Estados Unidos

Executive Summary Assessing the future scenarios discounted in asset prices is always a challenge, but investors need a consensus baseline so they can formulate their own investment strategy decisions. The conversations we had at BCA’s annual investment conference last week reinforced our view that investors are overly pessimistic about corporate earnings prospects. Fears about runaway compensation growth are unfounded. The money markets, on the other hand, appear to be overly blasé about the fed funds rate. We think terminal rate expectations will have to be revised higher and that investors will have to wait longer for rate cuts than the OIS curve currently projects. Margins Have Peaked, But They're Still High Bottom Line: We remain more optimistic than the consensus over the immediate term and continue to recommend a risk-friendly tilt in multi-asset portfolios over the next six months. We are more cautious about the twelve-month outlook and recommend neutral positioning over that timeframe. Feature BCA held its first in-person conference in three years last week at The Plaza Hotel in New York. The agenda offered attendees a smorgasbord of thought-provoking discussions with recognized experts inside and outside of BCA. We enjoyed the programmed content as well as the impromptu interactions with speakers, attendees, our colleagues and the financial media. Again and again, our unplanned conversations homed in on questions about the expectations embedded in stock prices and bond yields. The future scenarios that securities prices are discounting cannot be directly observed and therefore can never be known definitively in real time. If investors do not continuously approximate them, however, they will be unable to evaluate the likelihood that actual outcomes will be better or worse than expected. Our view that markets and the economy can surprise on the upside has been built on the idea that expectations are overly gloomy. That is still our view on balance, as we think the S&P 500 is pricing in a worse near-term earnings outlook than is likely to occur, though we expect the Fed to surprise markets hawkishly before this rate hiking cycle ends. The combination of positive earnings surprises over the next few quarters and a negative monetary policy surprise coming sometime by the second half of next year leaves us optimistic about risk assets over the next six months but wary of them over the next twelve months and beyond. Earnings The analyst consensus currently estimates that S&P 500 earnings per share over the next four quarters will exceed the second quarter’s annualized run rate by just 0.3% and the trailing four quarters by 5.5% (Table 1). Modest as those expectations may be, we do not sense that investors are counting on them. Financial media reports and our discussions with clients and colleagues suggest that investors are braced for peak-to-trough earnings declines in the double digits, consistent with past recessions (Chart 1). Those bandying about estimates of a 10-20% decline are not necessarily calling for them to occur in the next four quarters, but we think it is clear that the forward S&P 500 whisper number is below the official I/B/E/S consensus. Table 1The Official Bar Is Low, The Whisper Bar Is Lower Chart 1Recessions Are Hard On Earnings For nominal earnings growth to miss such meager expectations while inflation is high, profit margins will have to contract sharply, but we would also expect declining revenues to play a major role, as in the 2001 and 2007-2009 recessions (Chart 2). That expectation follows from our view that nominal GDP growth is a solid proxy for S&P 500 sales growth (Chart 3), with nominal GDP explaining 41% of the variation in S&P 500 sales since 1997 (64% correlation). Nominal GDP grew at close to a 10% clip in the first half, and if inflation is around 6% in the second half, we would expect 8% growth over the next two quarters and about 6% growth in the first half of next year.1 Chart 2Sales Fall In Downturns, Too Chart 3As Goes GDP, So Go Corporate Revenues Despite the revenue buffer provided by 7% nominal GDP growth, we expect S&P 500 profit margins will extend their decline from the 2Q21 peak (Chart 4). Investors nearly unanimously expect that margins are imperiled, but we are more sanguine about the pace of the decline than the consensus and suspect the difference comes down to the pace of wage growth. Compensation is the largest expense category by a wide margin and has the capacity to move the aggregate margin needle on its own. Just as the US growth outlook may rest on consumption, compensation may be the key to margins’ future path. Chart 4A Slower-Than-Expected Decline Much has been made of the shortage of available workers and its impact on wages, which are rising at the fastest pace in decades (Chart 5). In real terms, however, wage growth has been deeply negative ever since frontline workers stopped receiving hazard pay early in the pandemic (Chart 6). Real wages should find a footing as inflation cools and may eventually break into positive territory, but rampant talk of a wage-price spiral suggests that the consensus is factoring in much more. We think the prospects of a wage-price spiral like the one in the late seventies are being dramatically overestimated. Chart 5The Nominal Gains Have Been Great ...​​​​​ Chart 6... But They're Way Behind Consumer Prices​​​​​ We will not revisit the rationale for our wage-price spiral view in detail, but it is founded on the notion that workers’ current advantage, even if it were to persist for the rest of the Biden administration’s term, will not be sufficient to offset four decades of employers’ structural gains. Labor surely has the upper hand from a cyclical perspective – demand for workers exceeds supply – but we do not think it can convert its near-term advantage into durable gains. Private sector union membership has dwindled from over 30% at its mid-sixties peak to less than 7% today, leaving workers badly outgunned when trying to assemble a sellers’ cartel to counter the formidable buyers’ cartel enabled by 40 years of lax anti-trust enforcement. Even the “most pro-labor president leading the most pro-labor administration you’ve ever seen” isn’t likely to be able to counter several decades of weakened state-level labor protections.2 History says that employers will take as hard a line with their employees as is socially acceptable and what is deemed kosher has moved so far in their favor since President Reagan crushed the air traffic controllers’ union early in his first term that the seventies template does not apply. Monetary Policy If the earnings mood is unduly glum, however, it would seem to be offset by what strikes us as unfounded expectations that the Fed will stand down from its inflation fight before too long. Perhaps BCA strategists are a bit too credulous, but we are inclined to take the Fed at its word that, as former Vice Chair Richard Clarida put it at the conference, “failure [to subdue inflation] is not an option.” While we side with the consensus in our expectation that inflation will soon recede to 4% of its own accord as COVID bottlenecks are cleared, we judge that monetary and fiscal policymakers overstimulated aggregate demand in their efforts to shelter the economy from the pandemic. As a result, we expect that the Fed will have to administer much harsher monetary medicine to achieve its inflation mandate than markets are currently discounting. We have two objections to the money market’s fed funds rate expectations as derived from the overnight index swap curve (Chart 7). We think the fed funds rate will peak well north of 4% in this hiking cycle and there is almost no chance that the Fed will cut rates at any point in 2023. While markets have gotten more realistic about the monetary policy path than they were after the FOMC’s July meeting, we think they are still clinging to a vain hope. All financial assets will have to be repriced once it is snuffed out, and that repricing represents a significant risk to our constructive six-month view if it occurs before underweight asset managers are forced back into risk assets to protect their funds’ relative performance. Chart 7Magical Thinking The wide range of views about the neutral, or equilibrium, rate that demarcates the line where the fed funds rate flips from accommodative to restrictive explains the terminal rate uncertainty. The neutral rate cannot be directly observed and everyone from investors to central bankers is left to infer its location from the variables that they can see. We think the neutral rate is north of 4%, possibly as high as 4.5-5%, especially given our view that inflation will likely linger at 4%. New York Fed president John Williams suggested in a Wall Street Journal interview two weeks ago that it may be in the mid-3s. “We need to get the interest rate, relative to where inflation is expected to be over the next year, into a positive space and probably even higher.” The article said Williams expects inflation to range between 2.5 and 3% next year, suggesting that the real funds rate is on course to turn positive this fall. Melting one-year inflation expectations as implied by TIPS break-evens suggest that it’s been rising in sizable chunks week after week since the FOMC’s July meeting (Chart 8). We would take the over on Thursday’s 1.71% close if only it were available on New York’s newly legalized online sports books but someone who does expect sub-2% inflation next year might logically conclude that the Fed will be cutting rates soon. Chart 8Garbage In, Garbage Out Investment Implications Our conversations at the conference and its margins left us essentially where we began. We think investors are underestimating the economy’s ability to grow at a rate that will support continued corporate earnings growth over the next four quarters, albeit at a decelerating rate. On the other hand, we think markets face a reckoning when they are forced to price in a longer and more extensive rate hiking campaign than they currently expect. We square the circle from an investment strategy perspective by conditioning our views on investor timeframes. Because we think the earnings whisper numbers will be meaningfully revised higher before monetary policy expectations are reset more hawkishly, we remain tactically bullish. If rate expectations were to reset sooner than we currently expect (sometime early next year), our tactical call would be at significant risk and we would likely become as cautious over the six-month timeframe as we are over the twelve-month timeframe. As it stands now, we continue to recommend overweighting equities in balanced portfolios over the next six months while pursuing neutral risk asset positioning over timeframes of twelve months or more.   Doug Peta, CFA Chief US Investment Strategist dougp@bcaresearch.com Footnotes 1      Our nominal growth expectations assume the US economy maintains real growth at close to its 2% trend level, as consumption is supported by households’ considerable excess savings, but we do not repeat our case here. 2     The weather is fine, and the Saturday football unmatched, but it is flimsy labor protections that drew Boeing’s Dreamliner assembly work and a slew of foreign automakers to the Southeastern Conference’s legacy Deep South footprint and the other states competing for good factory jobs have taken notice.

Informe especial

Executive Summary Central banks are aggressively tightening policy around the world. Their ability to rein in inflation without causing a recession depends upon the level of the real neutral rates. Australia, Canada, New Zealand, and Sweden have elevated r-stars, but the picture changes drastically when their large debt loads are factored in. While real policy rates remain below r-star across DM economies for now, a more rapid decline in supply-driven inflation would correct this situation. Consequently, a global recession does not constitute our base case for the next six months, although it is a growing threat. The ECB is front-loading interest rate increases while it can, but the destination of travel is not changing significantly. Global R-Star Bottom Line: The global r-star varies greatly around the world and debt sustainability concerns weigh on the real neutral rates of Australia, Canada, New Zealand, and Sweden. The US economy remains best capable of handling higher interest rates.   Chart 1Rising Global Inflation Inflation around G10 economies has been very strong and much more durable than originally hoped. As a result, inflation now averages 7.1% on a headline CPI basis and 4.6% based on core CPI across among G10 economies (Chart 1). Central banks are tightening policy aggressively to prevent this elevated inflation from becoming entrenched. Essentially, they are aiming to avert the emergence of the kind of inflationary mentality that prevailed in the 1970s, which caused stubborn inflation during that decade. This exercise is fraught with difficulty. The objective is to achieve a policy setting that is slightly above the neutral rate of interest, but not too much so. On the one hand, keeping policy too accommodative will increase the chances that an inflationary mentality will emerge; on the other hand, if policy is tightened too much, a recession will become unavoidable and deflationary risks will escalate. A sense of where the neutral rate for major economies lies is therefore necessary to draw that line in the sand. To do so, we estimate the real neutral rate of interest for major DM economies using the methodology we introduced seven weeks ago, when we evaluated the neutral rates for the major Eurozone economies. This exercise shows that, at the current level of interest rates and inflation, policy among major economies remains accommodative. However, if inflation decelerates sharply in the coming months in response to declining global supply constraints and lower commodity prices, the recent increase in policy rates will have already gone a long way to normalizing monetary policy around the world. A Simple Approach The methodology we use is based on the approach developed by Holston, Laubach, and Williams (HLW)  to estimate the neutral real interest rate – or “r-star.” Specifically, we run regressions between the real interest rates in the US, Japan, the UK, New Zealand, Canada, Australia, Sweden, and Switzerland versus trend GDP growth and current account balances, which approximate the savings-investment balance. Mimicking the HLW methodology, the inflation expectations used to extract real interest rates from nominal short rates reflect an adaptative framework whereby inflation expectations are a function of the ten-year moving average of core CPI.1  Table 1Unadjusted R-Stars The results are shown in Table 1. New Zealand, Australia, and Canada have the highest real-neutral rate of the major economies. They have had stronger growth over the past 20 years because of their rapid population growth caused by high immigration rates. Moreover, their commodity-based economies and their booming construction sectors pushed up investment rates, which requires high interest rates to attract sufficient savings to finance. Sweden and the US follow. These two economies have lower population growth rates than the commodity producers; nonetheless, they outperform Japan and the other European nations in the survey on that dimension. Moreover, they fare comparatively well in terms of productivity growth, which implies that their trend growth – a key driver of the neutral rate – is also higher than that of the UK, Japan, Switzerland, or the Euro Area. The US’s r-star shows up as being slightly below what would be expected based on its potential GDP growth. This surprising outcome most likely reflects the role of the dollar in global FX reserves and its standing at the core of the global financial system. These two characteristics of the greenback create an important demand for dollar-denominated assets that is dissociated from US domestic economic fundamentals. This additional demand biases downward the US real neutral rate and suggests that weak trend growth abroad and global excess savings remain important forces for US financial markets. Chart 2Japan's Dissociated Real Rates Japan displays a surprisingly elevated real neutral rate of 0.1%. This result reflects the limitation of the approach. Japanese interest rates have been at zero since the late 1990s and real rates have been negatively correlated with inflation because of this nominal rigidity (Chart 2). However, while Japanese inflation has averaged a paltry 0.2% since 1997, it has nonetheless fluctuated with commodity prices and global economic activity. As a result, real rates have been essentially dissociated from Japanese domestic drivers. Hence, an empirical approach based on the evolution of domestic economic variables yields poor results for Japan. Instead, the lack of inflation when public debt has increased by 200% of GDP over the past 32 years and Japan’s large net international investment position imply that its r-star is inferior to that of the other countries in the sample, and thus should lie below -1%. For the Eurozone, we use the average result of our July study, which estimated the neutral rates of Germany, France, Italy, and Spain independently. Germany flatters this estimate since its real neutral rate stands near 0%. An average, excluding Germany, would be closer to -0.5%, or well below the US r-star. Meanwhile, the Swiss r-star is depressed by both a low population growth and the Swiss exceptional savings generation, as highlighted by its current account surplus that has averaged 8% of GDP over the past 20 years. Finally, the UK’s r-star stands at the bottom of the pack. The UK’s productivity growth has been very poor over the past ten years, averaging 0.7% per annum. This points to a weak potential GDP for that economy. Moreover, the hurdles to UK growth have only increased in recent years with the implementation of Brexit, which is hurting the availability of labor in the country, while putting the UK at an even greater disadvantage in European markets, its largest export destination. What About Debt? This approach to estimating r-star ignores a key dimension: debt sustainability. If we factor in this crucial variable, the level of interest rates causing economic activity to decelerate changes drastically for many countries. Chart 3Massive Real Estates Bubbles Since 2000, real estate prices have surged by 280%, 220%, 170%, and 200% in New Zealand, Canada, Australia, and Sweden, respectively. These gains dwarf the house price appreciation observed in the US, the UK, Japan, or Germany (Chart 3, top panel). This outperformance of house prices is particularly problematic because it does not reflect more rapid underlying cash-flow growth from the assets. Instead, the main driver of the stronger house prices in New Zealand, Canada, Australia, and Sweden has been the explosion of their price-to-rent and price-to-income ratios (Chart 3, bottom two panels). Rising real estate prices boosted economic activity relative to the underlying trend GDP of these countries. As a result, the long-term growth numbers of these four nations potentially overstate their underlying rate of growth. Even more importantly, real estate prices and activity are extremely sensitive to interest rates. Therefore, the risk of bursting bubbles in New Zealand, Canada, Australia, and Sweden limits how high interest rates may rise there without causing growth to plunge and deflationary spirals to emerge. Chart 4Rapidly Rising Debt Loads The accumulation of debt in these four countries accentuates the threats to growth created by real estate activity. The private-sector debt of New Zealand, Canada, Australia, and Sweden has risen much more quickly than has been the case in Germany and the US (Chart 4). Ultimately, these debt burdens create major headwinds against higher interest rates and suggest that the effective r-star of these nations lies well below the estimates constructed using only trend growth and the savings/investment balance. Table 2Drastic Changes Once Debt Is Accounted For To account for the private-sector leverage, we estimated new debt-adjusted r-stars. The impact of high debt loads on r-star estimates is evident in Table 2. The average real neutral rate of New Zealand, Australia, and Canada drops from 1.9% to -1.9%. In fact, Australia and Canada would sport the lowest r-star estimates of the nations under study. Sweden’s neutral rate also experienced a big decline from 0.6% to 0.2%. The US r-star estimate is also lowered by the addition of debt metrics in its equation, declining from 0.2% to -0.4%. The Eurozone average r-star experiences a significant decrease as well, driven mostly by Spain and France. The Swiss economy also sports a large private debt load, and its r-star is therefore curtailed from -0.75% to -1.3%. Finally, Japan’s r-star estimate barely changes, which confirms that the approach does not work well for that country. The greatest drawback of the method is that it is backward-looking. The main force that has brought down the global r-star over the past 20 years is the collapse in trend growth among most advanced economies (Chart 5). Consequently, neutral rates could improve from their current low levels if trend growth were to pick up in the coming years. On the positive side, the current age of the capital stock in both Europe and the US is extremely advanced (Chart 6), which suggests that a capex upturn is likely. Such an upturn would boost productivity and lift the r-star among most major economies. On the negative side, the growth of human capital is deteriorating as educational attainment stalls among most DM nations. The decline in the growth rate of human capital is a large threat to productivity over the coming decades. These problems are magnified in the Eurozone, as its high degree of economic fragmentation, lack of common fiscal policy, and higher regulatory burden create further handicaps to trend growth. Chart 5R-star And Global Growth Chart 6A Capex Revival? Bottom Line: Estimating the real neutral rates for the global economy often relies on trend growth and the savings/investment balance. However, such an approach often misses the vulnerability to higher interest rates created by high private-sector indebtedness. If this constraint is considered, the high r-star recorded in countries like New Zealand, Australia, or Canada is reduced dramatically. The US r-star also declines but significantly less so. As we already showed seven weeks ago, the same phenomenon is also visible in the Eurozone, albeit driven by France and Spain, not Germany or Italy. Investment Implications There are three main conclusions from the analysis above. First, the risk of a financial accident in commodity-producing economies is growing increasingly large. On the one hand, economies like New Zealand, Australia, and Canada are buoyed by the recent surge in commodity prices, with agricultural prices up 90% since their 2020 lows, metal prices up 68%, and energy prices up 340% since April 2020. On the other hand, the inflationary pressures created by robust commodity sectors invite the RBNZ, the RBA, and the BoC to lift interest rates quickly, which is hurting massively indebted private sectors. Already, in response to the 275bps and 300bps of hikes implemented by the RBNZ and the BoC, house prices in New Zealand have begun to buckle, down 12% and since their more recent peaks, and they are expected to plunge by as much as 25% in Canada by the end of next year. Chart 7NZD And CAD At A Disadvantage This suggests that non-commodity equities in Canada, Australia, and New Zealand, especially financials, could experience significant periods of underperformance, both against their domestic equity benchmark and global market averages. Additionally, while the NZD, AUD, and CAD all benefit from improving terms of trades, the potential for domestic weakness is such that these currencies are likely to lag their historical sensitivity to commodity price fluctuations. In fact, according to BCA’s foreign exchange strategist, the New Zealand and Canadian dollars are among the most expensive currencies in the G10 (Chart 7), and thus, it is likely to underperform other pro-cyclical currencies once the USD bull market reverses. Second, the neutral rate in the US has risen by 200bps relative to the rest of the world over the past seven years. The US economy has undergone a long deleveraging period in the wake of the GFC, which means that its private-debt-to-GDP ratio has declined relative to other advanced economies. Consequently, the vulnerability of the US economy to higher interest rates has decreased, even if relative US trend growth has not improved meaningfully. The market implications of this pickup in the neutral rate are manifold. To begin with, it allows US rates to rise further relative to other DM economies. BCA’s Global Fixed Income Strategy team continues to underweight US Treasurys in global fixed-income portfolios, especially relative to German Bunds (Chart 8). As a corollary, it also means that US financials are likely to continue to outperform their foreign peers, especially Canadian and Australian ones which will bear the brunt of the negative consequences of their debt bubbles. The increase in the US r-star relative to the rest of the world has been a key contributor to the dollar rally. It helps explain why the recent dollar strength has not hurt relative profit growth (Chart 9). However, the dollar is trading at a 32% premium to its purchasing power parity, or the same overvaluation as in 1985 and 2001. Thus, with the worsening US balance of payment picture, the US dollar is vulnerable to an eventual improvement in global growth next year. Chart 8US Rate Differentials Have Upside Chart 9The US Fares Better Chart 10Easy Or Not? Finally, despite the recent increase in rates, the high level of inflation recorded around the world implies that real policy rates are still well below r-star for major global economies, whether one uses actual inflation or the smooth formulation recommended by the HLW paper (Chart 10). This suggests that a recession is unlikely, especially in the US. The recession threat is higher in Europe but has little to do with policy. It is mostly a consequence of the massive terms of trade shock caused by the sudden jump in European energy prices in the wake of the Ukrainian war. However, because policy remains accommodative even in Europe, it follows that the Eurozone economy will rebound quickly once the worst of the energy shock is over next spring. Some humility is required. It is hard to gauge how much of the inflation surge over the past 18 months reflects supply factors. If inflation suddenly becomes much weaker because the easing in supply constraints has a greater-than-anticipated impact on inflation, real interest rates would jump rapidly around the world. In this scenario, policy rates could rise quickly and overtake r-star. This would mean that the disinflation impulse could rapidly morph into an outright deflationary environment, which implies that the odds of a deflationary bust like the one experienced in 1921 is greater than the market currently prices in.  Bottom Line: The debt-fueled real estate bubbles in the dollar-bloc economies suggests that they are at a greater risk of a financial accident than the US or the Eurozone. As a result, their financial sector looks vulnerable. Meanwhile, the higher US r-star compared to that of the rest of the world will continue to support higher yields in the US rather than in Europe or Japan. This phenomenon has been hugely positive for the US dollar, but it has likely run its course. Finally, global real interest rates remain below r-star estimates. Hence, the current slowdown is likely to prove to be a mid-cycle slowdown and Europe will rebound quickly from a potential recession caused by the recent surge in its energy prices. The ECB Joins The 75bps Club Last week, the ECB increased interest rates by 75bps, which brought its deposit rate to 0.75%. Interestingly, the euro did not rally much in response to this policy decision, even though it has not been fully discounted by the market. At first glance, the lack of responsiveness from European assets seems strange, especially since the vote for a 75bps rate hike was unanimous. The ECB is taking advantage of strong economic numbers to push up rates rapidly. The Eurozone Q2 GDP growth was robust at 0.6%, while the unemployment rate hit an all-time low of 6.6%. Meanwhile, inflation continues to beat consensus forecasts, with Eurozone core CPI and headline CPI standing at 4.3% and 9.1%, respectively in August. Chart 11Big ECB Revisions The market believes that more rapid interest rate hikes now will not translate into a much higher terminal rate, with the expected rates for June 2023 moving from 2.2% on September 7th to 2.4% after last Thursday’s decision. The ECB may have increased its inflation forecasts for the whole horizon, but it has also brought down GDP forecasts to 0.9% and 1.9% in 2023 and 2024, respectively (Chart 11). Moreover, ECB President Christine Lagarde went out of her way to telegraph to investors that the number of upcoming hikes was finite. The jumbo hike does not spell the start of a euro rally—for now. First, the lack of major change in the ECB’s terminal deposit rate is more important than the more rapid pace of hikes for the remainder of 2022. Second, the Fed is also lifting rates faster than investors expected ahead of the Jackson Hole meeting three weeks ago. Third, the euro remains vulnerable to any flare-ups in the energy market. True, natural gas and electricity prices have recently fallen, but the situation in Ukraine continues to be highly fluid, which suggests that volatility will linger in the energy market over the coming weeks.   Despite the near-term hurdles, the euro’s medium-term outlook is brightening. We are gaining confidence in our thesis that energy prices will peak once natural gas inventories have reached approximately 90% by November. Additionally, the support of the Governing Council’s doves for a 75bps hike suggests that they received something in exchange for their votes. In our view, this “something” is an activation of the Transmission Protection Instrument (TPI) before year-end. The TPI activation will allow for a normalization of the risk premia in the Italian debt market and will support the ECB’s ability to increase interest rates further down the road, despite the much lower r-star in Italy, Spain, and France than in Germany (Table 3). Table 3The Eurozone’s Different R-Stars Will Force The TPI’s Activation Bottom Line: The ECB may have delivered a jumbo hike last week, but its market impact was muted. Investors understand full well that the ECB is taking advantage of the recent bout of robust economic activity to front-load interest rate increases ahead of a likely economic contraction in Q4 2022 and Q1 2023. As a result, the terminal rate estimates have scarcely moved. Ultimately, we expect the ECB deposit rate to settle between 1.5% and 2% in the summer of 2023. While the move may not provide much of a boost to the euro in the near term, conditions are falling into place for a euro rally later this year.   Mathieu Savary, Chief European Strategist Mathieu@bcaresearch.com   Footnotes 1     For the US, we opted for core PCE, since it is the benchmark inflation measure the Federal Reserve uses.

Highlights Chart 1A Hot Labor Market The balance of data that’s come out during the past month points to a labor market that is not cooling very quickly. In fact, it is cooling much more slowly than we anticipated. First, nonfarm payroll growth of +315k in August is well above the +79k that is needed to maintain the unemployment and participation rates at current levels (Chart 1). Second, what had initially looked like a significant drop in job openings was revised away with the July JOLTS report. While the ratio of job openings to unemployed has leveled-off just below 2.0, it is no longer showing any signs of falling (bottom panel). Finally, the employment component of August’s ISM Manufacturing PMI jumped back above 50 and even initial unemployment claims have reversed their nascent uptrend. The conclusion we draw from this spate of strong employment data is that the Fed’s tightening cycle is not close to over. This means that the average fed funds rate that is priced into markets for 2023 is almost certainly too low. Feature Table 1 Recommended Portfolio Specification Table 2Fixed Income Sector Performance Table 3A Corporate Sector Relative Valuation And Recommended Allocation* Table 3BCorporate Sector Risk Vs. Reward* Investment Grade: Underweight Chart 2Investment Grade Market Overview Investment grade corporate bonds outperformed the duration-equivalent Treasury index by 8 basis points in August, bringing year-to-date excess returns up to -267 bps. The average index option-adjusted spread tightened 4 bps on the month, and it currently sits at 145 bps. Our quality-adjusted 12-month breakeven spread ticked up to its 56th percentile since 1995 (Chart 2). A report from a few months ago made the case for why investors should underweight investment grade corporate bonds on a 6-12 month investment horizon.1 The main rationale for this recommendation is that the slope of the Treasury curve suggests that the credit cycle is in its late stages. Corporate bond performance tends to be weak during periods when the yield curve is very flat or inverted. Despite our underweight 6-12 month investment stance, we wouldn’t be surprised to see some modest spread narrowing during the next couple of months as inflation heads lower. That said, spread compression will be limited by the inverted yield curve and the persistent removal of monetary accommodation. A recent report dug deeper into the corporate bond space and concluded that investment grade-rated Energy bonds offer exceptional value on a 6-12 month horizon.2 That report also concluded that long maturity investment grade corporates are attractively priced relative to short maturity bonds. High-Yield: Neutral Chart 3High-Yield Market Overview High-Yield underperformed the duration-equivalent Treasury index by 28 basis points in August, dragging year-to-date excess returns down to -519 bps. The average index option-adjusted spread tightened 15 bps on the month and it currently sits at 494 bps, 125 bps above the 2017-19 average and 43 bps below the 2018 peak. The 12-month spread-implied default rate – the default rate that is priced into the junk index assuming a 40% recovery rate on defaulted debt and an excess spread of 100 bps – increased modestly in August. It currently sits at 6.6% (Chart 3). As is the case with investment grade, high-yield spreads could stage a relief rally during the next few months as inflation falls and recession fears abate. However, the inverted yield curve will likely prevent spreads from moving much below the average level seen during the last tightening cycle (2017-19). All that said, even a move back to average 2017-19 levels would equate to a roughly 7% excess return for the junk index if it is realized over a six month period. This return potential is the main reason to prefer high-yield over investment grade in a US bond portfolio. While we maintain a neutral (3 out of 5) allocation to high-yield for now, we will downgrade the sector if spreads tighten to the 2017-19 average or if core inflation falls back to our 4% estimate of its underlying trend.3 MBS: Underweight Chart 4MBS Market Overview Mortgage-Backed Securities underperformed the duration-equivalent Treasury index by 100 basis points in August, dragging year-to-date excess returns down to -144 bps. We discussed the outlook for Agency MBS in a recent report.4 We noted that MBS’ poor performance in 2021 and early-2022 was driven by duration extension. Fewer homeowners refinanced their loans as mortgage rates rose, and the MBS index’s average duration increased (Chart 4). But now, the index’s duration extension is over. The average convexity of the MBS index is close to zero (panel 3), meaning that duration is now insensitive to changes in rates. This is because hardly any homeowners have an incentive to refinance at current mortgage rates. With the duration extension trade over, the only thing preventing us from increasing exposure to the Agency MBS space is that spreads still aren’t sufficiently attractive. The average index spread versus duration-matched Treasuries is roughly midway between its post-2014 minimum and post-2014 mean (panel 4). Meanwhile, the option-adjusted spread has moved above its post-2014 mean (bottom panel), but at just 42 bps, it still offers less compensation than a Aa-rated corporate bond or a Aaa-rated consumer ABS. At the coupon level, we moved to a neutral allocation across the coupon stack last month, but this month we initiate a recommendation to favor high-coupon (3%-4.5%) securities over low coupon (1.5%-2.5%) ones. Given the lower duration of high coupon MBS, this position will profit from rising bond yields on a 6-12 month investment horizon. Emerging Market Bonds (USD): Underweight Chart 5Emerging Markets Overview Emerging Market bonds outperformed the duration-equivalent Treasury index by 156 basis points in August, bringing year-to-date excess returns up to -563 bps. EM Sovereigns outperformed the Treasury benchmark by 117 bps on the month, bringing year-to-date excess returns up to -677 bps. The EM Corporate & Quasi-Sovereign Index outperformed by 180 bps, bringing year-to-date excess returns up to -491 bps. The EM Sovereign index outperformed the duration-equivalent US corporate bond index by 111 bps in August. Meanwhile, the yield differential between EM sovereigns and US corporates moved deeper into negative territory (Chart 5). As such, we continue to recommend a maximum underweight (1 out of 5) allocation to EM sovereigns. The EM Corporate & Quasi-Sovereign Index outperformed duration-matched US corporates by 168 bps in August. The index continues to offer a significant yield advantage versus duration-matched US corporates (panel 4). As such, we continue to recommend a neutral (3 out of 5) allocation to the sector. China is the most important trading partner for most EM countries and thus represents a major source of economic growth. Consequently, Chinese import volumes are a useful gauge for the outlook of EM economies. The persistent contraction of Chinese import volumes (bottom panel) therefore sends a negative signal for EM bond performance. Municipal Bonds: Overweight Chart 6Municipal Market Overview Municipal bonds outperformed the duration-equivalent Treasury index by 126 basis points in August, bringing year-to-date excess returns up to -44 bps (before adjusting for the tax advantage). We view the municipal bond sector as better placed than most to cope with the recent bout of spread volatility. As we noted in a recent report, state & local government revenue growth has been strong, but governments have been slow to hire (Chart 6).5 The result is that net state & local government savings are incredibly high (bottom panel) and it will take some time to deplete those coffers. On the valuation front, munis have cheapened up relative to both Treasuries and corporates since last year. The 10-year Aaa Muni / Treasury yield ratio is currently 82%, up from its 2021 trough of 55%. The yield ratio between 12-17 year munis and duration-matched corporate bonds is also up significantly off its lows (panel 2). We reiterate our overweight allocation to municipal bonds within US fixed income portfolios, and we continue to have a strong preference for long-maturity munis. The yield ratio between 17-year+ General Obligation municipal bonds and duration-matched US corporates is 80%. The same measure for Revenue bonds is 94%, just below parity even without considering municipal debt’s tax advantage. Treasury Curve: Buy 5/30 Barbell Versus 10-Year Bullet Chart 7Treasury Yield Curve Overview The Treasury curve bear-flattened in August as investors significantly marked up their 12-month rate expectations. Our 12-month Fed Funds Discounter – the market’s expected 12-month change in the funds rate – rose from 78 bps to 175 bps during the month and this caused the 2-year/10-year Treasury slope to flatten by 8 bps and the 5-year/30-year Treasury slope to flatten by 33 bps (Chart 7). We initiated a position in 5/30 flatteners (short 10-year bullet versus duration-matched 5/30 barbell) in our August 9th report.6 The main reason for this recommendation is our view that the Fed tightening cycle is not close to over. Therefore, it is too soon to position for a steepening of the 5-year/30-year Treasury slope. An analysis of past Fed tightening cycles shows that the 5-year/30-year Treasury slope tends to trough earlier than other segments of the yield curve. However, that trough has always occurred within a window spanning five months before the last Fed rate hike and three months after.7 On average, the 5-year/30-year slope troughs 1-2 months before the last Fed rate hike. Given our view that the Fed tightening cycle still has a lot of room to run, we think it makes sense to bet on a further flattening of the 5-year/30-year slope. This trade looks particularly attractive when you consider that a position short the 10-year bullet and long a duration-matched 5/30 barbell provides a yield pick-up of 12 bps (bottom panel). TIPS: Neutral Chart 8TIPS Market Overview TIPS outperformed the duration-equivalent nominal Treasury index by 8 basis points in August, bringing year-to-date excess returns up to +264 bps. The 10-year TIPS breakeven inflation rate fell 5 bps on the month, moving back into the Fed’s 2.3% - 2.5% comfort zone (Chart 8). Meanwhile, our TIPS Breakeven Valuation Indicator shows that 10-year TIPS are close to fairly valued versus nominals. In a recent report we unveiled our Golden Rule of TIPS Investing.8 In that report we showed that TIPS of all maturities tend to outperform equivalent-maturity nominal bonds whenever headline CPI inflation exceeds the 1-year CPI swap rate during a 12-month period. The 1-year CPI swap rate is currently 2.77%, and we think this will turn out to be too low based on our modeling of headline CPI. While we see value in TIPS relative to nominals, especially at the front-end of the curve, we also suspect that more value will be created during the next few months as CPI prints come in soft. Therefore, we are reluctant to immediately upgrade TIPS to overweight. Instead, we recommend that investors initiate a 2-year/10-year TIPS breakeven inflation curve flattener. The 2/10 TIPS breakeven inflation curve has recently jumped into positive territory (bottom panel), but an inverted inflation curve is much more consistent with the current macro environment where the Fed is battling above-target inflation. ABS: Overweight Chart 9ABS Market Overview Asset-Backed Securities outperformed the duration-equivalent Treasury index by 27 basis points in August, bringing year-to-date excess returns up to -25 bps. Aaa-rated ABS outperformed by 19 bps on the month, bringing year-to-date excess returns up to -24 bps. Non-Aaa ABS outperformed by 76 bps on the month, bringing year-to-date excess returns up to -28 bps. Substantial federal government support caused US households to build up an extremely large buffer of excess savings during the past two years. This year, consumers are starting to draw down that savings and are even starting to take on more debt. The amount of outstanding credit card debt is still low relative to household income, but it is rising quickly in absolute terms (Chart 9). Elsewhere, consumers are still paying down their credit card balances at high rates (panel 4), but banks are no longer easing lending standards on auto loans or credit cards (panel 3). To us, the prevailing evidence suggests that it will be a long time before delinquencies are a serious problem for consumer ABS. This justifies our overweight recommendation. That said, given that the trend toward consumer re-leveraging is in full swing, it makes sense to turn more cautious at the margin. We therefore close our prior recommendation to favor non-Aaa over Aaa-rated consumer ABS and move to a neutral allocation across the consumer ABS credit curve. Non-Agency CMBS: Overweight Neutral Chart 10CMBS Market Overview Non-Agency Commercial Mortgage-Backed Securities outperformed the duration-equivalent Treasury index by 26 basis points in August, bringing year-to-date excess returns up to -150 bps. Aaa Non-Agency CMBS outperformed Treasuries by 20 bps on the month, bringing year-to-date excess returns up to -103 bps. Non-Aaa Non-Agency CMBS outperformed by 41 bps on the month, bringing year-to-date excess returns up to -280 bps. CMBS spreads remain wide compared to other similarly risky spread products and are currently close to their historic averages. However, the most recent Senior Loan Officer Survey showed tightening lending standards and weaker demand for commercial real estate (CRE) loans (Chart 10). This suggests a more negative back-drop for CRE prices and CMBS spreads and causes us to reduce our recommended allocation from overweight (4 out of 5) to neutral (3 out of 5). Agency CMBS: Overweight Agency CMBS underperformed the duration-equivalent Treasury index by 29 basis points in August, dragging year-to-date excess returns down to -44 bps. The average index option-adjusted spread held flat on the month, close to its long-term average (bottom panel). At 55 bps, the average Agency CMBS spread continues to look attractive compared to other similarly risky spread products. Stay overweight. Appendix A: The Golden Rule Of Bond Investing We follow a two-step process to formulate recommendations for bond portfolio duration. First, we determine the change in the federal funds rate that is priced into the yield curve for the next 12 months. Second, we decide – based on our assessments of the economy and Fed policy – whether the change in the fed funds rate will exceed or fall short of what is priced into the curve. Most of the time, a correct answer to this question leads to the appropriate duration call. We call this framework the Golden Rule Of Bond Investing, and we demonstrated its effectiveness in the US Bond Strategy Special Report, “The Golden Rule Of Bond Investing”, dated July 24, 2018. Chart 11 illustrates the Golden Rule’s track record by showing that the Bloomberg Barclays Treasury Master Index tends to outperform cash when rate hikes fall short of 12-month expectations, and vice-versa. At present, the market is priced for 175 basis points of rate hikes during the next 12 months. Chart 11The Golden Rule's Track Record We can also use our Golden Rule framework to make 12-month total return and excess return forecasts for the Bloomberg Barclays Treasury index under different scenarios for the fed funds rate. Excess returns are relative to the Bloomberg Barclays Cash index. To forecast total returns we first calculate the 12-month fed funds rate surprise in each scenario by comparing the assumed change in the fed funds rate to the current value of our 12-month discounter. This rate hike surprise is then mapped to an expected change in the Treasury index yield using a regression based on the historical relationship between those two variables. Finally, we apply the expected change in index yield to the current characteristics (yield, duration and convexity) of the Treasury index to estimate total returns on a 12-month horizon. The below tables present those results, along with excess returns for a front-loaded and a back-loaded rate hike scenario. Excess returns are calculated by subtracting assumed cash returns in each scenario from our total return projections. Appendix B: Butterfly Strategy Valuations The following tables present the current read-outs from our butterfly spread models. We use these models to identify opportunities to take duration-neutral positions across the Treasury curve. The following two Special Reports explain the models in more detail: US Bond Strategy Special Report, “Bullets, Barbells And Butterflies”, dated July 25, 2017, available at usbs.bcaresearch.com US Bond Strategy Special Report, “More Bullets, Barbells And Butterflies”, dated May 15, 2018, available at usbs.bcaresearch.com Table 4 shows the raw residuals from each model. A positive value indicates that the bullet is cheap relative to the duration-matched barbell. A negative value indicates that the barbell is cheap relative to the bullet. Table 4Butterfly Strategy Valuation: Raw Residuals In Basis Points (As Of September 1, 2022) Table 5 scales the raw residuals in Table 4 by their historical means and standard deviations. This facilitates comparison between the different butterfly spreads. Table 5Butterfly Strategy Valuation: Standardized Residuals (As Of September 1, 2022) Table 6 flips the models on their heads. It shows the change in the slope between the two barbell maturities that must be realized during the next six months to make returns between the bullet and barbell equal. For example, a reading of -7 bps in the 5 over 2/10 cell means that we would expect the 5-year to outperform the 2/10 if the 2/10 slope flattens by less than 7 bps during the next six months. Otherwise, we would expect the 2/10 barbell to outperform the 5-year bullet. Table 6Discounted Slope Change During Next 6 Months (BPs) Appendix C: Excess Return Bond Map The Excess Return Bond Map is used to assess the relative risk/reward trade-off between different sectors of the US bond market. It is a purely computational exercise and does not impose any macroeconomic view. The Map’s vertical axis shows 12-month expected excess returns. These are proxied by each sector’s option-adjusted spread. Sectors plotting further toward the top of the Map have higher expected returns and vice-versa. Our novel risk measure called the “Risk Of Losing 100 bps” is shown on the Map’s horizontal axis. To calculate it, we first compute the spread widening required on a 12-month horizon for each sector to lose 100 bps or more relative to a duration-matched position in Treasury securities. Then, we divide that amount of spread widening by each sector’s historical spread volatility. The end result is the number of standard deviations of 12-month spread widening required for each sector to lose 100 bps or more versus a position in Treasuries. Lower risk sectors plot further to the right of the Map, and higher risk sectors plot further to the left. Chart 12Excess Return Bond Map (As Of September 1, 2022)   Ryan Swift US Bond Strategist rswift@bcaresearch.com Robert Timper Research Analyst robert.timper@bcaresearch.com Footnotes 1     Please see US Bond Strategy / Global Fixed Income Strategy Special Report, “Turning Defensive On US Corporate Bonds”, dated April 12, 2022. 2     Please see US Bond Strategy / Global Fixed Income Strategy Special Report, “Looking For Opportunities In US & European Corporates After The Recent Selloff”, dated May 31, 2022. 3    For more details on this call please see US Bond Strategy Weekly Report, “When The Dual Mandates Clash”, dated June 28, 2022. 4    Please see US Bond Strategy Weekly Report, “The Bond Market Implications Of A 5% Mortgage Rate”, dated April 26, 2022. 5    Please see US Bond Strategy Weekly Report, “Echoes Of 2018”, dated May 24, 2022. 6    Please see US Bond Strategy Weekly Report, “The Great Soft Landing Debate”, dated August 9, 2022. 7     In our analysis we examined seven Fed tightening cycles. The five most recent cycles and the two cycles that occurred during the inflation spike of the early 1980s. 8    Please see US Bond Strategy Special Report, “The Golden Rule Of TIPS Investing”, dated August 23, 2022.   Recommended Portfolio Specification Other Recommendations Treasury Index Returns Spread Product Returns

Dear client, We will not be publishing the US Equity Strategy next week, as I will be participating in BCA Investment Conference. We will return to our regular publishing schedule on September 19, 2022. Kind Regards, Irene Tunkel   Executive Summary Most Thematic ETFs Are Far Off Their Pandemic Peaks In today’s sector Chart I-pack report we recap our structural investment themes. EV Revolution: The EV cohort benefits from a structural transformation of the automobile industry that is further supported by favorable legislative tailwinds, and shifting consumer preferences. Generation Z: Generation Zers are coming of age and wield an increasing influence over consumer trends. Cybersecurity: The pandemic-driven shift to remote work, broad-based migration to cloud computing and increasing geopolitical tensions, are all structural forces that will ensure a healthy demand pipeline for cybersecurity companies. Green And Clean: Green energy is becoming cheaper to produce, which supports a wider adaptation of green technologies. Green tech also enjoys favorable legislative tailwinds that are coming on the back of rising geopolitical tensions, the ongoing energy crisis, and climate change action. Renewables help to diversify energy sources and offer a path towards energy security. Bottom Line: Thematic investments that capture the latest technological breakthroughs present unprecedented long-term investment opportunities for investors who can stomach short-term volatility. Feature This week we are sending you a Sector Chart I-Pack, which offers macro, fundamentals, valuations, technicals, and uses of cash charts for each sector. In the front section of this publication, we will overview recent equity performance and provide a recap of the US Equity Strategy structural investment themes. August – When The Rally Came To A Stall As we predicted in the “What Will Bring This Rally To A Halt?” report, the “inflation is turning, and the Fed will be dovish” rally has come to a screeching halt. The S&P 500 was down 8% in August as investors finally believe that Jay Powell’s Fed is hell-bound on extinguishing inflation even if it means squelching economic growth (Chart I-1). The message from Jackson Hole was very much Mario Draghi-like: “whatever it takes.” The market reaction was swift and brutal. The rally winners were in the epicenter of the sell-off that ensued on the back of Powell’s comments. Invesco QQQ Trust is already down nearly 9% off its August 16 peak, while Ark Innovation (ARKK) is down 13% (Chart I-2).  We expect that equities will continue to revert to their pre-summer lows. Chart I-1Summer Rally Winners Are At The Epicenter Of The Sell-off Chart I-2Most Thematic ETFs Are Far Off Their Pandemic Peaks With rates on the rise again, last week we shifted our overweight of Growth and underweight of Value to a neutral allocation. The last few months have been a rollercoaster. However, long-term investors may successfully survive the grind by resolutely sticking to some of the winning structural investment themes and ignoring short-term volatility. The fact that many themes are now more than 50% off their pandemic highs may indicate an opportune entry point. EV Revolution We initiated the EV Revolution theme in June 2021. Since then, the theme has outperformed the S&P 500 by 19%. The Auto and Components industry group is in the middle of a momentous transition to electric and autonomous vehicle manufacturing, thanks to technological advances in battery storage, AI, and radars. These technological breakthroughs help overcome most of the obstacles to the wide adoption of EVs. Multiple new entrants develop charging networks. Driving ranges are also rapidly increasing – Lucid promises a 500-mile range compared to Tesla’s 350. Couple that with the rising price of gas, the aging vehicle fleet, and the expectation that EVs will approach sticker parity with gas-powered cars as soon as 2023 (Chart I-3)  and there is no turning back to gas-guzzling vehicles. LMC Automotive forecasts that by 2031, EVs will reach 17 million units. Chart I-3EVs Will Reach Price Parity With ICEs In 2023 The entire EV cohort also benefits from favorable legislative tailwinds, thanks to this administration’s support of decarbonization. The Inflation Reduction Act (IRA) includes approximately $370 billion in clean energy spending, as well as EV tax credits for both new and used cars. In addition, executive action by President Biden has tightened fuel economy standards. California has mandated a complete switch to EV vehicles by 2035. The surge in EV Capex and R&D spending will boost the entire supply chain, which consists of chip manufacturers, battery and lidar R&D, part manufacturers, and charging networks. Many of these companies are still small. An ETF may be the best way to capture the theme (Table I-1). Table I-1EV/AV ETFs Generation Z: The Digital Natives The GenZ theme, which we identified exactly a year ago, has collapsed since the beginning of the market downturn and is down 47%. Its success was at the root of its demise – it captured overcrowded names most popular among GenZers, who are avid investors (Chart I-4). However, the theme is not “dead,” as a new cohort of Americans is coming of age, and they are not shy about it. Generation Z in the US includes 62 million people born between 1997 and 2012 (Chart I-5). With $143B in buying power in the US alone making up nearly 40% of all consumer sales, Gen Z wields increasing influence over consumer trends. This is the first generation of digital natives—they simply can’t remember the world without the internet. They are the early adopters of the new digital ways to bank, get medical treatments, and learn. Gen Z is joining the workforce and replacing retiring baby boomers. Chart I-4Gen Zers Are Avid Investors... Chart I-5Gen Zers Are Taking Over Gen Z is an umbrella theme that captures many other prominent themes, such as Fintech (Paypal & Social Finance), Crypto (COIN), Meme-investing (HOOD), Gaming and Alternative Reality (GAMR & ESPO), and Online Dating. But GenZers have a few behavioral quirks that make them different even from Millennials: Quality-Over-Price Shoppers: Gen Z was found to be less price sensitive when buying products, choosing quality over price. Lululemon (LULU) and Goose (GOOS) are among Gen Z’s favorites. Healthy Lifestyle: Gen Z is a “green” generation that deeply cares about the planet, loves the outdoors and traveling, and is crazy about pets. This is also a generation that prizes a healthy lifestyle and working out: Beyond Meat (BYND), Planet Fitness (PLNT), and Yeti (YETI). Generation Sober Chooses Cannabis: GenZers perceive hard liquor and tobacco as bad for their health. Curiously, marijuana is considered “healthy.” MSOS, CNBS, YOLO, and THCX are the biggest ETFs in this space. How To Invest In Gen Z? Gen Z is a nascent investment theme, so there are no ETFs available in the market yet. We propose that investors follow our Gen Z investment themes or replicate fully or partially our Gen Z basket. Cybersecurity: A Must-Have For Survival Despite its celebrity status, this is an industry that is still in the early innings of a growth cycle. The pandemic-driven shift to remote work, broad-based migration to cloud computing, development of the internet-of-things, and increasing geopolitical tensions create new targets for hackers who are after valuable data or just want to achieve maximum damage to the networks. Ubiquitous digitization requires increasingly more complex cyber defenses. With cybercrime costing the world nearly $600 billion each year and cyberattacks increasing in number and sophistication, the global cybersecurity market is expected to grow from $125 billion in 2020 to $175 billion by 2024. Both large and small businesses are yet to fully implement cybersecurity defenses. According to a survey by Forbes magazine, 55% of business executives plan to increase their budgets for cybersecurity in 2021 aiming to prevent malicious attacks. In response to the numerous breaches, the current US administration is placing a high priority on defensive cyber programs. Since 2017, US government departments have seen the cybersecurity share of their basic discretionary funding rise steadily from 1.38% to 1.73%. These developments are a boon for cybersecurity stocks (Chart I-6 & Chart I-7 ), the sales of which are soaring (Chart I-8). Chart I-6Cybercrime Losses Spur Demand for Cybersecurity Chart I-7Stepped Up Government Spending Will Lift Cybersecurity Stocks Chart I-8Cybersecurity Sales Are Soaring We introduced cybersecurity as a structural investment theme back in October 2021. So far, the CIBR ETF, which we use as a proxy for the performance of the theme, has underperformed the S&P 500 by 11%. Monetary tightening has weighed on the performance of these companies as they tend to be younger, smaller, and less profitable than their S&P 500 counterparts, i.e., CIBR has a strong small-cap growth bias. However, with cybersecurity stocks down 26% off their November-2021 peak and valuation premium back to earth, now may be an opportune moment to add to the theme. After all, these stocks have tremendous growth potential, warranting a long-term position in most equity portfolios. There are several highly liquid ETFs powered by the cybersecurity theme, such as CIBR, BUG, and HACK, which can be excellent investment vehicles (Table I-2). Table I-2Cybersecurity ETFs Green And Clean We introduced the “Green and Clean” theme back in March. Since then, it has outperformed the S&P 500 by 22%, benefiting from this administration’s focus on the mitigation of climate change. Putin’s energy stand-off with Europe has also put the industry into the global spotlight. The development of renewables will help diversify energy sources and offer a path toward energy security. Thus, renewable energy and cleantech companies are at the core of the global push to increase energy security and contain climate change. The International Renewable Energy Agency (IRENA) expects renewables to scale up from 14% of total energy today to around 40% in 2030. Global annual additions of renewable power would triple by 2030 as recommended by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Solar and wind power will attract the lion’s share of investments. Over the past 20 years, this country has made significant strides in shifting its energy generation toward renewable sources away from fossil fuels, increasing the share of clean energy from 3.7% in 2000 to 10% in 2020 (Chart I-9). Chart I-9A Structural Trend The key reason for the proliferation of green energy generation is that renewable electricity is becoming cheaper than electricity produced by fossil fuels – according to IRENA, 62% of the added renewable power generation capacity had lower electricity costs than the cheapest source of new fossil fuel-fired capacity. Costs for renewable technologies continued to fall significantly over the past year (Chart I-10). Renewables are similar to traditional utility companies: They require a massive upfront investment, but also enjoy substantial operating leverage. As production capacity increases, the cost of energy generation falls. Solar power generation is a case in point (Chart I-11). Hence, we have a positive reinforcement loop: more usage begets even more usage, bolstering the economic case for transitioning to cleaner energy resources. Chart I-10R&D Is Paying Off Chart I-11Capacity Is Inversely Correlated To Prices Increased renewables adaptation is possible thanks to several technological advancements including improved battery storage, implementation of smart grid networks, and an increase in carbon capture activities. There is a host of ETFs that offer investors a wide range of choices for access to renewable energy and cleantech themes (Table I-3). These ETFs differ in geographic span, industry focus, liquidity, and cost, but all are viable investment options. Table I-3Clean Tech ETFs Bottom Line Thematic investments that capture the latest technological breakthroughs present unprecedented long-term investment opportunities. However, these investments come with a warning: Technological innovation themes are intrinsically risky as they are rarely immediately profitable and require both continuous investment and technological breakthroughs to succeed. Also, most technological innovation themes carry high exposure to the small-cap growth style and are sensitive to rising rates and slowing growth. As such, they are fickle over the short term but pay off over a longer investment horizon.   Irene Tunkel Chief Strategist, US Equity Strategy irene.tunkel@bcaresearch.com     S&P 500 Chart II-1Macroeconomic Backdrop Chart II-2Profitability Chart II-3Valuations And Technicals Chart II-4Uses Of Cash Communication Services Chart II-5Macroeconomic Backdrop Chart II-6Profitability Chart II-7Valuations And Technicals Chart II-8Uses Of Cash Consumer Discretionary Chart II-9C Macroeconomic Backdrop Chart II-10Profitability Chart II-11Valuations And Technicals Chart II-12Uses Of Cash Consumer Staples Chart II-13Macroeconomic Backdrop Chart II-14Profitability Chart II-15Valuations And Technicals Chart II-16Uses Of Cash Energy Chart II-17Macroeconomic Backdrop Chart II-18Profitability Chart II-19Valuations And Technicals Chart II-20Uses Of Cash Financials Chart II-21Macroeconomic Backdrop Chart II-22Profitability Chart II-23Valuations And Technicals Chart II-24Uses Of Cash Health Care Chart II-25Sector vs Industry Groups Chart II-26Profitability Chart II-27Valuations And Technicals Chart II-28Uses Of Cash Industrials Chart II-29Macroeconomic Backdrop Chart II-30Profitability Chart II-31Valuations And Technicals Chart II-32Uses Of Cash Information Technology Chart II-33Macroeconomic Backdrop Chart II-34Profitability Chart II-35Valuations And Technicals Chart II-36Uses Of Cash Materials Chart II-37Macroeconomic Backdrop Chart II-38Profitability Chart II-39Valuations And Technicals Chart II-40Uses Of Cash Real Estate Chart II-41Macroeconomic Backdrop Chart II-42Profitability Chart II-43Valuations And Technicals Chart II-44Uses Of Cash Utilities Chart II-45Macroeconomic Backdrop Chart II-46Profitability Chart II-47Valuations And Technicals Chart II-48Uses Of Cash Recommended Allocation Recommended Allocation: Addendum

Executive Summary Chair Powell’s Jackson Hole speech did not change our fundamental take on the economy; we still think the expansion will survive through the first half of 2023 at a minimum. Financial markets’ reaction to Powell’s remarks highlighted that volatility will likely remain elevated but we continue to expect that equities will generate meaningful excess returns over Treasuries and cash over the rest of the year. The flow of data continues to send mixed signals about the outlook for financial markets and the economy, but the biggest risks to our view are no closer to occurring today than they were when we laid them out last month. An Eventful Intermeeting Period Bottom Line: We remain more optimistic than the consensus and continue to recommend a risk-friendly tilt in multi-asset portfolios over the next six months. We are still on high alert, however, and remain open to changing our views if incoming data begin to hint at an approaching inflection. Feature At the outset of a Zoom call last week, a US-based client asked if Chair Powell’s Jackson Hole speech had changed our view. The short answer is no, though it certainly roiled financial markets, providing the latest reminder that investors’ conviction levels should be lower than normal. This week’s report offers a longer answer, analyzing Powell’s comments while revisiting the risks to our view that we laid out in August. The principal risks have not gotten any closer to fruition and we therefore stand by our glass-half-full view, though we reiterate that it is contingent on incoming data flows – if they point to a worse outcome than our current base case, we may yet join the bearish chorus. The Fed Bigwigs Went To Grand Teton National Park … Chair Powell opened his speech by promising brevity, focus and directness and he delivered on all three counts. He used less than a third of his allotted 30 minutes to hammer home the Fed’s commitment to bringing inflation back to its 2% target and he didn’t mince words. The speech was short enough to allow the following close reading of it in which we excerpt a key line from nearly every paragraph, followed by our italicized takeaways. Powell: “Restoring price stability will take some time and requires using our tools forcefully to bring demand and supply into better balance.” US Investment Strategy: We are prepared to accept a lengthy stretch of subpar growth as the cost of getting inflation under control. Until further notice, fighting inflation takes precedence over encouraging growth. “The labor market … is clearly out of balance, with demand … substantially exceeding … supply[.]” The rip-roaring labor market is so strong that we have no choice but to lean against it given the inflation backdrop. “In current circumstances, … [the dots’] estimates of [the] longer-run neutral [fed funds rate] are not a place to stop or pause.” It will take a good bit more monetary tightening to get inflation back to the 2% target. “I said [in July] that another unusually large increase could be appropriate at our next meeting.” Another 75-basis point hike is on the table in September. The pace of increases will eventually slow, but we don’t yet know when. “Restoring price stability will likely require maintaining a restrictive policy stance for some time.” Don’t count on rate cuts any time soon. “[C]entral banks can and should take responsibility for delivering low and stable inflation.” The Fed is obligated to combat high inflation, even if some of its causes are beyond our control. Though we can’t relieve supply constraints, we can bring demand into better balance with supply. Related Report  US Investment StrategyRisks To Our View (Again) “If the public expects that inflation will remain low and stable over time, absent major shocks, it likely will. Unfortunately, the same is true of expectations of high and volatile inflation.” High inflation expectations can be self-fulfilling and we cannot allow them to become entrenched à la the 1970s. “The longer the current bout of high inflation continues, the greater the chance that expectations of higher inflation will become entrenched.” We cannot take it for granted that inflation expectations will remain well anchored despite high inflation prints. The public’s focus on inflation threatens future price stability and future growth and we would be playing with fire if we didn’t address it now. “[W]e must keep at it until the job is done.” If we do not act forcefully now, the cost of getting inflation back to the 2% target will be much greater. “We will keep at it until we are confident the job is done.” In case you missed my first reference to Paul Volcker’s memoir, Keeping At It, a moment ago, or the two times I spoke his name, understand that we’re willing to do whatever it takes to getting the inflation genie back in the bottle. … And All Investors Got Was A Lousy Selloff Our italicized translations should have sent a chill down the spines of equity investors and the S&P 500 duly plunged 3.4% after Powell’s speech, then followed up by sliding as much as another 3.8% in last week's sessions. BCA has always viewed 2023 rate cuts as something of a pipe dream, and we have been relieved to see the money market raise its terminal fed funds rate estimate while pushing out the date it will be reached. As Chart 1 shows, the expected terminal rate has risen by about 75 basis points and rate cuts have been pushed back since the July FOMC meeting, but even Jackson Hole didn’t get investors to give up on them entirely. Our best guess is that they still question the Fed’s commitment in the face of a slowdown. Chart 1A Lot Can Change In Five Weeks That interpretation offers a ready answer for why the glass-half-full view has taken a beating over the last six sessions but suggests that the glass-half-empty view could be at risk before too long. A higher terminal fed funds rate implies lower near-term earnings as well as a reduced willingness to pay for those earnings, so stocks have suffered as investors revised their expectations to better align with the Fed’s guidance. But the need to hike more and faster than investors expected underscores aggregate demand’s surprising resilience. If the labor market, consumption and corporate earnings all continue to hold up better than expected, equities have a path to move higher once the terminal rate outlook fully discounts the Jackson Hole rhetoric. Risks To Our View: Unanchored Inflation Expectations If it takes longer than markets expect for rate hikes to bite, and corporate earnings and economic growth surprise to the upside while inflation intrinsically recedes along with COVID's threat, underweight investors are likely to find themselves pulled back into equities. That scenario remains our base case, but it would become highly improbable if inflation expectations were to become unmoored, forcing the Fed to race to get the fed funds rate above 4% and keep it there. We therefore deem a breakout in inflation expectations to be an existential threat to our view. One month’s flat headline CPI reading certainly does not meet the Fed’s “clear and consistent” standard for falling inflation but various indications that consumer prices have peaked have begun to provide some near-term expectations relief. Two-year TIPS breakevens fell 35 basis points in two weeks, to 2.3%, their lowest level since January 2021 (Chart 2, top panel). Two-year CPI swap rates dipped 15 basis points in that stretch and are at their lowest level since last October (Chart 3, top panel). Intermediate- (Charts 2 and 3, middle panel) and long-term (Charts 2 and 3, bottom panel) expectations have ticked slightly higher in the last two weeks but reduced near-term expectations will take some of the pressure off them. Consumers see it the same way, with one-year inflation coming down sharply in the University of Michigan’s August survey (Chart 4, top panel) while long-term inflation expectations held steady at the bottom of the 2.9-3.1% range that has been in place for a year (Chart 4, bottom panel). Chart 2Way Lower Near-Term And ...​​​​​ Chart 3... Range-Bound Longer-Term Expectations​​​​​ Chart 4No Vicious Inflation Expectations Cycle Yet Risks To Our View: Consumer Retrenchment Our sanguine take on economic growth and corporate earnings will be in trouble if consumers begin to hoard their excess savings. The Personal Income report released the morning of Powell’s Jackson Hole speech indicated that the aggregate household savings rate was just 5% in July, matching June’s downwardly revised number. We view the steadily declining trend (Chart 5) as ongoing validation of our thesis that consumers will deploy their excess savings to keep consumption and the US economy growing at trend, despite uncomfortably high inflation. Chart 5Staying Out Of The Paradox-Of-Thrift Trap Risks To Our View: A Softening Labor Market The major labor market datapoints that have arrived over the last two weeks have been consistently robust. Job openings, which had appeared to have entered a steady decline, turned out to be in a holding pattern following a significant July beat and an upward revision to June’s reading. Before the release, job openings were projected to be 12.5% below their March peak; instead, they’ve only shrunk by 5%, or about 100,000 more than July’s net payroll additions (Chart 6, top panel). Meanwhile, job quits data softened a little more, falling for the fourth straight month (Chart 7, top panel) and pushing the quits rate to its lowest level since May 2021 (Chart 7, bottom panel). Taken together, the openings and quits data hint that a Goldilocks outcome – labor demand remains strong but not so strong that employees are able to command higher wages simply by walking to the competitor across the street – is not impossible. Chart 6Job Openings Have Gotten A Second Wind ...​​​​​ Chart 7... While Quits Are Slowing​​​​​ The four-week moving average of initial unemployment claims extended its modest decline after a smaller-than-expected number last week and a downward revision in the previous week’s estimate (Chart 8). Markets let out a sigh of relief after the August employment situation report managed to thread the needle,1 showing that net payrolls robust growth is gently moderating (Chart 9). The numbers below the headline were also encouraging; average hourly earnings increased just 0.3% from July and the labor force participation rate rose by 30 basis points to match the post-COVID high set in March (Chart 10). The part rate remains a full percentage point below its pre-COVID level, amounting to 2.75 million missing workers – if they were to return, payrolls would have room to expand even as the unemployment rate ticks higher. Chart 8Jobless Claims Have Been Falling Since Mid-July Chart 9Payrolls Are Still Growing At A Healthy Clip​​​​​​ Chart 10Yet Another Supply Constraint​​​​​ Investment Implications The data received over the last two weeks suggest that the economy retains considerable momentum. Solid nonfarm payrolls gains, the month-and-a-half interruption in initial unemployment claims’ uptrend and the job openings and job quits data paint a picture of a labor market that is still humming even as upward pressure on wages may be moderating. We continue to be heartened by the low and slightly declining savings rate, which lends support to our thesis that excess pandemic savings will provide households with a cushion to keep spending despite painful increases in the price of necessities. Finally, despite eye-popping inflation readings, household, business and investor inflation expectations have remained well anchored. Though the fundamentals have been good since we elaborated on the key risks to our view two weeks ago, the technical picture turned against us with a vengeance. The S&P 500 support at 4,175 folded like a cheap lawn chair after Chair Powell took to the podium at Jackson Hole. We are CFAs, not CMTs, though we posit that technical analysis has a place in fundamental practitioners’ processes as a means of identifying advantageous entry and exit points. Going forward, however, we will not float ideas about technical levels without explicitly defining stops to exit a position if the technical level fails to hold. The stock swoon that ensued after Jackson Hole underlines how much investors are hanging on the Fed. Any perceived change of emphasis or direction has the potential to scramble financial markets and we continue to advise that investors carefully manage their holding periods and benchmark deviations. Although we think the Fed will eventually force a sober reckoning for risk assets, we believe equities can outperform over the next three to six months and therefore recommend overweighting equities in multi-asset portfolios through the end of the year. If inflation decelerates over the rest of the year as we expect, the Fed’s rhetoric should become less frightening and risk assets should see renewed inflows as the gloomy scenarios take longer to arrive than the consensus currently expects.   Doug Peta, CFA Chief US Investment Strategist dougp@bcaresearch.com Footnotes 1      As we went to press, however, equities were selling off sharply, apparently on reports of an extended Gazprom pipeline shutdown.