Developed Countries

Informe especial

Resumen ejecutivo Mantenemos nuestra opinión de que los hogares están en mejor situación de lo que se percibe ampliamente, alimentados por un mercado laboral robusto y una formidable reserva de ahorros acumulados durante la pandemia. No creemos que el mercado bajista de acciones descarrile nuestro escenario base de que el consumo mantendrá la economía a flote durante los próximos trimestres. Empíricamente, los cambios en la riqueza bursátil han ejercido poco o ningún impacto sobre el consumo. La vivienda sí tiene un efecto patrimonial discernible, y el consumo puede ser más sensible a la caída de los precios de la vivienda que a su aumento. La fuerte caída en los precios de la vivienda que temen muchos inversores podría llevar a los propietarios a retraerse, lo que constituye el riesgo número uno para nuestra visión constructiva. Aunque la apreciación de los precios de la vivienda está en proceso de desaceleración, la oferta de vivienda sigue siendo insuficiente y los precios no caerán precipitadamente. Las habladurías sobre una burbuja inmobiliaria no tienen fundamento.   Las caídas del consumo son raras y esporádicas Las caídas del consumo son pocas y muy espaciadas Las caídas del consumo son pocas y muy espaciadas Conclusión: Ni el mercado bajista de acciones ni un mercado inmobiliario en suavización asfixiarán el consumo. La campaña antinflacionaria de la Fed eventualmente inducirá una recesión, pero las preocupaciones sobre los efectos patrimoniales están exageradas. Artículo Consumidores con liquidez que están reduciendo la montaña de ahorros excedentes que acumularon en 2020 y 2021 proporcionan la base para nuestra visión constructiva a corto plazo sobre los activos de riesgo y la economía. El retraimiento del consumidor es uno de los dos riesgos principales para nuestra postura1 y la abandonaríamos si una parte significativa de los hogares comenzara a recortar su gasto. No sabemos que los hogares recurrirán a sus ahorros para seguir consumiendo a un ritmo cercano a la tendencia: la magnitud de las transferencias fiscales que engrosaron sus cuentas bancarias fue sin precedentes; pero vemos la tasa de ahorro baja y decreciente como una validación continua de nuestra tesis. Los hogares pueden consumir por debajo de sus ahorros en forma sostenible en relación con su tendencia posterior a la crisis (Gráfico 1), ya que una tasa de ahorro del 5% reduce su reserva restante de 2,1 billones de dólares en solo 150.000 millones de dólares por trimestre.   Gráfico 1 Un período prolongado de desahorro es sostenible Un Período Prolongado De Desahorro Es Sostenible Un Período Prolongado De Desahorro Es Sostenible El efecto riqueza es real: el gasto de los hogares fluctúa con la riqueza, y podría cuestionarse si los consumidores seguirán gastando en medio de un mercado bajista de acciones mientras el aumento de 3 puntos porcentuales en las tasas hipotecarias presiona los valores de las viviendas. Por muy contraintuitivo que parezca, no obstante, los cambios en la riqueza bursátil han tenido un efecto modesto e inconsistente sobre el consumo. Los cambios en la riqueza inmobiliaria han ejercido una influencia mayor, y un estudio de destacados investigadores sugiere que el efecto es más fuerte cuando los precios de la vivienda descienden. En este informe consideramos la evidencia empírica relativa a los efectos de la riqueza bursátil e inmobiliaria, junto con las perspectivas de una fuerte caída en los precios de la vivienda. ¿Qué impulsa el gasto? A pesar de todo el discurso sobre el efecto riqueza, el gasto del consumidor es predominantemente una función del ingreso. Todas las regresiones multifactoriales que realizamos (Cuadro 1) indicaron que los cambios en el ingreso nominal explican la mayor parte de los cambios en el consumo nominal, con estimaciones que alcanzan hasta el 75%. Cuando regredimos el consumo real con el ingreso real y medidas reales de la riqueza bursátil e inmobiliaria, las estimaciones del efecto del ingreso fueron notablemente menores —típicamente entre el 10 y el 25%— pero los resultados modelados fueron drásticamente menos robustos. Por consiguiente, nos enfocamos en las relaciones nominales en el resto de este informe, aunque señalamos que las regresiones reales reforzaron la implicación contundente de las regresiones nominales de que los cambios en la riqueza bursátil son en gran medida irrelevantes para explicar los cambios en el consumo. Cuadro 1: Repaso de regresión La regresión lineal multifactorial es un método estadístico para determinar qué variables independientes influyen en los movimientos de una variable dependiente. El análisis de regresión revela la significancia estadística de las variables independientes en función de su relación empírica con la variable dependiente. Si la relación es lo bastante robusta como para que sea improbable que haya ocurrido al azar, la variable independiente se considera significativa. La ecuación de regresión describe una línea de mejor ajuste que minimiza la desviación agregada de las observaciones individuales respecto a la línea. Incluye un término constante, b, que marca el punto donde la línea de mejor ajuste intersecta el eje y, y un término x que denota cada una de las variables independientes, emparejado con un coeficiente, a. Cada coeficiente describe la sensibilidad de la variable dependiente ante cambios en el valor de cada variable independiente. Para la variable dependiente y, y las variables independientes x1, x2, …, xn, la ecuación se escribe como: y = a1x1 + a2x2 + … + anxn + b. La robustez de la regresión se indica por su valor de r-cuadrado, que varía de 0 a 1 y cuantifica la proporción del movimiento de la variable dependiente que se explica por el movimiento de las variables independientes. En nuestra investigación, utilizamos Gastos de Consumo Personal e Ingresos Personales de las Cuentas Nacionales como nuestras medidas de consumo e ingreso, respectivamente. Usamos la medida de acciones corporativas en poder de hogares y organizaciones sin fines de lucro del informe trimestral Financial Accounts of the United States de la Fed (informe Z.1) para medir la riqueza bursátil y seguimos la metodología de Case, Quigley y Shiller (2005 y 2013)2 para calcular la riqueza inmobiliaria.3 También seguimos la metodología de Case, Quigley y Shiller al regredir el cambio porcentual interanual del logaritmo natural de los valores de las variables. Las viviendas superan a las acciones Regresiones simples, que miden el impacto empírico de una única variable independiente sobre una variable dependiente, indican que los cambios en la riqueza bursátil ejercen considerablemente menos influencia sobre los cambios en el consumo que los cambios en la riqueza inmobiliaria. Con un rezago de dos trimestres, el consumo interanual ha variado casi tres centavos por cada dólar de movimiento en la riqueza bursátil (Gráfico 2). Tres centavos están en línea con estimaciones aproximadas de referencia, pero anotamos que el r-cuadrado de la regresión es inferior al 3%. Una regresión interanual sin rezago plantea un cambio en el consumo de 0,6 centavos por cada dólar de movimiento en la riqueza bursátil con un r-cuadrado microscópico del 0,1%. Gráfico 2 La relación de las acciones con el consumo es débil e poco fiable, ... La riqueza de los hogares La riqueza de los hogares   La regresión de la riqueza inmobiliaria indica que cada dólar de cambios en la riqueza inmobiliaria conduce a un cambio de 38 centavos en el consumo. Con un r-cuadrado del 38%, la regresión de la riqueza inmobiliaria genera un ajuste visiblemente más estrecho (Gráfico 3), inspirando mayor confianza en la relación propuesta, aunque está incompleta sin considerar el papel de otras variables en la influencia sobre el consumo. La relación de la riqueza inmobiliaria también es considerablemente más fuerte en términos sin rezago (Tabla 1). Gráfico 3 ... en contraste con el mayor y más consistente tirón de la vivienda La riqueza de los hogares La riqueza de los hogares   Tabla 1 Resultados de regresión simple La Riqueza de los Hogares La Riqueza de los Hogares     Gráfico 4 Las acciones están en manos de hogares con baja propensión marginal a consumir La riqueza de los hogares La riqueza de los hogares   Puede parecer sorprendente que cambios relativamente opacos en la riqueza inmobiliaria ejerzan una influencia mucho más fuerte sobre el consumo que cambios inmediatamente observables en la riqueza bursátil. Creemos que el resultado es función de la mayor amplitud de la propiedad de vivienda; casi dos tercios de los hogares son propietarios de su vivienda, y es con mucha diferencia el activo más importante para todos, salvo los hogares más ricos. La propiedad de acciones, por otra parte, está altamente concentrada, con el 1% superior de hogares por riqueza poseyendo más del 50% de las acciones, y el 10% superior poseyendo casi el 90% de ellas (Gráfico 4). Las fluctuaciones en el mercado de valores afectan principalmente a hogares con una baja propensión marginal a consumir, mientras que los cambios en los precios de la vivienda afectan a una porción mucho más amplia de estadounidenses. Las regresiones simples prepararon el terreno para lo que descubrimos al realizar regresiones multifactoriales, confirmando hallazgos de investigaciones previas. El ingreso es el principal impulsor del consumo, con un cambio de un dólar en el ingreso nominal provocando un cambio de 65 a 72 centavos en el gasto nominal, y su significancia estadística en los modelos no ofrece dudas (Tabla 2). Tabla 2 Resultados de regresión múltiple La riqueza de los hogares La riqueza de los hogares   El efecto riqueza de las acciones no es estadísticamente significativo en el modelo sin rezago al nivel del 5% (ni siquiera lo es al más indulgente nivel del 10%) y, en todo caso, es modesto (alrededor de 1,5 centavos por dólar). El modelo estaría mejor sin incluir la riqueza bursátil como variable independiente. En el modelo que rezaga el consumo dos trimestres, lo que produce un ajuste ligeramente mejor y concuerda más fácilmente con nuestra intuición de que los efectos de riqueza no se sienten de forma instantánea, el consumo se mueve de forma inversa con la riqueza bursátil, cayendo 3 centavos por cada aumento de un dólar en la riqueza bursátil y aumentando 3 centavos por cada disminución de un dólar. Ese resultado es estadísticamente significativo, aunque de difícil interpretación. La variable de riqueza inmobiliaria es cómodamente significativa incluso al nivel del 1% y su impacto es bastante grande tanto en la especificación sin rezago (14,5 centavos por dólar) como en la especificación con rezago de dos trimestres (11,75 centavos por dólar). Ambas especificaciones del modelo generan r-cuadrados altos, explicando el 58% y 60% de la variabilidad del consumo, respectivamente, y los valores modelados encajan extremadamente bien con los valores reales antes de que la pandemia alterara la relación entre el consumo y sus factores determinantes (Gráfico 5).   Gráfico 5 Un ajuste estrecho antes de la pandemia Una situación ajustada antes de la pandemia Una situación ajustada antes de la pandemia También ejecutamos una versión del modelo que sustituyó el Ingreso Disponible por el Ingreso Personal, pero debilitó ligeramente su poder explicativo y consideramos que la serie más amplia de Ingreso Personal es una mejor entrada. También ejecutamos una versión del modelo que utilizó las participaciones inmobiliarias de los hogares y los saldos hipotecarios de la sección Z.1 trimestral de la Fed para calcular un factor que traduzca la riqueza inmobiliaria bruta a riqueza inmobiliaria neta para reflejar que no todos los hogares poseen sus viviendas libre de gravámenes.4 Sustituir la riqueza inmobiliaria neta redujo el poder explicativo del modelo en unos dos puntos porcentuales pero dejó la significancia de las variables individuales mayormente intacta, mientras que redujo el efecto de riqueza inmobiliaria sin rezago y con rezago de dos trimestres a 7 y 5 centavos, respectivamente (Tabla 3). La riqueza inmobiliaria neta es más satisfactoria desde el punto de vista intelectual que la riqueza inmobiliaria bruta y las estimaciones más pequeñas del efecto riqueza están más en línea con la literatura revisada por pares. Tabla 3 Resultados de regresión múltiple con riqueza inmobiliaria neta La riqueza de los hogares La riqueza de los hogares   ¿Hacia dónde van los precios de la vivienda? Los inversores parecen estar preparados para una caída considerable en los precios de la vivienda a pesar de que las caídas nominales de precios son inusuales en la historia de cinco décadas de los índices líderes de precios de ventas repetidas. El Índice Case-Shiller Nacional ha disminuido solo el 19% de las veces de manera secuencial y el 14% de las veces en términos interanuales (Gráfico 6). Exceptuando los 21 trimestres consecutivos de caídas interanuales desde 1T07 hasta 1T12, el Índice Case-Shiller Nacional solo ha caído en cinco trimestres a lo largo de 41 años, todos durante la recesión de 1990-91 que incluyó cambios en la legislación fiscal que limitaron de forma marcada la capacidad de las personas para beneficiarse de pérdidas en inversiones inmobiliarias. El Índice de Precios de la Vivienda de la FHFA (antes OFHEO) ha caído en términos interanuales solo el 11% de las veces, con solo una caída ocurriendo fuera del período 2007 a 2012 (Gráfico 7).   Gráfico 6 Excluida la crisis, las caídas son raras, ... Ex-The Crisis, Las Caídas Son Raras, ... Ex-The Crisis, Las Caídas Son Raras, ... ​​​​​​   Gráfico 7 ... en ambas series principales ... En Ambas Series Principales ... En Ambas Series Principales ​​​​​​ Por lo tanto, los inversores que esperan una caída parecen anclarse en un atípico extremo. Nos estremece cada vez que escuchamos el término “burbuja inmobiliaria” usado para equiparar el panorama actual con el que precedió la crisis financiera. Que no quepa duda: no es 2007 en el mercado de financiación hipotecaria de ninguna manera, forma ni modo. Las originaciones de hipotecas residenciales se han hecho a prestatarios muy superiores a los de la etapa previa a la crisis (Gráfico 8) y se han hecho en términos mucho más sólidos, ya que la relación préstamo-valor de las hipotecas residenciales se redujo en 25 puntos porcentuales en la inmediata secuela del colapso hasta sus niveles fácilmente sostenibles de principios de los años 80 (Gráfico 9).   Gráfico 8 Las hipotecas se han otorgado a prestatarios de mejor calidad ... La Riqueza De Los Hogares La Riqueza De Los Hogares   Gráfico 9 ... en mejores condiciones que antes de la crisis ... En mejores términos que antes de la crisis ... En mejores términos que antes de la crisis   Gráfico 10 La oferta de viviendas es escasa La oferta de viviendas es limitada La oferta de viviendas es limitada La vivienda está ampliamente infraprovisionada, como lo evidencia la tasa de vacancia de viviendas en mínimo histórico (Gráfico 10). Las tasas hipotecarias más altas sin duda han puesto las cuotas mensuales fuera del alcance de algunos compradores potenciales, enviándolos a la banca rota, pero la oferta sigue siendo limitada y los precios de la vivienda caen lentamente. Kahneman y Tversky demostraron que las personas son rápidas para materializar ganancias vendiendo activos apreciados pero lentas para desprenderse de activos que están en pérdidas. Incluso si estamos subestimando la magnitud eventual de una caída en los precios de la vivienda, estamos seguros de que la caída no será súbita. Los propietarios que disponen de discreción sobre cuándo vender esperarán para ejercerla; la rotación se ralentizará a medida que los precios se suavicen y la oferta reducida ayudará a mitigar las caídas. Implicaciones para la inversión Nos inspiró a explorar el efecto de la riqueza inmobiliaria una afirmación llamativa aparecida en una destacada publicación de mercado hace dos semanas. Un estratega independiente afirmó que el efecto riqueza de una caída de un dólar en los precios de la vivienda era asombrosos 40 centavos, mientras que el efecto de una caída similar en los precios de las acciones era de 10 centavos. La afirmación se transmitió sin comentario ni crítica por la publicación, que durante mucho tiempo ha pregonado su escepticismo y su renuencia a aceptar afirmaciones alcistas sin más. Lamentablemente para sus lectores, dicho estándar aparentemente no se aplica a las afirmaciones bajistas, por muy erradas que puedan estar. (Según nuestros resultados, sospechamos que estas estimaciones del efecto riqueza se basan en regresiones simples.) Las opiniones divergentes son lo que genera un mercado, pero nada en la literatura revisada por pares respalda la idea de que la caída de 6,5 billones de dólares en acciones de propiedad directa y una hipotética caída del 10% en el patrimonio de la vivienda desde su nivel de casi 30 billones al 30 de junio extinguirán 650.000 millones y 1,2 billones de dólares de consumo, respectivamente. Ese golpe de casi 2 billones sería castigador, dado el ritmo anualizado actual del consumo de 17 billones de dólares. También sería sin precedentes: desde que la serie de Gastos de Consumo Personal comenzó en 1950, el consumo nominal solo ha disminuido por un margen apreciable a simple vista durante la Gran Recesión y la pandemia de COVID (Gráfico 11). Esas caídas históricas supusieron 3,5% desde el pico del 3T08 hasta el mínimo del 2T09 y 11,4% desde el pico del 4T20 hasta el mínimo del 2T21 durante el confinamiento.   Gráfico 11 Las caídas visibles en el gasto nominal son raras Las caídas visibles en el gasto nominal son raras. Las caídas visibles en el gasto nominal son raras. No nos importa asumir la posición contraria a la opinión de que podría producirse otra caída del 11%, asumiendo la ausencia de guerra nuclear u otra pandemia. Creemos que la disminución del 3,5% en la Gran Recesión probablemente seguirá fuera de alcance, dado que la crisis financiera surgió de una concatenación de eventos que no puede repetirse ahora que los reguladores han recortado tan profundamente las alas del sistema bancario. No todos los inversores se adhieren a las advertencias sensacionalistas sobre el mercado de la vivienda, pero la promiscuidad con la que se lanza el término burbuja nos sugiere fuertemente que la opinión consensuada sobreestima la probabilidad de un resultado económico nefasto. Cuando eventos subsecuentes revelen que la probabilidad del choque ha sido exagerada, las visiones consensuadas sobre la economía y las ganancias del S&P 500 tendrán que revisarse al alza y creemos que las revisiones eventuales proporcionarán a los activos de riesgo una vía para recuperar parte del terreno perdido este año. Seguimos creyendo que sería prematuro implementar medidas defensivas de asignación de activos a pleno antes de que eso ocurra.   Doug Peta, CFAJefe de Estrategia de Inversión para EE. UU.dougp@bcaresearch.com Notas al pie 1      Un repunte en las expectativas de inflación a largo plazo es el otro. 2      Case, Karl E., John M. Quigley, y Robert J. Shiller, “Comparando los efectos de la riqueza: el mercado de acciones frente al mercado de la vivienda,” Advances in Microeconomics, 5(1), 2005: 1-32. Case, Karl E., John M. Quigley, y Robert J. Shiller, “Efectos de la riqueza revisados: 1975-2012,” NBER Working Paper 18667, enero de 2013. 3      Case, Quigley y Shiller calculan la riqueza inmobiliaria en el tiempo t, HWt, como el producto del número de hogares en EE. UU., Nt, la tasa de propiedad de vivienda, ORt, el precio promedio de una vivienda unifamiliar en el período base (1T75 en nuestro estudio), AVGBASE, y un índice de precios ponderado de ventas repetidas relativo a su valor en el período base, (PIt/PIBASE). Usamos la serie de precio medio de viviendas existentes de la National Association of Realtors y el Índice Case-Shiller Nacional para las variables AVG y PI, respectivamente, según la siguiente ecuación: HWt = Nt × ORt × AVG1Q75 × (PIt/PI1Q75) 4     HWt, descrita en la segunda nota, es una medida bruta de la riqueza inmobiliaria. Dividimos la deuda hipotecaria pendiente por el valor de las participaciones inmobiliarias de los hogares para calcular la relación agregada préstamo-valor de las hipotecas residenciales, LTV. Restamos LTV de 1 para calcular la proporción del valor de la vivienda que representaba el capital agregado de los hogares en la vivienda y lo multiplicamos por HWt para producir una estimación de la riqueza inmobiliaria neta, NHW: NHWt = HWt × (1 – LTVt)

Executive Summary The USD has appreciated by over 25% since the beginning of 2021. This is a negative for US corporate sales and profits and is a drag on US equity performance. According to BCA FX strategists, the USD is likely to roll over as it appears overbought and overvalued. However, even if the USD has peaked, the effects of its appreciation will be imprinted in the earnings of US corporates for months. Our earnings model signals an earnings recession, with earnings expected to contract to the tune of 20% into the year-end. Technology and Materials are most exposed to the dollar, while Utilities, Financials, and Real Estate are the most domestic sectors. Growth is a more international style than Value, while midcaps offer the best protection from a stronger greenback. USES Model Breakdown Bottom Line: While a strong dollar is certainly a headwind for US earnings growth and for the performance of US equities, its adverse effects are minor compared to the effects of tighter monetary policy, slowing growth at home and abroad, rising costs, falling productivity, and fading pricing power. An earnings recession is inevitable. Dollar depreciation will be a welcome development, yet the dollar should be the least of investors’ worries. Feature The USD has appreciated by over 25% since the beginning of 2021 (Chart 1), a concerning development for US equity investors. The S&P 500 companies derive roughly 40% of sales from abroad and the strong dollar is a headwind: Not only does an appreciating domestic currency diminish foreign earnings through a currency translation effect, but it also makes US goods and services more expensive and less competitive in a global marketplace. Related Report  US Equity StrategyUS Dollar Bear Market: What To Buy & What To Sell Over the past few months, a number of US multinationals have complained about the adverse effect of the strong greenback on their sales and earnings. The list is both long and diverse and includes technology giants like Microsoft, Dell, and Netflix as well as the likes of Philip Morris, Johnson and Johnson, TJX, and Costco. Investors paid attention: Since the beginning of 2021, US companies with a high share of international sales underperformed their more domestically oriented counterparts by about 20% (Chart 2). However, partially this divergence in performance may be explained by the international index heavily overrepresenting Tech, which has headwinds of its own. Chart 1The USD Has Appreciated By Over 25%​​​​​​ Chart 2US Multinationals Have Underperformed​​​​​​ In this week’s report, we will analyze the effects of the stronger dollar on US corporate earnings, zooming in on its implications for the S&P 500 sectors and styles. Sneak Preview: A strong dollar is a definite negative for US corporate sales and profits and is a drag on US equity performance. However, when compared in magnitude to the effects of tighter monetary policy, slowing growth, and rising costs – the dollar should take a backseat to the other investor worries. USD: The Best House On The Worst Street The reasons for the rapid rise of the USD are manifold. The following are just a few: The Dollar smile: The USD outperforms when global growth is strong and investors are optimistic, as well as when growth slows and investors are fearful, benefiting from its status as a reserve currency. Over the past two years, both scenarios have played out. In 2021, investor flows pushed the dollar higher as the US was ahead of the rest of the world in terms of post-pandemic recovery. This year, the USD became a safe haven for jittery investors and became one of the rare assets delivering positive returns in the “sea of misery.” Chart 3Rate Differentials Favored The US The US looks good compared to other regions: Despite its own economic maladies, such as high inflation and slowing growth, the US has been in an advantageous position compared to the rest of the world. The US appears well insulated from global shudders compared to Europe, which is in the midst of a recession and an energy crisis, China roiling from the zero-COVID policy and property market fallout, and EM countries on the verge of food and energy shortages. Interest rate differentials: The Fed is being viewed as the most credible central bank to curb inflation. As a result, US rates have risen more than in other markets (Chart 3). The USD has been strengthening as the US has been enjoying relative stability and better growth compared to the other regions. The Fed is also ahead of the curve. Will The USD Appreciation Continue? BCA FX Strategist Chester Ntonifor does not expect the dollar to continue to appreciate for the following reasons: While the Fed is ahead of the curve, other central banks are also becoming more hawkish. As such, interest rate differentials will not materially move further in favor of the dollar. Inflation is a global problem as opposed to US-centric. Thanks to the Fed’s aggressive policy stance compared to the other central banks, the inflation impulse is slowing in the US, relative to a basket of G10 countries (Chart 4). In addition, the dollar is expensive, overbought, and is a crowded consensus trade (Chart 5). Chart 4The US Inflation Impulse Has Turned​​​​​ Chart 5The Dollar Is Overvalued On A PPP Basis​​​​​​ We concur. While we will not outright bet against the dollar, to our mind, risks are skewed to the downside. The dollar must be close to its peak, and we are neutral on a tactical basis. Effects Of USD Moves On S&P 500 Sales And Earnings Growth It Takes Time While US dollar appreciation may have come to an end, its toll will be imprinted on US earnings growth for a while. There is a lag between currency appreciation and its effects on company sales and earnings: It takes companies three to six months to change contracts, adjust prices and record revenue (Table 1). Stronger Dollar: Lower Sales And Lower Costs It is foreign sales that are most affected by the variation in the purchasing power of foreign currencies relative to the dollar (Chart 6). And while US multinationals hate the strengthening dollar, they also get a hand from it on the cost side of the equation, especially if they outsource a sizeable part of production abroad. Thus, the net effect on profits depends on the cost structure and the type of business. That explains why changes in the dollar are never one-to-one to changes in earnings growth. Table 1Sensitivity Of EPS YoY% To USD YoY% Over Time Modeling Effects Of A Stronger Dollar In the “Is An Earnings Recession In The Cards?” report published this past June, we introduced our EPS Growth Forecast Model (Table 2). The model has five intuitive factors: Chart 6The USD Primarily Affects Sales​​​​​​ Table 2EPS Growth Forecast Model ISM PMI is a gauge of US economic growth and a proxy for top-line growth. PPI stands for the change in costs. Pricing Power is a BCA proprietary indicator and captures companies’ ability to pass costs onto their customers. HY Spreads indicate costs of borrowing and also the state of the economy (spreads tend to shoot up in a slowing economy). USD represents the ability of US multinationals to sell goods abroad. These five factors explain 65% of the variation in earnings growth,1 and all factors are statistically significant. Earnings Recession Is Still In The Cards Back in June, we predicted an earnings recession later this year. After all, economic growth is slowing at home and abroad, and demand is rolling over while costs are rising, especially wages. Making things worse, productivity is falling, and Unit Labor Costs (ULC) hit nearly 10% in August. At the same time, consumers are reeling from rising prices, while companies are coming to realize that their ability to pass on costs to customers is pushing the limit. We have updated the model with three more months of data and expect earnings to start contracting in the third quarter, falling as much as 20% in the fourth quarter (Chart 7). None of this is surprising. S&P 500 margins have fallen by 2% in the second quarter, and earnings growth ex Energy came in at -2% on a nominal basis. Analysts expect six out of 11 S&P 500 sectors to deliver negative EPS Growth in Q3-2022. And while a 20% earnings drawdown sounds terrible, it is fairly mild compared to recent recessions – at the worst point in 2008, nominal earnings went to 0, printing a -100% contraction (Table 3). Chart 7The BCA Earnings Model Predicts A Earnings Recession Later This Year​​​​​​ Table 3The S&P 500 Earnings Drawdowns Here, we would like to emphasize that financial econometrics is not an exact science, and earnings growth point estimates are rarely precise. However, it is abundantly clear that earnings growth will trend well past the zero mark. Costs And Pricing Power Are Key Drivers Of S&P 500 Earnings In 2022 Breaking down the negative earnings growth forecast into contributions from different factors (Chart 8), we observe that the outcome is mostly driven by the interplay between PPI and Pricing Power – costs are rising and companies’ ability to pass them on further defines their profitability. And while commodity prices have fallen, these changes will take a while to flow into earnings. In addition, tighter monetary policy and slowing growth are the new speed bumps (HY Spreads and ISM PMI). Chart 8Interplay Of PPI And Pricing Power Drives The Direction Of Earnings Chart 9The USD Contribution Is Negative… USD Is Less Important So what about the dollar? According to our model, 1% of dollar appreciation is shaving off roughly 50bps from earnings growth. However, we need to keep this number in context. While the dollar has appreciated more than 25% since the beginning of 2021, only the last three to six months matter on a rolling basis. And over the past three months, USD has appreciated by about 8%, which will detract 4% from earnings in Q4-2022 (Chart 9). The importance of the USD for earnings growth is fairly minor compared to the other factors, such as pricing power, PPI, HY spreads, and ISM PMI (Chart 10). Chart 10... But Is Minor Compared To The Other Factors Bottom Line: A strong dollar is a headwind for earnings growth. However, its effects are dwarfed by other factors. Sectors Most Affected By The Strong Currency And Weakening Global Growth Table 4The S&P 500: % Of Foreign Sales By Sector While the overall negative effect of a strong dollar on the S&P 500 earnings is relatively minor, some sectors in the index are more exposed than others (Table 4). While the S&P 500 derives about 40% of sales from abroad, the Technology and Materials sectors have about 60% of foreign sales, and for the companies in these sectors, a strong currency is a serious concern. Utilities, Financials, and Real Estate are the most domestic in the index. It is important to note, that, at present, US multinationals are dealing not only with the effects of a stronger currency but also with global growth slowdown. Effects Of Strong Dollar On US Equity Performance While over the long term, a link between earnings growth and equities performance is irrefutable, in the short run, there may be significant variations. In this section, we will look at the relationship between equity returns and the USD. We will also isolate sectors and styles that are best positioned to withstand the current environment. And when the dollar swoons, we will also know which parts of the equity market are most likely to bounce back. USD Dollar Regimes To better understand the relationship between equity returns and the USD, we demarcate two distinct USD regimes, defined rather simplistically as “USD Rising” and “USD Falling” (Chart 11). Then we compile median monthly returns in each regime and keep track of how many months the S&P 500 was positive in each. Chart 11The USD Regimes Chart 12The USD Is A Headwind For The Performance Of Equities We found that when the USD is appreciating, median monthly returns are only 0.5% and are positive only 37% of the time. However, when the dollar is depreciating, median monthly returns are 1.4% and are positive 63% of the time (Chart 12). This relationship is significant at a 10% confidence level. Sector Performance Under Different USD Regimes When the USD rises, more defensive sectors, such as Utilities, Healthcare, and Consumer Staples tend to outperform. Energy has made the list thanks to the recent rally – normally Energy does not benefit from dollar strength (Chart 13). Chart 13Materials And Comm Services Will Outperform If The USD Turns The weakening dollar supports Materials as it stimulates demand, as well as the Communications sector, as it is home to multinational media and entertainment companies like Netflix, Facebook, and Google. Style Performance Under Different USD Regimes Growth Vs Value: Growth is more exposed to the USD than Value thanks to the index composition (Chart 14). Growth is home to Tech as well as Media & Entertainment, and “growthy” Consumer Discretionary, all of which have a higher share of earnings from abroad than the index. Value is dominated by Financials, Industrials, and Utilities, which are fairly domestic. Thus, while over time, exposure to the dollar fluctuates, over the long term, Growth is clearly more sensitive than Value (Chart 15). Chart 14Growth Is Dominated By Multinationals​​​​​​ Chart 15Growth Is More Exposed To The USD Than Value​​​​​​ Chart 16Mid Is A More Domestic Asset Class Than Small Small Vs Mid: According to a popular belief, small caps are insulated from currency moves as they don’t have reach and scale and earn very little outside of the US. However, small caps are often part of the ecosystem and supply chain of multinationals, and when the profitability of those is under pressure, they also start to feel the heat. Small caps have little leverage with their large clients and their profitability changes with the ebbs and flows of their larger brethren. Hence, they are quite sensitive to currency moves. Arguably, it is midcaps that are the most domestic asset class, as their exposure to the USD is less and more stable compared to the S&P 500 and small caps (Chart 16). Midcaps are usually not big enough to have much international reach but are big enough to have bargaining power with their multinational customers to guard their profitability. Investment Implications The S&P 500 derives roughly 40% of sales from abroad, which makes its earnings quite sensitive to dollar moves and global growth. The recent dollar bull market and slowing growth abroad have challenged US corporates and have detracted from their profit growth. However, slower growth, rising costs, and diminished pricing power by far dwarf the effects of the dollar. Overall, challenges at home and abroad are likely to trigger an earnings recession, which in all likelihood, has already started this summer, and is about to get worse. The dollar may be close to its peak, and our colleagues from the FX team expect dollar devaluation over the long term. A turn in the dollar will offer some respite for the performance of US equities despite the domestic backdrop of slowing growth and rising rates. It will also trigger a change in leadership, with sectors such as Materials and Communications rebounding from their lows. In terms of styles, a strong dollar lends support to Value, thanks to its sector composition. Once the dollar starts to depreciate, Growth will get another tailwind towards recovery. And lastly, midcap is one area in the US equity market somewhat more insulated from currency moves. Bottom Line While a strong dollar is certainly a headwind for US earnings growth and for the performance of US equities, its adverse effects are minor compared to the effects of tighter monetary policy, slowing growth at home and abroad, rising costs, falling productivity, and companies, diminished ability to pass on costs to customers—who are already strapped by rising prices. In short, dollar depreciation will be a welcome development, yet the dollar is the least of investors’ worries.   Irene Tunkel Chief Strategist, US Equity Strategy irene.tunkel@bcaresearch.com Footnotes 1      The model’s adjusted R-squared is 0.65. Recommended Allocation

Informe especial

Executive Summary What To Do With The Euro? The outlook for European assets is uniquely muddled. European energy prices will remain elevated, but the worst of the adjustment is already behind us. The global economy is teetering on the edge of a recession and weak global growth is historically very negative for European assets. However, European valuations and earnings forecasts already discount an extremely severe outcome for global growth. A hawkish Fed should support the dollar, but investors increasingly realize foreign central banks are fighting inflation equally aggressively. The dollar already anticipates a global recession. Meantime, European credit offers a large spread pickup over sovereigns and even appears as a decent alternative to equities. Within a credit portfolio, we adopt a more cautious approach towards European investment grade bonds (IG) relative to their US counterpart. Instead, we recommend favoring UK IG over Euro Area IG as well as Swedish IG relative to US IG.    Recommendations INCEPTION DATE RETURN SINCE INCEPTION (%) COMMENT Set a stop buy at EUR/USD 0.9650 with a stop-loss at 0.9400 9/26/2022     Bottom Line: Investors should maintain a modest long position in equities in European portfolios, with a preference for defensive stocks over cyclicals. The conditions are falling in place to buy the euro tentatively.   Following the hawkishness that transpired from the Fed press conference and revised forecasts last week, EUR/USD plunged below 0.99 and hit a 20-year low. Moreover, President Vladimir Putin’s announcement of a broader mobilization of the Russian army is stoking fears that the Ukrainian conflict will only be prolonged. The prospects of a lengthier war and greater energy market shock are raising further worries for Europe’s growth outlook, which weighs on European asset prices, notably the euro and the pound. The odds of a global financial accident are on the rise. Global central banks have joined the Fed and are relentlessly tightening global monetary and financial conditions. Moreover, the surging dollar is adding to global risks by raising the cost of capital around the world. This is a very fragile situation and the odds of a global recession have jumped significantly. Against this backdrop, investors should continue to overweight defensive equities at the expense of cyclical stocks. The euro also has more downside, but we are issuing a tentative stop-buy at EUR/USD 0.9650 with a stop at 0.9400. Credit remains a safer alternative to European stocks. The Evolving European Energy Backdrop Chart 1All About The Gas The surge of natural gas and electricity prices since the fall of 2021 has been one of the main drivers of the underperformance of European assets and the fall in the euro (Chart 1). While the medium-term outlook for European energy prices remains fraught with risk, the near-term prospects have improved. Following a surge from €77.4/MWh in June to €340/MWh on August 26, one-month forward natural gas prices at the Dutch Title Transfer Facility (TTF) have declined 45% to €187/MWh. These wild gyrations reflect the evolution of both the natural gas flows from Russia, which have fallen from 3,060Mcm to 599 Mcm today, and the rapid buildup of natural gas inventories across the European Union. The good news is that the costly efforts to rebuild European gas inventories have been successful. EU-wide inventories are at 85.6% capacity, achieving its 80% storage objective well before November. Germany has gone even further, with storage use now standing at 90% of capacity. This large stockpile, along with the re-opening of coal power plants and consumption curtailment efforts, should allow Europe to survive the winter without Russian energy imports, as long as the temperatures are not abnormally cold. The absence of a summer dip in Norwegian gas exports and the surge in LNG flows to Europe have partially replaced the missing Russian inflows, thus helping Europe rapidly rebuild its natural gas inventories (Chart 2). This success was a consequence of elevated European natural gas prices, which have allowed Europe to absorb LNG flows from the rest of the world (Chart 3). Chart 2No Restocking Without LNG Chart 3LNG Flowed Toward High Prices So far, the European industrial sector has managed to adjust better than expected to the jump in the price of natural gas, a crucial energy input. Take Germany as an example. For the month of August, Germany’s consumption of natural gas by the industrial sector fell 22% below the 2018-2021 average (Chart 4, top panel), while PPI moved up vertically. Yet, industrial output is only down 5% year-on-year and industrial capacity utilization stands at 85%, which is still a level that beats two thirds of the readings recorded between 1990 and this the most recent quarter (Chart 4, bottom panel). The adjustment will be uneven across various industries, with those most voracious of natural gas likely to experience a declining share of Europe’s gross value added. Using the German example once again, we can see that the chemicals, basic metal manufacturing, and paper products sectors are the most at risk from higher natural gas prices and most likely therefore to suffer the most from gas rationing this winter (Chart 5). Chart 4A Surprisingly Successful Transition Chart 5The Three Sectors Most At Risk Going forward, important changes are likely to take place that will allow the European economy to continue to survive on diminished Russian gas flows: European natural gas prices will remain elevated compared to the rest of the world to attract LNG flows to the region. Importantly, Europe’s capacity to absorb these flows keeps increasing, as more re-gasification ships are docked around the continent. Moreover, North America is building more facilities to export LNG to Europe. Chart 6Nuclear Energy's Contribution Will Rebound Nuclear electricity production will rebound. Currently, the EU’s nuclear production is around 43.2TWh, well below the normal 60TWh to 70TWh winter levels, driven mostly by the collapse in French production from 35TWh to 18TWh (Chart 6). This decline in nuclear electricity generation has accentuated the upward pressure on European natural gas and electricity prices. One of the key objectives of the nationalization of EDF by the French government is to accelerate the maintenance of France’s ageing nuclear power plants and allow a return to more normal production levels by the winter. The role of natural gas in European household’s energy mix will decline. Currently, EU households are the largest natural gas consumers and account for 41% of the bloc’s gas consumption (Chart 7). It will be easier to replace their natural gas consumption over time with other sources of energy than it will be to cut the industrial sector’s consumption extensively. As a result, even if European natural gas imports are permanently below 2021 levels, the industrial sector will not bear the brunt of the adjustment. Chart 7Households To Be Displaced These developments imply that natural gas prices have limited downside. However, we believe that the worst of the spike in prices is behind us, at least over the near term. The reason is that the inelastic buying created by the inventory re-stocking exercise since May 2022 is ending. In fact, the German Federal Minister for Economic Affairs and Climate Action, Robert Habeck, declared last week that his country would no longer purchase gas at any price. Chart 8The Most Painful Part Of The Adjustment Is Over If prices stabilize around €200/MWh, European industrial activity will continue to face a headwind, but the worst of the adjustment process will be in the rearview mirror as natural gas inflation recedes (Chart 8). Ultimately, capitalist systems are dynamic, and it is this rapid change in price that causes the most pain. In other words, the impoverishment of the European private sector has already happened. Steady states are easier to manage. Moreover, if natural gas prices eventually follow the future’s curve (this is a big “if”), the picture for Europe will improve considerably. One additional mitigating factor should ease the pain being experienced by the European private sector. Fiscal policy is responding very aggressively to the current energy crisis. So far, EU countries and the UK have allocated more than €500 billion to protect their private sectors against higher energy costs (Chart 9) and the UK just announced tax cuts of £45 billion. This is in addition to the disbursement of €150 billion from the NGEU funds in 2023. Moreover, the European commission is planning to modify the EU fiscal rules to abandon annual structural deficit targets and for debt sustainability to be evaluated over a ten-year period. Chart 9Massive Fiscal Support Bottom Line: The worst of Europe’s adjustment to higher energy prices is now behind us. However, European energy prices will remain elevated, which will continue to put Europe at a handicap compared to the rest of the world. Bad News From The Rest Of The World The worst of Europe’s energy crisis is behind us, but the world is teetering toward a recession, which will hurt the trade- and manufacturing-sensitive European economy. Chart 10A Global Recession This Way Comes The tightening in global financial conditions created by the surge in the dollar and by the jump in global yields is pushing the US Manufacturing ISM and the Euro Area PMIs toward the low-40s, which is consistent with a recession (Chart 10). The problem does not stop there. Global central banks have become solely focused on fighting inflation. For 2023, the FOMC’s dot plot forecasts both an interest rate rise to 4.6% and a 0.7% increase in the unemployment rate. This is tantamount to the Fed telling the market that it will increase interest rates as a recession emerges to repress inflation. Not to be undone, European central banks are also rapidly increasing their policy rates, even as they also forecast an imminent deterioration in domestic growth conditions. Quickly tightening policy in a slowing growth environment, especially as the dollar hits a 20-year high, is a recipe for a financial accident and a global recession. Chart 11No Help From China Moreover, China’s economy is still unable to create a positive offset to the deterioration in global monetary and financial conditions. The marginal propensity of China’s private sector to consume remains in a downtrend, hampered by the country’s zero-COVID policy and the continuing meltdown in real estate activity (Chart 11). Furthermore, the most rapid decline in the yuan exchange rate in 5 years is imparting an additional downside risk to the global economy. European stocks are uniquely exposed to these threats. Europe overweights deep cyclicals, which are currently squeezed by the deteriorating global growth outlook. The message from the collapse in FedEx’s stocks on very poor guidance is particularly ominous: this company has a much closer correlation with the Dow Jones Euro STOXX 50 than with the S&P 500 (Chart 12). European share prices are already factoring in much of the bad news. Valuations are significantly less expensive than they once were. The Shiller P/E ratio of European equities and their equity risk premium stand at the same levels as those in the 1980s. This is in sharp contrast to the US (Chart 13). Chart 12FedEx's Gloomy Delivery Chart 13Low CAPE In Europe Table 1A Deep Downgrade To European Earnings European forward earnings have also already done considerable work adjusting downward. Excluding energy, 2022 and 2023 forward EPS are down 10.3% and 11.9% since their peak, respectively (Table 1). But inflation flatters earnings growth and European large-cap indices are dominated by multinational firms, which implies that looking at earnings in USD terms makes more sense. In both real and USD terms, 2022 and 2023 forward EPS, excluding energy, are already down 25% and 26.4%, respectively. These adjustments are in line with previous recessions. The counterargument is that analysts still expect positive earnings growth in 2023 relative to 2022. However, at 4%, this increase in expected earnings is still well below inflation and 6% below the average expected growth in forward earnings recorded over the past 35 years (Chart 14). Additionally, a global recession could put further downward pressure on energy prices in Europe, which would create an additional cushion under European earnings in 2023 The implication here is that it still makes sense to be modestly long European equities in absolute terms, especially for investors with an investment horizon of twelve months or more. However, we cannot be complacent, as the risk of an additional selloff is still too large for comfort. As a result, for now investors should only garner a small exposure to European equities and do so while favoring defensive names over cyclical ones (Chart 15). Chart 14Weak Forward Earnings Growth Chart 15Continue To Favor Defensive Names Bottom Line: European stocks must still contend with the growing threat of a global recession catalyzed by tighter financial conditions and aggressive global central banks. The good news is that they already discount considerable pessimism, as illustrated by their low valuations and downgraded forward earnings. Consequently, investors can continue to nibble at European equities, but do so to a limited degree and by favoring defensive stocks over cyclical ones, at least for now. The Euro Dilemma On the back of the very hawkish Fed meeting and the announcement of Russia’s broadened military mobilization, the EUR/USD broke below the 0.99 support level and fell under 0.98, a level we judged in the past as very attractive on a six-to-nine months basis. Obviously, Fed Chair Jerome Powell’s reaffirmation of the FOMC’s war on inflation is a major boost to the dollar. The momentum property of the greenback implies that it has room to rally further in the near term. This narrative, however, overlooks the fact that the Fed is not the only central bank intent on fighting inflation, no matter the cost. The Norges Bank, the Riksbank, the ECB, and even the SNB have all showed their willingness to move aggressively against inflation. While the BoE only increased rates by 50bps last week, its communication suggested that an at least 75bps increase would be due at the November meeting, when the MPC publishes its Monetary Policy report that will incorporate the impact of the budget measures announced by new British Prime Minister, Liz Truss. Chart 16The Rest Of The World Is Catching Up To The Fed As a result, market interest rate expectations are climbing in the US, but they are rising even faster in Europe, albeit from a lower base. However, the decline in the expected rate of interest in the US relative to Europe and in the number of expected hikes in the US relative to Europe are consistent with a sharp decline in the DXY in the coming months (Chart 16). Due to its 80% weight in European currencies, a weaker DXY implies a rebound in the EUR, GBP, CHF, NOK, and SEK against the USD. Chart 17Surprising European Resilience Moreover, there could be room for expected interest rate differentials to narrow further against the dollar. The analysis we published two weeks ago shows that, even when the different nonfinancial private debt loads are accounted for, the gap in the US and Eurozone r-star stands at 1%. However, the spread between the Fed funds rate’s upper bound and the ECB Deposit Rate is 2%. The gap between the July 2023 US and Eurozone OIS is 1.7%. Since European inflation may prove more stubborn than that of the US in the near term, there is scope for the expected interest rate gap to narrow further, especially as the Euro Area final domestic demand is surprisingly more robust than that of the US (Chart 17). What about global growth? The view that the global economy is about to experience a recession is consistent with a stronger dollar, since the greenback is an extremely countercyclical currency. However, the DXY’s 25% rally since January 2021 already prices in such an outcome (Chart 18). Similarly, the euro is trading again at 2002 levels, which is also in line with a global recession with deep negative repercussions for the Eurozone. Additionally, the Euro has fallen 21% since May 2021, which compares to the 21.4% fall in 2008, the 20% decline in 2010, the 18% plunge in 2011/12 and the 24% collapse in 2014/15; yet EUR/USD is much cheaper now than in any of those instances. Moreover, the wide difference between the competitiveness of Germany and that of the rest of the Euro Area has now faded, which means that a major handicap against the euro has disappeared (Chart 19). Chart 18The Dollar Already Foresees A Recession Chart 19Normalizing Eurozone Internal Competitiveness This does not mean that the euro is not without risk. First, since the major euro collapse began in June 2021, EUR/USD breakdowns have been followed by average declines of 3.6%, ranging from 2.7% to 4.2%. Since the dollar is a momentum currency, it is unlikely that this time will be different. Second, if the tightening in global policy does cause a financial accident, the dollar will catch one last major bid that could push EUR/USD toward 0.9. As a result, to mitigate the danger, we recommend setting a stop-buy in the euro at EUR/USD 0.965 or 2.6% below the breakdown level of 0.9904. This position comes with a stop-loss at 0.94. For now, we would view this bet as a tactical position if it were triggered. Bottom Line: While a hawkish FOMC is very positive for the dollar, markets now expect foreign central banks to catch up to some extent with the Fed. This process is dollar bearish. Additionally, while a global recession would be supportive of the greenback, the USD already discounts this scenario. Instead, Europe is proving surprisingly resilient, which could soon create a tailwind for EUR/USD. Set a stop-buy at EUR/USD 0.965, with a stop-loss at 0.94. Market Update: European Credit After Central Bank Week For investors concerned with the left-tail risk in European equities, European credit offers a credible alternative in the near term. This asset class is also attractive relative to European government bonds. Taken together, the Fed, the ECB, the BoE, the Riksbank, the Norges Bank, the SNB, and the BoC have tightened policy by 475bps over the past month (Chart 20). Moreover, the SNB’s hike closed the chapter of negative rates in Europe. But make no mistake – there will be a second chapter. Until then, European corporate bond yields have risen enough to offer attractive spreads over duration-matched government bonds and to challenge the earnings yield provided by equities (Chart 21). Besides, the volatility observed in equity markets over the past few months makes the European corporate bond more appealing. Chart 20Central Bank Week Chart 21Push Back Against TINA Argument In the Euro Area, BB-rated bonds, which are the highest credit quality and largest tranche within the high-yield space, are particularly attractive. They sport a 6.6% YTM, at a spread of 480bps over 3-year German government bond yields. This compares to an equity earnings yield of 7.4% (Chart 21, top panel). In other European corporate bond markets, there is no need to go down in credit quality. Yields-to-maturity for investment grade corporate bonds in the UK, Sweden, and Switzerland provide appealing alternatives to equities, with shorter duration still. This is especially true in Sweden, where the equity earnings yield has collapsed and is now only 60bps above Swedish IG yield, with substantially greater risk. Meanwhile, the spread pickup offered by Swiss IG over Swiss government bonds of similar duration is at its widest in more than ten years (Chart 21, bottom panel). Chart 22Heed The Message From OIS Curve Differentials This week, we turn neutral on European credit versus US credit. Back in March, we made the case that European credit would outperform its US counterpart in response to a more hawkish Fed than the ECB. Since then, European IG outperformed US IG by 1% on a total return basis. However, with the Fed funds rate at 3.25%, traders now expect more monetary policy tightening from the ECB, which often corresponds to an underperformance of Euro Area credit relative to that of the US (Chart 22, top panel). On the other hand, Swedish IG is expected to outperform US IG over the next six months (Chart 22, bottom panel).   Mathieu Savary, Chief European Strategist Mathieu@bcaresearch.com Jeremie Peloso, Editor/Strategist JeremieP@bcaresearch.com   Tactical Recommendations Cyclical Recommendations Structural Recommendations

Dear client, Next week’s report will be on European assets, authored by my colleague Mathieu Savary. We will send that to you Monday, September 26. In that report, Mathieu looks at the European energy market in depth, and concludes the eurozone will survive the winter, but with critical tests in the coming weeks. Mathieu suggests the euro could touch 0.965 in this process. I trust you will find the report insightful. Our regular publication will resume on October 7. Kind regards, Chester Ntonifor, Foreign Exchange Strategist Executive Summary Real Yields Still Favor The Dollar Every central bank is stepping up its hawkish rhetoric, but the Fed is still being perceived as having the moat to deliver the most aggressive rate hikes. As long as the market believes the US economy will maintain its superstar status, the dollar has upside. That said, financial conditions are tightening meaningfully in the US. Meanwhile, US inflation has peaked relative to other G10 countries, suggesting the market could price a less aggressive path for Fed interest rates, relative to other central banks. Narrowing interest rate differentials will diffuse US dollar momentum.  The big risk of leaning against dollar strength is a recession that spreads from Europe, the UK, and China and becomes global. The dollar tends to do well during recessions, even after a prolonged bout of strength.  Our core trades remain at the crosses: short EUR/JPY and long EUR/GBP. We are looking to buy NOK/SEK on further weakness and our limit buy on AUD was triggered. Bottom Line: Stay neutral the dollar for now but conditions for a short position continue to accrue. Feature We last published our Month-In-Review report on August 12th, suggesting inflation was still strong globally, and central banks will zone in on their mandate of cooling prices. Since then, bankers have been very busy. The Reserve Bank of New Zealand (RBNZ) hiked rates by 50bps on August 17. At 3%, New Zealand now has one of the highest policy rates in the G10. The Norges Bank has hiked rates twice since, by 50bps. The policy rate now stands at 2.25%. The Reserve Bank of Australia (RBA) hiked policy rates by 50bps on September 6. The Bank of England (BoE) hiked by 50 bps on September 16th, albeit, below market expectations. The Riksbank hiked rates by 100 bps on September 20. In a rare occurrence, Sweden now has higher rates than the eurozone. The European Central Bank (ECB), the Fed, and the Swiss National Bank (SNB) recently hiked rates by 75 bps. Finally, as a lone wolf, the Bank of Japan (BoJ) stayed pat, but has massively intervened to stabilize the drawdown in the yen. The message is clear, global central banks are on a path to cool inflation and regain credibility. In recent weeks, the Fed has been one of the most aggressive in hiking policy rates (Chart 1). As a result, the 10-year US Treasury yield has risen from 3% to 3.7% in the last month, among the most aggressive in the G10 (Chart 2). Other central banks are also catching up as inflation accelerates outside the US. Specifically, US price gains have peaked relative to their G10 counterparts (Chart 3). Faster rising yields and slowing inflation means that relative real yields continue to bid the dollar higher (Chart 4). Chart 1The Fed Is Very Hawkish Chart 2Interest Rates Rising Meaningfully In The US Chart 3Other Central Banks Need To Play Catch Up Chart 4Real Yields Still Favor The Dollar This backdrop is highly deflationary. Tightening policy while economic growth is slowing is a toxic cocktail. It explains why the dollar continues to command a bid, as markets believe most central banks cannot engineer a soft landing. The dollar does well in hard landings. In the next few sections, we cover the important data releases over the last month in our universe of G10 countries, and the implications for currency strategy. What is clear is that most foreign central banks are committed to their tightening campaign, which argues for a neutral stance towards the DXY for now, with a view to sell after/if global central banks engineer a recession. US Dollar: Stealth Strength Chart 5US Dollar: Stealth Strength The dollar DXY index is up 17.4% year to date. Over the last month, the DXY index is up 3.6% (panel 1). The market focus for the dollar will remain the jobs and employment report. Job gains remain robust. In August, the US added 315K jobs. While the unemployment rate rose to 3.7%, the participation rate also rose from 61.2% to 62.4% (panel 2). Wages continue to rise. Average hourly earnings came in at 5.2% year-on-year in August. The Atlanta Fed wage growth tracker continues to edge higher across all income cohorts (panel 3). Headline inflation decelerated to 8.3% in August, but the core measure did accelerate from 5.9% to 6.3% (panel 4). On September 21, the Fed increased interest rates by 75bps, as expected. Inflows into US assets remain strong. According to TIC data, the US saw $154 bn of inflows in July. Higher interest rates are taking a toll on the housing market. Building permits fell sharply in August, which makes the rebound in housing starts look fleeting. Financial conditions are tightening in the US. From a currency perspective, the dollar is overbought, and sentiment is very bullish (panel 5). That said, as a momentum currency, the dollar will continue to perform well if risk assets fall to the wayside. We remain neutral in the short term, though valuation keeps us bearish over a long-term horizon.  The Euro: Undershooting Parity Chart 6The Euro: Undershooting Parity The euro is down 14.2% year to date. Over the last month, the euro is down 2.5%. As we go to press, the euro has broken below 0.97. The main risk for the eurozone remains stagflation: The ZEW Expectations Survey was at -60.7 in September, a bearish development for the euro (panel 1). Consumer confidence deteriorated further in September, to -28.8 for the eurozone (the European Commission measure). The deterioration has been consistent among member countries (panel 2). Inflation remains sticky in the eurozone. Headline CPI accelerated to 9.1% in August. PPI in the euro area was at 37.9% in July, an acceleration from the June reading (panel 3). The trade balance continues to deteriorate, hitting - €40.3bn in July. The preliminary PMI read for September was at 48.5 from 49.6, suggesting the eurozone is already in recession (panel 4). The Sentix confidence index deteriorated in September to -31.8. This remains above the 2020 low but is rapidly catching up to the downside. Despite the above data prints, the ECB lifted interest rates by 75 bps on September 8th. The ECB continues to fight soaring inflation and will need to engineer a recession in the eurozone to achieve its mandate. This is a key risk for the euro. We continue to sell the EUR/JPY cross, while we remain constructive on EUR/GBP (panel 5). Our initial line in the sand was 0.98 for the euro, but as my colleague will argue next week, it could substantially undershoot this level. Stand aside for now.  The Japanese Yen: Currency Intervention Chart 7The Japanese Yen: Currency Intervention The Japanese yen is down 19.71% year-to-date. The yen hit an intra-day low of 145.8, forcing intervention by Japanese authorities. That has assuaged selling pressure. Meanwhile, economic data out of Japan has been on the mend. The Eco Watcher’s survey showed that sentiment improved in August. Current conditions rose from 43.8 to 45.5. The outlook component also rose from 42.8 to 49.4. The trade balance in Japan continues to deteriorate, due to soaring energy costs. That said, exports are holding up, rising 22% year-on-year in August (panel 2). Machine tool orders also ticked up. Labor market conditions remain robust. The job-to-applicant ratio rose to 1.29% in July. Inflation is picking up in Japan (panel 3). The nationwide CPI report for august showed an increase in the core-core measure from 1.2% to 1.6%. Headline CPI rose from 2.6% to 3%. The Bank of Japan continues to keep monetary policy on hold. However, the depreciating yen triggered intervention from Japanese authorities. We are short EUR/JPY, a trade that continues to pan out and a call option on a BoJ shift. While inflation expectations remain sticky in Japan, they could overshoot (panel 4). Our thesis is that short-term investors should stand aside on the yen, but longer-term buyers are in for a bargain. The yen is cheap, a favorite short, and the Japanese economy could surprise to the upside (panel 5).  British Pound: Towards Parity? Chart 8British Pound: Towards Parity? The pound is down 19.59% year to date. The depreciation in the pound has picked up pace, with cable now trading near 1.1 (panel 1). The next level of support is the 1985 low of 1.08. Economic data in the UK continues to disappoint. CPI came in at 9.9% in August. The RPI came in at 12.3%. PPI was at 24%. According to BoE forecasts, we will hit double digits in CPI prints soon (panel 2). Nationwide house price inflation remained strong in August, rising 10% year-on-year (panel 3). Retail sales excluding auto and fuel fell 5.4% year-on-year in August (panel 4). Trade data remains weak. The current account is close to a record low (panel 5). The external balance remains negative for the pound. With the new fiscal package of tax cuts, gilt yields are hitting new highs and the cable is selling off. This is because more demand will depress real rates in the UK, if not accompanied by productivity gains. We are maintaining our long EUR/GBP trade. On cable, downside remains but we will be buyers at 1.05.      Australian Dollar: A Contrarian Trade Chart 9Australian Dollar: A Contrarian Trade The AUD is down 10.14% year-to-date (panel 1). Over the last month, the AUD is down 5.68%. The RBA hiked interest rates by 50bps in August, lifting the official cash rate to 2.35%. We believe further rate increases remain likely. Inflation is accelerating in Australia, as the labor market tightens (panel 2). 59K jobs were added in August. The participation rate also ticked up from 66.4% to 66.6%. While the unemployment rate rose (panel 3), labor market conditions remain the strongest in decades (panel 4). Monetary policy continues to have the desired effect, as home loan issuance declined 7% in July. The manufacturing sector remains strong, with the August manufacturing PMI coming in at 53.8. The external environment continues to weigh on the AUD. In July, the trade balance came in lower than expected at -A$8.7bn vs a forecast of A$14.5bn (panel 5). This was largely driven by commodity prices rolling over and slowing Chinese demand. The headwinds are likely to persist in the near term. That said, our limit buy on AUD/USD was triggered at 0.665. In our view, the AUD already embeds a lot of bad news.          New Zealand Dollar: Stay Short At The Crosses Chart 10New Zealand Dollar: Stay Short At The Crosses The NZD is down 15% year-to-date (panel 1). Over the last month, the NZD is down 6.8%. The Reserve Bank of New Zealand raised its official cash rate (OCR) in August by 50 bps to 3.0%. The RBNZ cited high core inflation (panel 2) and scarce labor resources as the primary reasons and guided towards tighter monetary policy.  Monetary policy continues to be having the desired effect across interest rate sensitive areas of the economy. Home sales continued to slow in August, with REINZ home sales down 18.3% year-over-year. Home price growth is also cratering nationwide (panel 3). There is some evidence of a soft landing in New Zealand. ANZ consumer confidence rose to -85.4 from -81.9. Business confidence also bounced to -47.8 (panel 4).  The Business NZ PMI expanded to 54.9 in August. The external sector however continues to suffer from headwinds. Dairy prices, circa 20% of exports, remained flat in August after falling sharply at the start of the month. New Zealand’s 12-month trailing trade balance remains in deficit. As the NZD is heavily dependent on international trade, headwinds from a slowing Chinese economy will continue to weigh on the currency. We are bearish NZD at the crosses, though it will hold up if the dollar rolls over.    Canadian Dollar: A Hawkish BoC Chart 11Canadian Dollar: A Hawkish BoC The CAD is down 7.5% year to date. Over the last month, it is down 4%. The tightening campaign by the BoC is having the desired effect on economic data. Beginning with the labor market, the unemployment rate ticked up in August to 5.4% (panel 2), the highest level since February of this year. August also marks the third consecutive month of job losses, albeit with a higher labor force participation rate at 64.8%. While inflation in Canada appears to have peaked, it remains sticky. Headline CPI fell to 7% from 7.6%. Core inflation has also declined to 5.8% (panel 3). The housing market continues to slow. Building permits and housing starts are rolling over (panel 4). Notably, building permits declined 6.6% month-over-month against a forecast decline of 0.5%. Housing starts in August fell to 267.4K from 275.2K in July. The incoming prints are a “carte blanch” for the BoC to continue its tightening campaign. In August, it increased its policy rate to 3.25% (panel 5). More hikes are likely forthcoming. The OIS curve shows a peak in the overnight rate at 4% in February next year (panel 5). Ultimately, the CAD benefits from the terms of trade boom (panel 1) and an eventual decline in the US dollar. But as long as the USD remains strong, CAD faces downside.   Swiss Franc: A Haven Chart 12Swiss Franc: A Haven The Swiss Franc is down 7% year-to-date. EUR/CHF broke below 0.95, and the risk is that this level is tested again in the coming days (panel 1). We penned a report earlier this year arguing that Switzerland was an oasis of optimism: Inflation is accelerating, but still sits at 3.5% for August (panel 2). The decline in import prices is encouraging following franc strength (panel 3). Sight deposits are rolling over suggesting the SNB is not intervening to weaken the franc (panel 4). We are buyers of CHF at the crosses.                        Norwegian Krone: Buy On Weakness Chart 13Norwegian Krone: Buy On Weakness The NOK is down 19.7% year-to-date and 8% over the last month (panel 1). Inflation remains high in Norway. In August, CPI grew 6.5% year-on-year (panel 2). PPI including oil rose 77.3%. The housing market will bear the brunt of rate hikes. Household indebtedness (panel 3), makes the task of policy calibration challenging. Consumer confidence fell to a new low in the third quarter. The good news is that economic activity is robust on the back of Norway’s energy advantage. The current account remains in surplus (panel 5). If global risk sentiment picks up, the krone will be a jewel in the G10. If the risk appetite remains muted, NOK will face strong headwinds.                    Swedish Krona: A Beta Play On The Euro Chart 14Swedish Krona: A Beta Play On The Euro SEK is down 23.9% year-to-date. Over the last month, the krona is down 5.6% (panel 1). The Riksbank surprised markets by raising rates by 1% on September 20th (panel 5). Critically, rising inflation was the catalyst. Headline inflation accelerated from 8.5% to 9.8% in August. This is well above target (panel 3). The economic tendency survey rolled over from 101.3 to 97.5. A strong PMI has been a beacon of hope in Sweden but the headline figure dipped from 53.1 to 50.6 in August. The housing market continues to soften (panel 2). The Riksbank’s latest estimate sees a 16% decline in prices this year.  Much like the NOK, the Swedish krona will gyrate along the path of the broad trade-weighted USD. Fundamentally, the krona remains more vulnerable to external shocks due to higher energy dependency and a strong dollar. But it is also incredibly cheap. We are looking for opportunities to be long SEK at the crosses.      Chester Ntonifor Foreign Exchange Strategist chestern@bcaresearch.com Trades & Forecasts Strategic View Cyclical Holdings (6-18 months) Tactical Holdings (0-6 months) Limit Orders Forecast Summary

Executive Summary Higher Brent Prices, Stronger Upside Bias The Fed is pacing a globally synchronized monetary-policy tightening cycle as the war in Ukraine escalates, following Russia’s mobilization of 300k reserve forces. Despite central-bank tightening, the intensification of the war increases the odds of higher inflation.  This will keep the USD well bid. Russia’s threat to cut oil supplies to states observing the G7 price cap will test US and EU resolve as winter sets in.  Retaliatory output cuts by Russia could send Brent crude oil prices above $200/bbl. The Biden administration remains fearful its G7 price cap and EU sanctions on Russian oil exports will spike prices.  The US will make 10mm barrels of crude from its SPR available in November as a palliative.  Our base case Brent forecast is slightly lower, averaging $105/bbl this year from $110/bbl, due to weaker realized prices.  On the back of this, we expect 4Q22 Brent to average $106/bbl, and for 2023 to average $118/bbl, up slightly vs. last month.  WTI will trade $3-$5/bbl lower. Bottom Line: The economic war pitting the EU and its allies against Russia could escalate and widen as more Russian troops pour into Ukraine.  This raises the odds of expanded conflict outside Ukraine, and higher war-driven inflation.  Our baseline forecast for 2023 remains intact, with a strong bias to the upside.  We remain long the COMT and XOP ETFs to retain exposure to commodities. Feature The Fed is pacing a globally synchronized monetary-policy tightening cycle at a time when the war in Ukraine is escalating. Russia’s mobilization of a reported 300k reserve forces raises the spectre of an expansion of the Ukraine war – perhaps crossing into a NATO state’s border – if tactical nuclear, biological, or chemical weapons are used. This is a low-probability outcome, but it would increase the odds of significantly higher inflation should it come to pass.1 The US central bank lifted its Fed funds rate 75 bps Wednesday to a range of 3% - 3.25% – and strongly indicated further rate hikes will follow. The Fed is one of numerous banks increasing policy rates. This synchronous monetary-policy tightening has not been observed for 50 years, and raises the odds of a global economic recession, according to the World Bank.2 The World Bank notes that since 1970, recessions have been “preceded by a significant weakening of global growth in the previous year, as has happened recently,” and, importantly, “all previous global recessions coincided with sharp slowdowns or outright recessions in several major economies.” The withdrawal of monetary and fiscal support “are necessary to contain inflationary pressures, but their mutually compounding effects could produce larger impacts than intended, both in tightening financial conditions and in steepening the growth slowdown.” Markets are acting in a manner consistent with this assessment, but, in our view, need to expand the risk set to include a higher likelihood of a war widening beyond Ukraine. While this is not our base case, it is worthwhile recalling the link between war and inflation. Prior to and during the 20th century’s two world wars, then the Korean and Vietnam wars, US CPI inflation rose sharply (Chart 1).3 Price controls and tighter monetary policy were needed to address these inflationary episodes. Chart 1A Wider Ukraine War Would Stoke Inflation Stronger USD Remains Oil-Demand Headwind Fed policy will continue to push US interest rates higher, which will push the USD higher on the back of continued global demand for dollar-denominated assets. This will keep the cost of most commodities ex-US higher in local currency terms, which, all else equal, will weaken commodity demand in general, and oil demand in particular. This will be compounded if tighter monetary policy at systemically important central banks (led by the Fed) results in a global recession in 2023. This is especially true for EM oil demand: The income elasticity of EM oil consumption is 0.61, which means a 1% decrease (increase) in real EM GDP translates into a 0.61% decrease (increase) in oil demand, all else equal. In our base case, we expect global oil demand to grow 2.2mm b/d this year and 1.91mm b/d next year, roughly in line with the US EIA’s and IEA’s estimates (Chart 2). We expect EM demand will increase 1.25mm b/d this year, and 1.90mm b/d next year, accounting for almost all of global growth. As before, we expect China’s oil demand growth to be de minimus this year, on the back of its zero-tolerance COVID-19 policy. EM remains the key driver of our global oil demand assumptions, which, in our modeling, are a function of real income (GDP). Offsetting the stronger USD effects on demand is gas-to-oil switching demand, resulting from record-high LNG prices this year. This will add 800k b/d to demand globally this winter (November – March). Chart 2Global Oil Demand Holding Up Oil Supply Getting Tighter Oil supply will remain challenged this year and next, as core OPEC 2.0 – the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (KSA) and the United Arab Emirates (UAE) – approaches the limit of what it can supply to the market and still retain sufficient spare capacity to meet unexpected supply shocks (Chart 3). Among the anticipated shocks we believe core OPEC 2.0 is aware of is the loss of 2mm b/d of Russian crude oil output over the next year, due to the imposition of EU embargoes on seaborne crude oil and refined products, which will go into effect 5 December 2022 and 5 February 2023, respectively. The continued inability of non-core OPEC 2.0 states to maintain higher production – “The Other Guys” in our nomenclature – is another foreseeable shock (Chart 4). This is becoming acute for OPEC 2.0, given The Other Guys account for most of the 3.6mm b/d of below-quota output currently registered by the producer coalition.4 This is a record gap between expected production and actual production from OPEC 2.0, which was registered in August. Chart 3Core OPEC 2.0 Conserves Supplies Chart 4'Other Guys' Production Keeps Falling Net, demand will continue to outpace supply in our base case (Chart 5, Table 1). This will require continued inventory draws for the next year or so, as core OPEC 2.0 continues to conserve supplies (Chart 6). Chart 5Demand Continues To Outpace Supply Chart 6Inventory Will Continue Drawing Table 1BCA Global Oil Supply - Demand Balances (MMb/d, Base Case Balances) To Dec23 Russian Wild Card Battlefield losses in Ukraine are forcing Russia’s military to activate some 300k reserve troops. These losses again are prompting veiled threats to deploy nuclear and perhaps chemical weapons, which drew a sharp warning from US President Biden.5 Further economic losses will begin mounting in a little more than two months, as the first of two major EU oil-import embargoes and a ban on insuring/re-insuring vessels carrying Russian crude and products takes hold. In addition, a US-led G7 price cap on Russian oil purchases will go into effect with the December embargo on seaborne crude imports into the EU.6 We continue to expect Russia will be forced to shut in ~ 2mm b/d of crude oil production by the end of next year – taking output from a little more than 10mm b/d to ~ 8mm b/d.7 Russian’s President Putin already has threatened to cut off oil supplies to anyone abiding by the G7 price cap.8 In our modeling, a unilateral 2mm b/d cut in Russian output – in addition to the lost sales from the EU embargoes and insurance/reinsurance bans – would take Brent prices above $200/bbl (Chart 7). On the downside, a severe global recession that removes 2mm b/d of demand next year could send prices below $60/bbl. Equally plausible cases for either outcome can be made, given current supply-demand fundamentals and the geopolitical backdrop discussed above. This can be seen in the lack of skew in the options markets, which is measured by the difference in out-of-the-money call and put implied volatilities (Chart 8). The skew sits close to zero at present – meaning options buyers are not giving higher odds to a sharp upside or downside move at present.9 Chart 7Higher Brent Prices, Stronger Upside Bias Chart 8Option Skew Shows Up Or Down Moves Equally Likely In our modeling and analysis, we continue to believe the balance of risk is to the upside. As can be seen in Chart 6, inventories are below the 2010-14 five-year average – OPEC 2.0’s original target when it was formed – which means KSA and the UAE will be able to respond to any demand shocks that cause unintended inventory accumulation (e.g., the sort that occurred during the COVID-19 pandemic or the OPEC market-share war of 2015-16). Managing the upside risk is more difficult: KSA and the UAE are close to the limits of what they can supply and still carry sufficient spare capacity to meet unexpected production losses. KSA’s crude oil output is just over 11mm b/d, and the UAE’s is at 3.2mm b/d, according to OPEC’s Monthly Oil Market Report. This puts both within 1mm b/d of their max production capacity of 12mm and 4mm b/d. Both got close to producing at these max levels in early 2020, when Russia provoked a market share war; this was quickly reversed as a magnitude of the COVID-19 demand destruction became apparent. The only other large producer outside the OPEC 2.0 coalition capable of increasing and sustaining higher output is the US shales, which are producing at 7.8mm b/d and have pushed total US crude oil output to 12.2mm b/d (Chart 9). Leading producers in the shales have foreclosed any sharp increase in output this year, given tight labor markets and services and equipment markets in the US. Chart 9US Shales Close To Max Output Investment Implications Global crude oil markets remain tight, with demand continuing to exceed supply. The risk that the economic war pitting the EU and its allies against Russia could expand to a more kinetic confrontation involving additional states is higher, as more Russian troops are called up to serve in Ukraine. If the additional troops do not reverse Russia’s battlefield losses – or if Ukraine looks like it will win this war – Putin likely will feel cornered, and get more desperate.10 We believe Putin will first attempt to impose as much economic pain on the West as possible by cutting off all natural gas and oil flows to the EU and states and firms observing the G7 price cap. However, if that does not force the West to relent on its economic war with Russia, a war with NATO could evolve in which tactical nukes or other weapons of mass destruction are employed. At that point, Putin would have concluded there would be nothing he could do to restore Russia’s standing as a world power. Any plume – nuclear, biological or chemical (NBC) – that crosses a NATO border likely would be treated as an act of war. NATO would have to act at that point. This is not our expectation, nor is it any part of our base case. But it is a higher non-trivial risk than it was last month or last week. This raises the odds of higher war-driven inflation, as well, which will further complicate central-bank monetary policy at a time of war. Our baseline forecast remains intact, with a strong bias to the upside. We remain long the COMT and XOP ETFs to retain exposure to commodities.   Robert P. Ryan  Chief Commodity & Energy Strategist rryan@bcaresearch.com Ashwin Shyam Research Analyst Commodity & Energy Strategy ashwin.shyam@bcaresearch.com Paula Struk Research Associate Commodity & Energy Strategy paula.struk@bcaresearch.com Commodities Round-Up Energy: Bullish In its September update, the US EIA reported natural gas consumption will hit record levels in 2022, increasing by 3.6 Bcf/d to just under 87 Bcf/d on average, led by increases in the electric power residential and commercial sectors (Chart 10). US natural gas consumption in the electric power sector will increase in 2022 due to limitations at coal-fired power plants and weather-driven demand. It is expected to decrease in 4Q22 and in 2023, due to more renewable electricity generation capacity. Natural gas consumption in the residential and commercial sectors for 2023 is expected to be similar as 2022 levels. Base Metals: Bullish According to Eurometaux, a consortium of European metal producers, approximately 50% of the EU’s zinc and aluminum production capacity is offline due to high power prices. More operations are expected to shut as European power prices remain elevated and metal prices drop on recessionary fears (Chart 11). The decision to reopen a smelter following a shutdown is expensive and can result in long wait times. This will make the bloc’s manufacturers heavily reliant on metal imports from other states, which likely will lead to higher pollution from these plants. Aluminum supply is particularly vulnerable to this power crisis since one ton needs an eye-watering 15 megawatt-hours of electricity – enough to power five homes in Germany for a year. Precious Metals: Neutral The Fed’s additional 75-bps rate hike will strengthen the USD and weaken gold prices. Geopolitical risk has been a tailwind for the greenback thus far, as investors rush to the USD instead of the yellow metal for safe-haven investments. If this trend continues, along with further Fed rate increases, the additional risk arising from Putin’s reserve force mobilization and possible expansion of the Ukraine war will boost the USD and leave gold in the doldrums.   Chart 10 Chart 11   Footnotes 1     Please see Vladimir Putin mobilises army reserves to support Ukraine invasion, published by ft.com on September 21, 2022. 2     Please see Is a Global Recession Imminent?, published by the World Bank on September 15, 2022.  The report notes, “Policymakers need to stand ready to manage the potential spillovers from globally synchronous withdrawal of policies supporting growth. On the supply-side, they need to put in place measures to ease the constraints that confront labor markets, energy markets, and trade networks.” 3    Please see One hundred years of price change: the Consumer Price Index and the American inflation experience, published by the US Bureau of Labor Statistics in April 2014.  4    Please see OPEC+ supply shortfall now stands at 3.5% of global oil demand, published 20 September 2022 by reuters.com. 5    Please see Biden warns Putin over nuclear, chemical weapons, published by politico.eu on September 17, 2022. 6    Please see EU Russian Oil Embargoes, Higher Prices, which we published on August 18, 2022, for discussion. 7    We include Russia among “The Other Guys” in our balances estimates.  8    Please see Explainer: The G7's price cap on Russian oil begins to take shape, published by reuters.com on September 19, 2022. 9    We use the standard measure of skew – i.e., the difference between 25-delta calls and puts – to determine whether option market participants are discounting a higher likelihood of an up or down move, respectively. 10   Please see CIA director warns Putin's 'desperation' over Russia's failures in Ukraine could lead him to use nukes, published by businessinsider.com on April 15, 2022. Investment Views and Themes Strategic Recommendations Trades Closed in 2022