Skip to main content
Skip to main content

Equities

While the communications equipment industry provides a contrarian tech sector investment opportunity, in relative terms, computer hardware offers a much different profile. Hardware investment is highly cyclical, rising and falling with discretionary spending budgets. The latter are being pruned as the corporate sector tightens its belt as a consequence of deflation and profit margin pressure. The chart shows that, unlike telecom equipment, hardware investment continues to sink as a share of total spending. That will sustain downward sales pressure and keep manufacturers operating at suboptimal rates. Already, the rate of hardware output has plunged, and is well below the rate of capacity growth. Such a dynamic warns of an intensification of deflationary pressures, particularly given that vendors to end clients are aggressively slashing prices. Without a positive demand impulse, the odds of computer hardware profit disappointment will remain acute. We continue to recommend an underweight position. The ticker symbols for the stocks in this index are: AAPL, EMC, HPE, HPQ, NTAP, SNDK, STX, WDC.

A global comparison suggests that China's capacity utilization does not appear particularly weak compared to other countries. The excess capacity problem is not unique to China, and therefore cannot be explained by China's investment-driven growth model. Chinese stocks have been unduly punished by the "overcapacity" stigma, which is unwarranted and will eventually correct.

Special Report

Within the EM equity space, country effects still significantly overwhelm sector impact. In turn, the importance of country selection within advanced countries has dropped. Macro analysis is still very pertinent with respect to adding alpha when investing in EM stocks. At this moment, the macro outlook does not warrant a bullish stance on EM.

There are no indicators that consistently lead share prices or can differentiate cyclical bull markets from short-term oversold rebounds. Investors who are right on the big-picture view will be rewarded, and <i>vice versa</i>. From a big-picture perspective, our bias remains that EM/China growth will not pick up sustainably, and that EM EPS will not recover materially in the next 12 months. Therefore, we recommend fading this rally.

Both the demand for and availability of capital favors consumers over businesses, on the margin. The latest Fed senior loan officer survey showed that banks are tightening standards on C&I loans, the most rapidly growing component of bank assets. This reflects the broad-based deterioration in corporate sector balance sheet health. Conversely, willingness to extend consumer credit remains high. Previous deleveraging has vastly improved household balance sheets. Debt servicing payments are historically low as a share of income. Consumer spending is outpacing capital spending, which is driving a rise in personal loans relative to business credit. A narrowing yield curve has much more bearish implications for banks than it does for credit card companies, whose interest rate spreads are far less susceptible to yield curve swings. This is borne out in the tight inverse correlation between the yield curve and the share price ratio (bottom panel). Consequently, we recommend initiating a pair trade in the undervalued consumer finance/banks share price ratio. Please see yesterday's Weekly Report for more details.
Consumer finance stocks have been among the worst financial sector performers in the last six months creating a negative divergence with bullish macro drivers. For instance, relative performance has far undershot the level implied by the decline in unemployment claims and the housing market (top panel). Household net worth has spiked back toward all-time highs as a share of disposable income courtesy of the recovery in financial markets and residential real estate value. Importantly, wages & salaries growth is robust, courtesy of U.S. dollar strength and the collapse in fuel prices, which should underpin consumer appetite for debt. Revolving consumer credit, a good proxy for credit card debt, has been growing at a pre-financial crisis clip since last autumn. That is a major change from the first few years after the crisis, when debt growth was extremely volatile, which created uncertainty about the sustainability of credit card company receivables growth, and capped valuations. A more stable outlook should translate into a higher multiple, all else equal. We recommend an overweight position, and a new long/short trade vs. banks, please see the next Insight. The ticker symbols for the stocks in this index are: AXP, COF, SYF, DFS, NAVI.

The Fed's decision to scale back intended interest rate hikes reflects economic reality.

A dovish Fed bought the bounce a bit more time, but there is little incentive to add portfolio risk. Buy consumer finance, especially vs. banks, and expect communications equipment outperformance.

While the FOMC was more dovish than expected, rising inflation may cause the Fed to escalate hawkish rhetoric. The bounce in oil should help high-beta stocks. Underweight U.S. equities versus Europe, Japan and H-shares. We estimate U.S. equities will deliver returns of 4%, ann. over the next 10 years, <i>vis-à-vis</i>  9% for the euro area and Japan, and 14% for H-shares. Central banks have more options to combat any possible debt-deflation spiral in Europe/Japan/China than is often recognized.

The allure of gold equities has risen another notch following this week's dovish shift at the FOMC. After raising interest rates only a few months ago in the face of tight financial conditions, the Fed has backed down, acknowledging global headwinds. However, this flip flop also underscores the Fed's data dependency, which is fostering increased overall policy uncertainty. When combined with the unknown consequences and efficacy of negative deposit rates abroad, the allure of owning gold as a portfolio and currency hedge climbs. At a minimum, the inability of global growth to gain traction underscores that real interest rates, the opportunity cost of holding gold, are likely to stay extremely low, or negative, for a prolonged period. As a result, gold should stay well bid, despite the gains that have already accrued year-to-date. We reiterate our recent upgrade to overweight.