there is a huge pool within the financial architecture unable to access funding through central bank swap lines. To be exact, around 60% of outstanding foreign exchange swaps/forwards are among non-bank financial and other institutions. Hedge funds are included in this group, and they entail a lot more credit risk than any central bank would be willing to bear. Then there is the Fed’s FIMA facility. This is a temporary repo facility for foreign and international monetary authorities (FIMA) that allows account holders to temporarily exchange their Treasury securities held with the Fed for US dollars. However, the pool of Treasury securities available to swap for US dollars has shrunk significantly. This has been on the back of slowing global trade and conscious diversification of reserves by offshore concerns (Chart I-7). Chart I-6EM And DM Currencies Chart I-7A Smaller Pool Of Treasurys To Sell The bottom line is that there is a window between a crisis and action by the Fed that could exacerbate the knee-jerk rally in the US dollar, as we have been highlighting in recent weeks. For now, there remains ample room for foreign central banks to draw on dollar liquidity (Chart I-8). As such, the dollar bounce will be an opportunity to establish fresh short positions rather than signal a renewed bull market. Chart I-8Ample Swap Liquidity Currency Positions US Dollar: A temporary dip in inflation expectations in the US will boost real rates and encourage flows back into US fixed-income assets. The drop in oil prices, which has been moving neck in neck with US inflation expectations, corroborates this view (Chart I-9). The DXY could easily touch 96 before consolidating gains. Chart I-9US Inflation Expectations Could Drop Euro: It remains unclear the disbursement of the funds from the pandemic emergency purchase program (PEPP). In the meantime, the European Central Bank stood pat today, confirming the narrative that Europe might be out of monetary bullets and fiscal policy is needed to revive animal spirits. This could cause air pocket for EUR/USD, which could touch 1.15 before rebounding. Yen: The yen is a perfect “heads I win, tails I don’t lose much bet.” Japan is one of the few countries offering positive real rates (Chart I-10). Switzerland also falls in that category. In a world that can temporarily dip into deflation, one might prefer to be in US dollars, but the yen and Swiss franc will also hold up nicely. Chart I-10Only In Japan And Switzerland Loonie: Our colleagues at the Daily Insights summarized the Bank Of Canada’s actions this week as technical and not fundamental (Chart I-11). With no real change in monetary policy, Canadian asset prices will remain dominated by global trends. The CAD has cyclical upside versus the USD, as we wrote about, but the current period of market tumult should push the loonie lower in the coming month or two. Chart I-11Canada Versus US Scandinavian currencies: The NOK and SEK have borne the brunt of the dollar decline so far and will bounce the most once reflation is back in play. We have a limit buy order on Nordic currencies should they decline further (Chart I-12). Chart I-12Dollar Seasonality Relative Value: Focus on relative value at the crosses rather than outright dollar bets. We are short the NZD/CAD, CAD/NOK and EUR/GBP as plays on relative fundamentals. EUR/GBP remains at risk of a significant selloff if we get a Brexit deal. Oil currencies: Remain long petrocurrencies versus the euro, but we are looking to use the tactical bounce in the dollar to shift to USD shorts. Silver: Short-term investors should stand aside on silver for now. The bullish thesis remains intact but volatility will rise in the short term.   Chester Ntonifor Foreign Exchange Strategist chestern@bcaresearch.com Currencies U.S. Dollar Chart II-1USD Technicals 1 Chart II-2USD Technicals 2 Recent data from the US have been positive: GDP recovered by 33.1% quarter-on-quarter on an annualized basis in Q3. The Markit Manufacturing PMI marginally increased from 53.2 to 53.3 in October. The services PMI also increased, from 54.6 to 56. The Chicago Fed National Activity Index declined from 1.11 to 0.27 in September. Initial jobless claims increased by 751K for the week ending on October 23rd. The DXY index increased by 1% this week alongside the equity market correction, impacted by the looming US elections and increasing number of COVID-19 cases. Our Geopolitical strategists have upgraded Trump’s odds of winning from 35% to 45%, though major opinion polls still favor a Biden victory. Our bias is that a Biden win will likely increase fiscal stimulus and decrease economic and trade policy uncertainties, which is bearish for the US dollar. Report Links: A Few Market Observations - October 23, 2020 Does The US Save Too Much Or Too Little? - October 16, 2020 Tail Risks In FX Markets - October 2, 2020 The Euro Chart II-3EUR Technicals 1 Chart II-4EUR Technicals 2 Recent data from the euro area have been mixed: The Markit Manufacturing PMI increased from 53.7 to 54.4 in October. However, the Services PMI declined from 48 to 46.2.  M3 money supply surged by 10.4% year-on-year in September. The Economic Sentiment Indicator was unchanged at 90.9 in October. The euro plunged by 1.4% against the US dollar this week. On Thursday, the ECB held its key interest rate unchanged at -0.5% despite re-imposed lockdown measures against surging COVID cases in Europe. However, it also hinted that there could be additional policy action and more stimulus in December should conditions worsen. Report Links: Addressing Client Questions - September 4, 2020 On The DXY Breakout, Euro, And Swiss Franc - February 21, 2020 Updating Our Balance Of Payments Monitor - November 29, 2019 Japanese Yen Chart II-5JPY Technicals 1 Chart II-6JPY Technicals 2 Recent data from Japan have been positive: The Jibun Manufacturing PMI increased from 47.7 to 48 in October. The Coincident Index rose from 78.3 to 79.2 in August. The Leading Economic Index also ticked up from 86.7 to 88.4. Retail trade fell by 8.7% year-on-year in September.  The Japanese yen depreciated by 0.3% against the US dollar this week amid market volatilities. With relatively higher real interest rates, a current account surplus and cheaper valuation, the Japanese yen is our favorite safe-haven currency. We continue to recommend holding the Japanese yen as a portfolio hedge for surfing election and COVID waves. On a separate note, the BoJ kept its interest rate on hold this Thursday. The Bank also weakened its economic forecast for this year but upgraded the economic recovery outlook. Report Links: The Near-Term Bull Case For The Dollar - February 28, 2020 Building A Protector Currency Portfolio - February 7, 2020 Currency Market Signals From Gold, Equities And Flows - January 31, 2020 British Pound Chart II-7GBP Technicals 1 Chart II-8GBP Technicals 2 Recent data from the UK have been mixed: Retail sales increased by 4.7% year-on-year in September. The Markit Manufacturing PMI declined from 54.1 to 53.3 in October. The services PMI fell from 56.1 to 52.3 in October. The British pound plunged by 1.5% against the US dollar this week amid broad USD strength. The latest PMI releases saw a steeper decline in the services industry. As UK’s services account for more than half of total economic output, it suggests that the pound is more exposed to second infection risks than other manufacturing-oriented economies. Report Links: Revisiting Our High-Conviction Trades - September 11, 2020 Updating Our Balance Of Payments Monitor - November 29, 2019 A Few Trade Ideas - Sept. 27, 2019 Australian Dollar Chart II-9AUD Technicals 1 Chart II-10AUD Technicals 2 Recent data from Australia have been positive: Imports fell by 1% month-on-month in September. Exports, however, increased by 3% month-on-month. The trade surplus widened from A$2.6 billion to A$5.1 billion. Headline CPI increased by 0.7% year-on-year in Q3, up from -0.3% the previous quarter. The Australian dollar fell by 1.5% against the US dollar this week. The pickup in inflation eased the RBA’s pressure to further ease monetary policy further. The expansion in the trade account surplus also bodes well for the Australian dollar in a reflationary environment. Report Links: An Update On The Australian Dollar - September 18, 2020 On AUD And CNY - January 17, 2020 Updating Our Balance Of Payments Monitor - November 29, 2019 New Zealand Dollar Chart II-11NZD Technicals 1 Chart II-12NZD Technicals 2 Recent data from New Zealand have been negative:  Exports fell from NZ$4.4 billion to NZ$4 billion in September while imports expanded from NZ$4.7 billion to NZ$5 billion. The trade deficit therefore widened from NZ$282 million to NZ$1,013 million. The ANZ Business Confidence Index rose to -15.7 from -28.5 in October. The New Zealand dollar fell by 1.2% against the US dollar this week. The ANZ Activity Outlook Report said that “there was a mix of ups and downs” in recent developments and warned against higher economic and unemployment risks once the cushioning impact of the wage subsidy fades. Report Links: Currencies And The Value-Versus-Growth Debate - July 10, 2020 Updating Our Balance Of Payments Monitor - November 29, 2019 Place A Limit Sell On DXY At 100 - November 15, 2019 Canadian Dollar Chart II-13CAD Technicals 1 Chart II-14CAD Technicals 2 Recent data from Canada have been positive: Building permits increased by 17% month-on-month in September. The Canadian dollar plunged by 1.7% against the US dollar this week. Crude oil prices dropped by 12% this week amid worries about the second infection wave and prolonged travel restrictions, which represent a headwind for the Canadian dollar. On Wednesday, the Bank of Canada announced that it would keep interest rates on hold at 0.25% and maintain such low policy rates until the inflation objective is achieved. Moreover, the Bank is recalibrating the QE program to shift purchases towards longer-term bonds, which have a more direct influence on the borrowing rates for household and businesses. Report Links: Currencies And The Value-Versus-Growth Debate - July 10, 2020 More On Competitive Devaluations, The CAD And The SEK - May 1, 2020 A New Paradigm For Petrocurrencies - April 10, 2020 Swiss Franc Chart II-15CHF Technicals 1 Chart II-16CHF Technicals 2 Recent data from Switzerland have been negative: The ZEW Expectations Index plunged from 26.2 to 2.3 in October. Total sight deposits increased from CHF 705.1 billion to CHF 706.9 billion for the week ending on October 23rd. While the Swiss franc depreciated by 1% against the US dollar this week, it increased by 0.5% against the euro, which brings it close to our limit buy price of 1.06. An expensive currency is likely to impede growth for a small open economy like Switzerland, suggesting the SNB will step up its currency intervention. Prepare to go long EUR/CHF.  Report Links: On The DXY Breakout, Euro, And Swiss Franc - February 21, 2020 Currency Market Signals From Gold, Equities And Flows - January 31, 2020 Portfolio Tweaks Before The Chinese New Year - January 24, 2020 Norwegian Krone Chart II-17NOK Technicals 1 Chart II-18NOK Technicals 2 Recent data from Norway have been positive: Retail sales increased by 0.3% month-on-month in September. The Norwegian krone plunged by 3.4% against the US dollar this week, making it the worst performing G10 currency. Despite recent market volatilities, we continue to favor the Norwegian krone in the long run based on its cheap valuation and a brighter energy outlook in the post-vaccine world. We are looking to rebuy the Nordic currencies on weakness. Report Links: Revisiting Our High-Conviction Trades - September 11, 2020 A New Paradigm For Petrocurrencies - April 10, 2020 Building A Protector Currency Portfolio - February 7, 2020 Swedish Krona Chart II-19SEK Technicals 1 Chart II-20SEK Technicals 2 Recent data from Sweden have been positive: The trade balance shifted from a deficit of SEK 2.1 billion to a surplus of SEK 2.6 billion in September. Consumer confidence increased from 88.4 to 90 in October. Retail sales increased by 3.9% year-on-year in September. PPI fell by 4.2% year-on-year in September. The Swedish krona decreased by 1.9% against the US dollar this week. While COVID cases have been resurging in Sweden, Sweden’s services is lower, as a % of GDP, than other major euro area countries and therefore less exposed to the risk of a second wave. We continue to recommend the Swedish krona from a cyclical perspective. Kelly Zhong Research Analyst Report Links: Revisiting Our High-Conviction Trades - September 11, 2020 Updating Our Balance Of Payments Monitor - November 29, 2019 Where To Next For The US Dollar? - June 7, 2019 Trades & Forecasts Forecast Summary Core Portfolio Tactical Trades Limit Orders Closed Trades