Real Estate
Falling home prices and relatively tight financing conditions for property developers will likely prevent a recovery in construction activity. There has recently been a pickup in residential property sales. Our research reveals that this has been the result…
Highlights Analysis on the Chinese property market is available below. In the Philippines, domestic demand is set to accelerate at the hands of the government’s fiscal boost. The current account deficit will widen and the peso and local bonds will likely sell-off. This warrants an underweight stance in this interest rate-sensitive bourse. A new trade: Pay 2-year swap rates. The outlook for China’s property market and construction activity is downbeat. Financial market plays leveraged to mainland construction activity remain at risk. The Philippines: The Cycle Is Turning The relative performance of Philippine equities against the EM benchmark is moving inversely to the direction of relative (Philippines minus EM) local bond yields (Chart I-1). When local Philippine bond yields drop versus those of other EMs, this bourse outperforms, and vice versa. Likewise, Philippine share prices in absolute terms exhibit a negative relationship with local bond yields (Chart I-2). The rationale behind this high sensitivity in share prices to local interest rates is the large presence of banks and property stocks in the Philippines' bourse. Banks account for 20% and real estate stocks another 21% of the local stock exchange. These sectors benefit in a falling interest rate environment and suffer during periods of rising rates. Chart I-1Philippines Vs. EM: Relative Stock Prices And Bond Yields Chart I-2Philippine Stocks Are Inversely Correlated To Domestic Bond Yields Our underweight position in Philippine equities has not played out because the economy has slowed much more than we had expected, which has also coincided with collapsing US Treasury bond yields. Consequently, Philippine local bond yields have plummeted, supporting the stock market’s absolute and relative performance. Chart I-3Philippine Growth Slowed Due To A Slump In Government Spending Chart I-4Negative Fiscal & Credit Impulse Stabilized The Current Account Deficit The growth rate of the Philippines has decelerated markedly due to sharp slowdowns in both government spending and bank loan growth (Chart I-3). In fact, the combined bank loan and fiscal spending impulse has plunged, leading to a major slowdown in domestic demand, which in turn has stabilized the current account (Chart I-4). The latter effect has supported the currency and allowed the central bank to cut rates. A budget deadlock on a number of items delayed the approval of the 2019 budget, causing government spending to plunge in the first half of 2019. In short, it was unintended fiscal tightening that has wrong-footed our view on the direction of the macro cycle, and consequently Philippine financial markets. Government spending has been instrumental in driving fixed capital formation since President Rodrigo Duterte came to power in May 2016. Philippine local bond yields have plummeted, supporting the stock market’s absolute and relative performance. Going forward, the macro cycle is set to reverse: Chart I-5Philippines: Signs Of A Growth Rebound Government expenditure will rise substantially – infrastructure spending in particular – lifting imports. The 2019 budget was approved back in April, and the House of Representatives has given the green light to extend the shelf-life of the current 2019 budget. Moreover, the fiscal 2020 budget, now approved by Duterte, entails 12% nominal growth in government expenditures in general and 14% growth in capital/infrastructure spending in particular. Duterte will oversee 100 flagship infrastructure projects estimated to cost 4.3 trillion Philippine pesos, or 24% of GDP. More than half of these projects are either ongoing or will commence construction in the next six to eight months. The larger infrastructure expenditure will encourage bank lending. Overall, domestic demand will revive considerably, causing the current account deficit to widen. Importantly, the expected fiscal boost will come on top of already strong consumer spending. The marginal propensity to spend among households and companies is already improving, confirming domestic growth acceleration (Chart I-5, top panel). In particular, both vehicle and machinery sales are recovering (Chart I-5, middle panel). Narrow and broad money impulses have bottomed (Chart I-5, bottom panel). Stronger imports amid still-depressed exports due to sluggish global demand will lead to a widening of the current account deficit. We expect the peso to resume its depreciation. Renewed currency weakness and a domestic demand revival will put a floor under inflation. The central bank is headed by Governor Benjamin Diokno, the former Budget Secretary and an associate of populist President Duterte. The odds are that the central bank will not hike interest rates in the face of a rising current account deficit and modestly rising inflation. This will reinforce currency depreciation. Finally, domestic bond yields are set to rise. A widening fiscal deficit has historically coincided with higher domestic bond yields (Chart I-6). Odds are it will not be different this time. Besides, Philippine banks have been relentlessly purchasing government bonds because credit demand from companies has been sluggish (Chart I-7). As private credit demand begins to recover and banks accelerate their loan origination, they will become net sellers – or will at least ease their pace of government bond purchases – pushing yields higher. Chart I-6Rising Fiscal Deficit Is Bad News For Bonds Chart I-7Philippine Commercial Banks Have Been Purchasing Government Bonds En Masse Bottom Line: Unintended fiscal tightening has slowed domestic demand, narrowed the current account deficit, supported the currency and induced a drop in local bond yields. This has allowed the Philippines’ interest rate-sensitive bourse to outperform the overall EM equity index. Going forward, the macro cycle is set to reverse. This cycle is about to reverse due to strong fiscal expansion: Domestic demand and imports will grow briskly, and the current account deficit will widen considerably. Widening twin deficits will lead to material currency depreciation and higher domestic bond yields. Investment Recommendations Continue shorting the Philippine peso versus the US dollar. 2-year swap rates are 48 basis points below the policy rate (Chart I-8). The market will price out rate cuts as the business cycle recovers and the currency depreciates. We recommend a new trade: pay 2-year swap rates. Dedicated EM fixed-income investors should underweight the Philippines in their EM domestic currency bonds and sovereign credit portfolios. Chart I-8The Market Is Expecting Rate Cuts Chart I-9Philippine Equity Market Is Not Cheap Does an upcoming growth revival warrant an overweight stance in Philippine stocks within an EM equity portfolio? As shown in Charts I-1 and I-2, this equity market is more sensitive to interest rates than growth. The growth deceleration did not prevent this stock market from outperforming its EM peers. Hence, higher local bond yields amid renewed currency depreciation will likely lead to a period of underperformance. Finally, Philippine stocks are not cheap in absolute terms or relative to the EM benchmark (Chart I-9). Hence, they will not respond well to rising interest rates. Chart I-10Philippine Property Stocks Will Suffer As Interest Rates Rise Within this bourse, underweight/short property stocks. These stocks are the most vulnerable to rising bond yields (Chart I-10). The key risks to our strategy are lower global bond yields and continuous flows of foreign capital into EM assets in general, and local bonds in particular. Ayman Kawtharani Editor/Strategist ayman@bcaresearch.com Arthur Budaghyan Chief Emerging Markets Strategist arthurb@bcaresearch.com China: Making Sense Of The Property Market Real estate activity in general, and property construction volumes in particular, are critical to our thesis of an ongoing growth slowdown in China. The basis is that construction volumes on the mainland have a considerable impact on industrial activity both within and outside China. On the structural front, housing demand is facing major headwinds: Genuine pent-up demand for housing has diminished. Most Chinese households already own at least one property. Based on a recent survey conducted by The Economic Daily,1 nearly 97% of households surveyed own at least one residential property. Last year’s China Household Finance Survey (CHFS), conducted by Southwestern University of Finance and Economics of China, showed about 68% of new homes sold in China’s urban areas in the first quarter of 2018 were purchased for the purpose of investment. In addition, the living area per capita in China’s urban areas has risen to 40 square meters as of the end of last year – larger than in South Korea and Japan. Other structural impediments include low affordability, slowing rural-to-urban migration, demographic changes and the promotion of the housing rental market. The government has been repeatedly stressing that China will not use the property market as a short-term economic growth-booster this time. The authorities will also continue to prevent speculative housing demand. Between late 2015 and 2017, the People's Bank of China undertook outright monetization of excess housing inventories via the Pledged Supplementary Lending (PSL) program. So far, even though the Chinese economy has already slowed considerably, the government has not injected much stimulus into the property market. On the contrary, the government has drastically reduced the number of slum-reconstruction units as well as its PSL injection this year. This year, the government has also started a new long-term project of renovating residential buildings built in 2000 or earlier. The projects involved include adding parking lots, elevators, fiber cable installments, electricity/gas line improvements, and so on. This renovation program will likely delay property purchases from those owners who were considering purchasing new properties instead of living in the older residential buildings. Chart II-1Property Sales In China: A Sustainable Recovery? From a cyclical perspective (6-12 months), falling home prices and relatively tight financing for property developers will likely prevent a recovery in construction activity: First, Chart II-1 shows there has recently been a pickup in residential property sales. Our research reveals that this has been the result of aggressive promotion strategies – price reductions – implemented by many real estate developers. Among the promotions being offered by many developers are “buy one property, get the second one at half price,” “buy a house and get a car for free,” or “buy a house and get free furniture and decorations.” Local governments have been “discouraging” outright property price declines. Yet, it seems they have allowed implicit price reductions to take place. In cases where outright price cuts cannot be avoided, the authorities try to limit them. Earlier this month, the government of Maanshan, a third-tier city in the Anhui province, released a rule instructing property developers not to lower prices by more than 10%. The outlook for China’s property market and construction activity is downbeat. As a result, official statistics on new housing prices do not truly reflect price pressures in the marketplace. Official statistics show new housing prices are rising at 9% since last year. Nevertheless, many 1st- and 2nd- tier cities are showing price declines in their secondhand residential property markets (Chart II-2). Chart II-2China: Secondary Market Property Prices Are Weak Chart II-3Chinese Property Developers: Massive Pre-Sold Homes, But Lack Of Funding To Complete Construction All in all, it seems that falling home prices have begun to spread from 1st tier cities to some 2nd- and 3rd-tier cities. The number of cities reporting declines in residential home prices is on the rise. Second, in theory, falling property prices should discourage new starts and new construction. Falling prices signal that supply is exceeding demand, with producers typically responding by curtailing output. This holds true for any industry. However, the intricacies of property developers in China may be different. Chart II-4Building Construction Data Is A Broader Measure Than Commodity Buildings Specifically, property developers have been pre-selling aggressively since 2017 while slowing their completion process due to lack of financing (Chart II-3). Such financial constraints arose due to their rapid expansion in the past 10 years. Having already incurred enormous amounts of leverage, they have resorted to pre-sales as another source of funding. Property developers are currently under pressure to deliver those units that were pre sold about two years ago. Will they be able to secure new funding and ramp up construction? Or will they default or delay delivery of houses? It may well be different for each developer. The ones with strong balance sheets and access to financing will build and deliver. The weakest ones will default, while the average ones will likely delay delivery. Hence, it is difficult to gauge construction trends in the next six months in the residential property market. Even so, it is unlikely to be very strong given the industry is highly fragmented, and many small and medium and even some large developers are financially weak. Finally, there is a large gap between the two construction activity datasets – both published by the National Bureau of Statistics. These datasets are referred to as “commodity buildings” and “building construction” (Chart II-4). “Commodity buildings” – i.e., those developed by real estate developers (the equivalent of homebuilders in the US), are only a subset of “building construction.” The “building construction” dataset is more comprehensive. It includes not only “commodity buildings” but also buildings built by non-real estate developers. For example, companies, universities, and various organizations that can construct both residential and non-residential buildings for their own use. Both datasets include residential and non-residential buildings. From a cyclical perspective (6-12 months), falling home prices and relatively tight financing for property developers will likely prevent a recovery in construction activity. Chart II-5 illustrates that “building construction” floor area started, under construction and completed are all shrinking. They are much weaker than floor area started, under construction and completed of “commodity buildings.” Chart II-5Building Construction Is In Recession Chart II-6Falling Construction-Related Commodities Prices Reflect The Weakness In China Construction Activity The take-away from these datasets is as follows: Construction activity in China goes beyond property developers and “commodity buildings” statistics do not always paint the complete picture. Companies and organizations have dramatically curtailed their construction activity. Combined with tight financing conditions for real estate developers, this heralds a downbeat outlook for construction activity. Bottom Line: While short-term fluctuations in construction activity are impossible to gauge in China, the cyclical outlook remains negative. The current round of stimulus has avoided the property market, and real estate bubble excesses have not yet been wrung out. This is why we remain negative on China’s construction outlook and continue to recommend underweighting property developers relative to both the A-share and investable equity indexes. Falling steel, iron ore and industrial commodities prices confirm that construction activity in China remains weak (Chart II-6). Ellen JingYuan He Associate Vice President ellenj@bcaresearch.com Footnotes 1 The Economic Daily, administratively managed by the Ministry of Communication, is one of the most influential and authoritative newspapers in China. It is an official outlet for the government to publicize its economic policies. Equities Recommendations Currencies, Credit And Fixed-Income Recommendations
Real estate activity in general, and property construction volumes in particular, are critical to our thesis of an ongoing growth slowdown in China. The basis is that construction volumes on the mainland have a considerable impact on industrial activity both within and outside China. On the structural front, housing demand is facing major headwinds: Genuine pent-up demand for housing has diminished. Most Chinese households already own at least one property. Based on a recent survey conducted by The Economic Daily,1 nearly 97% of households surveyed own at least one residential property. Last year’s China Household Finance Survey (CHFS), conducted by Southwestern University of Finance and Economics of China, showed about 68% of new homes sold in China’s urban areas in the first quarter of 2018 were purchased for the purpose of investment. In addition, the living area per capita in China’s urban areas has risen to 40 square meters as of the end of last year – larger than in South Korea and Japan. Other structural impediments include low affordability, slowing rural-to-urban migration, demographic changes and the promotion of the housing rental market. The government has been repeatedly stressing that China will not use the property market as a short-term economic growth-booster this time. The authorities will also continue to prevent speculative housing demand. Between late 2015 and 2017, the People's Bank of China undertook outright monetization of excess housing inventories via the Pledged Supplementary Lending (PSL) program. So far, even though the Chinese economy has already slowed considerably, the government has not injected much stimulus into the property market. On the contrary, the government has drastically reduced the number of slum-reconstruction units as well as its PSL injection this year. This year, the government has also started a new long-term project of renovating residential buildings built in 2000 or earlier. The projects involved include adding parking lots, elevators, fiber cable installments, electricity/gas line improvements, and so on. This renovation program will likely delay property purchases from those owners who were considering purchasing new properties instead of living in the older residential buildings. Chart II-1Property Sales In China: A Sustainable Recovery? From a cyclical perspective (6-12 months), falling home prices and relatively tight financing for property developers will likely prevent a recovery in construction activity: First, Chart II-1 shows there has recently been a pickup in residential property sales. Our research reveals that this has been the result of aggressive promotion strategies – price reductions – implemented by many real estate developers. Among the promotions being offered by many developers are “buy one property, get the second one at half price,” “buy a house and get a car for free,” or “buy a house and get free furniture and decorations.” Local governments have been “discouraging” outright property price declines. Yet, it seems they have allowed implicit price reductions to take place. In cases where outright price cuts cannot be avoided, the authorities try to limit them. Earlier this month, the government of Maanshan, a third-tier city in the Anhui province, released a rule instructing property developers not to lower prices by more than 10%. The outlook for China’s property market and construction activity is downbeat. As a result, official statistics on new housing prices do not truly reflect price pressures in the marketplace. Official statistics show new housing prices are rising at 9% since last year. Nevertheless, many 1st- and 2nd- tier cities are showing price declines in their secondhand residential property markets (Chart II-2). Chart II-2China: Secondary Market Property Prices Are Weak Chart II-3Chinese Property Developers: Massive Pre-Sold Homes, But Lack Of Funding To Complete Construction All in all, it seems that falling home prices have begun to spread from 1st tier cities to some 2nd- and 3rd-tier cities. The number of cities reporting declines in residential home prices is on the rise. Second, in theory, falling property prices should discourage new starts and new construction. Falling prices signal that supply is exceeding demand, with producers typically responding by curtailing output. This holds true for any industry. However, the intricacies of property developers in China may be different. Chart II-4Building Construction Data Is A Broader Measure Than Commodity Buildings Specifically, property developers have been pre-selling aggressively since 2017 while slowing their completion process due to lack of financing (Chart II-3). Such financial constraints arose due to their rapid expansion in the past 10 years. Having already incurred enormous amounts of leverage, they have resorted to pre-sales as another source of funding. Property developers are currently under pressure to deliver those units that were pre sold about two years ago. Will they be able to secure new funding and ramp up construction? Or will they default or delay delivery of houses? It may well be different for each developer. The ones with strong balance sheets and access to financing will build and deliver. The weakest ones will default, while the average ones will likely delay delivery. Hence, it is difficult to gauge construction trends in the next six months in the residential property market. Even so, it is unlikely to be very strong given the industry is highly fragmented, and many small and medium and even some large developers are financially weak. Finally, there is a large gap between the two construction activity datasets – both published by the National Bureau of Statistics. These datasets are referred to as “commodity buildings” and “building construction” (Chart II-4). “Commodity buildings” – i.e., those developed by real estate developers (the equivalent of homebuilders in the US), are only a subset of “building construction.” The “building construction” dataset is more comprehensive. It includes not only “commodity buildings” but also buildings built by non-real estate developers. For example, companies, universities, and various organizations that can construct both residential and non-residential buildings for their own use. Both datasets include residential and non-residential buildings. From a cyclical perspective (6-12 months), falling home prices and relatively tight financing for property developers will likely prevent a recovery in construction activity. Chart II-5 illustrates that “building construction” floor area started, under construction and completed are all shrinking. They are much weaker than floor area started, under construction and completed of “commodity buildings.” Chart II-5Building Construction Is In Recession Chart II-6Falling Construction-Related Commodities Prices Reflect The Weakness In China Construction Activity The take-away from these datasets is as follows: Construction activity in China goes beyond property developers and “commodity buildings” statistics do not always paint the complete picture. Companies and organizations have dramatically curtailed their construction activity. Combined with tight financing conditions for real estate developers, this heralds a downbeat outlook for construction activity. Bottom Line: While short-term fluctuations in construction activity are impossible to gauge in China, the cyclical outlook remains negative. The current round of stimulus has avoided the property market, and real estate bubble excesses have not yet been wrung out. This is why we remain negative on China’s construction outlook and continue to recommend underweighting property developers relative to both the A-share and investable equity indexes. Falling steel, iron ore and industrial commodities prices confirm that construction activity in China remains weak (Chart II-6). Ellen JingYuan He Associate Vice President ellenj@bcaresearch.com Footnotes 1 The Economic Daily, administratively managed by the Ministry of Communication, is one of the most influential and authoritative newspapers in China. It is an official outlet for the government to publicize its economic policies.
Feature We spent the past two weeks visiting and exchanging views with our clients in Asia. We presented our view that the ongoing stimulus measures are beginning to bear fruit in terms of stabilizing China’s economic activity, and that we expect the economic slowdown to bottom early next year. In addition, Chinese policymakers are signaling their willingness to accelerate stimulus on both monetary and fiscal fronts, which should mitigate the downside risks and help the economy regain traction in 2020. Interestingly, our view sparked divergent responses: clients outside of China were more upbeat about the state of the Chinese economy than clients from mainland China. While few investors we spoke to showed concerns over an imminent “hard landing” in China’s economy or systemic risk from China’s financial system, our mainland Chinese clients remain skeptical that the ongoing stimulus will be sufficient to revive the economy. They were also worried that financial regulations may be too restrictive to generate the amount of money growth needed for the economy. Another interesting observation was that while being pessimistic about the economy, our mainland Chinese investors share our assessment that Chinese domestic stocks still have some upside in the coming year. On the other hand, global investors, who are more sanguine about China’s economic recovery, prefer to wait on the sidelines before favoring Chinese investable stocks (Chart 1). Chart 1AA Tale Of Two Markets: Onshore Outperforms Global Markets... Chart 1B...While Offshore Underperforms Below we present some of the top questions that were posed by investors during our trip, along with our answers. We recap the conclusions of our view, and draw out the investment implications of the differences between the sentiments towards China’s equity markets, in the last question of the report. Q: Recent economic data suggests a weakening Chinese economy. Why do you think the economy will reach a bottom in 2020? Historically, China’s credit formation has consistently led economic activity by about three quarters (Chart 2). Even though credit growth this year has not been as strong as in previous expansionary cycles, a turning point in the credit impulse occurred at the start of 2019. This suggests that economic activity should turn around within the next two quarters. Chart 2Expecting A Turn In Q1 2020 Chart 3Emerging Green Shoots Furthermore, despite weakening headline economic data, some underlying components indicate promising improvements (Chart 3): Growth in infrastructure investment has ticked up modestly in the past couple months, and is set to improve further. The State Council mandated local governments to allocate the proceeds from special-purpose bond sales to infrastructure projects by the end of October. This, combined with a frontloading of next year’s local government bonds, should lend support to infrastructure spending in the coming months. After fluctuating in and out of contraction for a year, growth in auto manufacturing production picked up in August and remained positive through October. This improvement is due to less contraction in auto sales and a faster reduction in auto inventories. Moreover, electricity output surged in October, which also indicates that growth may be gaining momentum. Chart 4Trade Should Improve Into 2020 Lastly, global financial conditions have eased significantly and credit growth has picked up worldwide, which should help support global demand. Even though Sino-US trade negotiations are ongoing, our baseline view is that a “Phase One” trade deal will be inked in the next couple months. Eased trade tensions and even some rollbacks in the existing tariffs on Chinese export goods, coupled with improved global demand, should provide some tailwinds to China’s external sector (Chart 4). Q: What is your outlook on China’s economic policy for 2020? The Chinese economic growth model remains reliant on credit formation and capital investment. Therefore, the sustainability of an economic recovery depends on whether Chinese policymakers are willing to keep the stimulus wheel turning. Chart 5A Sign Of A Policy Shift For investors favoring China-related assets, the good news is that there has been an increasing urgency in policymakers’ tone to support economic growth since September. Capex growth from state-owned enterprises (SOEs) has increasingly outpaced the private sector, which is significant: A sustained rotation in the pace of SOE vis-à-vis private sector capex marked a turning point in the 2015-2016 cycle, when Chinese policymakers’ imperative to supporting growth outweighed their desire to continue with structural reforms (Chart 5). We do not expect a 2016-style drastic rise in SOE capex growth next year, because the current economic slowdown is not as severe or prolonged as in 2015. Nonetheless, the rotation in capex growth is an important signal that Chinese policymakers may be more willing to stimulate the economy by again allowing the state sector to upstage the private sector. In the meantime, we expect that some pro-growth “policy adjustments” will be deployed in 2020: Chart 6Infrastructure Investment Likely To Rise Monetary policy will incrementally ease, with one to two 10-15bps loan prime rate (LPR) cuts in the next 3-6 months. At the same time, China’s central bank (PBoC) will keep bank liquidity ample and commercial banks’ funding costs relatively low, by continuing frequent liquidity injections to stabilize the interbank rate. A further cut in the reserve requirement ratio (RRR) is also highly likely. Keeping banks well capitalized will partially mitigate the pressure commercial banks face from falling profit margins and rising credit defaults. Accommodative monetary conditions will also support more stimulus on the fiscal front. We expect that the National People’s Congress in March 2020 will approve higher quotas on the issuing of local government bonds. Chinese state-owned commercial banks will continue to be the main buyers for local government bonds. A portion of 2020 local government special-purpose bond issuance will be frontloaded to the remainder of 2019 and into the first months of next year. Relaxed capital requirements will likely boost local governments’ infrastructure project funding and expenditures. Our model suggests infrastructure spending should pick up from the current 3.3% year-on-year, to close to 7.5% in the second and third quarters next year (Chart 6). There are subtle signs that the government is starting to relax restrictions on the real estate sector. Land sales by local governments have increased since mid-2019, and the trend will continue into 2020 (Chart 7). Income from land sales accounts for 70% of local government revenues, thus allowing more land sales should help fund a larger local government spending budget next year. Declining government subsidies to shantytown renovation (namely the Pledged Supplementary Lending, or PSL) have recently abated and will likely continue to improve (Chart 8). Chart 7Some Improvement To Come In The Real Estate Sector Chart 8Government Subsidies Will Continue December’s Central Economic Work Conference (CEWC) will set policy priorities for the following year. We think Chinese policymakers will make economic growth a top priority for 2020. Credit growth swelled in the first quarter of 2019 following the December 2018 CEWC, and we expect a surge in early 2020 as well.Due to the unusually high credit growth in January this year and the seasonal factor next year (Chinese New Year will fall in January 2020), the surge in credit growth, on a year-over-year basis, will more likely be muted until towards the end of the first quarter and into the second quarter. Investors should overweight Chinese investable stocks in the next 6-12 months, but need to watch for more positive signs to upgrade tactical stance. Beyond the second quarter, however, the outlook gets cloudier as tension from the US election heats up and President Trump may change his trade negotiation strategies with China.1 This may have implications on China’s domestic policies. But for now, our baseline view is that Chinese policymakers will incrementally accelerate the pace of economic stimulus throughout next year. Q: Monetary policy has been accommodative for more than a year, but capex this year has fallen below market expectations compared with past cycles. How will further stimulus help to revive investment and economic growth next year? In short, our answer is this: interest rate cuts alone will not be enough to boost economic growth in China. Capex, and growth more generally, will only revive through synchronized policy support from the Chinese authorities. In a previous report2 we discussed that the lack of response to monetary easing has been due to a less effective monetary policy transmission mechanism, a reactive and reluctant central bank, and a debt-loaded corporate sector. More importantly, the “half-measured” stimulus has been preferred by Chinese authorities in this cycle, as they prioritized financial de-risking over growth and have significantly tightened financial regulations since 2016. Given the expected policy pivot to a more pro-growth stance in the coming year, the following underlines our conviction that capex should pick up in 2020. Modern Money Theory (MMT), with Chinese characteristics:3 local governments will ramp up debt again, and this quasi-fiscal stimulus will be a key support to the economy in 2020. During the 2015-2016 cycle, aggressive interest cuts did not result in a significant uptick in credit growth. Bank lending was not the core driver for economic recovery in 2016. The economy only bottomed following an unprecedented issuance of local government bonds after mid-2015 (Chart 9). Chinese authorities will keep a “back door” open: even though overall tight financial regulations will remain intact, we expect the PBoC to allow a more moderate contraction in shadow banking (Chart 10). This will provide smaller banks and enterprises access to tap into bank credit. Importantly, this means the government will acquiesce to local governments in providing extra funding through shadow banking. We already see local government financing vehicles (LGFV) making a comeback in recent months. Chart 9A Chinese Version Of MMT Chart 10The "Back Door" May Open Wider Small- and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) will benefit from lowered financing costs through the new LPR system. As we pointed out in our previous report,4 the new LPR regime is not intended as much to expand bank credit as to help struggling SMEs survive economic hardships. This, along with tax cuts, should provide SMEs some relief from capital constraints. Q. CPI has been rising sharply and is above the government’s inflation target of 3%. Will inflation prevent the PBoC from maintaining an easy monetary policy? Chart 11PBoC Likely To Capitulate To Producer Deflation No. We think deflationary pressure in the industrial sector (measured by producer prices) poses a bigger threat to the economy, and that PBoC is more likely to loosen monetary policy than to tighten (Chart 11). Chart 12 shows that the recent surge in headline consumer prices has almost been entirely driven by soaring pork prices. There is compelling evidence from historical data that, unless core consumer price inflation also rises, climbing food prices alone will have a limited impact on PBoC policy (Chart 13). We think this approach is justified, as the necessity of “core feedthrough” is also what most central banks in the developed world look for when confronted with a detrimental supply shock. Chart 12Rising Pork Prices Have Driven Up Headline Inflation... Chart 13...But Won't Be Driving Up Interest Rates Chart 14A Wild Year For The RMB Core CPI has been trending downwards since February 2018, and there is no evidence to suggest that food prices will drive up core CPI inflation (Chart 13, bottom panel). This, in combination with deflating producer prices, means that the probability of tighter monetary policy over the coming 6-9 months is extremely low. In fact, we expect, with high conviction, that the PBOC will guide the LPR lower in the coming months. Q: What is your view on the RMB for 2020? The RMB depreciated by 5% against the US dollar from its peak in February this year, mostly driven by market expectations of US tariffs imposed on Chinese export goods. Interest rate differentials, short-term capital flows, and economic fundamentals all have played much smaller roles in the RMB’s value changes (Chart 14). The depreciation in the CNY/USD this year has pushed the RMB close to two sigma below its long-term trend (Chart 15). As we expect a “Phase One” trade deal to be signed and trade tensions abating at least in the near term, the RMB will face upward pressure through the first half of 2020. The appreciation will also be supported by, although to a lesser extent, China’s improved domestic economy, rising demand for RMB-denominated assets, and a weakening US dollar (Chart 16). According to our model, the USD/CNY exchange rate can return to a 6.8-7.0 range, if a significant portion of the existing tariffs is rolled back (Chart 17). This range seems to be within the “fair value” of the RMB, justifiable by the current China-US interest rate differential (Chart 14, bottom panel). Chart 15Has The RMB Gone Too Far? Chart 16Demand For RMB Assets On The Rise, Despite The Trade War However, it would not be in the PBoC’s best interests to let the RMB appreciate too rapidly, because an appreciating Chinese currency would act as a deflationary force on China’s export and manufacturing sectors. The large differential in the China-US interest rates would allow PBoC to cut interest and/or RRR rates, to ease upward pressure on the RMB. Chart 17Tariff Rollbacks Will Push Up RMB Q: How should equity investors position themselves towards China over the coming year? We are bullish on Chinese investable stocks in the next 6 to 12 months, based on our view that the Chinese economy will bottom in the first quarter next year, policy will be incrementally more supportive, and a “Phase One” trade deal will be signed soon. In the very near term, however, we think downside risks to Chinese equities are not trivial. We remain a neutral tactical stance, but will continue to watch for the following signs before upgrading our tactical call from neutral to overweight.5 Chart 18A (top panel) shows that cyclical stocks remain very depressed relative to defensives, underscoring investors’ lack of confidence in the Chinese economy and trade negotiations. A breakout in cyclicals versus defensives would signify a major improvement in investor sentiment towards Chinese economic growth. An uptick in the relative performance of industrials and consumer staples (Chart 18A, bottom panel). The negative sensitivity of industrials and positive sensitivity of consumer staples to monetary policy suggests that the relative performance between the two sectors may be a reflationary barometer for China’s economy. The relative performance trend remains off its recent low, which suggests that China’s existing policy stance has not yet turned more reflationary. A technical breakdown in the relative performance of healthcare and utility stocks (Chart 18B) would also be a bullish sign. Investable health care and utilities stocks have historically led China’s economic activity, core inflation and stock prices by 1-3 months. A technical breakdown in the relative performance of these sectors would signify that market participants anticipate a bottom in China’s economy. As we mentioned at the outset, we observed an interesting divergence in sentiment among our domestic versus global investors. This divergence is reflected in both the onshore and offshore stock markets; year to date, onshore A shares have outperformed global benchmarks by 5.6% (Chart 1, on page 1 of the report). Chart 18AWaiting For A Telltale Sign... Chart 18B...Before A Tactical Upgrade However, all of the outperformance in A shares occurred before end April, when the trade talks broke down and domestic credit expansion significantly slowed from the first quarter. Since May, the relative performance of A shares in US dollar terms has been mostly flat, reflecting the fact the markets were not expecting a significant stimulus forthcoming. Chinese investable stocks, on the other hand, have been trading heavily on the day-to-day news surrounding the trade negotiations and have significantly underperformed both domestic A shares and global benchmarks. Therefore, our base case view of a trade truce coupled with an improved Chinese economy and more supportive policy near year, warrant a cyclical overweight stance favoring Chinese investable stocks over their domestic peers. Earnings from both onshore and offshore markets will benefit from a modest improvement in economic activity, but we think the investable market will benefit more from the trade truce and more upside growth potential. Stay tuned. Jing Sima China Strategist jings@bcaresearch.com Footnotes 1Please see Geopolitical Strategy Special Report, "Is China Afraid Of The Big Bad Warren?" dated October 25, 2019, available at gps.bcaresearch.com 2Please see China Investment Strategy Weekly Report, " Threading A Stimulus Needle (Part 1): A Reluctant PBoC," dated July 10 2019, available at cis.bcaresearch.com 3We call it a “MMT” because China’s state-owned commercial banks own approximately 80% of local government bonds. The commercial banks are essentially backed by China’s central bank, which has a fiat currency system and can make independent monetary policy decisions. 4Please see China Investment Strategy Weekly Report, "Mild Deflation Means Timid Easing," dated October 9, 2019, available at cis.bcaresearch.com 5Please see China Investment Strategy Special Report, "A Guide To Chinese Investable Equity Sector Performance," dated October 30, 2019, available at cis.bcaresearch.com Cyclical Investment Stance Equity Sector Recommendations
Underweight Similar to utilities, REITs have come to the forefront lately as they have populated the top return sector ranks. Importantly, today several key factors signal that investors should shed public market real estate exposure. Namely, weakening supply/demand dynamics, pricing pressures, macro headwinds and still pricey valuations (primarily rock bottom cap rates) are all firing warning shots. On the demand front, not only our proprietary real estate demand indicator has sunk recently, but also the latest Fed Senior Loan Officer survey revealed that demand for CRE loans remains feeble (third & bottom panels). Simultaneously, fewer bankers are willing to extend CRE credit according to the same quarterly Fed survey (second panel). This tightening backdrop coupled with decelerating credit growth, will continue to weigh on CRE prices and S&P REITs. Bottom Line: We reiterate our underweight rating in the S&P real estate sector. For more details, please refer to the most recent Weekly Report. The ticker symbols for the stocks in this index are: BLBG – S5RLST – AMT, PLD, CCI, SPG, EQIX, WELL, PSA, EQR, AVB, SBAC, O, DLR, WY, VTR, ESS, BXP, CBRE, ARE, PEAK, MAA, UDR, EXR, DRE, HST, REG, VNO, IRM, FRT, KIM, AIV, SLG, MAC.
Dear Client, Instead of our regular weekly report next Monday, this Friday November 22, you will receive our flagship publication “The Bank Credit Analyst” with our annual investment outlook. Our regular publication service will resume on December 2 with our high-conviction calls for 2020. Kind regards, Anastasios Avgeriou Highlights Portfolio Strategy Weakening supply/demand dynamics, pricing pressures, macro headwinds and pricey valuations are all warning that REITs are headed south. Global capex blues and the ongoing manufacturing recession, the resilient US dollar and weak operating metrics all confirm that an underweight stance is still warranted in the S&P communications equipment index. Recent Changes There are no changes to our portfolio this week. Table 1 Feature The S&P 500 made fresh all-time highs again last week, as investors focused on hopes of a US/China trade deal and continued to ignore negative data/news at their own peril. Domestically, unemployment insurance claims jumped to the highest level since June, and none of the major market and industry groups showed a gain in output on a month-over-month basis in October according to the latest Fed industrial production release. Internationally, Korean exports remain in the doldrums, Chinese data releases were weak across the board, and the mighty US dollar is making multi-decade highs versus a slew of EM currencies. Chart 1Disquieting Gap All of this begs the question is global growth going to recover and aid the equity market grow into its lofty valuation? Our indicators suggest that a definitive earnings trough is now pushed out to Q2/2020. Thus, equity market caution is still warranted. Given all the recent equity market euphoria, we feel more and more like “the lone calf standing on the desolate, dangerous, wolf-patrolled prairie of contrary opinion” as – arguably the greatest trader of all time – Jesse Livermore mused roughly a century ago. Share buybacks have been a key pillar underpinning stocks since the GFC averaging roughly $500bn/annum since 2010. But, last year equity retirement jumped to nearly $1tn/annum. That is clearly unsustainable, warning that there is a disconnect between the S&P 500 and already steeply decelerating share buybacks. Our equity retirement estimate for next year is a return to the 10-year average, signaling that the market may hit a significant air pocket (top panel, Chart 1). Another perplexing recent phenomenon has been the lack of buying on margin that typically confirms SPX breakouts. While this episode may be similar to the 2015/16 episode, if margin debt does not recover soon it will exert downward pull on the broad market (bottom panel, Chart 1). Turning over to earnings, revenues, margins and the forward multiple is instructive. Turning over to earnings, revenues, margins and the forward multiple is instructive. Chart 2 highlights the S&P 500 earnings growth surprise factor. In more detail, this IBES/Refinitiv data show how accurate the sell side analysts’ 12-month forward EPS forecasts have been over time: a reading above zero implies the analyst community was too timid, while a fall below zero signals analysts were too optimistic. Chart 2Unhinged From The EPS Accuracy Signal Equity market momentum moves with the ebb and flow of this factor and given the still downbeat message both from our SPX profit model (please refer to our recent webcast slides) and our simple liquidity indicator (please see Chart 4 from last week’s publication), we doubt 10% profit growth is even plausible for 2020. On the margin front, all four key profit margin drivers are on the brink of turning from tailwinds to headwinds as we recently highlighted in our “Peak Margins?” Special Report. Revenue growth is also at risk of a standstill. Domestic producer prices are deflating, and the ISM prices paid index has been clobbered. German, Japanese, Korean and Chinese wholesale prices are contracting and the OECD’s composite PPI measure is also sinking, suggesting that final demand is anemic at best. Under such a dire global pricing backdrop, it will be challenging for SPX sales to sustain their positive momentum, especially if the greenback remains well bid (Chart 3). Chart 3Top Line Growth Troubles Forward multiples have slingshot higher despite a near 40bps increase in the 10-year yield since Labor Day. When the discount rate rises the multiple should come in and vice versa. Thus, we would lean against the recent spike in the S&P 500 forward P/E (10-year yield shown inverted, Chart 4). This week we are updating our negative views on a niche high-yielding sector and a tech subgroup. Finally, while sifting through market internals, we recently stumbled upon the GICS2 S&P consumer services index. Digging deeper into services was revealing. This relative share price ratio has gapped down of late. One of the reasons is that the services component of the personal consumption expenditure (PCE) data is decelerating (PCE services shown advanced, middle panel, Chart 5). The ISM non-manufacturing survey is also an excellent leading indicator of the S&P consumer services index, and warns that things will likely get worse before they get better (bottom panel, Chart 5). Chart 4Lofty Valuations Chart 5Market Internals Signal: Sit This One Out This week we are updating our negative views on a niche high-yielding sector and a tech subgroup. Getting Real With Real Estate We would refrain from chasing high yielding real estate stocks higher, and would rather avoid them altogether at the current juncture. Similar to utilities, REITs have come to the forefront lately as they have populated the top return sector ranks. However, real estate stocks, which have split out of the financials sector, are a niche GICS1 sector with a mere 3% market capitalization weight in the SPX, and have not driven the S&P 500 to all-time highs. Instead, tech stocks have, owing to their 23% market capitalization weight, as we have shown in recent research.1 Importantly, several key factors continue to signal that investors should shed public market real estate exposure. Namely, weakening supply/demand dynamics, pricing pressures, macro headwinds and still pricey valuations (primarily rock bottom cap rates) are all firing warning shots. The commercial real estate (CRE) sector is a bubble candidate that exemplifies this cycle’s excesses. As we have highlighted in the past, CRE prices sit at roughly two standard deviations above both the historical time trend and the previous cycle’s peak (not shown).2 Worryingly, CRE demand is waning. Not only our proprietary real estate demand indicator has sunk recently, but also the latest Fed Senior Loan Officer survey revealed that demand for CRE loans remains feeble (third & bottom panels, Chart 6). Simultaneously, fewer bankers are willing to extend CRE credit according to the same quarterly Fed survey (Chart 7). This tightening backdrop is weighing on CRE credit growth and CRE prices (second panel, Chart 6). In fact, absent credit growth providing the necessary fuel to sustain the CRE price inflation frenzy, there are rising odds that investors pull the plug on REITs (top panel, Chart 7). Chart 6Demand Ails Chart 7Time To... Already, occupancy rates have crested and there are increasing anecdotes of credit quality deterioration. As a result, CRE rents are also failing to keep up with inflation which eats into relative cash flow growth prospects (Chart 8). The supply side build up tilts this delicate balance further into deficit. Non-residential construction shows no signs of abating, with multi-family housing starts still running at an historically high rate of roughly 400K/annum (Chart 9). Such relentless overbuilding sows the seeds of the eventual felling in CRE prices and rents, which should also dent the S&P real estate sector. Chart 8...Lighten Up On Real Estate Chart 9Supply Build Up Is Deflationary Meanwhile, interest rate related headwinds will also weigh on this high-yielding sector in coming quarters, especially if the selloff in the bond market gains steam as BCA’s fixed income strategists continue to expect. While in the 2000s REITs were positively correlated with the 10-year Treasury yield, since 2010 this relationship has flipped and is now a tight inverse correlation (Chart 10). Chart 10Rising Yields = Sell REITs Finally, our proprietary Valuation Indicator (VI) has enjoyed an impressive run since the 2017 trough and despite the recent relative selloff remains in overvalued territory. Our Technical Indicator (TI) hit a wall of late near one standard deviation above the historical mean and has only partially unwound the overbought reading since the early 2018 bottom. If our thesis pans out, we expect heightened selling pressure to weigh further on our VI and TI (Chart 11). Chart 11Still Too Pricey Bottom Line: We reiterate our underweight rating in the S&P real estate sector. The ticker symbols for the stocks in this index are: BLBG – S5RLST – AMT, PLD, CCI, SPG, EQIX, WELL, PSA, EQR, AVB, SBAC, O, DLR, WY, VTR, ESS, BXP, CBRE, ARE, PEAK, MAA, UDR, EXR, DRE, HST, REG, VNO, IRM, FRT, KIM, AIV, SLG, MAC . Lost Signal The communications equipment rally stalled early in the summer and has since morphed into a bear market. We are sticking with our underweight recommendation, especially given a darkening profit outlook for this niche tech sub-group. Bellwether CSCO’s latest guidance was weak and confirmed that this capex-laden tech sub-index is in for a rough ride. Worryingly, CSCO’s key enterprise segment has no pulse. Historically, this data series has been positively correlated with telecom carrier capital outlays and the current message is grim (second panel, Chart 12). Tack on the ongoing manufacturing recession with CEOs canceling/postponing capital spending plans and the outlook dims further for the revenue prospects of communications equipment vendors (third & bottom panels, Chart 12). Chart 12Heed The CSCO Warning Adding insult to injury, the US/China trade war is further complicating the picture. The ongoing tariffs have exacerbated the global growth slowdown and global capex plans have come under intense scrutiny. The IFO’s World Economic Outlook capex intentions survey has plunged, warning that global exports of telecom gear have ample downside (Chart 13). Chart 13Global Capex Blues Chart 14US Dollar The Deflator The greenback’s resilience is also sapping business purchasing power, especially in the emerging markets, denting final-demand. Therefore, the US dollar’s appreciation robs communications equipment manufacturers’ pricing power, makes their goods more expensive in the global market place, and as a consequence forces market share losses on them (Chart 14). The greenback’s resilience is also sapping business purchasing power, especially in the emerging markets, denting final-demand. The implication of weakening pricing power is that profits will likely underwhelm. Currently, the sell-side is penciling in roughly 10% EPS growth for the S&P communications equipment index over and above the SPX in the next twelve months. This is a tall order and we would lean against such extreme analyst optimism (bottom panel, Chart 15). Operating metrics are quickly losing steam, another harbinger of profit ails for this tech sub-group. In more detail, our productivity proxy has taken a steep turn for the worse and industry executives have also put investment projects on hold (middle panel, Chart 15). Moreover, the communication equipment new orders-to-inventories ratio is contracting and industry resource utilization is probing multi-year lows, according to the Fed’s latest industrial production release. Under such a backdrop, relative top line growth is on track to level off and likely flirt with the contraction zone (Chart 16). Chart 15Operating Metric... Chart 16...Dysphoria Netting it all out, global capex blues, the resilient US dollar and weak operating metrics all confirm that an underweight stance is still warranted in the S&P communications equipment index. Bottom Line: Continue to avoid the S&P communications equipment index. The ticker symbols for the stocks in this index are: BLBG – S5COMM – CSCO, JNPR, MSI, ANET, FFIV. Anastasios Avgeriou US Equity Strategist anastasios@bcaresearch.com Footnotes 1 Please see BCA US Equity Strategy Insight Report, “Deciphering Sector Returns” dated August 30, 2019, available at uses.bcaresearch.com. 2 Please see BCA US Equity Strategy Special Report, “10 Most FAQs From The Road” dated April 8, 2019, available at uses.bcaresearch.com. Current Recommendations Current Trades Size And Style Views Stay neutral cyclicals over defensives (downgrade alert) Favor value over growth Favor large over small caps (Stop 10%)
Highlights While the Caixin PMI is pointing to improving economic conditions, other data series still reflect weak growth. China’s business cycle is likely to bottom in Q1 of next year, rather than in Q4. The failure of Chinese stocks to significantly outperform the global benchmark and the continued underperformance of cyclical stocks underscore the near-term risks to equities if this month’s trade & manufacturing data disappoint. We continue to recommend a neutral tactical stance (0-3 months) towards Chinese equities versus global stocks, but expect them to outperform on a cyclical (6-12 month) time horizon after economic growth firmly bottoms. Feature Tables 1 and 2 on pages 2 and 3 highlight key developments in China’s economy and its financial markets over the past month. On the growth front, the data remains mixed: the strength in the October Caixin PMI and the September pickup in electricity production are positive signs, but other important datapoints still point to weak conditions. We continue to expect that China’s business cycle is likely to bottom in Q1 of next year, rather than in Q4. We continue to expect that growth will bottom in Q1 of next year, rather than in Q4. Table 1China Macro Data Summary Table 2China Financial Market Performance Summary Within financial markets, Chinese stocks have rallied in absolute terms over the past month in response to greatly increased odds of a trade truce between China and the US, but have failed to outperform the global benchmark. This, in combination with the continued underperformance of cyclical stocks, suggests that hard evidence of an economic improvement in China will be required before Chinese stocks begin to rise in relative terms. The risk of near-term underperformance is still present, especially if October’s hard trade and manufacturing data disappoint. We continue to recommend a neutral tactical stance (0-3 months) towards Chinese equities versus global stocks, but expect them to outperform on a cyclical (6-12 month) time horizon after economic growth firmly bottoms. In reference to Tables 1 and 2, we provide below several detailed observations concerning developments in China’s macro and financial market data: Chart 1Not Yet A Clear Change In Trend The Bloomberg Li Keqiang index (LKI) ticked up in September, led by an improvement in electricity production. An improvement in the LKI in lockstep with a rising Caixin manufacturing PMI (discussed below) raises the odds that the Chinese economy may be bottoming earlier than we expect, but for now only modestly so. Chinese economic data is highly volatile, and Chart 1 shows that the improvement in the LKI is very muted when shown as a 3-month moving average. In addition, a slight improvement also occurred earlier this year, but proved to be a false signal. All told, for now we continue to expect that growth will bottom in Q1 of next year, rather than in Q4. Our leading indicator for the LKI was essentially flat in September on a smoothed basis, with sequential declines in M3 growth and the credit components of the indicator offsetting improvements in monetary conditions and M2. From a big picture perspective, the story of our LKI leading indicator remains unchanged: it continues to trend higher, at a much shallower pace than has been the case during previous easing cycles. The uptrend is the basis of our forecast that China’s growth will soon bottom, but the uncharacteristically shallow nature of the rise suggests that the eventual recovery will be modest. On a smoothed basis, Chinese residential floor space sold improved again in September, following a very significant rise in August. Over the past 12-18 months, we had emphasized that the double-digit pace of growth in China’s housing starts was unsustainable because it had entirely decoupled from the trend in sales (which have reliably led construction activity over the past decade). This gap disappeared over the summer due to a significant slowdown in starts, which is what we predicted would occur. However, the recent acceleration in floor space sold represents a legitimate fundamental improvement in the housing market, that for now is difficult to attribute to the recent drivers of housing demand (Chart 2).1 Still, investors should continue to watch China’s housing demand data closely over the coming few months, for further signs of a potential re-acceleration in housing construction. Investors need to see meaningful sequential improvements in China’s October trade and manufacturing data. The October improvement in China’s Caixin PMI was quite notable, as it appears to confirm the full one-point rise in the index that occurred in September and suggests that manufacturing in China’s private-sector is now durably expanding. Still, conflicting signals remain: the official PMI fell in October and remains below 50, and the significant September improvement in the Caixin PMI was not corroborated by an improvement in producer prices or nominal import growth (Chart 3). As PMIs are simply timely coincident indicators that do not generally have leading properties, investors will need to see meaningful sequential improvements in China’s October trade and manufacturing data in order to have confidence that the Caixin PMI improvement is not a false signal. Chart 2It Is Not Yet Apparent What Is Driving A Pickup In Housing Demand Chart 3If The Caixin PMI Is Not A False Signal, A Hard Data Improvement Must Occur Soon Chinese stocks have rallied 6-7% over the past month in absolute terms, but have modestly underperformed global equities. The rally in global stock prices has occurred largely in response to the mid-October announcement of a trade truce between China and the US. The failure of Chinese stocks to outperform during this period suggests hard evidence of an economic improvement in China will be required before Chinese stocks begin to outpace their global peers. At the regional equity level, the other notable development over the past month has been the continued outperformance of the MSCI Taiwan Index versus the global benchmark. Taiwan’s outperformance has been boosted by a rising TWD versus the dollar, but Taiwanese stocks have also outperformed in local currency terms. Taiwan province is highly exposed to global trade, and it is not surprising that equities have reacted positively to the prospect of a trade truce between the US and China. Further meaningful outperformance, however, will likely require a re-acceleration in Taiwanese exports, as export growth has merely halted its contraction (Chart 4). Within China’s investable equity market, cyclicals have underperformed defensives over the past month after having rallied significantly from late-August to mid-September (Chart 5). We noted in our October 30 Special Report that these cyclical sectors have historically been positively correlated with pro-cyclical macroeconomic and equity market variables,2 and their underperformance versus defensives is thus consistent with the failure of Chinese stocks in the aggregate to outperform global equities over the past month. In both cases, outperformance likely requires hard evidence of an upturn in China’s business cycle. Chart 4Export Growth Needs To Improve In Order To Expect Further Taiwanese Relative Outperformance Chart 5Cyclical Underperformance Underscores The Near-Term Risks To Chinese Vs. Global Stocks We do not take the rise in Chinese government bond yields as necessarily indicative of an imminent breakout in relative equity performance. Chart 6Chinese Relative Equity Performance Leads Bond Yields, Not The Other Way Around Chinese 10-year government bond yields have risen roughly 15bps over the past month, and are now 30bps off of their mid-August low. Many market participants view Chinese government bond yields as a leading growth barometer, but 10-year yields have actually lagged Chinese investable stock performance over the past two years (Chart 6). As such, we do not take the rise in yields as necessarily indicative of an imminent breakout in relative equity performance. Chinese onshore corporate bond spreads have declined over the past month as government bond yields have been rising, continuing a pattern of negative correlation between the two that has prevailed since early-2018. A negative correlation between yields and corporate bond spreads is a normal relationship, and it suggests that spreads may narrow over the coming year if the Chinese economy bottoms in Q1, as we expect. Spreads remain elevated despite the substantial easing in monetary conditions that occurred last year, due to persistent concerns about rising onshore defaults. While we acknowledge that defaults are indeed occurring, we have argued on several occasions that the pace of defaults would have to be much faster in order for current spreads to be justified.3 We continue to recommend a long RMB-denominated position in China’s onshore corporate bond market. The RMB has appreciated over the past month in response to news of a likely trade truce between the US and China, with most of the rise having occurred versus the US dollar. USD-CNY is likely to sustainably trade below the 7 mark in a trade truce scenario, but how much further downside is possible in the near-term absent a re-acceleration in Chinese economic activity remains an open question. With the Fed very likely on hold for the next year, stronger than expected economic growth in China would likely catalyze a persistent selloff in USD-CNY barring a re-emergence of the Sino-US trade war. This, however, is not our base-case view, meaning that we expect modest post-deal strength in the RMB. Jonathan LaBerge, CFA Vice President Special Reports jonathanl@bcaresearch.com Jing Sima China Strategist JingS@bcaresearch.com Footnotes 1. Please see China Investment Strategy Special Report, “China’s Property Market: Where Will It Go From Here?” dated September 13, 2018. 2. Please see China Investment Strategy Weekly Report, “A Guide To Chinese Investable Equity Sector Performance,” dated October 30, 2019. 3. Please see China Investment Strategy Weekly Reports, “A Shaky Ladder,” dated June 13, 2018, "Investing In The Middle Of A Trade War,” dated September 19, 2018 and "2019 Key Views: Four Themes For China In The Coming Year,” dated December 5, 2018. Cyclical Investment Stance Equity Sector Recommendations
Highlights The banks got the current earnings season off to a good start, … : Lending growth may be running in place, and net interest margins are under pressure, but positive operating leverage helped the banks beat expectations, and they are returning gobs of cash to their shareholders. … are quite constructive about the economy, … : The big banks’ CFOs and CEOs were uniformly bullish about the U.S. economy based on their perceptions of household and corporate health. … expect stellar credit performance to continue for the foreseeable future, … : Net charge-off and non-performing loan ratios are near all-time lows and the banks don’t see them rising any time soon. … and appear to be willing to extend loans in all categories except commercial real estate: Every bank sees unattractive competition in commercial real estate lending and plans to continue shrinking its CRE loan book. Nothing To See Here Two-fifths of the companies in the S&P 500 have now reported their quarterly earnings, and after this week the share will be two-thirds. At the aggregate level, it appears as if investors’ worst fears will not be realized, just as they weren’t in the first two quarters of the year. 2018’s greater than 20% year-on-year growth, powered by the sharp cut in the top corporate income tax rate, has rolled off, but earnings have yet to contract. They were projected to fall by a little over 3% at the beginning of this reporting season, but repeated practice has allowed corporate managements to hone their underpromise-and-overdeliver skills to a fine point, and we won’t be surprised if they avert an outright contraction. Chart 1Profit Margins Are Being Squeezed, ... Chart 2... But Neither Growing Compensation, ... Earnings growth has been stagnant this year (Chart 1, bottom panel), though revenues have grown a little faster than nominal GDP (Chart 1, top panel), with which they should converge over time. Profit margins have finally come under pressure, though it’s not exactly clear why. Employee compensation is businesses’ biggest expense by far, and while it has risen from its lows, its growth decelerated last quarter (Chart 2). Dollar strength is a headwind for U.S.-based multinationals, but the dollar only really moved last quarter, after ending the first half where it started the year (Chart 3). Dollar gains weigh on revenues just as surely as they do on profits, though we would not be at all surprised if the share of non-dollar expenses is a good bit smaller than the widely quoted 33-40% estimate of S&P 500 constituents’ foreign sales. Chart 3... Nor A Stronger Dollar Is A Clear-Cut Culprit Rate cuts have sparked a wave of mortgage refinancings, shifting wealth from mortgage investors to homeowners, who are more likely to spend it. Easier monetary conditions should help grease the skids for future earnings growth, both in the U.S. and abroad, and we expect the Fed will cut the fed funds rate by another 25 basis points when it meets this week. We have sympathy for the argument that since interest rates were not a meaningful constraint on growth, cutting them is not likely to provide much of a catalyst. Falling rates have provoked a wave of mortgage refinancings (Chart 4), however, so even if they don’t drive a big lending increase, they are already on their way to putting more money in the pockets of homeowners. Lower rates also reduce the risk of default by lowering debt-service costs for adjustable-rate borrowers, and by encouraging investors who need income to venture further out the risk curve, providing ample capital for borrowers seeking to extend their maturing obligations. Chart 4Putting More Money In Homeowners' Pockets Follow The Money Chart 5Bank Stocks Are Probing Resistance For two years, beginning in 2014, we reviewed the biggest banks’ earnings calls every quarter. The goal was to observe the give and take between bank management and sell-side analysts to gain some insight into the lending market and where it might be headed. We specifically sought information about banks’ willingness to lend, consumers’ and businesses’ appetite for credit, borrower performance, and the banks’ bottom-up perspective on the economy. We were also trying to glean insight into mortgage lending and what it might imply for residential investment. Studying the banks is a natural pursuit for a firm that was founded upon the insight that following money flows through the banking system would provide us with a window into the future direction of the economy and financial markets, and we return to it today. Our analysis is not meant to evaluate the banks’ own investment potential, though we note that they are testing resistance once again (Chart 5), and our Global Investment Strategy and U.S. Equity Strategy services both recommend overweighting them. This round of calls found bank management teams eager to ramp up their distributions to shareholders and optimistic about their ability to deploy technology to drive further efficiency gains. Big Banks Beige Book As a group, the banks were constructive on the economy. Despite widespread recession concerns, they do not see evidence of a looming slowdown from their interactions with consumers and businesses. Overall loan growth has remained around 5% over the last year and a half (Chart 6), while corporate and industrial (C&I) loan growth has ground to zero over the last thirteen weeks (Chart 7). The CEOs and CFOs do not see the C&I slump as the beginning of a worrisome trend, though, and global corporate bond issuance hit an all-time high in September, led by sizable issues from mega-cap U.S. companies. Businesses seeking credit are having no trouble getting it, though all the banks expressed an intention to continue cutting back their exposure to commercial real estate (CRE) loans. Chart 6Bank Lending Is Supporting Activity Without Risking Overheating Chart 7Lending Momentum Has Slowed, But It's Okay Another commercial real estate issue emerged across the calls: several of the biggest banks are consolidating their branch footprints. Prompted by questioning from one analyst, they touted branch closures as a way to enhance efficiency. We do not know if a reduction in bank demand for branch space would have an observable effect on demand for retail space across the country, but it certainly would in Manhattan. It seems possible that branch closures could pressure some retail lessors’ profitability, and thereby act as a drag on CRE whole-loan and CMBS performance at the margin. The Economy [C]onsumer spend and … confidence continue to be strong. I think business activity continues to be strong. I think it’s moderated somewhat because of … trade policy, but generally, I think the economy is solid. (Dolan, USB CFO) I think it’s fair to say that perhaps marginal investment is being impacted by trade fatigue in terms of the uncertainty, but … [there’s] still growth. … [T]he consumer is incredibly strong, … spending is strong, sentiment is strong, … credit is good. [I]t is true that [the recent ISM manufacturing and non-manufacturing surveys] were disappointing[,] so [there are] cautionary signs, but credit remains very good and there is still very healthy business activity. (Piepszak, JPM CFO) In general, our commercial customers continue to see moderate demand and no widespread issues related to trade uncertainty and interest rate changes. … [W]hile our customers are cautious, the most common concern they identify is their ability to hire enough qualified workers. (Shrewsberry, WFC CFO) Consumer payments up 6% year-to-date … [and 6% year-over-year 3Q growth in both our small business segment and total commercial loans] are tangible examples that the U.S. economy is still in solid shape, despite the worries and concerns about trade wars, capital investment slowdowns or other global macro conditions. (Moynihan, BAC CEO) Borrower Performance [W]e’ve had growth in the United States for the better part of 10 years [a]nd … credit is extraordinarily good. … [C]onsumer credit, commercial credit, wholesale is extraordinarily good, it can only get worse if you have a [turn in the] cycle. [Our guidance relates to expected performance across a full cycle.] We’re at the over-earning part of the cycle [beating the through-the-cycle expectation] in credit today, and [at] one point we’ll be at the under-earning part [pulling the full result down to our expectation]. (Dimon, JPM CEO) Our net charge-off rate remains near historic lows at 27 basis points (Chart 8). (Shrewsberry, WFC) Chart 8C&I Charge-Off Rates Are Near Their Historic Lows Credit quality remains stable, and we are not seeing any early indicators in our portfolio that cause us concern. (Cecere, USB CEO) Banks see no broad credit warning signs, but they're perfectly happy to let non-bank lenders take some commercial real estate share at this point of the cycle. We closely monitor our commercial portfolio for signs of weakness and credit quality indicators remain strong. (Shrewsberry, WFC) Lender Willingness [W]e are mindful that at some point, the industry will experience a credit downturn, and we remain disciplined in terms of origination quality and our long-term strategy of remaining within our defined credit box regardless of the competitive environment. (Cecere, USB) [Commercial] real estate banking [declined] as we remain selective, given where we are in the cycle. (Piepszak, JPM) [Commercial real estate lending] is one market where there’s late cycle behavior, there’s lots of non-bank competitors, … more than bank competitors. And so we really have to pick our spots in order to maintain our risk/reward, credit and pricing in loan terms quality. … I wouldn’t look for it to grow meaningfully until the cycle turns and our best customers have really interesting opportunities to put their own capital to work. (Shrewsberry, WFC) [Our declining commercial real estate lending is] really a function of [competition] that we’re not comfortable with. (Cecere, USB) Banks’ Real Estate Demand [C]ustomer behaviors are changing. The amount of transaction activity that’s happening in the branches is significantly less[.] In fact, … roughly 70, 80% of it goes through the digital channel today. So that gives us the opportunity to really reconfigure the branch network, both in terms of size and numbers[.] I think those trends are going to continue … , and … we may accelerate or increase some of [our right-sizing] activity[.] (Dolan, USB) Teller and ATM transactions declined 6% from a year ago, reflecting continued customer migration to digital channels. We’ve consolidated 130 branches in the first nine months of this year, including 52 branches in the third quarter. (Shrewsberry, WFC) [D]o we continue to work on real estate configurations that were down 50 million square feet from the start of 2010[?] [C]an we push [the occupancy rate] up, can we densify the space[?] (Moynihan, BAC) Investment Implications While rereading the April 2014 U.S. Investment Strategy that reviewed the big banks’ 1Q14 earnings calls, we were struck by how similar the picture is today. Back then, we described the central challenge for investors as choosing between mushy fundamentals and generous monetary policy that might be expected to inspire a valuation overshoot. As we do now, we anticipated that activity would soon pick up, providing markets with a fundamental boost, but we also had the sense that “policy settings are such that no much more than the status quo may be required to keep the party going.” We reiterated our equity overweight and our preference for spread product over Treasuries. Between inflection points, investing is an exercise in trend following, and there's no reason to believe that the monetary policy trend is about to change without clear advance notice. Although we are congenitally optimistic about our species and our country, we are not perma-bulls. We simply recognize that, between inflection points, investing is an exercise in trend following, no matter how uncomfortable it may make an investor to leave the portfolio dials alone for a while. As long as the monetary policy backdrop remains extremely accommodative across all of the major developed economies, and central banks are set to add even more accommodation before they start removing it, the bullish trend will remain in place. The prospective real returns of cash and highly-rated sovereign bonds are likely to remain negative for a while against that backdrop, encouraging investors to direct their marginal investment dollar to risk assets as long as a fundamental reversal is not imminent. We think a fundamental inflection is at least two years away, and therefore continue to believe that it is too early to de-risk investment portfolios. We reiterate our recommendation that investors remain at least equal weight equities in balanced portfolios, and at least equal weight spread product within their fixed-income allocations. Doug Peta, CFA Chief U.S. Investment Strategist dougp@bcaresearch.com
Aspectos destacados
El mercado de divisas está bifurcado en términos de expectativas a corto plazo frente a factores a largo plazo. La corona sueca, la corona noruega y la libra esterlina son compras sólidas a largo plazo, pero podrían seguir siendo muy volátiles a corto plazo.
Seguimos enfocándonos en los cruces en lugar de apuestas directas sobre el dólar. Mantener posiciones largas en SEK/NZD, GBP/JPY y NOK/SEK. Ajustar los stops en la posición larga de GBP/JPY para proteger ganancias.
EUR/SEK debería alcanzar su techo una vez que mejore el crecimiento global.
Vender la relación oro/plata en 90, como se recomendó en el informe de la semana pasada.1
Artículo principal
Chart I-1
Una vía en un solo sentido desde 2018
Calle de sentido único desde 2018
Calle de sentido único desde 2018
De todas las monedas del G10 que seguimos, la corona sueca probablemente sea la más desconcertante. El Riksbank es uno de los pocos bancos centrales que han subido tipos este año, pero la corona sigue siendo la moneda más débil del G10. Admitimos que el desempeño del sector manufacturero sueco ha sido pésimo, y lo fue especialmente en septiembre, pero esto no ha sido una historia exclusiva de Suecia. La zona del euro, que también está experimentando una profunda recesión manufacturera, ha visto un mejor comportamiento de su moneda a pesar de un Banco Central Europeo (BCE) más dovish.
El rendimiento inferior de la corona plantea la pregunta de si esto señala una recesión manufacturera global mucho más prolongada, o si es indicativo de algo más endógeno a Suecia. Dicho de otra manera, ¿el impulso de la fortaleza de USD/SEK (e incluso USD/NOK) ha sido un dólar apreciándose, o más bien factores domésticos (Chart I-1)? Y si es lo segundo, ¿cuáles son los indicadores importantes a tener en cuenta en caso de que un giro esté a la vuelta de la esquina?
El debate entre datos blandos y datos duros
La gran pregunta para Suecia es si el sector manufacturero solo está en un proceso volátil de establecer un fondo, o si está a punto de contraerse mucho más. La producción industrial está creciendo actualmente al 4% interanual, pero la señal de los datos blandos es que debería estar contrayéndose en cifras de dos dígitos (Chart I-2, panel superior). Como tal, hay o bien una gran desconexión entre la percepción de los inversores y la realidad, o estamos al borde de un desplome manufacturero mucho más profundo. Los tipos de cambio tienden a ser extremadamente fluidos al descontar una amplia gama de datos económicos y, en el caso de Suecia, al descontar el resultado para el crecimiento global. Sin embargo, con EUR/SEK en 10.8 y USD/SEK en 9.7 – este último muy por encima de sus máximos de 2008 – es razonable asumir que cualquier cosa que no sea una recesión profunda justificará una SEK más fuerte.
Una de las ratios más consistentes para señalar un fondo en el sector manufacturero sueco en particular (y en el de la zona euro en general) es la ratio pedidos manufactureros-niveles de inventario (Chart I-2, panel inferior). La caída en septiembre fue desconcertante. Sin embargo, a diferencia del PMI manufacturero, esta ratio no está marcando nuevos mínimos, evidencia tentativa de que podríamos estar en un proceso volátil de fondo en lugar de una caída prolongada. La última vez que encontramos tal divergencia fue en 2011/2012, en el auge de la crisis de deuda europea; en esa ocasión, los datos duros suecos terminaron enviando la señal correcta para la economía en su conjunto.
El deterioro del sector manufacturero aún no ha afectado al consumo interno en general ni al mercado laboral en particular.
El deterioro del sector manufacturero aún no ha afectado al consumo interno en general ni al mercado laboral en particular. El componente de importaciones del índice PMI se mantiene muy por encima del de las exportaciones. Mientras tanto, el componente de empleo del índice PMI comenzó a estabilizarse hacia la mitad de este año, lo que significa que el crecimiento del empleo debería tocar fondo en torno al 1% aproximadamente (Chart I-3). Las exportaciones suecas están más arriba en la cadena de valor manufacturera que en la mayoría de las demás economías desarrolladas, y el sector del automóvil es bastante importante. Pero hasta ahora, la economía sueca ha resistido bastante bien la desaceleración del sector automotriz, con la producción aún registrando un 7% anual.
Chart I-2
Los datos blandos son mucho peores
Los datos cualitativos son mucho peores
Los datos cualitativos son mucho peores
Chart I-3
La demanda doméstica se mantiene bien
La demanda interna se mantiene sólida
La demanda interna se mantiene sólida
El repunte de la tasa de desempleo sueca es problemático, pero no creemos que constituya un cambio mayor en la dinámica del mercado laboral. Suecia tiene una larga historia de mayor apertura hacia solicitantes de asilo y refugiados que muchos otros países europeos. La crisis siria de hace un par de años provocó un aumento excepcional, donde el número de solicitantes de asilo se disparó a más de 150.000 o casi el 1,5% de la población total (Chart I-4). Históricamente, la inmigración ha proporcionado un gran dividendo laboral a Suecia, permitiendo que el crecimiento supere tanto al de EE. UU. como al de la zona euro. Pero esto también ha sido una fuente de desempleo friccional, mientras los nuevos migrantes se integran en la fuerza laboral.
Chart I-4
Un nuevo grupo de mano de obra que debe integrarse
Una nueva reserva de mano de obra que debe integrarse
Una nueva reserva de mano de obra que debe integrarse
Los trabajadores nacidos en el extranjero ahora constituyen alrededor del 20% de la población total, una gran parte de los cuales necesita aprender un nuevo idioma y adquirir nuevas habilidades (Chart I-5A). Este dividendo de crecimiento se cosechará durante muchos años. La integración es un tema políticamente contencioso, y por ello la ley de asilo y reunificación familiar altamente restrictiva adoptada a mediados de 2016 probablemente signifique que el auge migratorio ya ha quedado atrás. El ascenso de los Demócratas de Suecia, antiinmigración, en las elecciones de septiembre de 2018 es un ejemplo. Sin embargo, el giro de la población democrática hacia la derecha ha sido un fenómeno global, por lo que no es tan negativo para Suecia en términos relativos. Todo ello para decir que, en comparación con la mayoría de las naciones desarrolladas, Suecia aún disfruta de una perspectiva demográfica relativamente positiva (Chart I-5B).
Chart I-5A
Un enorme dividendo laboral
Un enorme dividendo laboral
Un enorme dividendo laboral
Chart I-5B
Sin un evidente precipicio demográfico
No hay un precipicio demográfico aparente.
No hay un precipicio demográfico aparente.
La afluencia de migrantes tiene un impacto mixto en la inflación. Si bien existe presión a la baja sobre los salarios, debido a un aumento en la proporción de empleo que paga salarios más bajos, todavía hay presión al alza sobre la vivienda y el consumo en respuesta al mayor número de trabajadores. Esto se suma a un impulso fiscal al aumentar el gasto del gobierno en servicios sociales. Mientras tanto, la tasa de desempleo entre las personas nacidas en el extranjero ronda el 15%. Esto significa que la curva de Phillips está plana durante los primeros años, antes de empezar a empinarse. Pero a medida que la nueva fuerza laboral finalmente se absorbe en la economía, debería comenzar a generar presiones salariales significativas.
El Riksbank entiende claramente estas dinámicas, por lo que en años anteriores su postura ha sido acomodaticia incluso cuando la economía sueca ha mantenido un buen comportamiento. Los tipos de interés se recortaron a territorio negativo en 2015 y se mantuvieron en -0.5% (por debajo del tipo de política del BCE) durante toda la recuperación global en 2016 y 2017. La flexibilización cuantitativa también se ha prolongado hasta 2020, con mucha antelación respecto al anuncio del renovado programa de compras de activos del BCE. Ambos han aflojado enormemente las condiciones monetarias en Suecia, incluso a través de una moneda más débil. De cara al futuro, hay algunas razones clave para creer que la trayectoria de menor resistencia para la corona ahora es al alza:
Una corona débil típicamente ha ayudado al sector manufacturero con un desfase de doce meses.
Una corona débil típicamente ha ayudado al sector manufacturero con un desfase de doce meses. Las divergencias negativas solo tienden a ocurrir antes de recesiones profundas. A menos que estemos en esa situación particular ahora, una mejor demanda de bienes suecos relativamente más baratos (piense Volvo frente a BMW) debería llevar a una corona más fuerte (Chart I-6).
Sí, el Riskbank ha estado llevando a cabo QE, pero el ritmo de expansión de su balance se ha ido desacelerando en trimestres recientes. USD/SEK tiende a seguir las tendencias relativas de los balances entre el Riksbank y la Fed, pero se ha abierto una cuña a favor de la corona (Chart I-7). Mientras tanto, con la Fed a punto de reexpandir su balance, esto también debería favorecer a una SEK más fuerte frente al USD.
Chart I-6
Corona sueca y manufactura
Corona Sueca Y Manufactura
Corona Sueca Y Manufactura
Chart I-7
USD/SEK y balances relativos
USD/SEK Y Balances Relativos
USD/SEK Y Balances Relativos
El mercado de la vivienda sueco se está convirtiendo en una espina para el Riksbank. Cuando se introdujeron los tipos negativos en 2015, el crecimiento de los precios de la vivienda se disparó hasta el 15% interanual (Chart I-8). Más recientemente, una limitación de la migración ha permitido cierto enfriamiento, pero el apalancamiento de los hogares suecos sigue siendo muy elevado. Con la memoria de la crisis inmobiliaria de los años 90 aún fresca, esto está haciendo que el Riksbank se sienta bastante incómodo con su postura de política actual.
El coste de acarreo es menor por estar corto en NZD comparado con estar corto en el dólar estadounidense.
Nuestra inclinación es que, aunque el gobernador Stefan Ingves prefiere renormalizar la política lo más rápido posible, dado que dirige una economía pequeña y abierta con el comercio representando un impresionante 45% del PIB, está a merced de las condiciones externas. La SEK es la moneda más barata del universo G10 y podría rebotar con fuerza ante la mínima evidencia de que el crecimiento global ha tocado fondo. Además, un crecimiento global al alza ajustará la utilización de recursos, lo que debería comenzar a impulsar las presiones inflacionarias subyacentes en Suecia (Chart I-9)
Chart I-8
Precios de la vivienda en Suecia##br## Están en burbuja
Los precios de la vivienda en Suecia están en una burbuja
Los precios de la vivienda en Suecia están en una burbuja
Chart I-9
Utilización de recursos e inflación en Suecia
Utilización de Recursos e Inflación en Suecia
Utilización de Recursos e Inflación en Suecia
En términos de estrategia de negociación con SEK, USD/SEK y NZD/SEK tienden a estar altamente correlacionados; dado que la SEK tiene una mayor beta al crecimiento global que el kiwi (Suecia exporta el 45% de su PIB frente al 27% de Nueva Zelanda). En términos relativos, la economía sueca parece haber tocado fondo en relación con la de EE. UU., lo que hace del SEK/NZD una forma atractiva de jugar la caída de USD/SEK. Mientras tanto, el coste de acarreo es menor por estar corto en NZD comparado con estar corto en el dólar estadounidense (Chart I-10). En cuanto a EUR/SEK, el cruce podría consolidarse en los niveles actuales antes de dirigirse a la baja, pero en última instancia alcanzará su pico una vez que el crecimiento global se reoriente al alza.
Chart I-10
Mantener posición larga en SEK/NZD
Mantener posición larga en SEK/NZD
Mantener posición larga en SEK/NZD
Conclusión: Mantenemos la posición larga en SEK/NZD como una apuesta de valor relativo, pero la verdadera apreciación reside en el cruce SEK/USD. Nuestra inclinación es que la debilidad de la SEK ha sido impulsada por el enfoque del mercado en datos blandos decepcionantes, mientras que los datos duros se mantienen relativamente resilientes. Una vez que quede más claro que el entorno de crecimiento global no es tan precario como sugieren las encuestas, la corona podría rebotar con fuerza.
Asuntos internos
Nuestra posición larga en GBP/JPY alcanzó un 5% esta semana. Estamos ajustando stops a 138 para proteger ganancias. También fuimos sacados de la posición corta en EUR/NOK con una pérdida del 2%. Por ahora nos mantenemos al margen. EUR/NOK cotiza ahora por encima de los niveles de recesión de 2008, lo cual solo se justifica por una recesión prolongada del crecimiento, pero la gestión del riesgo requiere paciencia por ahora. Estén atentos.
Chester Ntonifor, Estratega de Divisas chestern@bcaresearch.com
Notas a pie
1 Por favor consulte el Foreign Exchange Strategy Weekly Report, titulado “Sobre la velocidad del dinero, EUR/USD y la plata,” con fecha 11 de octubre de 2019, disponible en fes.bcaresearch.com
Divisas
Dólar estadounidense
Chart II-1
Técnicas USD 1
Análisis técnico USD 1
Análisis técnico USD 1
Chart II-2
Técnicas USD 2
Análisis técnico del USD 2
Análisis técnico del USD 2
Los datos recientes en EE. UU. han sido débiles:
Las ventas minoristas se contrajeron un 0.3% mensual en septiembre. La producción industrial cayó un 0.4% mensual.
Los precios de exportación e importación cayeron 1.6% interanual en septiembre.
El índice de sentimiento del consumidor de Michigan creció hasta 96 en octubre, desde 93.2 en el mes anterior.
El índice manufacturero NY Empire State aumentó a 4 en octubre, desde 2 en septiembre.
Los permisos de construcción e inicios de viviendas cayeron 2.7% y 9.4% mensual en septiembre, pero la recuperación de la vivienda se mantiene intacta.
Las solicitudes iniciales de subsidio por desempleo aumentaron a 214K en la semana terminada el 11 de octubre.
El índice DXY se depreció un 0.7% esta semana. El último Beige Book resumió que la economía estadounidense se expandió a un ritmo de leve a moderado. La desaceleración del sector manufacturero sigue siendo el mayor riesgo para la economía, mientras que las tensiones comerciales continúan pesando sobre el sentimiento empresarial y las intenciones de gasto de capital. El más reciente “entente” en las discusiones comerciales podría representar un cambio pivotal desde la elevada incertidumbre que prevaleció durante el verano.
Enlaces de informes:
Sobre la velocidad del dinero, EUR/USD y la plata - 11 de octubre de 2019
Preservando capital durante puntos de disturbio - 6 de septiembre de 2019
¿Ha cambiado el paisaje de las divisas? - 16 de agosto de 2019
El euro
Chart II-3
Técnicas EUR 1
EUR Análisis técnico 1
EUR Análisis técnico 1
Chart II-4
Técnicas EUR 2
EUR Análisis Técnicos 2
EUR Análisis Técnicos 2
Los datos recientes en la zona del euro siguen siendo modestos:
La inflación general cayó a 0.8% interanual en septiembre, la más baja en casi tres años. Sin embargo, la inflación subyacente aumentó a 1% interanual.
La producción industrial en la zona del euro continuó contrayéndose, un 2.8% interanual en agosto.
El sentimiento ZEW en la zona del euro cayó aún más a -23.5 en octubre, sin embargo esto está muy por encima de las expectativas de -33. El sentimiento ZEW para Alemania también cayó a -22.8 en octubre. Cabe señalar que las expectativas siguen mejorando en relación con la situación actual.
La balanza comercial en la zona del euro mejoró a €20.3 mil millones en agosto, desde €17.5 mil millones revisados a la baja en julio. Sin embargo, esto se debe principalmente a una contracción de las importaciones.
EUR/USD subió 0.9% esta semana, en parte ayudado por la amplia debilidad del dólar. La dinámica comercial en la zona del euro sigue siendo preocupante: las exportaciones cayeron un 2.2% interanual en agosto, mientras que las importaciones se desplomaron un 4.1% interanual. Notablemente, en lo que va de año, el superávit comercial de la UE con EE. UU. creció a €103 mil millones, desde €91 mil millones un año antes, mientras que el déficit comercial con China se amplió aún más a €127 mil millones desde €116 mil millones.
Enlaces de informes:
Sobre la velocidad del dinero, EUR/USD y la plata - 11 de octubre de 2019
Algunas ideas de trading - 27 de sept. de 2019
La batalla de los bancos centrales - 21 de junio de 2019
Yen japonés
Chart II-5
Técnicas JPY 1
Análisis técnico del JPY 1
Análisis técnico del JPY 1
Chart II-6
Técnicas JPY 2
Análisis técnico del JPY 2
Análisis técnico del JPY 2
Los datos recientes en Japón continúan decepcionando:
La producción industrial cayó un 4.7% interanual en agosto.
La utilización de la capacidad disminuyó un 2.9% mensual en agosto.
El yen japonés cayó 0.8% frente al dólar estadounidense esta semana. Kuroda ha vuelto a enfatizar que el BoJ no dudará en actuar si los desarrollos económicos continúan deteriorándose. Por otra parte, mientras la Fed y el BCE están en camino de expandir sus balances mediante compras de activos, queda abierta la cuestión de cuánto más puede hacer el BoJ, más allá del control de la curva de rendimientos. Mantenemos una postura larga en el yen en previsión de que hará falta un “momento Lehman” para que el BoJ actúe de forma agresiva.
Enlaces de informes:
Algunas ideas de trading - 27 de sept. de 2019
¿Ha cambiado el paisaje de las divisas? - 16 de agosto de 2019
Ajustes de cartera en un trading veraniego poco líquido - 5 de julio de 2019
Libra esterlina
Chart II-7
Técnicas GBP 1
Análisis técnico GBP 1
Análisis técnico GBP 1
Chart II-8
Técnicas GBP 2
GBP Análisis técnico 2
GBP Análisis técnico 2
Los datos recientes en el Reino Unido han sido mayormente negativos:
La tasa de desempleo ILO aumentó ligeramente a 3.9% en agosto. El crecimiento trimestral de las ganancias medias se desaceleró a 3.8%, sin embargo esto estuvo por encima de las expectativas de 3.7%.
El índice de precios minoristas creció 2.4% interanual en septiembre, una desaceleración desde 2.6% en el mes anterior.
La inflación general se mantuvo sin cambios en 1.7% interanual en septiembre, mientras que la inflación subyacente subió a 1.7% desde 1.5%.
Las ventas minoristas crecieron 3.1% interanual en septiembre, desde 2.6% en el mes anterior.
GBP/USD se disparó 3.3% esta semana por el optimismo hacia la cumbre del Consejo Europeo sobre el Brexit. Desde una perspectiva de valoración, la libra cotiza con un gran descuento respecto a su valor justo. Si las noticias positivas sobre el Brexit continúan, la libra podría seguir subiendo. Mantenemos posición larga en GBP/JPY, que está más de 5% en ganancias. Ajustar el stop a 138.
Enlaces de informes:
Algunas ideas de trading - 27 de sept. de 2019
Reino Unido: ¿Desaceleración cíclica o malestar estructural? - 20 de sept. de 2019
La batalla de los bancos centrales - 21 de junio de 2019
Dólar australiano
Chart II-9
Técnicas AUD 1
AUD Análisis técnico 1
AUD Análisis técnico 1
Chart II-10
Técnicas AUD 2
Análisis técnico del AUD 2
Análisis técnico del AUD 2
Los datos recientes en Australia han sido modestos:
La confianza empresarial NAB cayó aún más a -2, mientras que las condiciones mejoraron a 1 en el tercer trimestre.
En el frente del mercado laboral, la tasa de desempleo cayó a 5.2% en septiembre. Se crearon 14.7K empleos, consistentes en 26.2K empleos a tiempo completo y una pérdida de 11.4K empleos a tiempo parcial.
AUD/USD aumentó 0.4% esta semana. Las actas del RBA se publicaron a principios de esta semana. Curiosamente, presentan un debate agudo sobre los efectos de los tipos bajos. Por un lado, los tipos más bajos se han justificado teóricamente para lograr el pleno empleo y el objetivo de inflación. Por otro lado, algunos miembros del RBA temen que los tipos bajos puedan alimentar precios de la vivienda ya inflados. La probabilidad de otro recorte de tipos ha disminuido tras las actas del RBA.
Enlaces de informes:
Una visión contraria sobre el dólar australiano - 24 de mayo de 2019
Cuidado con los rendimientos marginales decrecientes - 19 de abril de 2019
Aún no fuera de peligro - 5 de abril de 2019
Dólar neozelandés
Chart II-11
Técnicas NZD 1
Análisis técnico del NZD 1
Análisis técnico del NZD 1
Chart II-12
Técnicas NZD 2
Análisis técnico del NZD 2
Análisis técnico del NZD 2
Los datos recientes en Nueva Zelanda han sido negativos:
Las llegadas de visitantes aumentaron 1.8% interanual en agosto, ligeramente por debajo del 2% del mes anterior.
La inflación general se desaceleró a 1.5% interanual en el tercer trimestre.
NZD/USD ha estado más o menos plano esta semana. Estrechamente ligada al crecimiento global, la moneda neozelandesa ha estado fluctuando con el vaivén de los titulares sobre el conflicto comercial EE. UU.-China. Los dos países acordaron un acuerdo parcial la semana pasada, sin embargo los detalles siguen siendo vagos. Si bien el kiwi es una moneda de alta beta, debería tener un rendimiento inferior en los cruces. Seguimos jugando la debilidad del kiwi a través del dólar australiano y la corona sueca.
Enlaces de informes:
USD/CNY y turbulencia del mercado - 9 de agosto de 2019
¿Hacia dónde va el dólar estadounidense? - 7 de junio de 2019
Aún no fuera de peligro - 5 de abril de 2019
Dólar canadiense
Chart II-13
Técnicas CAD 1
Técnicas de CAD 1
Técnicas de CAD 1
Chart II-14
Técnicas CAD 2
Análisis técnico CAD 2
Análisis técnico CAD 2
Los datos recientes en Canadá han sido relativamente fuertes:
La tasa de desempleo disminuyó aún más a 5.5% en septiembre. Además, el salario medio por hora siguió creciendo 4.3% interanual, desde 3.8% en el mes anterior. Por último, se crearon 53.7K empleos en septiembre, muy por encima de las expectativas de 10K.
Tanto la inflación general como la subyacente se mantuvieron sin cambios en 1.9% interanual en septiembre.
El dólar canadiense se apreció 1% frente al dólar estadounidense, gracias a los positivos datos de empleo del pasado viernes. Todos los ojos están puestos en las elecciones federales de este mes, que podrían ser cruciales para el futuro del sector energético canadiense y las políticas medioambientales.
Enlaces de informes:
Preservando capital durante puntos de disturbio - 6 de septiembre de 2019
Ajustes de cartera en un trading veraniego poco líquido - 5 de julio de 2019
Sobre el oro, el petróleo y las criptomonedas - 28 de junio de 2019
Franco suizo
Chart II-15
Técnicas CHF 1
CHF Técnicos 1
CHF Técnicos 1
Chart II-16
Técnicas CHF 2
Análisis técnico CHF 2
Análisis técnico CHF 2
Los datos recientes en Suiza han sido positivos:
El superávit comercial (excluyendo metales preciosos) se amplió bruscamente a CHF 2.88 mil millones en septiembre. Notablemente, las exportaciones suizas aumentaron 8.2% mensual a CHF 20.3 mil millones, lideradas por mayores ventas de productos químicos y farmacéuticos. Las importaciones suizas cayeron ligeramente 1.4% mensual a CHF 17.4 mil millones.
Los precios al productor y de importación continuaron cayendo 2% interanual en septiembre.
USD/CHF cayó 1% esta semana. El franco suizo seguirá librando una lucha entre ser una moneda defensiva y ser una herramienta de manipulación por parte del SNB. Nuestra estimación es que EUR/CHF 1.06 es un punto de estrés último. Las carteras globales deberían mantener el franco suizo como seguro, por la sencilla razón de que la moneda es un rendimiento estructural superior.
Enlaces de informes:
Notas sobre el SNB - 4 de octubre de 2019
¿Qué hacer con el franco suizo? - 17 de mayo de 2019
Cuidado con los rendimientos marginales decrecientes - 19 de abril de 2019
Corona noruega
Chart II-17
Técnicas NOK 1
NOK Análisis técnico 1
NOK Análisis técnico 1
Chart II-18
Técnicas NOK 2
Análisis técnico de NOK 2
Análisis técnico de NOK 2
Los datos recientes en Noruega han sido deprimidos:
La balanza comercial pasó a un déficit de NOK 1.2 mil millones en septiembre. Eso supone una disminución de NOK 24 mil millones interanual.
La corona noruega se ha depreciado casi 1% frente al dólar estadounidense esta semana. Los precios de la energía se han mantenido bajos en las últimas semanas. Además, la balanza comercial noruega pasó a déficit por primera vez desde noviembre de 2017. Las exportaciones se desplomaron 19.5% interanual, debido a menores ventas de productos energéticos, mientras que las importaciones aumentaron 12.9% interanual. El mensaje es claro: Noruega sigue resistiendo bien a nivel doméstico, pero la dependencia de las exportaciones de petróleo introduce volatilidad en cualquier pronóstico de crecimiento. BCA ha revisado a la baja sus proyecciones del precio del petróleo para 2019, lo que ha disminuido el atractivo de la corona noruega. Estén atentos.
Enlaces de informes:
Algunas ideas de trading - 27 de sept. de 2019
Ajustes de cartera en un trading veraniego poco líquido - 5 de julio de 2019
Sobre el oro, el petróleo y las criptomonedas - 28 de junio de 2019
Corona sueca
Chart II-19
Técnicas SEK 1
Análisis técnico del SEK 1
Análisis técnico del SEK 1
Chart II-20
Técnicas SEK 2
SEK Indicadores técnicos 2
SEK Indicadores técnicos 2
Los datos recientes en Suecia han sido neutrales:
La tasa de desempleo se mantuvo sin cambios en 7.1% en septiembre.
USD/SEK cayó 1.1% esta semana. Como la moneda con peor rendimiento del G-10 este año, la corona sueca ahora cotiza con un gran descuento respecto a su valor justo. Consulte nuestra sección principal de esta semana, que presenta un análisis en profundidad sobre la economía sueca y la corona.
Enlaces de informes:
¿Hacia dónde va el dólar estadounidense? - 7 de junio de 2019
Balanza de pagos en el G10 - 15 de febrero de 2019
Un simple ranking de atractivo para las divisas - 8 de febrero de 201
Operaciones y previsiones
Resumen de previsiones
Cartera central
Operaciones tácticas
Órdenes límite
Operaciones cerradas