Developed Countries

Highlights The markets are already looking past Omicron. Now they have new worries – the Fed battling inflation. In the past, the Fed moved because of confidence that strong economic growth can withstand rates normalization. This time around, the Fed’s hand is forced by inflation, which is no longer deemed “transitory”.  So far, fear of an inflation-induced tightening cycle manifests in expectations of a steeper trajectory for rates, and violent and indiscriminate rotation out of the tech names. Companies have set aside record amounts of cash for wage increases. This is sure to cut into corporate profitability and validates our thesis that peak margins are in the rear-view window. Supply bottlenecks are easing, so is the ISM activity index, which we interpret as a normalization. When it comes to our style recommendations, we continue preferring small caps over large caps on the back of attractive valuations and favorable economic backdrop. Today, we also upgrade Value / Growth from neutral to OW - rising rates are a tailwind for Value. Recommended Allocation Feature December was a good month for equities (Chart 1). While the beginning of the month was marred by turbulence, induced by the arrival of Omicron, and the Fed shifting to a more hawkish stance, Santa Claus did deliver a rally to close the month, with the S&P 500 rising by 6% and lifting its 2021 gains to an impressive 27%. But 2021 was a wild year for active investors, as only 15% of funds and strategies outperformed the S&P 500. Hence, many investors had to watch the S&P 500 gains from the sidelines: The year was characterized by rotation across sectors and styles. December brought about a sell-off in the most speculative names in the equity market (EEM, IWM, ARKK, BTC, IPO), which has continued unabated into January: The Fed’s imminent monetary tightening is a culprit. Capital has also rotated away from Cyclicals and towards Defensives (the MSCI Cyclicals / Defensive ratio was down 7% in December). However, Cyclicals are starting to rebound from the Omicron slump. Overarching Macroeconomic Themes Omicron or “Omicold”? Either Way, The US Market Is Looking Past It… Little was known about the Omicron variant when it took us all by surprise at the end of November. Fortunately, an expectation that this variant is more contagious but less virulent has come to pass: While the number of cases has surged (nearly, every family I know in the tri-state area has had it by now), the number of hospitalizations has remained contained (Chart 2). The economic damage, at least in the US, has been minor, and mostly due to people being away from work sick or quarantined. It also appears that this COVID wave is close to a peak, which explains the recent outperformance of Cyclicals (Chart 3): The markets are already looking past Omicron. Now they have new worries – the Fed battling inflation. Chart 2Omicron Wave Is Close To A Peak... Chart 3...And Cyclicals Are Rebounding Inflation Is Forcing The Fed’s Hand Into An Aggressive Tightening Cycle Fed rate hikes are now all but certain: The market is pricing in four rate hikes in 2022 with a probability of nearly 90% (Chart 4), a noticeable increase from the three rate hikes expected in December 2021. The Fed’s December meeting minutes indicate that the first rate hike may come as soon as March. What is different this time is the inflation backdrop: In the past, the Fed moved because of confidence that strong economic growth can withstand rates normalization. This time around, the Fed’s hand is forced by inflation, which is no longer deemed “transitory”. The Fed is raising rates to squish growth to tame inflation, giving rate rises a different context: The Fed is behind the curve, and while in the past the stock market took rate hikes in its stride (after a short-lived slump in performance), now market reaction may be much more negative. So far, fear of an inflation-induced tightening cycle manifests in expectations of a steeper trajectory for rates (Chart 5), and violent and indiscriminate rotation out of the tech names. Chart 4Market Is Expecting Four Hikes In 2022 Chart 5Rates Made A Vertical Move More Wage Raises Are On The Way – A Headwind To Corporate Profitability According to the NIPA, wages constitute about 50% of sales of US companies. Over the past year, nominal wages increased by 5.8% but still could not keep up with rising prices – real wage growth is running at -2.3% (Chart 6). Considering that in 2021 only a minor share of workers got raises – those rejoining the workforce, starting a new job, or members of a few labor unions, the majority of Americans have had no change in income and have been bewildered by prices in the supermarkets. As the new calendar year rolls on, many of these workers will negotiate their salaries to get inflation adjustments (Chart 7). In fact, according to the WSJ, companies have set aside record amounts of cash for wage increases. This is sure to cut into corporate profitability and validates our thesis that peak margins are in the rearview window. Chart 6Wages Are Not Keeping Up With Inflation Chart 7Wage-Price Spiral? Another concern is a wage-price spiral, leading to rampant inflation, making the Fed’s job harder, and calling for more aggressive monetary tightening, striking a blow to the stock market. Supply Bottlenecks Are Easing, So Is The ISM Activity Index The ISM Manufacturing index has turned from 64.7 to 58.7 (Chart 8A). Part of the decline in the top-line numbers is due to the resolution of supply-chain bottlenecks: The ISM Supplier Index has fallen from 78.6 to 64.9 (Chart 8B), indicating a reduction in delivery times. On the other hand, the New Orders index has also declined from 68 to 60.4, suggesting that bottlenecks are clearing thanks to the reduction in business activity, which we interpret as a normalization. Of course, zero-tolerance to COVID policy in China and other countries may lead to new production and shipping delays, and another leg up for the inflation readings. Chart 8AISM PMI Has Turned... Chart 8BAnd Not Only Because Of Shorter Delivery Times Styles Comments Small Vs. Large Cap: Sticking To Our Overweight In Small Valuations: Small caps are cheap and unloved, trading at 16x forward earnings with a 25% discount to Large. The BCA Valuation Indicator for Small vs. Large is standing more than two standard deviations below its long-term average. Profitability: Since 2019, Small has delivered 47% annualized profit growth compared to 14% from Large. The small companies have demonstrated resilience and successfully navigated the economic landscape, plagued with supply bottlenecks, labor shortages, and surging prices (Chart 9A). Small-cap margins have exceeded the historical average and have likely peaked, just like the margins of their larger brethren. According to the NFIB Small Business Survey, a core concern is inflation, but 54% of small companies intend to raise prices, passing on costs to customers. Like all other American companies, they experience labor shortages and are planning to raise wages too. On balance, we believe that small caps will remain profitable and their earnings will continue to grow, albeit at a slower pace, i.e., at 15% (Chart 9B), which is significantly less than 88% in 2021, but more than the 10% growth expected of larger companies. Chart 9ASmall Businesses Are Worried About Inflation And Are Raising Prices Chart 9BEarnings Growth Expectations Have Normalized Macroeconomic Backdrop: Historically, small caps have outperformed large caps in the environment of rising rates (Chart 10), because of higher allocations to Cyclicals, such as Financials and Industrials. Also, while rising rates take the froth off the high-flying growth stocks, smaller companies are cheap and have moderate growth expectations. Overweight Small vs. Large: Attractive valuations and fundamentals, and a high likelihood to perform well when rates are rising, make overweighting Small vs Large an attractive proposition. Risks: While we stay with the call, there are a few caveats: Small caps’ margins are narrow, and continued cost pressures, especially surging labor costs, have the potential to dent their profitability. Further, while empirical analysis indicates that Small outperforms during the rate-hiking cycle, we are concerned that surging inflation may render this analysis less useful – can this time really be different? Growth Vs. Value: Shifting Towards Value Valuations: Over the course of 2021, Growth outperformed Value by 23% (trough to peak), and by 5% over just the last 26 weeks. As a result of such a strong run, Growth has become very expensive, trading at 29x forward multiples, which is which is a 70% premium to Value (which is trading at 17x). The Growth/Value BCA Valuation Indicator corrected below the 2 standard deviation mark and is mean reverting. Profitability: Despite significant valuation discrepancy between Growth and Value, both asset classes are set to deliver roughly the same earnings growth over the next year, suggesting that the premium for Quality and Growth may be excessive (Chart 11A). Macroeconomic Backdrop: Since the beginning of the pandemic, performance of Value vs. Growth has been strongly linked to the direction of change in yields (Chart 11B). Growth is overweight long-duration Technology stocks, while Value is highly exposed to Financials, which appear to thrive in the environment of rising rates. Chart 11AGrowth Expectation Are Similar, But Value Is Cheaper Chart 11BRising Rates Are A Tailwind For Value Overweight Value: As we stated in our 2022 Outlook, “Our neutral position [in Growth vs. Value] will be a great launching pad towards overweighting value stocks at the first whiff of rising long rates.” Now, with rate hikes drawing nearer and Omicron peaking, we are changing our neutral allocation to a cyclical overweight in Value, and underweight in Growth. Valuations and the macroeconomic backdrop are at the core of the call. Risks: We may be early with our presumption that Omicron is just an uber-contagious “Omicold” – hospitalizations may still surge, while global lockdowns may cause much economic damage. In that case, rates may remain range-bound, while the Fed may delay rate hikes. Then Growth would be bound to outperform Value.   Irene Tunkel Chief Strategist, US Equity Strategy irene.tunkel@bcaresearch.com   S&P 500 Chart 12Macroeconomic Backdrop Chart 13Profitability Chart 14Valuations And Technicals Chart 15Uses Of Cash Cyclicals Vs Defensives Chart 16Macroeconomic Backdrop Chart 17Profitability Chart 18Valuation And Technicals Chart 19Uses Of Cash Growth Vs Value Chart 20Macroeconomic Backdrop Chart 21Profitability Chart 22Valuations And Technicals Chart 23Uses Of Cash Small Vs Large Chart 24Macroeconomic Backdrop Chart 25Profitability Chart 26Valuations and Technicals Chart 27Uses Of Cash Recommended Allocation Footnotes  .   

Highlights European economic activity will suffer in Q1 from both the Omicron wave and elevated natural gas prices. The Omicron wave will fade quickly and its impact on growth will be short lived. The biggest economic risk related to Omicron is inflation. Inflation is being caused by supply disruptions, a function of China’s zero-tolerance policy toward COVID. An ebbing of COVID will allow cyclicals to breakout relative to defensive equities in the second quarter. Buy banks / sell tech. For the remainder of the winter, European electricity will remain expensive because of elevated natural gas prices. This process creates a drag on growth and prevents the euro from recovering. European PMIs have not yet bottomed; however, they will do so in Q2. While French and UK economic activity has led Europe in recent months, Germany and the Netherlands are likely to continue to lag as the Omicron variant is only starting there. Italian and Spanish spreads have limited upside under these circumstances. Feature At the end of 2021, the European economy was hit by a spike in COVID-19 infections and another surge in natural gas prices. These shocks will continue to affect activity in the first few months of 2022. Understanding the evolution of these shocks will help investors find attractive entry points for the dominant trend that will play out for the remainder of the year. Omicron Spikes Chart 1Omicron Is Different COVID-19 cases are once again spiking across Europe because of the highly contagious Omicron variant. As Chart 1 shows, cases in the UK, France, Spain, and Italy have now eclipsed previous peaks. Cases in Germany and the Netherlands have declined recently, but this improvement reflects the ebbing Delta wave. These two countries are likely to follow the path of their European neighbors in relation to the Omicron variant. The Omicron wave will not have a lasting impact on European economic activity despite its frightening scale. Hospitalizations are rising, but they remain far from levels implied by the number of active cases in France, the UK, and Spain (Chart 1, third panel). Additionally, hospitalizations spans are shorter because the infection seems to be less virulent. Recent data out of France indicates that COVID-induced admissions in ICU are now around 18% with a median length of stay of three days, compared to roughly 30% and seven days in the previous waves. This more positive health outcome also reflects the benefit of elevated vaccination rates in the region. The evolution of the Omicron wave in South Africa also points toward a rapid turnaround of the COVID situation in Europe. Gauteng Province, where Omicron first became dominant, witnessed a sharp rise in new cases that declined less than four weeks after the outbreak began (Chart 1, bottom panel). The number of cases there thus seems to have reached its apex already. There are limited reasons to expect a different trajectory for the Omicron wave in Europe. This wave is also affecting individual behavior. Rules are now being developed to impose vaccinations on swath of the recalcitrant population in Italy and Austria, and the French president is openly defying anti-vaxxers by further limiting their daily lives. Vaccination rates are increasing and booster campaigns have rolled out successfully, as the UK illustrates. Finally, anti-viral drugs such as Pfizer Paxlovid will further limit the severity of infections of contaminated individuals. This background implies that the likelihood is low for long-lasting, severe lockdowns, such as those that prevailed in 2020 and in early 2021. As a result, the impact of the Omicron wave on economic activity and the labor market will be temporary and will wane before the end of Q1 2022. Chart 2Cyclicals Will Breakout... Eventually Financial markets have already adopted this view, as evidenced by European equities that rallied smartly through December—until the release of the Fed’s minutes last week spooked investors. We are inclined to agree with investors and look beyond the impact of COVID at the index level. Nonetheless, as long as the wave remains in place and economic activity bears its footprint, cyclicals will not break out relative to defensives (Chart 2). Omicron, however, is not without risks. China’s commitment to its zero-tolerance policy toward COVID-19 remains firmly in place, which may prove inflationary for the global economy. Entire cities such as Xi’an and Yuzhou have been pushed into lockdowns, and, if Omicron spreads further, more cities will suffer the same fate. If it is sufficiently widespread, then this process will produce global supply-chain bottlenecks again and renew pricing pressures, especially if it expands to Chinese port cities.  Investment Implications The first relevant market implication of a transitory Omicron shock is that, despite its violence and breadth, global markets will avoid a severe sell-off caused by plunging economic activity. As a corollary, cyclical stocks may continue to consolidate in the near-term against their defensive counterparts, but a breakout by the middle of 2022 remains highly likely. Chart 3Utilities Hate Ebbing Waves Tactical traders will also soon benefit from a short-term investment opportunity. Utilities have been outperforming in recent weeks as investors bid up defensive plays. However, the pattern of previous waves indicates that, as soon as this wave of cases peaks, utilities stocks will suffer a significant period of underperformance (Chart 3). Thus, short-term investors should sell European utilities once the seven days moving average of new cases peaks in the UK. Chart 4Banks To Outperform Tech The environment is also likely to remain favorable for banks relative to tech stocks in Europe. The recently released Fed minutes revealed that the FOMC has a strong hawkish bias and that the March meeting will be a live one. It also showed that, if Omicron proved to be inflationary because of its impact on supply chains, the Fed might be even more inclined to raise interest rates and cut its balance sheet size. Thus, a transitory Omicron shock to growth that is likely to have inflationary effects will contribute to higher yields. This will hurt tech stocks relative to banks, especially as European banks forward earnings are rising relative to the tech sector and their relative valuations are extremely favorable (Chart 4). Bottom Line: The number of COVID-19 cases in Europe is spiking rapidly, but we do not expect lengthy lockdowns to become the norm. As a result, the shock to growth caused by the Omicron variant will be ephemeral. Nonetheless, China’s health policy response points to some inflationary risks caused by supply bottlenecks. Investors should expect European markets to continue to take Omicron in stride and cyclicals to breakout later this year. Utilities are soon to be sold relative to the broad market and European banks will benefit at the expense of tech stocks. Natural Gas Remains The Euro’s Foe Chart 5Natural Gas Prices Are High And Volatile Dynamics in the European natural gas market remain a major risk for European economic activity and European currencies over the course of the first quarter of 2022. Natural gas prices on the Title Transfer Facility in the Netherlands spiked to a record close of EUR181/MWh on December 21, 2021, as tensions with Russia rose in Ukraine. Since then, Dutch natural gas prices—the continental European benchmark—have declined by 46% (Chart 5). The following combination of factors explains this sharp retrenchment: Europe, France, and Germany in particular have enjoyed exceptionally clement weather in recent days, stifling demand for heat and electricity. 11 LNG tankers from the US have been rerouted toward Europe, accounting for 800,000 tonnes of natural gas. Tensions between Russia and the West have eased somewhat. Despite this recent decline in the price of natural gas, it remains at elevated levels. BCA’s commodity and energy strategy team expects its volatility to stay high over the remaining winter months. First, Asia is not sitting on its hands as LNG shipments shift toward Europe. Instead, a bidding war is starting in order to attract liquefied gas to the East. Second, Europe’s winter is far from over, which means that demand-boosting cold fronts are still likely. Finally, Russia is sending gas back to its territory to fulfil its own domestic needs (and probably to continue to put pressure on European nations). Chart 6European Electricity Is Dear The continuation of elevated European natural gas prices and the potential for further upsides of volatility remain headwinds to European economic activity this winter, ones we deem comparable to Omicron. The main impact is via electricity prices. As Chart 6 highlights, they are still extremely high in France, Germany, and Spain. The continued surge in the price of CO2 emission quotas is increasing the pressure on electricity prices, as will the upcoming maintenance of many nuclear power plants in France. Gas consumption is contracting on a year-on-year basis in major European markets (Chart 7). This development indicates that elevated natural gas prices are already creating a supply shock to activity and sapping discretionary disposable income from households. The recent decline in European consumer confidence, despite strong employment numbers and growing net worth, confirms that households are feeling the pinch from elevated electricity and natural gas prices (Chart 8). Chart 8Consumers Feel The Pinch Chart 7Gap Consumption Is Slowing High natural gas and electricity prices also create further inflation risks for Europe. The recent spikes to 23.7% in PPI inflation and to 5% for headline CPI inflation show the effect of high-energy costs. Instead, a genuine threat would emerge if household inflation expectations followed energy prices, which could in turn trigger a wage-price spiral in Europe. We are not there yet, but the longer natural gas and electricity prices rise, the greater the likelihood of this scenario. Investment Implications The principal consequence of the strength of the European natural gas market is its euro-bearish impact. The tax on European growth is high, which delays the willingness of the ECB to remove monetary accommodation in a meaningful way. On the western shore of the Atlantic, the Fed is poised to pull the trigger soon and is now discussing a decrease in the size of its balance sheet, something the ECB is nowhere near ready to do. Consequently, although EUR/USD may be cheap and oversold on a cyclical basis, a turnaround is unlikely as long as electricity prices remain this elevated. Chart 9EUR/USD near An Existential Level Bottom Line: European natural gas prices may have come off their Christmas boil, but they remain elevated and will likely experience major bouts of upside volatility over the remainder of the winter. Hence, the drag on growth stemming from demanding electricity prices remains intact, which negatively affects consumer confidence. The euro cannot rally meaningfully until natural gas prices mean-revert, especially as the Fed ramps up its hawkishness. A re-test of EUR/USD long-term trendline around 1.10 is likely before the end of Q1 (Chart 9). The Evolution Of European PMIs European manufacturing activity remains below its June peak, but it has surprised many observers by how well it is withstanding the various shocks hitting the continent. Despite this encouraging behavior, it may take a few more months before the PMIs find a floor. The following three factors best explain why European manufacturing activity will decelerate further: The Chinese economic slowdown is not over. Credit growth is improving, but much of this comes from increasing purchases of banker’s acceptances by financial institutions, which does not in turn provide credit to the economy. Thus, European exports to China and EM will remain on the backfoot. The Omicron crisis remains intact and natural gas remains a drag, as previously discussed. Chart 10Manufacturing Deceleration Will End In Q2 The evolution of the Sentix Global Investor Survey and the ZEW survey, which are a very reliable forecaster of the Manufacturing PMI, points to more economic weakness in Q1 2022 (Chart 10). While these forces will hurt growth in the near term, they also suggest that this deceleration is long in the tooth and that activity will firm anew during the second quarter of the year. The gap between the expectation and current activity components of the Sentix Global Index Survey and the ZEW survey have already bottomed. Moreover, both Omicron and natural gas crises will ebb as winter passes. Finally, Chinese authorities will not let growth collapse and will likely generate a small pickup in activity after the Chinese New Year. Already, the PBoC has ramped up its liquidity injections and Premier Li Keqiang recently highlighted potential tax cuts and support for the corporate sector to help Q1 and Q2 domestic activity. Looking at European countries individually shows that current economic conditions are disparate and largely reflect the different impacts of both Omicron and natural gas prices. To judge economic conditions, we expand the Rotation Methodology introduced two months ago.1 Instead of analyzing financial assets, we examine manufacturing PMIs through this lens, looking at the evolution of the level and momentum of each country’s manufacturing PMIs compared to the overall European level. This approach reveals the following over the past six months (Chart 11): France experienced the greatest relative improvement, moving from a Lagging economy to the Leading economy in Europe. France benefits from limited lockdowns, from the large role of nuclear power in electricity generation, and from its diminished exposure to China’s slowdown compared to Germany. This economic performance explains why French equities have recently performed so much better than sectoral biases would have justified. The UK economy remains in the Leading quadrant despite the ferocity with which the Omicron wave has overtaken the nation. This paradox reflects the health policy chosen by Downing Street, emphasizing voluntary isolation and investing heavily in booster shots. Relative to that of the rest of Europe, Italy’s and Spain’s PMIs are still elevated, but they are losing momentum, which is pulling these two countries into the Weakening quadrant. The Netherlands suffered the greatest decrease in activity, dropping from the Leading quadrant to the Lagging one. The Netherlands is under a severe lockdown to combat the Delta wave. The situation is unlikely to improve meaningfully any time soon as the Omicron wave is starting there. Germany is trying to stage a recovery, moving from the Lagging quadrant into the Improving one. However, we worry that this will not work out and that Germany will shift back into the Lagging quadrant as the government prepares to crackdown further on COVID because the Omicron variant is starting to hit the country. Investment Implications Chart 12Peripheral Spreads To Stay Contained The continuation of the weakness observed in Germany and the Netherlands will force the ECB to remain more dovish than implied by the inflation rate. As a result, Spanish and Italian bond spreads are unlikely to move anywhere close to the levels recorded in the spring of 2020 (Chart 12), especially as their respective economies outperform those of Germany and the Netherlands.   Mathieu Savary, Chief European Strategist Mathieu@bcaresearch.com     Footnotes 1     The “Leading” (“Lagging”) quadrant denotes countries with PMIs performing better (worse) than the benchmark, the European manufacturing PMI, with strengthening (weakening) momentum. The “Improving” (“Weakening”) quadrant denotes countries with PMIs that are performing worse (better) than the benchmark, with strengthening (weakening) momentum. Tactical Recommendations Cyclical Recommendations Structural Recommendations Closed Trades Currency Performance Fixed Income Performance Equity Performance

Highlights The prospect of Fed rate hikes seems to be weighing on 2022 equity return expectations, … : Financial media outlets have been sounding the alarm about the impact of rate hikes on equity returns.  … but we think concerned investors are getting ahead of themselves, because monetary policy works with a lag, … : It takes time for changes in the fed funds rate to work their way through the economy. Even if the FOMC initiates a rate hike campaign in March, its effects may not begin to be felt until September or next March.  … and the fed funds rate is miles away from becoming restrictive: In inflation-adjusted terms, the entire interest rate structure is incredibly supportive of economic activity. Assuming 4% inflation, the real fed funds rate will still be well below the bottom of its 2013-19 range even if all of the rate hikes investors are currently discounting occur in 2022. We continue to believe that it is too soon to turn defensive in multi-asset portfolios: The bull markets in equities and credit will eventually end, but not while the FOMC is only beginning to unwind maximum monetary accommodation. Feature The release of the minutes from the FOMC’s December meeting momentarily roiled financial markets last week. The minutes had a distinctly hawkish tone, pointing to a mid-March liftoff date and raising the specter of a shrinking Fed balance sheet. The ensuing sell-off dovetailed with rising anxiety in the financial media about the potentially adverse equity market impacts of impending rate hikes. The opening two paragraphs of “The Big Uneasy” article that filled the front page of The New York Times’ Business section on New Year’s Day captured the prevailing tone:1 For two years, the stock market has been largely able to ignore the lived reality of Americans during the pandemic … because of underlying policies that kept it buoyant. Investors can now say goodbye to all that. The body of the article was much more measured, pointing out that a series of rate hikes would eventually slow the economy and could diminish investors’ near-term appetite for equities, before wrapping up with a wildly sensationalist quote. “The nightmare scenario is: The Fed tightens and it doesn’t help,” said Aaron Brown, a former risk manager of AQR Capital Management who now manages his own money and teaches math at [NYU]. Mr. Brown said that if the Fed could not orchestrate a “soft landing” for the economy, things could start to get ugly – fast. And then, he said, the Fed may have to take “very aggressive action like a rate hike to 15 percent, or wage and price controls, like we tried in the ‘70s.” By an equal measure, the Fed’s moves, even if they are moderate, could also cause a sell-off in stocks, corporate bonds and other riskier assets, if investors panic when they realize that the free money that drove their risk-taking to ever greater extremes over the past several years is definitely going away. Dennis Gartman, the longtime writer of a daily newsletter for traders and institutional investors, echoed the theme in an interview with Bloomberg Radio last Monday. The Bloomberg story summarizing the interview was headlined “Gartman Sees Stocks Falling 15% in 2022 on Aggressive Fed Hikes” and hewed to the higher-rates/lower-stocks mantra. “Gartman said … that stocks could trade 10% to 15% lower this year. While [he] has long been calling for a bear market, he said the catalyst for the decline could be the central bank raising interest rates amid a continued rise in inflation. … ‘The advent of a bear market will come when the Fed begins to tighten monetary policy, and that will be later this year. No question.’” We admired The Gartman Letter and subscribe to the Times, but fed funds rate concerns have gotten overdone. In our view, anxiety about the effect of rate hikes on equity returns in 2022 is misplaced on two counts. First, it ignores that monetary policy only impacts the economy with a lag. Second, it fails to distinguish between the level of the fed funds rate and its direction. The economy and the S&P 500 have historically thrived in the early stages of rate-hiking campaigns, meeting their Waterloo only after the level of the fed funds rate becomes restrictive. The Fed Funds Rate Cycle We formulate investment strategy based on our analysis of the cycles that exert the strongest pull on financial markets: the business cycle, the credit cycle and the monetary policy cycle. As applied to US markets, we have found that the monetary policy cycle has the most reliably meaningful impact. As shown in Figure 1, we decompose the cycle into four phases based on whether the FOMC is hiking (the left half of the curve) or cutting (the right half) rates and the position of the fed funds rate relative to our estimate of its equilibrium level (the dashed horizontal line). We deem policy to be accommodative when the funds rate is below equilibrium and restrictive when it is above equilibrium. We like to describe equilibrium as the fed funds rate that neither encourages nor discourages economic activity. The equilibrium rate is a concept and cannot be directly observed; though our estimate represents our best efforts, we recognize that no one can always pinpoint it in real time. We nonetheless take heart from the sharp divide in S&P 500 returns across periods that we have designated as easy or tight. As we show for the first time in this report, growth in key economic indicators aligns consistently with the progression of the funds rate cycle, supporting the investment conclusion that the approaching rate-hiking phase will be favorable for risk assets. Monetary Policy Works With A Lag The idea that monetary policy affects the economy with long and variable lags, first advanced by Milton Friedman in the late fifties, is universally accepted. To test the proposition within our policy cycle framework, we mapped growth in nonfarm payrolls, aggregate bank lending, consumption and GDP across rate cycle phases over the last 60 years. All series grew at their fastest rate in Phase I, when the Fed is tightening policy but has not yet made it tight. They continued to grow faster than their through-the-cycle pace, even when adjusted for inflation, in Phase II, when the Fed continues to hike the funds rate beyond its equilibrium level. Growth in Phases III and IV, when the Fed is easing policy to stimulate the economy, is markedly slower across all metrics than it is when the Fed is tightening. Chart 1 shows each indicator’s phase-by-phase performance in its own panel, with growth in early tightening Phase I (the solid black line) and late tightening Phase II (the dashed green line) easily surpassing early easing Phase III (the solid gray line) and late easing Phase IV (the dashed red line). Chart 1It Takes A While To Turn A Battleship, Especially When The Rudder Moves With Long And Variable Lags Table 1 fleshes out the results, reporting each metric’s compound annual growth rate (CAGR) across the phases and compiling the CAGRs when the Fed is hiking rates and when it's cutting them. It also presents the nominal growth rates for lending, consumption and GDP, which are not shown in the chart. We view the results as forcefully supporting the long-and-variable view, especially as the FOMC deliberately moves at an incremental pace so as not to act like Friedman’s fool in the shower.2 Given that Phase II growth is comfortably above trend for every metric, it appears that Phase I would have to move at hyperspeed to hobble the economy at any point over the next year-plus. Table 1Phase I Is The Economy's Growth Sweet Spot The Starting Point Matters, Too The economy should also be insulated from the adverse effects of reduced accommodation by virtue of its current level of support. The real fed funds rate is way below its financial crisis lows (Chart 2, top panel), along with the real 10-year Treasury yield (Chart 2, bottom panel). Both rates have steadily declined over the last 40 years' complete peak-to-peak cycles, in line with the US economy’s declining potential growth. Falling inflation has further contributed to a decline in the nominal equilibrium rate, as per the actual fed funds rate and our in-house estimate (Chart 3). Chart 2Real Rates Have A Long, Long Way To Go To Become Restrictive Chart 3Interest Rates May Have More Headroom Than Markets Think Our estimate bottomed well before the onset of the pandemic, however, and we would argue that the economy currently has far less need for monetary policy support than it did in the aftermath of the crisis. While the financial system reeled, Congress provided stingy fiscal support before taking it back like Lucy pulling the football away from Charlie Brown. In contrast, the US now has a surfeit of fiscal support and even WeWork founder Adam Neumann has ready access to capital. The upshot is that the rates tipping point is miles away and we doubt the Fed can cover that much ground in the space of one year. For Equities, Level Trumps Direction The level, not the direction, of the fed funds rate has driven US equity performance over the 60-year period covered by our equilibrium estimate. The S&P 500 has eked out a 0.4% nominal annualized return across the aggregate 19 years that policy has been tight, by our reckoning, while advancing 10.6% annually over the accumulated 41 years when it has been easy (Table 2). Easy policy’s ten-percentage-point advantage over tight policy leaves cutting rates’ four-point edge over hiking rates in the dust. Table 2Easy Policy Settings Yield An Extra 10 Percentage Points Of Nominal Returns, ...​​​​​​ Table 3... And An Extra 11.5 After Adjusting For Inflation​​​​​​ The easy/tight disparity widens to eleven-and-a-half percentage points when nominal returns are adjusted for inflation. In Phases I and IV, when the fed funds rate is below our estimate of equilibrium, the S&P 500 has generated robust 7.1% real annualized returns while shedding 4.4% in Phases II and III, when the funds rate exceeds our equilibrium estimate (Table 3). Stocks do better on a real basis when the Fed is cutting rates, just as they do on a nominal basis, but the spread is narrower. The level of rates is the key dividing line, not their direction. Investment Implications The empirical record overwhelmingly supports the idea that early-stage rate hikes will not stifle growth or prevent equities from generating ample positive excess returns over Treasuries and cash. Against a backdrop of high and soaring inflation that the economy has only faced twice in the last 50 years (Chart 4), however, it is worth considering whether this time could be different. Whereas most recent rate hike campaigns have patiently aimed to prevent potential inflation pressures from taking root in a robust economy, this one might require the Fed to move urgently to get the genie back in the bottle. Chart 4Be Careful What You Wish For, Central Bankers The potential for urgent rather than incremental action could turn the prevailing positive correlation between stock prices and interest rates negative, as our Chief Emerging Markets Strategist Arthur Budaghyan has warned. If inflation worries choke off animal spirits, multiple de-rating could more than offset typical Phase I earnings gains, sending stocks lower. Although we do not expect multiple contraction in 2022 given the dearth of asset classes with positive expected real returns, we see it as one of the major threats to our risk-friendly positioning. We will be watching out for it, along with adverse pandemic surprises and the possibility that consumption could disappoint, though we will stick with our constructive positioning in the meantime.   Doug Peta, CFA Chief US Investment Strategist dougp@bcaresearch.com Footnotes 1      "Fed’s Moves in 2022 Could End the Stock Market’s Pandemic Run", The New York Times (nytimes.com). Accessed January 3, 2022. 2     Friedman likened central banks to a person who excessively turns the hot or the cold tap in the shower when the water temperature does not change immediately, only to shock him/herself once the lag between action and effect closes.