Developed Countries

Highlights Brexit no-deal vs. deal = 1.28 vs. 1.37 on GBP/USD. Any break-out into the high 1.30s is a tactical sell – because the bigger driver of GBP/USD is the global stock market, which is due a breather. The medium-term direction of EUR/USD is gently higher… …yet the best expression of this is not through EUR/USD per se, but through a 50:50 combination of the defensive CHF/USD and the cyclical SEK/USD. Underweight technology versus healthcare. Fractal trade: Long RUB/ZAR. Feature Chart of the WeekWhat's Driving Pound/Dollar? Hint: It's Not Brexit Brexit is the story that refuses to go away. In the four and a half years since Britons voted to leave the EU, Americans have managed to elect and then reject a president. But as we write, four and a half years of negotiation have still not managed to deliver a UK/EU trade deal. Perhaps, in true European style, a deal will materialise at the eleventh hour, fifty-ninth minute, and fifty-ninth second. The Big Brexit Decisions Have Already Been Made Yet the recent haggling over a free trade deal is a sideshow, a choice between the most minimalist of deals, or no deal. The much bigger decisions on the UK/EU economic and political relationship have already been made. The recent haggling over a UK/EU free trade deal is a sideshow. The UK will end the free movement of people, leave the customs union and single market, and will have the scope to set its own rules, regulations, and standards. In response to these much bigger decisions, foreign direct investment (FDI) into the UK has fully adjusted, which is to say, slumped. Hence, the pound has largely absorbed Brexit and reverted to its traditional dependence on the direction of global equities (Chart of the Week and Chart I-2). This traditional dependence exists because the value of the UK stock market and other risk-assets is outsized relative to the UK economy. Additionally, the UK stock market is over-weighted to economically sensitive sectors. This makes the pound ultra-sensitive to equity and other risk-asset portfolio inflows and outflows (Chart I-3).   Chart I-2Brexit Has Become Less Important For The Pound Chart I-3FDI Has Adjusted For Brexit, So Portfolio Flows Once More Drive The Pound Having said that, Brexit developments can still cause deviations from the pound’s established relationship with global equities. For example, the escalation and resolution of tensions over the Withdrawal Agreement last year resulted in a 4 cent (3.5 percent) discount and then a 4 cent premium in pound/dollar within a 1.22-1.30 range. Applying the same framework to the current Brexit tensions, the equivalent range would be 1.28-1.37. But to repeat, the bigger driver of pound/dollar is the direction of global equities, and as we explain later, equities may be due a breather. If, for example, stocks corrected by 10 percent, cable could easily retest 1.25. Hence, any break-out of cable into the high 1.30s is a tactical selling opportunity. The ECB Is Exhausted This week, the ECB will once again dip into its alphabet soup of policy weapons: PEPP, TLTRO, APP, NIRP. Not forgetting the potent, and yet unused, OMT. The unfortunate thing is that these instruments have done all they can. They are exhausted. Weapons that provide liquidity to solvent but illiquid banks are exhausted. The ECB’s weapons can tighten the gap between the EONIA (interbank) lending rate and the ECB deposit facility rate. If the EONIA rate is elevated, it means that the interbank lending market is dysfunctional. But right now, EONIA is deeply negative and little different to the ECB deposit facility. Meaning that there is no liquidity shortage in the banking system, and there is little more that the ECB weapons can do on this front (Chart I-4). Weapons that provide liquidity to solvent but illiquid sovereign borrowers are exhausted. The ECB’s weapons can tighten the gap between a periphery bond yield, say Italy, and a core bond yield, say France. If periphery yields are elevated, it means that periphery sovereigns might be struggling for market funding. But right now, 2-year yields in Italy are deeply negative and little different to those in France. Meaning that there is no liquidity shortage among euro area sovereign borrowers, and there is little more that the ECB weapons can do on this front (Chart I-5). Weapons that depress interest rates along the entire term-structure are exhausted. The ECB’s weapons can depress the level of short-term and long-term euro area interest rates. But right now, both the deposit facility rate and the euro area 7-10 year bond yield are deeply negative. Meaning that euro area interest rates are within touching distance of the lower bound along the entire term-structure, and there is little more that the ECB weapons can do on this front (Chart I-6). Chart I-4Ample Liquidity For Euro Area Banks Chart I-5Ample Liquidity For Euro Area Sovereigns Chart I-6Euro Area Interest Rates Cannot Go Much Lower Some people counter that the ECB is not out of ammunition. It could just buy government debt in the primary market – meaning, print money for government spending. In theory, yes, but this would constitute fiscal easing, and it would require a major rewriting of the central bank mandate including a likely loss of independence. To repeat, in terms of pure monetary easing, the ECB is exhausted, and this carries important implications for the euro, and the euro’s inverse – the dollar. The broad level of the dollar index (DXY) depends on the US versus euro area long-duration bond yield spread. The broad level of the dollar index (DXY) depends on the US versus euro area long-duration bond yield spread (Chart I-7). Given that the ECB’s monetary easing is exhausted, the spread cannot widen from the euro area side, it can only narrow. Chart I-7In The Long Term, The Dollar Index (DXY) Tracks The US Vs. Euro Area Bond Yield Spread From the US side, the spread could move symmetrically, at least in theory. But as we explain in the next section, the ability of risk-assets to tolerate higher bond yields is very limited. This imposes a de facto asymmetry on US yield direction to the downside – a fact reinforced by the Federal Reserve’s recent strategic review which explicitly made its reaction function asymmetric. The central bank will be thick-skinned to reflationary shocks, but trigger-happy to the slightest further deflationary shock. And the biggest risk of a deflationary shock comes from the elevated valuations in financial markets. The upshot is that the medium-term direction of the euro versus the dollar is gently higher. But the caveat is that this will be punctuated by sharp countertrend euro sell-offs during periods of market stress, as occurred in March. During such dislocations, equity portfolio flows flee to haven assets and markets, which boosts the dollar, yen, and Swiss franc. The compelling proof is that in 2020 the broad dollar index has traded as the perfect mirror-image of the stock market (Chart I-8). Chart I-8In The Short Term, The Dollar Is A Mirror-Image Of The Stock Market Hence, the best expression of medium-term euro appreciation version the dollar is not through the euro per se, but through a 50:50 combination of the defensive Swiss franc and the cyclical Swedish krona. Tech Stocks Are Exhausted Three weeks ago, in Sell Stocks If the Bond Yield Rises By 0.3 Percent, we pointed out that the (earnings) yield premium on tech stocks versus the 10-year T-bond yield was just 0.3 percent above a 2.5 percent lower threshold that had signalled four previous ‘tipping points.’ In the intervening three weeks, a 5 percent rally in tech stocks combined with a 0.1 percent rise in the bond yield has taken tech stocks to this tipping point (Chart I-9). Chart I-9Tech Stock Valuations Are At A Tipping Point Previous flirtations with this tipping point in February 2018, October 2018, April 2019, and January 2019 resulted in an exhaustion or, worse, a correction, in tech stocks – and by extension in the overall market. In this regard, note that the stock market had already peaked in mid-January this year well before the pandemic devastated it in mid-February. Independently signalling an exhaustion of the tech rally, at least in relative terms, the 130-day fractal structure of technology versus healthcare is also at its tipping point of fragility. Again, previous flirtations with this tipping point have resulted in an exhaustion, or reversal, in relative performance. This is because a fragile fractal structure implies excessive trending and a potential liquidity shortage, requiring a price reversal to match sell and buy orders (Chart I-10). Chart I-10Tech Versus Healthcare Performance Is At A Tipping Point Investment does not present certainties. It only presents probabilities which you must play to your advantage. The combination of two independent indicators that suggest that the tech rally is fragile implies a higher than even chance of an exhaustion or correction in the sector in the coming months. Which would then spread to the aggregate market. One thing that might mitigate this is if bond yields backed down again. Therefore, for the time being, we are not making an absolute recommendation, just a relative recommendation between two growth sectors. Underweight technology versus healthcare. On a 6-month horizon, underweight technology versus healthcare. Fractal Trading System* This week’s recommended trade is long RUB/ZAR, whose long downtrend is now at a 130-day fractal reversal point. The profit-target and symmetrical stop-loss is set at 5 percent. The rolling 12-month win ratio now stands at 59 percent. When the fractal dimension approaches the lower limit after an investment has been in an established trend it is a potential trigger for a liquidity-triggered trend reversal. Therefore, open a countertrend position. The profit target is a one-third reversal of the preceding 13-week move. Apply a symmetrical stop-loss. Close the position at the profit target or stop-loss. Otherwise close the position after 13 weeks. * For more details please see the European Investment Strategy Special Report “Fractals, Liquidity & A Trading Model,” dated December 11, 2014, available at eis.bcaresearch.com.   Dhaval Joshi Chief European Investment Strategist dhaval@bcaresearch.com Fractal Trading System*   Cyclical Recommendations Structural Recommendations Closed Fractal Trades Trades Closed Trades Asset Performance Currency & Bond Equity Sector Country Equity Indicators Bond Yields Chart II-1Indicators To Watch - Bond Yields Chart II-2Indicators To Watch - Bond Yields   Chart II-3Indicators To Watch - Bond Yields Chart II-4Indicators To Watch - Bond Yields Interest Rate Chart II-5Indicators To Watch - Interest Rate Expectations Chart II-6Indicators To Watch - Interest Rate Expectations   Chart II-7Indicators To Watch - Interest Rate Expectations Chart II-7Indicators To Watch - Interest Rate Expectations    

In the latest Strategy Report we published our high-conviction calls for the year 2021 comprising four overweights and three underweights. We want to hedge our high-conviction calls with a long VIX futures position for the June 16, 2021 expiry. We are spending $25.3 to go long and are comfortable paying up for insurance when the SPX is at all-time highs and there is a risk of some growth disappointment in the next six months. The chart below draws a parallel with the March 2009 SPX lows and plots the VIX in 2009 and 2010. While the path of least resistance is lower for volatility, sporadic surges are typical in the year following recessions. The S&P 500 also troughed in March 2020 and if history is an accurate guide, the path to SPX 4,000 will be rocky next year. As a reminder, the S&P 500 suffered a 16% correction in May 2010 and the VIX spiked higher Bottom Line: We went long the VIX June 2021 futures as a small hedge to overweight equity positions.

2020 will soon be history and on the eve of the New Year, it is instructive to update our presidential cycle and SPX returns research. Encouragingly, still elevated policy uncertainty will likely continue to recede next year and act as a tonic to equity returns. The chart shows the S&P 500’s performance in the first year of a presidential cycle. The market rallies 8% and 6% on a median and average basis, respectively. With regard to the range of outcomes, since 1952 the healthiest rally can net more than 30% in gains, while bear markets have also pushed SPX returns down 30%. Our sense is that 2021 will turn out to resemble 2013 or 2017 rather than 2001 or 2009. Currently, our end-2021 SPX 4,000 target (first introduced in our November 9 Special Report) represents a 17% gain from the Election Day and falls within the historical return norm. Bottom Line: Our cyclically sanguine broad equity market view remains intact.

Highlights Chart 1Bond Yields & The CRB/Gold Ratio In our last report of November, we noted that the rising COVID case count was likely to lead to a challenging few months for the US economy, but we also questioned whether financial markets would pay attention or whether they would stay focused on the vaccine roll-out and eventual economic recovery. We now have our answer. November’s employment report was the worst since April, but the Treasury curve has bear-steepened, credit spreads have come in and TIPS have outperformed nominals. What’s more, the jump in the CRB Raw Industrials / Gold ratio suggests that the 10-year Treasury yield has even more near-term upside (Chart 1). With a vaccine on the horizon and Congress closing in on a fiscal relief package, investors should stay positioned for the reflation trade on a 6-12 month horizon: below-benchmark portfolio duration, nominal and real yield curve steepeners, inflation curve flatteners, overweight TIPS versus nominals and overweight corporate bonds rated Ba and higher. Feature Investment Grade: Overweight Investment grade corporate bonds outperformed the duration-equivalent Treasury index by 233 basis points in November, bringing year-to-date excess returns up to -74 bps. The strong rally in corporate bonds since March has culminated in extremely tight valuations for investment grade corporates. The 12-month breakeven spread for the Bloomberg Barclays Corporate Index (adjusted to keep the average credit rating constant) has only been tighter 4% of the time since 1995 (Chart 2). The same figure for the Baa-rated credit tier is 5%. We retain a positive outlook on corporate credit despite these stretched valuations. In our view, an environment where the economy is recovering and where the Fed will be very cautious about scaling back accommodation is the exact sort of environment where we should expect a lot of enthusiasm for spread product and, as a result, extremely tight spreads. We will not be surprised if our 12-month breakeven spread percentile rank valuation measure reaches its all-time expensive level within the next couple of months. While the macro environment makes it difficult to turn negative on investment grade corporates, we acknowledge that other sectors may offer better opportunities, particularly in the higher credit tiers. Specifically, we find better value in tax-exempt municipal bonds than in corporates and recommend that investors favor the former over the latter. At the sector level, we continue to recommend overweight allocations to subordinate Bank bonds, Healthcare and Energy bonds. We also advise underweight allocations to Technology and Pharmaceutical bonds. Chart 2Investment Grade Market Overview Table 3ACorporate Sector Relative Valuation And Recommended Allocation* Table 3BCorporate Sector Risk Vs. Reward* High-Yield: Neutral High-Yield outperformed the duration-equivalent Treasury index by 382 basis points in November, bringing year-to-date excess returns up to -5 bps. After last month’s strong outperformance, Ba-rated junk bonds are now beating duration-equivalent Treasuries by 267 bps, year-to-date. The B and Caa credit tiers are lagging by 179 bps and 548 bps, respectively. We still view Ba-rated junk bonds as the sweet spot within the corporate credit space. The sector is relatively insulated from default risk and yet still offers a sizeable spread pick-up over investment grade corporates (Chart 3). We remain underweight B-rated and lower junk bonds for now as those securities are pricing-in a relatively optimistic outlook for the default rate. But, an imminent vaccine roll-out makes that outlook appear more realistic and we could soon upgrade the lower-rated junk credit tiers when we think the value is exhausted in the Ba-rated and higher securities. Looking at value for the junk index as a whole, we see that the index is pricing-in a default rate of 3% for the next 12 months, significantly below the 8.3% that was observed during the most recent 12-month period (panel 3). However, only four corporate issuers defaulted in October down from a monthly peak of 22 in July. Job cut announcements, an excellent indicator of the default rate, are also falling rapidly (bottom panel). At the sector level, we advise overweight allocations to high-yield Technology and Energy bonds. We are underweight the Healthcare and Pharmaceutical sectors. Chart 3High-Yield Market Overview MBS: Underweight Mortgage-Backed Securities underperformed the duration-equivalent Treasury index by one basis point in November, dragging year-to-date excess returns down to -39 bps. The conventional 30-year MBS index option-adjusted spread (OAS) tightened 1 bp on the month, and it currently sits at 64 bps (Chart 4). This is significantly higher than the 59 bps offered by Aa-rated corporate bonds, the 53 bps offered by Agency CMBS and the 25 bps offered by Aaa-rated consumer ABS. Despite the relatively attractive OAS, we continue to view the elevated primary mortgage spread as a risk for MBS investors. It suggests that mortgage rates need not rise alongside Treasury yields in the near-term, meaning that mortgage refinancings can continue at their current rapid pace (panel 3). All else equal, this elevated refinancing activity will pressure MBS spreads wider. The recent spike in the mortgage delinquency rate does not pose a near-term risk to spreads as it is being driven by households that have been granted forbearance from the federal government (panel 4). The risk for MBS holders only comes into play if many households are unable to resume their regular mortgage payments when the forbearance period expires early next year. But even in that case, further government intervention to either support household incomes or extend the forbearance period would mitigate the risk. Chart 4MBS Market Overview Government-Related: Underweight The Government-Related index outperformed the duration-equivalent Treasury index by 64 basis points in November, bringing year-to-date excess returns up to -222 bps. Sovereign debt outperformed duration-equivalent Treasuries by 157 bps on the month, bringing year-to-date excess returns up to -269 bps. Foreign Agencies outperformed the Treasury benchmark by 46 bps in November, bringing year-to-date excess returns up to -647 bps. Local Authority debt outperformed Treasuries by 139 bps in November, bringing year-to-date excess returns up to -228 bps. Domestic Agency bonds outperformed by 10 bps, bringing year-to-date excess returns up to -23 bps. Supranationals outperformed by 9 bps, bringing year-to-date excess returns up to +2 bps. US dollar weakness is usually a boon for Emerging Market (EM) Sovereign and Foreign Agency returns. However, this year’s dollar weakness has occurred mostly relative to other Developed Market currencies (Chart 5). Value has improved somewhat for EM Sovereigns during the past few weeks, but the index continues to offer less spread than the Baa-rated US Credit index (panel 4). At the country level, Turkey, Colombia, Mexico, Russia and South Africa are the only countries that offer a spread pick-up relative to duration and quality-matched US corporates. Of those, only Mexico looks attractive on a risk/reward basis. Chart 5Government-Related Market Overview Municipal Bonds: Overweight Municipal bonds outperformed the duration-equivalent Treasury index by 130 basis points in November, bringing year-to-date excess returns up to -340 bps (before adjusting for the tax advantage). Municipal bond spreads tightened sharply relative to both Treasuries and Corporates in November, but they remain exceptionally attractive relative to history (Chart 6). In fact, as we showed in a recent report, the Bloomberg Barclays Revenue Bond index offers a greater yield than the quality-matched Credit index across the entire maturity spectrum (before adjusting for the tax advantage).1 This is also true for the Bloomberg Barclays General Obligation (GO) index beyond the 12-year maturity point. Eight-to-twelve-year maturity GO bonds trade only 1 basis point through the Credit index, implying a breakeven effective tax rate of 4%. Six-to-eight-year maturities trade 11 bps through the Credit index, implying a breakeven effective tax rate of 16%. Extraordinary valuation is the main reason for our recommendation to overweight municipal bonds. The severe ongoing state & local government credit crunch is a concern, but it is a risk we are willing to take. It now looks possible that a relief package containing some federal funds for state & local governments will be passed before the end of the year. This would alleviate a lot of the concern. But even in the absence of federal assistance, the combination of austerity measures (bottom panel) and all-time high State Rainy Day Fund balances should help stave off a wave of municipal downgrades. Chart 6Municipal Market Overview Treasury Curve: Buy 5-Year Bullet Versus 2/10 Barbell The Treasury curve bull-flattened in November, but then bear-steepened sharply during the first week of December. All told, the 2/10 Treasury slope is currently 81 bps, 7 bps steeper than at the end of October. The 5/30 Treasury slope is 131 bps, 4 bps steeper than at the end of October. Our expectation is that continued economic recovery will cause investors to price-in eventual monetary tightening at the long-end of the Treasury curve. With the Fed maintaining a firm grip on the front end, this will lead to Treasury curve bear steepening. A timely vaccine roll-out and/or further fiscal stimulus will speed this process up. We recommend positioning for a steeper curve by owning the 5-year Treasury note and shorting a duration-matched barbell consisting of the 2-year note and 10-year notes. This position is designed to profit from 2/10 curve steepening.     Valuation is a concern with our recommended steepener, as the 5-year yield is below the yield on the duration-matched 2/10 barbell (Chart 7). However, the 5-year looked much more expensive during the last zero-lower-bound period between 2010 and 2013 (bottom 2 panels). We anticipate a return to similar levels. Chart 7Treasury Yield Curve Overview TIPS: Overweight TIPS outperformed the duration-equivalent nominal Treasury index by 70 basis points in November, bringing year-to-date excess returns up to -23 bps. The 10-year and 5-year/5-year forward TIPS breakeven inflation rates rose 8 bps and 5 bps on the month. They currently sit at 1.91% and 1.96%, respectively. Core CPI was flat in October and the year-over-year rate dropped from 1.73% to 1.63%. The 12-month trimmed mean CPI fell even more – from 2.37% to 2.22% – so the gap between core and trimmed mean inflation continued to narrow (Chart 8). We expect further narrowing in the months ahead, and therefore expect core CPI to come in relatively hot. For this reason, we recommend maintaining an overweight allocation to TIPS versus nominal Treasuries for the time being, even though the 10-year TIPS breakeven rate is now somewhat expensive according to our Adaptive Expectations Model (panel 2).2 Inflation pressures may moderate once core and trimmed mean inflation measures converge, and this could give us an opportunity to tactically reduce TIPS exposure sometime next year. We also recommend holding real yield curve steepeners and inflation curve flatteners. With the Fed now officially targeting an overshoot of its 2% inflation goal, we would expect the cost of 2-year inflation protection to rise above the cost of 10-year inflation protection (panel 4). With the Fed also exerting more control over short-dated nominal yields than over long-term ones, we expect that short-maturity real yields will come under downward pressure relative to the long end (bottom panel). Chart 8TIPS Market Overview ABS: Overweight Asset-Backed Securities outperformed the duration-equivalent Treasury index by 11 basis points in November, bringing year-to-date excess returns up to +82 bps. Aaa-rated ABS outperformed the Treasury benchmark by 10 bps on the month, bringing year-to-date excess returns up to +68 bps. Non-Aaa ABS outperformed by 17 bps, bringing year-to-date excess returns up to +174 bps (Chart 9). On paper, the Treasury department’s decision to let the Term Asset-Backed Loan Facility (TALF) expire at the end of the year is quite negative for ABS. However, as we explained in a recent report, we don’t expect a material impact on spreads.3 For one thing, Aaa ABS spreads are already well below the borrowing cost offered by TALF. But more importantly, consumer credit quality remains quite robust. As we first explained back in June, the stimulus received from the CARES act led to a significant increase in disposable income and a jump in the savings rate (panel 4).4  Faced with an income boost and few spending opportunities, many households took the opportunity to pay down consumer debt. Granted, further income support from Congress is needed now that the CARES act’s enhanced unemployment benefits have expired. But given the substantial boost to savings that has already occurred, we are confident that more stimulus will arrive in time to prevent a wave of consumer bankruptcies. Chart 9ABS Market Overview Non-Agency CMBS: Neutral Chart 10CMBS Market Overview Non-Agency Commercial Mortgage-Backed Securities outperformed the duration-equivalent Treasury index by 85 basis points in November, bringing year-to-date excess returns up to -168 bps. Aaa Non-Agency CMBS outperformed Treasuries by 71 bps on the month, bringing year-to-date excess returns up to -2 bps. Non-Aaa Non-Agency CMBS outperformed by 127 bps, bringing year-to-date excess returns up to -620 bps (Chart 10). We continue to recommend an overweight allocation to Aaa-rated Non-Agency CMBS and an underweight allocation to non-Aaa CMBS. Even with the imminent expiry of TALF, Aaa CMBS spreads are already well below the cost of borrowing through TALF and thus will not be negatively impacted.5  Meanwhile, the structurally challenging environment for commercial real estate could lead to problems for lower-rated CMBS (panels 3 & 4). Agency CMBS: Overweight Agency CMBS outperformed the duration-equivalent Treasury index by 38 basis points in November, bringing year-to-date excess returns up to +55 bps. The average index spread tightened 6 bps on the month. It currently sits at 53 bps, above typical historical levels (bottom panel). At its September meeting, the Fed decided to slow its pace of Agency CMBS purchases. It is no longer looking to increase its Agency CMBS holdings, but rather, it is only purchasing what is “needed to sustain smooth market functioning”. This is nonetheless a Fed back-stop of the market, and it does not change our overweight recommendation.    Appendix A: Buy What The Fed Is Buying The Fed rolled out a number of aggressive lending facilities on March 23. These facilities focused on different specific sectors of the US bond market. The fact that the Fed has decided to support some parts of the market and not others has caused some traditional bond market correlations to break down. It has also led us to adopt of a strategy of “Buy What The Fed Is Buying”. That is, we favor those sectors that offer attractive spreads and that benefit from Fed support. The below Table tracks the performance of different bond sectors since the March 23 announcement. We will use this to monitor bond market correlations and evaluate our strategy’s success. Table Performance Since March 23 Announcement Of Emergency Fed Facilities Appendix B: Butterfly Strategy Valuations  The following tables present the current read-outs from our butterfly spread models. We use these models to identify opportunities to take duration-neutral positions across the Treasury curve. The following two Special Reports explain the models in more detail: US Bond Strategy Special Report, “Bullets, Barbells And Butterflies”, dated July 25, 2017, available at usbs.bcaresearch.com US Bond Strategy Special Report, “More Bullets, Barbells And Butterflies”, dated May 15, 2018, available at usbs.bcaresearch.com Table 4 shows the raw residuals from each model. A positive value indicates that the bullet is cheap relative to the duration-matched barbell. A negative value indicates that the barbell is cheap relative to the bullet. Table 4Butterfly Strategy Valuation: Raw Residuals In Basis Points (As Of December 4TH, 2020) Table 5 scales the raw residuals in Table 4 by their historical means and standard deviations. This facilitates comparison between the different butterfly spreads. Table 5Butterfly Strategy Valuation: Standardized Residuals (As Of December 4TH, 2020) Table 6 flips the models on their heads. It shows the change in the slope between the two barbell maturities that must be realized during the next six months to make returns between the bullet and barbell equal. For example, a reading of 70 bps in the 5 over 2/10 cell means that we would only expect the 5-year to outperform the 2/10 if the 2/10 slope steepens by more than 70 bps during the next six months. Otherwise, we would expect the 2/10 barbell to outperform the 5-year bullet. Table 6Discounted Slope Change During Next 6 Months (BPs) Appendix C: Excess Return Bond Map The Excess Return Bond Map is used to assess the relative risk/reward trade-off between different sectors of the US bond market. It is a purely computational exercise and does not impose any macroeconomic view. The Map’s vertical axis shows 12-month expected excess returns. These are proxied by each sector’s option-adjusted spread. Sectors plotting further toward the top of the Map have higher expected returns and vice-versa. Chart 11Excess Return Bond Map (As Of December 4TH, 2020) Our novel risk measure called the “Risk Of Losing 100 bps” is shown on the Map’s horizontal axis. To calculate it, we first compute the spread widening required on a 12-month horizon for each sector to lose 100 bps or more relative to a duration-matched position in Treasury securities. Then, we divide that amount of spread widening by each sector’s historical spread volatility. The end result is the number of standard deviations of 12-month spread widening required for each sector to lose 100 bps or more versus a position in Treasuries. Lower risk sectors plot further to the right of the Map, and higher risk sectors plot further to the left.   Ryan Swift US Bond Strategist rswift@bcaresearch.com Footnotes 1 Please see US Bond Strategy Weekly Report, “Political Risk Will Dominate In A Pivotal Month For The Bond Market”, dated October 13, 2020, available at usbs.bcaresearch.com 2 For more details on our model please see US Bond Strategy Weekly Report, “How Are Inflation Expectations Adapting?”, dated February 11, 2020, available at usbs.bcaresearch.com 3 Please see US Bond Strategy Weekly Report, “Preparing For A Dark Winter … But Do Markets Care?”, dated November 24, 2020, available at usbs.bcaresearch.com 4 Please see US Bond Strategy Weekly Report, “No Holding Back”, dated June 16, 2020, available at usbs.bcaresearch.com 5 Please see US Bond Strategy Weekly Report, “Preparing For A Dark Winter … But Do Markets Care?”, dated November 24, 2020, available at usbs.bcaresearch.com Fixed Income Sector Performance Recommended Portfolio Specification Corporate Sector Relative Valuation And Recommended Allocation