Estados Unidos

Underweight In yesterday’s Weekly Report1 we recommended downgrading the niche S&P homebuilding index to underweight, as most, if not all, positive profit drivers are already reflected in relative share prices. The drop in interest rates has been more than accounted for by the year-to-date outperformance in homebuilders and is no longer a positive catalyst. For instance, the mortgage application purchase index (MAPI) initially benefited from the plunge in interest rates, but the recent 30bps rise in the 10-year Treasury signals that the MAPI has tentatively crested (second panel). Simultaneously, lumber prices are gaining steam and coupled with contracting new home prices signal that homebuilding profits will suffer a setback (middle & fourth panels). This stands in marked contrast to the sell-side community that has been ratcheting up profit estimates for the S&P homebuilding index (bottom panel). Bottom Line: Downgrade the S&P homebuilding index to underweight. For additional details on the rationale behind this move please refer to the most recent Weekly Report.1 The ticker symbols for the stocks in this index are: BLBG – S5HOME – DHI, LEN, PHM, NVR.   1  Please See U.S. Equity Strategy, "Is This It?," dated October 21, 2019.

The latest Standard & Poor’s update of Q2 buybacks revealed that one of the largest equity buyers since the Great Recession went on a buyer’s strike. The chart shows that SPX buybacks are actually contracting. Not only has the fiscal impulse died down from the 2018 zenith, but also the economic soft patch is re-concentrating CEO minds. In other words, there is evidence that not only are CEOs pruning capex (as a reminder investment spending contracted in Q2), but also they are cutting back on equity retirement. Such prudent cash management typically happens when confidence in the longevity of the business cycle is low. Historically, the ISM manufacturing and the Conference Board CEO surveys are excellent leading indicators of SPX buybacks and the current message is to expect further contraction in the latter. Bottom Line: This “slaying of animal spirits” as we highlighted in recent research1 represents a red flag and warrants caution on the prospects of the broad equity market in the coming months.​​​​​​​ 1 Please See U.S. Equity Strategy, "Slaying Animal Spirits," dated October 10, 2019.

Highlights Duration: Trade uncertainty has depressed survey measures of economic sentiment, but the hard economic data have been relatively robust. If the trade war starts to calm down during the next two months, as we expect, then the survey data will rebound, causing bond yields to move higher. Fed: With inflation expectations low, the Fed must ensure that financial conditions stay accommodative and that the economic recovery remains on track. This means that the Fed will meet market expectations and cut rates next week. Beyond that, we expect growth to improve enough that further cuts are unnecessary. Negative Convexity: This year’s large decline in yields has increased the attractiveness of negatively convex assets, in risk-adjusted terms. Investors should favor high-yield over investment grade corporates. They should also favor Agency MBS over Aaa, Aa and A rated corporates. Feature Chart 1Positive Surprises Driven By The Hard Data The next two months are crucial for the U.S economy. Measures of sentiment, on both the business and consumer side, are sending recessionary signals. However, measures of actual economic activity paint a more benign picture (Chart 1). This divergence between the “hard” and “soft” data will likely resolve itself within the next couple of months, and the outcome of U.S./China trade negotiations will play a major part in determining whether that resolution is positive or negative. On the “Hard” And “Soft” Data There is a ton of economic data available to investors these days, but all of it can generally be classified as either “soft” or “hard”. We call measures of actual economic activity, such as housing starts or retail sales, “hard” data. These are the sorts of measures used to calculate a nation’s GDP. Alternatively, we use the term “soft” data to describe survey measures where firms or consumers are asked to describe whether activity is improving or deteriorating, or whether they are becoming more or less optimistic about the future. Some examples of soft data are PMI surveys and measures of consumer confidence. Both sorts of measures have value. Soft data are usually timelier and often lead the hard data. However, they are also more prone to whipsaws. The hard data tend to be more reliable, but don’t always provide enough lead time to be actionable. The soft and hard data are sending very different signals. At present, the soft and hard data are sending very different signals. On the consumer side, core retail sales are growing at the robust year-over-year pace of 4.8%, even though consumer confidence has declined during the past year (Chart 2). On the business side, the ISM manufacturing PMI survey came in at 47.8 in September, the lowest print since 2009. However, industrial production has fallen by only 0.1% during the past year. Industrial production growth got as low as -4% during the 2015/16 period, when the ISM was at a higher level (Chart 3). Similarly, actual orders for core durable goods have barely contracted, even though CEO confidence is at recessionary levels (Chart 3, panel 2). Capacity utilization also remains fairly strong, well above its 2016 low (Chart 3, bottom panel) Chart 2Hard Vs. Soft Data: On The Consumer Side Chart 3Hard Vs. Soft Data: On The Business Side Housing is the only sector of the economy that doesn’t currently display a dichotomy between the hard and soft data. All measures of housing activity are growing strongly, a rapid snapback following last year’s weakness (Chart 4). Chart 4Housing Activity Summary Trade Negotiations Are Pivotal The soft data started to lag the hard data at around the same time as the Global Economic Policy Uncertainty index shot higher last year (Chart 5). This leads us to conclude that worries about the trade war’s negative consequences have caused sharp declines in measures of sentiment and confidence, even though the trade war’s actual impact on the hard data has been minor. This is what makes the outcome of November’s U.S./China trade talks so important. If an agreement is reached that makes it clear that no new tariffs will be implemented, we expect that would remove enough uncertainty for the soft data to improve, converging with the hard data. However, if things fall apart, then we would expect the negative survey data to eventually drag the hard data lower. Housing is the only sector of the economy that doesn’t currently display a dichotomy between the hard and soft data. Our sense at the moment is that the looming 2020 U.S. election provides enough incentive for both sides to strike a deal, but the outcome could still go either way. Last Friday’s report from our Global Investment Strategy service discussed the outlook for trade negotiations in more detail.1 For bond investors, we are confident that a removal of trade uncertainty would lead to a rebound in important soft data measures such as the ISM manufacturing PMI and the CRB Raw Industrials index. Any increase in those measures would also send bond yields sharply higher. The ratio between the CRB Raw Industrials index and Gold continues to track the 10-year Treasury yield closely (Chart 6). Chart 5Trade War Worries Affecting ##br##Sentiment Chart 6Bond Yields Will Shoot Higher Once Trade Uncertainty Dissipates Bottom Line: Trade uncertainty has depressed survey measures of economic sentiment, but the hard economic data have been relatively robust. If the trade war starts to calm down during the next two months, as we expect, then the survey data will rebound, causing bond yields to move higher. The Fed Next Week The dichotomy between hard and soft data fits nicely with how the Fed has been describing the economic outlook for most of the year. That is, an economy who’s baseline outlook is favorable but that faces some downside risks. While that outlook doesn’t immediately suggest a policy response, low inflation expectations make it pretty clear what the Fed’s course of action will be during the next few months. The 5-year/5-year forward TIPS breakeven inflation rate is currently 1.68%, well below the 2.3%-2.5% range that is consistent with the Fed’s inflation target (Chart 7). What’s more, the median 3-year inflation forecast from the New York Fed’s Survey of Consumer Expectations just hit an all-time low (Chart 7, bottom panel). The Fed must take appropriate action to drive inflation expectations higher. At present, this means that it must ensure that financial conditions stay accommodative so that the economic recovery can continue. Eventually, continued economic recovery will lead to higher realized inflation (Chart 7, panel 2), and inflation expectations will follow realized inflation higher. Chart 7Low Inflation Expectations Equals Accommodative Fed In order to keep financial conditions accommodative, the Fed must at least match the market’s current rate cut expectations. An October rate cut is more or less fully priced, and it is therefore highly likely that the Fed will cut rates next week. After that, the market is pricing in roughly 50/50 odds of a fourth rate cut in December. But those expectations will certainly change as we learn the outcome of November’s trade talks and as the economic data roll in. Ultimately, we expect that enough good news will hit the wire between now and December that a fourth rate cut will be unnecessary. But the more important message is that, as long as inflation expectations are low, the Fed will not risk upsetting market expectations. Balance Sheet Update The Fed decided not to wait until next week to unveil its revamped balance sheet policy. It didn’t really have the luxury of time, given the turmoil in money markets that we discussed in a recent report.2 The main conclusion from our report is that the Fed must inject more bank reserves into the economy if it wants to maintain control of interest rates. This is exactly what the Fed will do going forward. It announced that it will purchase Treasury bills at least until the second quarter of 2020, starting at an initial pace of $60 billion per month. It will also continue to reinvest the proceeds from maturing Treasury notes/bonds and MBS into newly issued Treasury notes/bonds. Continued economic recovery will lead to higher realized inflation. Assuming the pace of $60 billion per month stays constant, and making some other assumptions about the growth rates of non-reserve liabilities, we project that the Fed’s actions will cause the supply of reserves to rise from $1.53 to $1.63 trillion by next June, and that its securities holdings will rise from $3.59  to $4.05 trillion (see Chart 8 and Table 1). Chart 8The Fed's Balance Sheet Over Time Table 1Fed's Balance Sheet: Projections As we have argued in the past, now that the link between the Fed’s balance sheet and its interest rate policy has been severed, we see no investment implications from the Fed’s new balance sheet strategy. As per our Golden Rule of Bond Investing, changes in the fed funds rate relative to expectations will continue to drive bond yields.3 Since the Fed’s balance sheet strategy tells us nothing about its future interest rate plans, it should mostly be ignored. Bottom Line: With inflation expectations low, the Fed must ensure that financial conditions stay accommodative and that the economic recovery remains on track. This means that the Fed will meet market expectations and cut rates next week. Beyond that, we expect growth to improve enough that further cuts are unnecessary. A Good Time To Buy Negative Convexity We have repeatedly mentioned the attractiveness of high-yield bonds and Agency MBS during the past few weeks. The one thing those sectors have in common is that they are negatively convex. That is, unlike most fixed income instruments, their durations are positively correlated with yields. As a result, this year’s big drop in yields has led to large declines in duration for both high-yield and agency MBS (Chart 9). But despite this lower duration, junk spreads have remained relatively flat while MBS spreads have actually widened. In other words, expected return has not fallen even as the risk embedded in negatively convex securities has declined markedly. Chart 9Negatively Convex Products Are Attractive Last week we unveiled a new way of measuring risk for U.S. spread products.4 The Risk Of Losing 100 bps can be thought of as the number of standard deviations of annual spread change necessary for a sector to underperform duration-matched Treasuries by more than 100 basis points. A higher value means the sector is at a lower risk of losing 100 bps, and vice-versa. Chart 10 shows our new risk measure plotted against expected return for the investment grade and high-yield credit tiers, as well as for conventional 30-year Agency MBS. The y-axis shows each sector’s 12-month expected excess return, which we calculate as OAS less an adjustment for expected default losses. The x-axis shows the Risk Of Losing 100 bps. To put recent market moves in context, we show how each sector has moved within Chart 10 since spreads last troughed, about one year ago. Notice that last October, Ba and B rated junk bonds offered more expected return than Baa-rated corporates, with similar risk. Now, Ba and B offer a similar return advantage, but with much less risk. Caa-rated junk now strictly dominates the Baa sector in terms of risk and reward. Chart 10Risk-Reward Tradeoff Favors Negatively Convex Securities Turning to Agency MBS, we see again that the large fall in duration has led to a substantial risk reduction since last October. This is why we recently recommended upgrading Agency MBS at the expense of Aaa, Aa, and A corporates.5 Bottom Line: This year’s large decline in yields has increased the attractiveness of negatively convex assets, in risk-adjusted terms. Investors should favor high-yield over investment grade corporates. They should also favor Agency MBS over Aaa, Aa and A rated corporates. Ryan Swift U.S. Bond Strategist rswift@bcaresearch.com Footnotes 1 Please see Global Investment Strategy Weekly Report, “Kumbaya”, dated October 18, 2019, available at gis.bcaresearch.com 2 Please see U.S. Bond Strategy Weekly Report, “What’s Up In U.S. Money Markets?”, dated September 24, 2019, available at usbs.bcaresearch.com 3 Please see U.S. Bond Strategy Special Report, “The Golden Rule Of Bond Investing”, dated July 24, 2018, available at usbs.bcaresearch.com 4 Please see U.S. Bond Strategy Weekly Report, “A Perspective On Risk And Reward”, dated October 15, 2019, available at usbs.bcaresearch.com 5 Please see U.S. Bond Strategy Weekly Report, “Two Themes And Two Trades”, dated October 1, 2019, available at usbs.bcaresearch.com Fixed Income Sector Performance Recommended Portfolio Specification

Aspectos destacados Estrategia de cartera La débil demanda de vivienda, el mínimo en las tasas de interés, la deflación de los precios de viviendas nuevas y las pobres perspectivas de empleo en la industria sugieren que ahora procede una posición infraponderada en el índice S&P homebuilding.      El fortalecimiento de la dinámica demanda/oferta, las regulaciones IMO Sulfur 2020, y las expectativas de beneficios relativos hundidas indican que hay más ganancias por delante para las acciones puras de refino. Cambios recientes Bajar la calificación del índice S&P de construcción de viviendas a infraponderado, hoy. Tabla 1 ¿Esto es todo? ¿Esto es todo? Artículo Las acciones intentaron alcanzar nuevos máximos históricos la semana pasada, continuando con el entusiasmo por el acuerdo comercial "fase uno" y respirando con alivio por resultados bancarios mejores de lo esperado. Dudamos que se materialice un acuerdo real que incluya la Propiedad Intelectual y el sector tecnológico. En el mejor de los casos, lo único que obtuvimos fue una tregua comercial. Vale la pena repetir la reciente analogía futbolística de Larry Kudlow: “Es como estar en la línea de siete yardas en un partido de fútbol... Y como fanático sufridor de los New York Giants, podrían estar en la línea de siete y nunca logran llevar el balón a la zona de anotación... Cuando llegas al último 10 por ciento, a la línea de siete yardas, es difícil”. Como recordatorio, las altas tarifas permanecen vigentes y hay muchas probabilidades de que el daño ya infligido al comercio global sea lo suficientemente severo como para que pasen meses antes de que surjan brotes verdes. Mientras tanto, dando seguimiento a nuestro “candidato a gráfico del año” que publicamos hace dos semanas, profundizamos y descubrimos dos índices económicos sensibles adicionales que consistentemente alcanzaron su pico antes que el SPX en los tres ciclos anteriores (Gráfico 1). Ahora conforman el Indicador Líder de Acciones de la Estrategia de Renta Variable de EE. UU.: un compósito con ponderación igual del índice S&P Banks, el índice Russell 2000 y el índice Value Line Geometric, que señala que el dinero fácil ya se ha hecho este ciclo en el SPX (Gráfico 2). Gráfico 1 Tres señales infalibles... Tres señales infalibles... Tres señales infalibles... Gráfico 2 ...Combinadas en un único indicador líder de acciones ...Combinados en un único indicador líder de renta variable ...Combinados en un único indicador líder de renta variable Es importante subrayar que, en ausencia de crecimiento de beneficios, sigue siendo extremadamente difícil que las acciones emprendan un nuevo tramo alcista sostenible confiando únicamente en la expansión de múltiplos. Gráfico 3 muestra nuestro actualizado Indicador de Poder de Fijación de Precios Corporativos (CPPI) y continúa desinflándose. De hecho, la fuerte caída de nuestro CPPI compensa más que la caída en el crecimiento salarial, advirtiendo que la contracción de márgenes en el S&P 500 tiene poder de persistencia1 (panel inferior, Gráfico 3). Analizando en profundidad, nuestro CPPI está agitando una bandera roja. Como recordatorio, calculamos el poder de fijación de precios por grupo industrial a partir de las tasas de crecimiento relevantes del CPI, PPI, PCE y las materias primas para cada uno de los 60 grupos industriales que seguimos. Tabla 2 también destaca las tendencias de poder de fijación de precios a más corto plazo y la diferencia de cada industria con respecto a la inflación general. Sólo el 42% de las industrias que cubrimos están elevando los precios de venta en más del 1%, y el 33% están claramente deflacionando. Preocupantemente, solo el 26% de los sectores están subiendo precios a un ritmo superior al de la inflación general. En cuanto a las tendencias de poder de fijación de precios, dos tercios de las industrias que cubrimos están o bien planas o en tendencia descendente (Tabla 2). Gráfico 3 Poder de fijación de precios corporativo nulo Nulo poder corporativo de fijación de precios Nulo poder corporativo de fijación de precios Tabla 2 Poder de fijación de precios por grupo industrial ¿Es esto todo? ¿Es esto todo? El oro ha saltado a la cima de nuestra tabla galopando a una tasa del 26% anual (recuerde que estaba en deflación en nuestra actualización de principios de julio), y solo tres industrias adicionales relacionadas con materias primas llegaron al top veinte (Tabla 2). La desaparición del complejo de materias primas de los primeros puestos es consistente con los problemas del PPI global y la fortaleza del dólar estadounidense. Esta semana actualizamos dos grupos, uno temprano y otro profundamente cíclico. Curiosamente, los sectores defensivos tienen una presencia saludable en los diez primeros puestos con cinco entradas. Por el contrario, las materias primas en general y las industrias relacionadas con la energía en particular ocupan la parte baja de la clasificación, ya que el crudo WTI está deflacionando fuertemente desde el pico de octubre de 2018. Sumando todo, la inflación de precios de venta del sector corporativo se está hundiendo en línea con las expectativas de inflación deprimidas. Como planteamos en nuestro reciente Informe Especial sobre márgenes de beneficio, los márgenes de beneficio ya han alcanzado su pico para el ciclo. Reiteramos nuestra visión cautelosa del mercado accionario en un horizonte cíclico de 9 a 12 meses. Esta semana actualizamos dos grupos, uno temprano y otro profundamente cíclico. Resquebrajando los cimientos de la construcción de viviendas Recomendamos degradar el nicho del índice S&P homebuilding a infraponderado, ya que la mayoría, si no todos, los impulsores positivos de beneficios ya están reflejados en los precios relativos de las acciones. Específicamente, la caída de las tasas de interés ha sido más que compensada por el comportamiento superior en lo que va del año de los constructores de viviendas. Desde la Gran Recesión, los constructores de viviendas han estado en ciclos claramente definidos de subidas y bajadas, y hay muchas probabilidades de que pronto entremos en una oscilación descendente (panel inferior, Gráfico 4). Las tasas de interés tocaron fondo a principios de septiembre y hay poco impulso adicional que puedan ejercer sobre los precios relativos de las acciones (rendimiento del Treasury a 10 años mostrado invertido, panel superior, Gráfico 4). Gráfico 4 Las ganancias relativas están agotadas Las ganancias relativas están agotadas. Las ganancias relativas están agotadas. Preocupantemente, las expectativas de los consumidores de comprar una vivienda nueva se desplomaron el mes pasado según la encuesta de The Conference Board, y esa debilidad en la demanda afectará a los inicios de vivienda y, en última instancia, a los ingresos de la construcción de viviendas (Gráfico 5). Gráfico 5 Aparecen grietas Formación de grietas Formación de grietas Para colmo, los precios de venta de casas nuevas están perdiendo terreno frente a los precios de las viviendas existentes, pero dicho descuento ya no está impulsando los volúmenes dado que las ganancias de cuota de mercado de ventas de viviendas nuevas se han estancado recientemente. Ya, las ventas del S&P homebuilding están contrayéndose y existe el riesgo de que la deflación se arraigue en esta industria de la construcción (Gráfico 6). Aunque el índice de solicitudes de hipoteca para compra (MAPI) ha estado subiendo por el desplome de las tasas de interés, el aumento de 30 puntos básicos en el rendimiento del Treasury a 10 años desde el 1 de septiembre indica que el MAPI ha alcanzado tentativamente su pico (segundo panel, Gráfico 7). Gráfico 6 Ventas en contracción Ventas por contrato Ventas por contrato Gráfico 7 Problemas de margen Problemas de margen Problemas de margen Simultáneamente, los precios de la madera están cobrando fuerza y, junto con la contracción de los precios de viviendas nuevas, señalan que las ganancias de los constructores sufrirán un retroceso (paneles medio y cuarto, Gráfico 7). Esto contrasta notablemente con la comunidad sell-side que ha estado aumentando las estimaciones de beneficios para el índice S&P homebuilding (panel inferior, Gráfico 7). Resumiendo, la débil demanda de vivienda, el mínimo en las tasas de interés, la deflación de los precios de viviendas nuevas y las deterioradas perspectivas de empleo en la industria sugieren que ahora procede una posición infraponderada en el índice S&P homebuilding. En el frente operativo, el mercado laboral también emite una señal de alarma. Las ofertas de empleo en la industria de la construcción están cayendo como una piedra y el crecimiento del empleo en la construcción residencial coquetea con la zona de contracción. Históricamente, los flujos y reflujos en los empleos de la construcción han ido a la par con el rendimiento relativo de los precios de las acciones y el mensaje actual es esperar una caída en estos últimos (Gráfico 8). La mayoría de los indicadores que seguimos subrayan un entorno desafiante para la construcción de viviendas en los próximos meses. Sin embargo, existe un riesgo clave para nuestra visión: las tasas de interés. Si la tasa hipotecaria fija a 30 años cayera más desde los niveles actuales, atraerá a los compradores de primera vivienda y amortiguaría el golpe a la demanda de construcción de viviendas (tasas hipotecarias mostradas invertidas, panel superior, Gráfico 9). De forma similar, los banqueros están dispuestos a extender crédito hipotecario y están reportando una demanda creciente de préstamos inmobiliarios residenciales como consecuencia rezagada de la caída de las tasas. Pero, nuestra sensación es que las ganancias fáciles están agotadas y está a la vista una reversión en la mayoría de estas medidas (Gráfico 9). Gráfico 8 Preste atención al mensaje del mercado laboral Preste atención al mensaje del mercado laboral Preste atención al mensaje del mercado laboral Gráfico 9 La posible caída de las tasas es un riesgo clave Las Tarifas Potencialmente Más Bajas Son Un Riesgo Clave Las Tarifas Potencialmente Más Bajas Son Un Riesgo Clave Resumiendo, la débil demanda de vivienda, el mínimo en las tasas de interés, la deflación de los precios de viviendas nuevas y las deterioradas perspectivas de empleo en la industria sugieren que ahora procede una posición infraponderada en el índice S&P homebuilding. Conclusión: Bajar la calificación del índice S&P homebuilding a infraponderado, hoy. Los símbolos bursátiles de las acciones de este índice son: BLBG – S5HOME – DHI, LEN, PHM, NVR. Mantenerse con las refinerías Aunque nuestra visión alcista sobre las refinerías tuvo un comienzo resbaladizo, ha recuperado todas las pérdidas y esta posición ahora está en positivo. Los factores están alineándose para ganancias adicionales en los próximos meses y recomendamos que los inversores mantengan esta recomendación de sobreponderar en acciones puras del downstream. De manera alentadora, las acciones de refino han estado superando al índice energético general últimamente y han reanudado su tendencia relativa alcista de varios años (panel superior, Gráfico 10). En cuanto a la válvula de alivio de las exportaciones, las exportaciones netas de productos refinados de EE. UU. están en una tendencia secular al alza y sorprendentemente no se ven afectadas por los movimientos del dólar (panel inferior, Gráfico 10). Sume las regulaciones de la Organización Marítima Internacional (IMO) Sulfur 2020 que pronto se adoptarán en el combustible de transporte marítimo, y las refinerías de EE. UU. que producen fuelóleo de menor azufre están bien posicionadas para superar en rentabilidad al SPX. Gráfico 10 Reanudada la tendencia alcista Tendencia alcista reanudada Tendencia alcista reanudada El consumo doméstico de productos refinados se mantiene vigoroso y debería servir como catalizador para desbloquear un excelente valor en este subgrupo energético nicho (panel medio, Gráfico 11). De hecho, el consumo de gasolina está volviendo a expandirse por el aumento de los kilómetros recorridos por vehículo (panel inferior, Gráfico 11). Gráfico 11 Demanda sólida... Demanda sólida... Demanda sólida... La dinámica de oferta de productos de refinería también se está moviendo en la dirección correcta. Los inventarios de gasolina se están reduciendo y deberían impulsar las expectativas de beneficios relativos castigadas de las refinerías (inventarios mostrados invertidos, panel inferior, Gráfico 12). Es importante, este contexto de demanda/oferta más firme ha sido un impulso para los márgenes de refino y debería continuar sustentando el impulso relativo de los precios de las acciones (panel medio, Gráfico 12). En términos de lo que ya está descontado para esta industria, la barra esperada de crecimiento de beneficios es extremadamente baja y está cayendo, y el valor relativo se ha restaurado por completo. Primero, en términos de valoraciones relativas, la ratio precio/ventas relativa histórica se ha corregido un 35% desde el pico de mediados de 2018 (panel medio, Gráfico 11). En términos de PER a futuro, las refinerías son extremadamente atractivas comparadas con el SPX tras una casi reducción a la mitad en el PER futuro relativo en los últimos quince meses (segundo panel, Gráfico 13). Gráfico 12 ...El contexto de oferta está impulsando los 'crack spreads'  ...El entorno de la oferta está impulsando los crack spreads ...El entorno de la oferta está impulsando los crack spreads Gráfico 13 El umbral de beneficios es inusualmente bajo El umbral de ganancias está inusualmente bajo El umbral de ganancias está inusualmente bajo En segundo lugar, el crecimiento EPS relativo ha caído por debajo de la línea cero tanto a doce meses como a cinco años vista. Ese pesimismo está sobredimensionado y nos inclinaríamos a contradecir el pesimismo del sell-side (panel inferior, Gráfico 13). Incluso la ratio de revisiones de ganancias netas de la industria de refino se ha desplomado, lo cual es contrariamente positivo (tercer panel, Gráfico 13). Sumando todo, la firmeza de la dinámica demanda/oferta, las regulaciones IMO Sulfur 2020, y las expectativas de beneficios relativos hundidas indican que hay más ganancias por delante para las acciones puras de refino. Conclusión: Mantener sobreponderado el índice S&P oil & gas refining & marketing. Los símbolos bursátiles de las acciones de este índice son: BLBG – S5OILR – MPC, VLO, PSX, HFC.   Anastasios Avgeriou, Estratega de renta variable de EE. UU. anastasios@bcaresearch.com   Notas al pie 1      Consulte el Informe Especial de BCA U.S. Equity Strategy, “Peak Margins” de fecha 7 de octubre de 2019, disponible en uses.bcaresearch.com. Recomendaciones actuales Operaciones actuales Visión sobre tamaño y estilo Mantener neutral: cíclicos frente a defensivos   (alerta de degradación) Favorecer el valor sobre el crecimiento Favorecer las grandes capitalizaciones sobre las pequeñas (Stop 10%)

Highlights The investors we met last week were ready to hear some good news: The constructive story we told across three days of client meetings is more sanguine than the consensus view, but clients were open to considering it. Global economic weakness and the elevated risk of a U.S. recession were primary concerns, … : As our Global Investment Strategy colleagues have suggested, it will take some time for investors to be convinced that global manufacturing really has seen the bottom and that the U.S. isn’t flirting with a recession. … followed by trade tensions and corporate indebtedness, … : Our small sample suggests that investors may have become de-sensitized to the daily ebb and flow of the U.S.-China conflict, though we continue to believe it looms large in the minds of corporate managements. … but nothing matches the anxiety provoked by Elizabeth Warren’s ascent: Every client asked about the potential consequences of a Warren White House. Feature We spent most of last week meeting with a subset of wealth management and family office clients. They are more focused on absolute returns than relative returns, but their primary concerns are nearly identical to their relative-return peers’. Our meetings touched on a broad constellation of questions about the fate of the expansion, the equity bull market, global growth and the U.S.-China trade negotiations. Clients also asked about the credit outlook and if inflation should be on their radar, but the topic that they raised with the most fervor, in every single one of our meetings, was the prospect of a Warren or Sanders presidency. Q: What is the bond market telling us? We think of the bond market as having two distinct components, rates (Treasuries) and credit (spread product). We have gotten used to regular retracements in the 10-year Treasury yield since it bottomed in July 2016, but watching it melt from 3.25% last November to 1.5% this August has challenged our constructive take on the U.S. economy. Falling yields are not necessarily signaling imminent economic trouble, however, so we continue to hold the view that a recession won’t occur before late 2021 or early 2022. We see this year’s falling Treasury yields as a coincident reflection of decelerating growth, not a harbinger of a recession. On a purely domestic basis, the principal driver of the decline in yields has been the shift in monetary policy expectations. The Fed’s dovish pivot did not occur in a vacuum, of course. Clear signs of decelerating growth set the stage for easier policy, both here and abroad. Whether or not the Fed was always calling the tune, all three step-function declines in 12-month forward fed funds rate expectations occurred as it was guiding markets to expect easier policy: ahead of the March FOMC meeting, when Fed speakers began warning of the danger of inflation expectations becoming unanchored on the downside; in May, when they were busily preparing the ground for a rate cut; and after the July meeting raised the prospect that the July cut would not be a one-off event (Chart 1). Chart 1The Fed's Dovish Pivot, ... Sovereign rates are not entirely determined domestically, and much of the softness in Treasury yields reflects the softness in yields in the rest of the world. So far this year, 10-year sovereign yields have moved in lockstep on either side of the Atlantic (Chart 2), preserving no-arbitrage conditions in currency-hedged Treasuries, gilts and bunds. Crude prices are another global variable, and their decline has weighed on inflation break-even rates (Chart 3), dampening the inflation compensation demanded by Treasury buyers. From a rates perspective, we think the bond market is telling us that global growth has slowed, central banks have taken monetary accommodation up a notch, and oil prices have slid. That’s not exactly an ideal growth backdrop, but it hardly spells the end of the expansion. Chart 2... And European Sovereigns' Gravitational Pull Have Dragged Treasury Yields Lower The credit market concurs. It doesn’t betray a whit of concern that the expansion is in trouble. Spreads quickly unwound last year’s fourth-quarter spike, and have since hung around their post-crisis lows (Chart 4). Non-financial corporations have become more indebted throughout the expansion, but servicing the debt is not at all onerous with yields at rock-bottom levels (Chart 5). Our U.S. Bond Strategy service’s proprietary corporate health monitor is signaling that corporate balance sheets have weakened (Chart 6, third panel), but the other elements required for a meaningful widening of spreads – a completed monetary tightening cycle1 (Chart 6, second panel), and a tightening of lending standards (Chart 6, bottom panel) – are not yet in place. Chart 3Falling Oil Prices Have Smothered Inflation Worries Chart 4Spreads Are Tight, ...   Chart 5... And Debt Service Is Easy Q: Isn’t it time to reduce credit exposures? Tight spreads may be a contrarian warning sign. Though it is sensible to shift some of a company’s financing burden to debt when it is so much cheaper than equity, combining a larger debt burden with degraded covenant protections is a concern. Low interest rates will keep debt service costs from chafing, and help keep defaults in check for now, but the bond market is increasingly vulnerable. Chart 6Spread Widening Conditions Aren't Yet In Place Chart 7Income Investors Need Not Apply Despite that vulnerability, when the next default cycle arrives, it will not have anywhere near the impact of the housing bust because it will deal no more than a glancing blow to the banks. Single-family homes collateralize the American banking system; corporate bonds are held by a diffuse assortment of unlevered players. It stinks for any unlevered investor when it loses money, but it doesn’t cause much of a ripple in the overall economy. Today’s buildup in corporate borrowing is not analogous to 2006-7’s residential mortgage Superfund site, and suggestions to the contrary are ill-founded. Elevated corporate leverage is a vulnerability, but it is not enough for an investor to identify a vulnerability; s/he also has to identify the catalyst that will cause it to snap. Nonfinancial corporate debt levels are a fissure that has been made longer by debauched covenants. Markets won’t suffer until the fissure lengthens and widens enough to turn into a crack that no investor can ignore. It is our view that easy monetary conditions will keep the fissure out of sight and out of mind for several months at least. Defaults only occur when a borrower is unable to refinance its maturing obligations. As long as there is at least one lender willing to extend new credit at manageable terms, the borrower won’t go bust. The current monetary policy backdrop, featuring zero/negative interest rate policy in much of the major economies, all but ensures a steady supply of willing lenders. Life insurers, pension funds and endowments with a need for income to offset fixed liabilities have been forced out the risk curve to source income sufficient to meet them (Chart 7). The net result has been to provide even wobbly credits offering an incremental 50 or 75 basis points with a line of would-be lenders out the door and around the corner. The global manufacturing sector has already succumbed to recession, but stout performance in the service sector has allowed developed economies to keep expanding. The weakest credits will not find lifelines, but plenty of dubious ones will. The current ultra-loose monetary policy environment is simply not a backdrop in which defaults pick up in earnest. Until central banks get a little less prodigal, the marginal lender won’t become more selective, the plates will keep spinning, and spread product will continue to generate excess returns over cash and Treasuries. Q: Things look worse outside the U.S. What’s your global growth outlook? Chart 8Manufacturing May Be Bottoming, ... The global manufacturing sector is in recession, but the overall global economy is not (Chart 8). A manufacturing recession does not necessarily lead to a full-blown recession, and the ongoing expansion in developed economies’ much larger service sector provides a formidable bulwark against manufacturing’s struggles (Chart 9). While it is too early to conclude if or when global activity will accelerate, our global leading economic indicator, and the diffusion index that leads it, suggest that it is in the process of bottoming (Chart 10). Chart 9... And Services May Have Stopped Decelerating ... Chart 10... If Leading Indicators Have Found A Footing Chart 11From Headwind To Tailwind Our China Investment Strategy team sees scope for Chinese growth to gather some steam in the first quarter of 2020, when local governments will be freed from the budget constraints imposed by Beijing through the end of this year. In the meantime, September money and credit growth topped expectations, and policymakers have been undertaking modest stimulus measures like trimming bank reserve requirement ratios. Changes in Chinese credit growth lead changes in global growth (Chart 11), via China’s credit-reliant import channel. Its imports are Europe’s, Japan’s, Asian EMs’, and Australia’s, Brazil’s and Chile’s exports. As their exports rise, so too does their aggregate demand, giving rise to a self-reinforcing virtuous circle. Q: What would President Warren mean for markets? Investors’ concerns about a Warren presidency are surely justified; Senator Warren has openly, and often gleefully, expressed hostility for banks, defense contractors, drug companies, oil companies engaged in fracking, and big tech. That’s quite a list, and it accounts for a considerable share of S&P 500 market capitalization. It is fair to say that a Warren administration would be unfriendly to equity investors, but there are several points to keep in mind before liquidating one’s portfolio and fleeing the country. It’s too early to award her the Democratic nomination. In October 2007, the smart money was certain that Hillary Clinton had already locked up a berth in the finals against the eventual Republican nominee. Very few Americans could have named the freshman senator from Illinois, known for little more than a well-received speech at the 2004 convention, but he became President Obama. A lot could still happen between now and the Iowa caucuses on February 3rd. Unseating an incumbent president is a tall order. As long as the economy does not enter a recession between now and next November, and the administration can achieve a policy victory without suffering a high-profile policy failure, our Geopolitical Strategy colleagues argue that Trump should be the presumed winner of the 2020 election. Their presumption applies no matter who captures the Democratic nomination, even as the U.S. electorate is shifting to the left over time (Chart 12). Transforming Washington is easier said than done. The framers designed the federal government to be fairly resistant to sweeping change. The Electoral College tamps down popular passions in the presidential election, and Congress and the courts limit the power of the executive branch. Administrations with majorities in the House and Senate routinely find themselves with less freedom than they would like, especially after they exhaust political capital achieving one major legislative initiative (as with the Obama Administration and the Affordable Care Act). Even if the Democrats ride President Warren’s coattails to control over Capitol Hill next November, legislators from conservative or swing districts and states will balk at her entire suite of proposals. Chart 12Democratic Voters Are Leaning More Left Investment Implications Our sunnier view of the global economic outlook translates into more constructive equity allocations across global regions and blocs. The BCA house view recommends equal weight allocations to Emerging Markets and the Eurozone within global equity portfolios across tactical (0-3-month) and cyclical (3-12-month) timeframes. We expect to upgrade EM and Eurozone equities to overweight, and downgrade U.S. equities from overweight, across those timeframes once global growth begins to accelerate. We would also favor higher-beta currencies versus the dollar, and limit or avoid exposure to lower-beta currencies like the yen or the Swiss franc, if the data are poised to validate our base-case growth scenario. BCA’s recommendations have become especially data dependent because global investors seem to be firmly ensconced in “show-me” mode. It has been our sense as a firm, supported by the impression we got from last week’s meetings, that investors are reluctant to give growth prospects, and risk assets, the benefit of the doubt. Ground down by trade-related tweets, and skeptical that the latest wave of extraordinary monetary policy measures will have a perceptible impact on growth or inflation, they want to see definitive evidence of a turn before they’ll adjust their portfolio positioning to accommodate it. The wariness is also a reflection of the conflicting signals issued late in the business cycle and the elevated levels of geopolitical uncertainty. If the global economy turns as we think it soon will, global investors should be prepared to add cyclical exposures to their portfolios, even if Elizabeth Warren solidifies her current status as the front-runner for the Democratic nomination. That sense of wariness keeps us recommending benchmark duration exposure in fixed income portfolios over the 0-to-3-month tactical timeframe, though we have little appetite for interest-rate exposure looking out beyond the near term, and are below-benchmark duration over the 3-to-12-month cyclical and greater-than-12-month strategic timeframes. We still like spread product over the full 12-month horizon, as we expect stronger growth will make viable U.S. corporations better credits and that ZIRP/NIRP will continue to protect some of the rest. We endorse the house view that relative U.S. equity returns may slow, but global growth should give a boost to absolute equity returns, and we continue to recommend that investors remain at least equal weight equities in balanced portfolios. Doug Peta, CFA Chief U.S. Investment Strategist dougp@bcaresearch.com Footnotes 1 We are in accord with Chair Powell’s stated view that the rate cuts are mid-cycle cuts, not the beginning of a new easing cycle.